The 9/11 Memorial and OWS occupy two parks adjacent to each other in Lower Manhattan. Otherwise, they couldn't be more different.
October 17, 2011 seemed like a fine day to head downtown and see the memorial I’d avoided up to and just after the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. It was another stunning autumn morning, with another cerulean sky visible through towers, half built with aspirations to touch the clouds that floated by. Hundreds of people going about their business were amplified by thousands more whose presence makes this, if not a world trade center, than the world’s visiting center.
I also planned to stop by another, much smaller site I remembered well: a 3300 square foot slip of green my husband would eat in on pleasant days when he wished to escape the long shadows of the World Trade Center. Then, it was called Liberty Plaza Park; now it is Zuccotti Park, renamed after the chairman of the reality company that provided for its restoration after the September 11th attacks devastated it. For several years, Zuccotti Park hosted the annual 9/11 anniversary commemorations. Currently, it’s hosting Occupy Wall Street.
Symbolism is important in making a statement, whether it involves words, notes, or physical space. So is context. The 16 acres known as ground zero was and is sacred ground to some; to others, a historically significant site. For me, ground zero is about the lives that were lost but also the resilience that was found, however temporarily, to go on, to make something better, to be better. Although I was part of a group that lobbied (unsuccessfully) for the addition of a cultural/educational component at the site--living monuments to a possible future and to the important freedoms the attacks didn’t take away—we lost. It helps to have a Visitors’ Center to supply some context, more of which the museum will also provide. Unfortunately, right now it’s possible to bypass the Center and most people do.
As a family member, I was directed around the absurdly long lines to enter the space, which consists of two massive waterfalls conforming to the footprints of the original towers and ringed with low granite walls bearing the names of the nearly 3,000 people.

Using the guide I'd been handed, I made my way to the far side of the north pool and located my husband’s name. I touched the engraved stone and whispered “Well, here you are.” And waited. But the rush of emotions I anticipated-- grief perhaps; but also reverence, awe, inspiration, a telescoping of past, present and future—never came. It was all very lovely but somehow…static.
As I walked over to Zuccotti Park, I was struck by the number of tourists; it seemed as if there were more of them than there were protestors. The park initially gave the appearance of being a mess but it really wasn’t; bedding was neatly stacked, except when someone was still sleeping. An older gent did a pretty good rendition of “God Bless America” on the bagpipes. I made my way tentatively into the trees, where people were talking or texting or reading. I saw several meetings taking place, conducted in relatively quiet tones, since neither megaphones nor sound equipment is allowed.
I couldn’t hear what was being said; I’ve read elsewhere that a dedicated corps of occupiers is meeting to try and devise a set of demands. Sure there are some goof-offs, but the few protesters I encountered in my all-too-brief sojourn both wanted a change to a skewed system and felt frustrated that they were characterized as slackers or whiners, or insufficiently prepared to take on the entire system by which banks and businesses that don’t create jobs and CEOs who don’t produce dividends are nevertheless rewarded.
On the way home, I thought about how alive that little slip of green had felt and how…not so much dead as not alive the memorial had felt to me. Of course, that’s not the function of memorials; they are erected to remember the past and to honor the dead. The best of them, it must be said, can also deliver the message: never again.
As for the park formerly known as Liberty, it is teeming with good intentions and honest efforts and a target that its location should not obscure: not so much Wall Street as an economic system that accrues wealth for a disproportionate few; yet fights to keep at arms’ length any regulation that accrues to the common good. It’s the job of the protestors in a free democracy to draw attention to the system’s failings; it’s not their job to fix it. If we and our representatives allow the novelty of a group of people camping out overnight to distract from agreeing on and implementing solutions, then we will have robbed OWS of its important symbolic message: no more.


Salon.com
Comments
A subtle buildup to the emotional; serene, wise, and beautifully thought out piece, Nikki. R
Brava, Nikki. r.
♥R
HUGGGGGGGGG
Thanks for sharing something so personal.
More than a contrast or juxtaposition of antipodes, the relationship and connection between the two "parks" seems clear, to me,
the desperate doings and undoings of men and women here, and everywhere.
(with respect for your loss)
"It’s the job of the protestors in a free democracy to draw attention to the system’s failings; it’s not their job to fix it." Hell to the yeah.
The shot of your hand on the memorial speaks volumes.
Rated for complexity.
--sinclair louis
"One withstands the invasion of armies; one does not withstand the invasion of ideas."
--victor hugo
occupy wall street, my speech to the masses
P.S. I just bought your book and look forward to reading it!
There are a couple things wrong with this. First we don't live in a democracy. Second the people there are in the wrong place.
They need to be at the White House. The people on Wall Street are very regulated people. Yes, some people try to get away with things, that's always true, but there are those who watch over them and try to prevent or catch the wrong doers. For the most part the people on Wall Street are doing only what the government allows them to do. If you don't like what they are legally doing, go to DC.
President Obama had 2 years where he didn't need a single, not one, GOP vote to fix anything. Why didn't he fix this if you think it's such a problem?
why did you avoid the memorial?
not much there
@ume: I DIDN'T avoid the memorial; all you need to do is look at the pictures, my friend. That's my hand you see over my husband's name.
@catnlion: *sigh* I admit to being disappointed in Obama's actions, (benefiting from 20-20 hindsight). but chiefly because he wasn't tougher on the financial industry. Where you and I might differ is in what we think is the appropriate amount of regulation--or at least the appropriate amount of payback for reward.
Making money legitimately is fine. Asking for government money and then failing to offer loans to small businesses or mortgage-seekers is not. Paying dividends for inspired stewardship is fine. Pretending bonus income is capital gains is not. Asking for incentives to create jobs in this country in the form of tax relief may be okay but NOT if the "relief" money is used NOT to create jobs, but to hire accountants and lawyers to find further ways to avoid paying money to the government you expect to keep the peace, maintain the infrastructure and then lend YOU money when you slip up after selling phony bundles to unsuspecting (albeit very foolish ) small investors.
When I see the financial industry grow a conscience to match the set of cajones it seems to collectively sport, I'll be first in line to ask the Zuccotti Park denizens to move along.
In a lot of way we don't disagree. If people are doing stupid, BS, things then maybe a new regulation is needed. The OWS people need to be hammering those who make the regulations, not those who are going to work and playing by the rules.
You have never heard me say we don't need regulations. Crooks have always been with us and always will be. Regulations need to make sense and do what they are needed to do. Really, is there a need for me to tell the government every time I stop and go pee? Really, I have to tell them.
We also need people to oversee the regulators. They can create unlimited power for themselves and do what they want. The FCC is going to do net neutrality. SCOTUS and Congress have told them they don't have the authority to do it but their new regulations take effect next month.