Editor’s Pick
FEBRUARY 10, 2010 12:02PM

Iowa GOP tactics: throw gay kids under the (school) bus

Rate: 19 Flag

Yesterday, the Republicans in the Iowa House of Representatives tried to finagle a procedural vote in an attempt to force action on a constitutional ban on gay marriage.

Happily, neither the House nor Senate went for it and as a result, homophobes will have to wait until 2014 to bring up the matter again. (WHOtv.com)

Great news right?  Yep.  Can't deny this is a good thing for Iowa, ergo the United States.   But, how did these House Republicans manage to force a vote yesterday to begin with?  The answer is here:

HOUSE FILE 2291 - Introduced  BY  SCHULTZ and WINDSCHITL  A BILL FOR

1 An Act relating to protected traits or characteristics of

2    students under public and nonpublic school harassment and

3    bullying prohibitions and policies.

4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA:

1  1    Section 1.  Section 280.28, subsection 2, paragraph c, Code

1  2 2009, is amended to read as follows:

1  3    c.  "Trait or characteristic of the student" includes but

1  4 is not limited to age, color, creed, national origin, race,

1  5 religion, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, gender

1  6 identity, physical attributes, physical or mental ability or

1  7 disability, ancestry, political party preference, political

1  8 belief, socioeconomic status, or familial status.

1  9                           EXPLANATION

1 10    This bill strikes sexual orientation and gender identity

1 11 from the definition of the term "trait or characteristic of the

1 12 student" used for purposes of protecting students in public and

1 13 nonpublic schools from harassment and bullying.

This document is Iowa House File #2291. HF 2291 was Submitted by Representatives Jason Shultz and Matt Windschitl. 

Schultz told WHO-TV 13 in Des Moines that HF 2291 was maneuvering to force a vote on a Gay Marriage Ban.  Neat.  In another brilliant interview Schultz said when defending the move to strike gay and lesbian kids out of the bill, "The Bully Bill or Safe School Act doesn't protect anyone anyway." Wow.  

What WHO didn't ask Mr. Shultz was how he felt about advocating gay bashing in public schools as a political tool. I called and left him a message at his Capitol office.  

I am anxiously awaiting a call back.

In the meantime, I decided to play around a bit with this bill to see how we might feel if it looked like this instead:

1 1 Section 1.  Section 280.28, subsection 2, paragraph c, Code 2009, is amended to read the following:  c.  "trait or characteristic of the student "includes but is not limited to age, color, creed, national origin, race, religion, marital status, sex,sexual orientation, gender identity, physical attributes, physical or mental ability or disability, ancestry, political party preference, political belief, socioeconomic status, or familial status.

Explanation

This bill strikes sexual orientation and gender identity from the definition of the term "trait or characteristic of the student" used for purposes of protecting students in public and non public schools from harassment and bullying.  

In addition, we have struck out socioeconomic status as well, therefore declaring open season on all the poor kids out there.  Or, if the poor kids are able to gather enough sticks, they can beat the crap out of the rich.  Get after it.

Or, looked like this:

1 Section 1.  Section 280.28, subsection 2, paragraph c, Code 2009, is amended to read the following:  c.  "trait or characteristic of the student "includes but is not limited to age, color, creed, national origin, race, religion, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, physical attributes, physical or mental ability or disability, ancestry, political party preference, political belief, socioeconomic status, or familial status.

Explanation

This bill strikes sexual orientation and gender identity from the definition of the term "trait or characteristic of the student" used for purposes of protecting students in public and non public schools from harassment and bullying.  
In addition, we have struck out color as well, therefore declaring open season on all the blacks.  Regrettably, this means it is open season on white kids as well.  We are feverishly working on an amendment to rectify that loophole.
Or, even like this:  

1 1 Section 1.  Section 280.28, subsection 2, paragraph c, Code 2009, is amended to read the following:  c.  "trait or characteristic of the student "includes but is not limited to age, color, creed, national origin, race, religion, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, physical attributes, physical or mental ability or disability, ancestry, political party preference, political belief, socioeconomic status, or familial status.

Explanation

This bill strikes sexual orientation and gender identity from the definition of the term "trait or characteristic of the student" used for purposes of protecting students in public and non public schools from harassment and bullying.  

In addition, we have struck out physical or mental ability or disability. The really neat thing about striking this out is that you can finally — balls to the wall — kick the crutches from neath that troublesome cripple.  Feel free to terrorize the mentally retarded, jump out from behind the bushes at them — make them wet their pants.  World's your oyster, kids.

