Southern Exposure

Ruminations of a Native Son

AJCalhoun

AJCalhoun
Location
Greater Washington. DC., United States
Birthday
February 06
Title
Critical Care Technician
Company
Dimensions Healthcare System
Bio
Compulsive writer (mostly memoirs and sociopolitical rants), musicologist, hermeticst, fiscal conservative, radical centrist, agrarian socialist; Charter member, Factualist Party; born and raised in DC, healthcare professional, retired businessman, civic and policial activist on two coasts, civil rights movement veteran, and serial divorcee. An empiricist's worst nightmare, I believe in everything but I don't believe everything, including many things I believe in. Turned down by US Army in 1966 for medical reasons, thrown out of Col. Hasan's Black Man's Army in 1967 for being "too militant." Scion of a family only Tennessee Williams could have dreamed up. There's more. There's always more.

MY RECENT POSTS

OCTOBER 31, 2012 2:00PM

Just Bend Over...

Rate: 10 Flag

In today's Washington Post Ezra Klein commented on the newspapers across the country that have chosen to endorse Mitt Romney and their reasoning-in-common: That it would be better to have a President with whom Congress is willing to work than to endure another 2-4 years of obstructionist back-and-forth. Klein, of course, finds this to be a bad idea. 

I find it to be more than a bad idea. I also find the excessive politesse shown Romney et al by the media (Klein included), to be an insult in itself. As Romney lies his way through the campaign in repetitive and bald-faced fashion, journalists and the media at large refer to these outrageous statements as "misstatements," "misstatements of fact," "falsehoods," as "missing the mark," and other euphemisms for what they are: Lies. 

Klein (who I like, don't get me wrong) says that "There are good reasons to endorse Mitt Romney for president. But if you want the political system to work more smoothly, endorsing McConnell and Boehner's strategy over the past four years is folly."

And he bends over for them. Backwards? No. Head first. Ezra Klein, ever the diplomat, refuses to call out the lying blackguards who have run the  nation nearly into the ground, and doesn't even address the lying semi-human who would work with them to finish the job. He says to endorse this candidate (only indirectly) would be "folly." 

In reality it would be suicide. 

To vote for a pair of men, one of whom lies on a daily basis, changes his positions as often as the guy in Warhol's "Sleep," who will say anything at any given moment to pander to the audience of the moment, and the other who has honestly articulated a vision of whosale regression into at least the mid-1950s (anyone remember McCarthy, polio, Jim Crow, etc.) would not be mere folly. It would be, in the reasoning of editorials by the staff of, say, the De Moines Register and of course David Brooks of the overrated New York Times, pragmatism, something for which the sitting president has been criticized and at times derided for practicing. So get rid of him, give away the store, and let the pragmatism turn into an open croneyism instead. That's the ticket. That's the way to get things to "work." Of course that's only if you want things like an overturning of Roe vs. Wade; vaginal probe sonograms (rape with an instrument), "throwing out" of our public school system in favor or a privatized system of education in which the indoctrination programs would be decided by boards of directors; the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare") repealed and hundreds of thousands of Americans stripped of healthcare or subjected once again to pre-existing conditions constraints; damn near every skilled job in the country shipped off to China, and of course, lest we forget, war without end, starting with Iran...then by all means, bend over and take it. You'll like it after a while. Because that's what they want to do, and no euphemism will suffice here. What they want to do is fuck you, me, and everyone else in this country, including their most ardent and most foolish supporters. 

The newspapers that have endorsed Mitt Romney for president use the logic that is it better to submit to political rape than it is to continue to struggle against it, to endure a slow recovery made slow by the enemy in Congress that wants nothing more than to see the current president put out of office...and why? 

Do I even need to say it? 

So yes, by all means, from Des Moines to New York, go on, get it over with, bend over and take it, because if you manage to get your boys into office, you are going to be not merely the victims of "folly," but rape victims who truly did ask for it. Only we'll all be getting fucked, thank you very much, and I, for one, have no intention of submitting to this forcible rape of my nation, my ethics, nor my personal life.

If Romney and Ryan should prevail, I make you this promise: Their political lives and those of their abettors in Congress will become a hell the likes of which they clearly can not imagine. The nation will surely suffer, but so will they. In the end we may all be ruined, but they will not take us from behind, with outrageous lies and senseless theories. 

No justic, no peace.

I, for one, do not believe the American people will bend over for this bald and florid power play. I cannot accept an America that allows itself to be raped in order to avoid a little discomfort, then hand over its wallet. Then again, I grew up in the aftermath of the Second World War and the most prosperous and (up till now) crazy time in our history. There were giants in the land then - and some of them were Republicans. 

I believe the giants are still here, and that on November 6 they will wake and send these lying, cheating, inhuman bastards back to their dark and sordid corners to sulk. 

Yes, I believe that will happen. And I believe in calling a lie a lie. We can not elect a blatant liar president, and I believe the majority of us will not bend over and take it for the sake of expedience. 

I don't believe the America will commit suicide on November 6. 

I know I won't. 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
there was a day when newsmen bristled and spat, now they are a sort of lackey, at best a reverse butler ironing out the wrinkles from the master before politely offering it. But then we must remember who owns them, feeds them- like factory workers disassembing the machines in a plant bought by Bain they know too well that "just one more day" is all that's left. A long way from the days of the "Aurora".
Yeah, lets just face forward and take it!! Wait...what?
Tell it like it is, brother. The ugly truth about "journalists" is that most engage in CYA, not wanting to offend either side too much and thereby lose access with the side that wins.

