Alaska Progressive

Alaska Progressive
Location
Anchorage, Alaska, USA
Birthday
March 11
Title
Prole
Bio
I am the Subversive Clown. Telling the truth is a subversive act.

MY RECENT POSTS

MARCH 19, 2010 2:28AM

The U.S. Military’s Pro-Abortion Policy

Rate: 0 Flag

Recent events in Afghanistan highlight why, unlike the military of the United States, I am Pro-Choice and not Pro-Abortion.  Reporter Jerome Starkey of the Times of London was the first to report on a February 12th night-raid conducted by U.S. Special Forces in Afghanistan in which they killed a local police chief and a district prosecutor, as well as three women: a pregnant mother of ten, a pregnant mother of six, and a  teenaged girl.  All were taking part in a celebration to honor the birth of a grandson when the slaughter occurred.  Making matters worse, the U.S. military tried to cover up the story.  The initial official version differed significantly from eye-witness accounts.  For example, American officials denied involvement in the killings, and claimed the women were discovered bound and gagged and apparently killed execution style.  Officials now say that  their bodies were wrapped in the traditional Afghani manner before burial and admit that these atrocities were the work of American Special Forces. See the full story at the following links:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/afghanistan/article7060395.ece

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/15-3

This incident is the latest example of the U.S. Military’s preemptive abortion policy.  These women had no 'right to choose.'  Although, to the Military’s credit, they did perform the abortions free-of-charge to the recipients, and paid their families $2,000 compensation (how generous!) for each death of a non-fetus.  The United States' Military has also performed many extreme late-term abortions (fourth trimester through age eighteen) in its conduct of the invasions and/or occupations of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.  These abortions have been performed via “shock and awe” bombings of civilians, drone attacks on wedding parties, numerous night raids, and other egregious crimes against the innocent, many thousands of which are women and children.  They generally follow a pattern:  first, the military denies involvement and blames the Taliban; then, when the lie is uncovered, it offers a half-assed apology and throws a few bucks at the victim's family as hush money.  

One would expect  the so-called Pro-Lifers on the Right to be up in arms regarding these forced abortions, but they seem to not want to deviate from the “Support Our Troops” mantra that has been ingrained into their tiny brains.  This illustrates the hypocrisy of the political right-wing on the abortion issue.  They decry abortion before birth, then, after the child is born, it is fair game.  The Right grants particular favor to post-partum abortions in those cases where the abortee has a different skin color or religion.  If the Right was really pro-life, they would support pro-life policies such as single-payer universal healthcare-for-all and affordable daycare.  They would be anti-war, anti-death penalty, and anti-prison industrial complex.  The Right argues about the sanctity of life for the unborn, but once the first breath of air is taken, it is just another body to be exploited and discarded. 

Perhaps the problem with the U.S. Military’s abortion policy is the use of “Special” Forces.  If they used regular forces instead of the retarded ones, these types of incidents wouldn’t continue to occur.  I refer, of course, to the morally retarded.  It is unfair to equate these “Special” Forces to those people who may have a mental handicap, such as Special Olympians, because there is no doubt that Special Olympians have far more integrity, dignity, and morality than the murderous Special Forces. 

Another possible reason for the problem  may lie with General Stanley McChrystal-Meth, who has an apparent drug addiction and should be relieved of his duties as soon as possible.  The monkey on his back is evident in his close relationship with Hamid Karzai and his drug kingpin brother, Ahmed Karzai, who is said to be on the CIA’s payroll as he controls Afghanistan's opium trade.  Denial is also a red flag when it comes to addiction, and no one is in more denial regarding our operations in Afghanistan than Gen. McChrystal-Meth.  He claims to want to defeat the Taliban, yet his forces terrorize the country with night raids, and alienate the very people he hopes to win over.  To the Taliban's recruitment effort, McChrystal-Meth is a  wet dream.  He's also delusional; as the general makes statements regarding the importance of avoiding civilian casualties,  the corpses of innocent people continue to pile up higher and higher, as illustrated by the February 21st bombing of three trucks that killed 27 civilians. 

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/03/16-7

The U.S. Military’s Abortion Policy needs to be changed immediately.  People like Malalai Joya, known as the bravest woman in Afghanistan,  or the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA) have the answers. It is time to end the occupation and stop the violence we are perpetrating on the Afghan people. 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
what? with all the problems in afghanistan you're pointing to the army's policy of aborting babies to prevent deployment delays? what about the need to bribe local pashtun and dari tribes to gain their acceptance? How about the money paid to the Taliban during 2001 to gain their support for the drug war and allow America to build a pipeline (negotiations broke down six months before 9/11). how about the use of unarmed drones, a possible war crime? Or maybe NATO's indiscriminate killing of hundreds of unarmed civilians. Or that fact that the war was authorized by congress as part of the war powers act, to extend for 90 days and only to fight those RESPONSIBLE FOR 9/11, which as congressman Ron Paul recently pointed out, was not the Taliban. I'm completely in favor of trying to stabilize afghanistan and beat back the radical forces completely into pakistan, but what the hell does abortion have to do with anything, other than that it's the US army's policy to keep women from getting pregnant to avoid deployment?
“This illustrates the hypocrisy of the political right-wing on the abortion issue.”



Well at least they don’t seem to hold a patent on hypocrisy.


From America’s most recent Noble Peace Prize winner,

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=112651&sectionid=351020403

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article7017929.ece

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDBPNXR1NL4


I’m finding it hard to see this as “Bushes war” as a matter of fact I’m finding it hard to see the difference between so called neo-cons and progressives. Aside from really hating each other, they basically do the exact same thing. It is just a matter of who gets into the drivers seat, and who stands in the wings waiting for their turn. Each faction whining that the other is the root of all evil thus claiming the moral high ground.
I'm down with you Bill. Chill my brother. I'm using abortion as a rhetorical devise to point out the hypocrisy of the right and our military's egregious policies in Afghanistan as well as Iraq and Pakistan. I do appreciate your passion.

Knight 99 - I'm addressing the actions of our military under Obama's watch. This is his war. I could not agree more with regard to the two parties being virtually identical. Hell Obama has the same motherfuckers running the war that Bush had.
Okay.

Then you have a problem with your military in foreign countries. Not necessarily a “so-called Pro-Lifers’ problem.

After all militaries were designed to KILL from their inception, that is what they do. If you unleash them upon a foreign nation, that is exactly what they will do. Try to chain them up in the backyard, and they will eventually turn on you.

In my humble opinion, it would be best is to legislate a national defense force of well trained and funded volunteers protecting the nations sovereignty like pit bulls without any domestic policing powers. Alas that would never happen, but I would think foreign relations would not be nearly as strained.
You try to write, and one agrees with your sentiments, but you struggle mightily to pull it off, and it's painful to watch. What's it like to want to express something so bad but to be fundamentally unable to do so? What's it like to be unable to be cogent? Seems like it would be sad. BTW: like the clown suit.
So, what are you trying to say, B.F.? I think he got the point across rather well, and a good point it is. How can one fight a "war" against, "what"? civilians? The "enemy" looks just like everyone else, and everyone looks like the "enemy". Wars are traditionally fought with armies, against, armies. Not, armies against the population. That's called an "unprovoked attack". And, those responsible for unprovoked attacks, are terrorists. Meaning, America is a baby killing terrorist nation. Any questions?