as above, so below

aaroncynic

aaroncynic
Location
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Birthday
December 31
Bio
I'm some things to a few people. Mostly a nuisance but sometimes a zine writer, internet radio host, blogger, musician, and project organizer. I run a small website where you can read mine and other fabulous contributor's words: www.diatribemedia.com and also contribute to the Chicagoist (www.chicagoist.com). When not shouting about the falling sky over the internet, reading about government conspiracies or watching b-rate sci-fi, you can find me singing for the band Burning Luck. Direction is only relative to your position in the grand scheme of things. Some day, I'll sort this all out.

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
NOVEMBER 9, 2010 8:11AM

Could Decision Points Rewrite History?

Rate: 13 Flag

Former CIA analyst Ray McGovern published a brilliant and damning piece regarding former President Bush’s upcoming memoir, Decision Points. In his essay, McGovern points out W’s little talked about “damn right” remarks he made when authorizing the waterboarding of terrorist Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Not only did W sign off on the form torture as an acceptable practice, but added “damn right” and asserted that the torture saved lives.

McGovern not only points out the glaring falsehood in that assertion, but shows exactly how the torture of prisoners became a recruiting tool for insurgents in Iraq. In addition, he rightly states that the under-reporting of the torture issue in the media, coupled with plenty of support (or shoulder shrugging) of the American public at large implicates us all. The essay comes on the heels of Bush’s related comments regarding the “lowest point” in his presidency, when Kanye West hurt his feelings by saying he didn’t care about black people during Hurricane Katrina.

Courtesy Wikipedia

While both these comments may seem only tacitly related, public reaction to statements made surrounding Decision Points so far tells a much more damning tale of W’s presidency and our response to it. During the time leading up to Obama’s election, plenty of the public was fed up with disastrous and criminal policies of the Bush Administration – part of the reason why Obama was voted into office. A mere two years later and we’re already willing to rewrite history. Should we feel sorry for W because Kanye made some unscripted comments about his handling of one of the worst natural disasters in American history? Is it right to call that the “low point in the Bush administration?” What about intelligence failures leading up to 9/11? What about launching a war that killed hundreds of thousands based on false pretenses? What about tanking our economy? What about legalizing torture, something even Reagan, demagogue of the right wing, condemned?

Decision Points will be an opportunity for the Bush administration to not only build a more positive post presidential legacy, but to indemnify its criminal actions and whitewash history. As the Bush administration comes back into view with this book, it is the responsibility of the media and the American people to tell the truth about the last 8 years, not to let history be rewritten.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
GWB never met a lie he didn't like. The American people have never met a liar they haven't liked. That's what happens when you want to live a lie and still be called "good".

We shrug our shoulders now, but we are sowing the seeds of hell and come it will.
This idea that "Decision Points" is going to transform all the negative public opinion on Bush is a media meme, nothing more. He's the new Nixon, a crook and a liar in the eyes of the people. He'll stay that way for the next forty years, until the next one comes along to play that role--unless we change the equation. It isn't a wholly anti-establishment phenomenon either, since there has always been a "worst president." Somebody has to fill that role. Grant filled it before Hoover, and Nixon since the 70's. But it's something to work with--it identifies a bedrock layer of common sense mistrust of the ruling class. Rated.
Good, tight post. The problem of course, is that the MSM validates him with their soft-ball interviews and knee-jerk "respect." I mean, what do you have to do in this country to be totally discredited and treated with scorn - eat your victims like Jeffrey Dahmer?
rated
Harry - all too true. It's too uncomfortable for us to face up to the things that have been done in our name.

Boko - you're probably right about that, provided that we're willing to work with it. Sadly, I think plenty of people out there are all too willing to let the distortions and misinformation repeated by politicians and the MSM become fact, because challenging them is a difficult task.
Kate - thanks! Unfortunately, even if folks are discredited for their actions they end up getting gigs as commentators on Fox News. Just look at Ollie North.
aaron - The power of the media to do anything is really very limited. They mostly just check the temperature of the water and go with it. That doesn't mean, however, that there aren't whole other fathoms that escape them. The public opinion on Bush is enormously negative. Even the tea party folks hate his guts.
another point seems to be lost again and again: Bush lied about torture saying "we do not torture period." He did this repeatedly.

It was both the torture and the lying about it that earned him so much anger by his critics. Bush is, at heart, very contemptuous of most human beings, and human life. He was only able to make a credible presidential contender by his party by jacking up the execution rate in Texas while serving as governor.

His contempt for human beings and for telling the truth...I hope history will remember these things about him.
What anti-intellectual would marry a librarian?
Thanks for writing this and for linking to the McGovern piece. It is long but well worth reading.
As far as revisionist history goes I'm fascinated by Bush's statement that to intervene in Katrina would have caused a constitutional crisis. Even if it's true, I never heard that one til now. Great post!
And here's an interesting story that just appeared on Yahoo.

Apparently, history isn't only being rewritten. It's being covered up and destroyed, and no one's going to do anything about it.
"what do you have to do in this country to be totally discredited and treated with scorn "

Well, you could start by throwing the Constitution under the bus and creating a hostile atmosphere for society's producers. Last week's historic events prove that the American public is fairly scornful of that.
@ Gordon: Kate asked "what do you have to do in this country to be totally discredited and treated with scorn? "

you responded:
Well, you could start by throwing the Constitution under the bus and creating a hostile atmosphere for society's producers. Last week's historic events prove that the American public is fairly scornful of that.

You're honestly cool with W bragging about committing war crimes? Our former president? We hung German war criminals for this. What is wrong with you that you think that comment made moral sense? Torture is evil. Some things are more important than political gain. What is wrong with you?
Very well put. And as has been pointed out before, if waterboarding was so effective, why did they have to waterboard Mohammed something like 280 times?
Bush's comments have failed to shift me from my view that the man was a total disaster who left large parts of the US constitution broken and twisted. He's going to go down in history as a total and utter asshat.
By the way, can someone remove the comment spam above this comment?
I agree. This book is self-justification and an attempt to influence W's place in history. He shouldn't go unchallenged.
Stoneman (good name for you)

I was answering a question and talking about Obama. You're ranting about Bush. And you wonder what's wrong with ME?

Please keep the spam. It makes more sense that the other parts of this thread.
BOKO, I sure hope you're right. It is scary though how fast this country is willing to rewrite history.... how short our memories are.... the only thing that has come out of his mouth in as long as I remember is his unwillingness to comment/critisize Obama's presidency. He is saying it's out of decency and respect for the office. I however wonder if it's because he simply is out of politics now and can't be bothered... or if he's simply not bright enough to understand and comment now that he isn't surronded by advisors.