 

 (thanks to OS blogger wakingupslowly for the email yesterday regarding this! xx A)

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
"Color" probably was appropriately striken, as "race" is included. Interesting article, Apopsa.
So, basically, if I get this right, and someone correct me if I'm wrong here, Iowa Republicans are basically trying to implement a statewide reversal at least part of the NATIONAL Matthew Shephard Act hate crimes legislation, that would apply to students?

Why am I not surprised?
We've got some world class ass clowns as state legislators here. It's sad, but it can't be said they don't represent their constituents. After all, western Iowa (the 5th district) sends Steve KKKing back to congress every 2 years.

Hopefully the actually moderate and fair minded rest of the state can keep these folks in check until the bigots cycle off the actuarial tables.
Just sickening . . . not surprising, unfortunately, but sickening. I re-read this a couple of times, searching for what their justification might be . . . nope, they want that left as open season.
The good news is this bill in addition to the procedural vote to add a gay marriage amendment to the Iowa Constitution are dead. This bill featured here was simply to force a procedural vote. I encourage you all to read the link to the WHO TV 13 article: http://www.whotv.com/news/who-tv-safe-schools-020710,0,164239.story
Thank you for this. Ticks me off. I'm posting for my friends to read too.
thank you for shining a light on this. its important.
Excellent work on this subject. The mind absolutely boggles. I wonder how these people look themselves in the mirror. Let us know if your message is ever returned.
How can the state that leveraged Obama into the Presidency be the same state that year after year sends a dullard like Chuck Grassley to DC?
Thanks for catching this and writing it up. I can't say I'm shocked, but I can say I'm disgusted.
another public service, akopsa, you put your finger right on the heart of the issue

but how come you know so much about what's going on in Iowa and Idaho, just wonderin'
Hey Roy - I am a native Iowan - like to keep up to date on all the goings on about town there. Idaho - I have no explanation for that one! xx a
Ohhhh, my.

Yes, it's been a rough week up there, at the state capitol. Very rough.
brian - they never expected any movement per se on this bill. the republican's used it as a political tool to bring a vote to the floor. the procedural vote - from my understanding - is that it was a way to get the anti-gay marriage constitutional amendment to a vote. it failed. democrats have the majority in iowa. and now, the republicans facing the 2010 elections can go back to their constituents and say they pushed for an anti-gay marriage vote and those liberal democrats blocked it. pure political maneuvering. gross
While I'm glad that neither the house nor the senate went for it this time I feel strongly that we have to confront the Christian right agenda outside politics as usual. There has to be visible outpouring from the people. We can't just leave it up to the elected officials as they do this funky thing sometimes where they seek common ground with religious fanatics. It's really bad for the rest of us when that happens. Oh how I hate when that happens. Thanks for the post. Rated.
Republicans are sociopaths.
Are you fucking kidding me?
The angry part of me wishes that, if such legislation as this were ever passed, those who voted for its passage would end up having gay kids who would end up being so severely harassed by their peers that they would end up committing suicide; so that the legislators would feel, first, the shame of having a gay child and, second, the horror of having their child take his or her own life in large part on account of the legislator's actions to remove such legal protections from the laws of the state. This is not to say that I believe being gay or having a gay child is shameful, since I am proudly gay myself; it is to say only that such legislators are likely to view having a gay child as a cause for shame. It is also not to say that gay persons - or anyone who is marginalized by society and harassed simply because of who he or she is - should choose suicide as a way out of the tragedy of having to face harassment and/or abuse on a regular basis; they need to seek a place of safety - and such places exist, though they may be difficult to find in some areas of the country - and to work to surround themselves with others who can help them resist their harassers and affirm their own worth as human beings. Sadly, too many Americans are mean-spirited enough to side with such callous and manipulative legislators as these Republicans, so I fear this will not be the last time such actions are attempted.
This is so very interesting and an amazing story. I cant believe we are fighting over sexual orientation. This is really hard to believe. We are so beyond that. Thanks Rachel Henderson - Alaska Fishing Lodge
Regardless of your personal opinions and beliefs, at least have some compassion and sympathy in your hearts for a cause many people are fighting for. I remember not too long ago, it seemed absurd that women would have the right to vote. Think about it. Christina Griffin Personal Loans
Nice site. Love the article keep up the great work. You always have such informative articles. Sierra Romesburg from Sex Toys