But I shouldn't paint with too broad a brush -- I tip my hat to Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O'Donnell, and Martin Bashir, and two of my favorite print journalists Matt Tiabbi and Charles Pierce. All of them have the courage to call a crook a crook, a fool a fool, and a liar a liar.

Since I have no chance of being employed by the MSM, I am free to call 'em as I see 'em, too. And as far as I can see, Myth Romoney is a pathological liar and a sociopath, a man without a spine, a conscience or a soul.

But maybe I should hold back a little in case Fux News runs out of fools and considers me to replace Sarah Palin.
Oh, yeah!
So yes, by all means, from Des Moines to New York, go on, get it over with, bend over and take it, because if you manage to get your boys into office, you are going to be not merely the victims of "folly," but rape victims who truly did ask for it. Only we'll all be getting fucked, thank you very much, and I, for one, have no intention of submitting to this forcible rape of my nation, my ethics, nor my personal life.

Fabulous!

Lezlie
kenneth houck: Yes, there was a day...and there are still a few, but they are seen as adversaries by all sides, so their jobs are harder and their resources sometimes more limited. Meanwhile the mainstream either remains polite or actually fawns. And Bain rolls on, joining the ranks of Haliburton and the rest of the mercenary, money grubbing hustlers - and truth is the victim.

Tink: Well it may have sounded good at first glance. ;)

Marilyn Sands: Thank you!

Tom Cordle: I couldn't have said it better - or as well. And the five you mention are stars in a rather dark galaxy, but they do shine. I also would add the name of our own Joan Walsh, who has on consecutive days called Romney "The Man Without a Soul" and "The Hollow Man."

The day Faux fires Palin and hires you there will be other signs and wonders too, as we enter either the end days or a new age. In either case it would be far more interesting.

Lezlie: Thank you so much!
You're right about everything but the giants. They have left the building. The people who are left who call it as they see it, guys like Paul Krugman and Thomas Friedman, aren't listened to by anyone but us. Cronkite is dead. Brinkley is dead. Edward R. Murrow, who stood up to McCarthy, is long dead. Woodward and Bernstein aren't kids any more. Who's left are the scorekeepers. They don't fact-check and, if they do, they try to make both sides look equivalent even if they're wildly unequal because to do anything else it to look partial, and the modern truth is that it is far more important to look impartial than to be impartial. During the last election, Rupert Murdoch, the owner of both Fox News and the Wall Street Journal, donated $1,000,000 to the Republicans. That's the equivalent of a referree stopping what he's doing and joining one team on the field, without bothering to remove his uniform. Not a word was said about this. And the media are considered liberal? By whom?

The reason you don't want the Republicans in office is precisely because the Giants are gone - there would be no one to stop them.
Have many of us here in the halls of OS been driven to this level of disgust/despair since the depth of feelings about Viet Nam? For or against, there was a real - and **thinking** - passion.. We came close in '00.. and then 9/11 happened and rattled everyone. We've never recovered. So few actually think anymore, it seems, and surely not for themselves, fear drives all.

Rated for a pain so deep.
koshersalaami's comment scares me.

I want a way for the people that like Romney and his ilk to live under those precepts without impacting the rest of us. They need to see what they are asking for in a way that they can't avoid acknowledging.
Best summation of what's at stake here I have read. Rape, indeed, is what it would be.
Newshounds traded in their integrity when they started thinking of themselves as members of a profession, as opposed to a vocation. Bigger difference than it might appear on the surface. I learned the distinction in a rude awakening decades ago when I and my newsroom colleagues were organizing a union (in the South). The National Labor Relations Board dashed our "professional" conceit by informing us we were not professionals, but, rather, in the same category as any other blue collar vocation. For me this realization was liberating.
Time is running out.Presuming your permission,this goes to FB as one of the last chances to wake voters up.
Rated
koshersalaami: They certainly do seem to be gone. I haven't seen any lately. There are a handful of brave souls who give it their best, but they have very little support, which counts for something as well. At this point in this particular piece of history, stopping the Republicans from completing their mission would make us all giants - collectively. This may be our destiny, too. Or should I say, May it be.

Thanks for your comments.

seer: Yes. It is a pain as deep and a division as gaping as the one during and post-Vietnam. So many have forgotten this has happened before, and possibly because the trigger looked so different. Still, in both cases the word "quagmire" comes to mind. It hurts. And pain is something a people will only abide for so long. I believe the time has come. And again, may it be.

Thank you so much.

just phyllis: Very well said. This is exactly the thing they need: To be able to see exactly what it is they are asking for, something like Mark Twain's "War Prayer" or Blake's "The Price of Experience." It has to be shoved in their faces with the force of truth.

Thanks for getting it.

Chicken Maaan: Rape is what it is.

Your sad yet freeing epiphany regarding journalism is greatly appreciated in the sharing here. It's interesting, too, because my journalism teacher, back in the mid-60s, said that very thing to us one day. It shut everyone up for a minute. It was freeing. Thanks so much for bringing that with you.

Heidi Banerjee: Thank you very much, and for purposes of any future use, please always presume my permission. By all means.