Aliquot

A portion of science, at all intersections.

aliquot

aliquot
Location
Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Birthday
December 31
Title
Dr.
Bio
Neuroscience Ph.D. ************************** Passionate about science education and outreach; enjoys a great discussion about the intersection of science and everyday life *************************** Currently a biomedical researcher at a Harvard University hospital - Areas of expertise: endocrinology, appetite and metabolism, neuroscience, biochemistry, molecular biology *************************** Areas of interest: science and art, science and society, science policy, books/films/music, reading great magazines, travel, learning new things and sparking new ideas, gardening/nature *** All Content Copyright Aliquot - do not reproduce without express permission ***

Aliquot's Links

Recommended links: Science Education
Recommended links: General Science Resources
Recommended: Science and Society
Aliquot Posts: Earth and Environment
Aliquot's Favorite OS Science Posts by other bloggers
Aliquot posts: Read, Watch, Visit, Do, Browse
Aliquot posts: Wacky Science of the Month
Aliquot posts: Only Human?
Quick Links - Aliquot
Aliquot posts: current research and science resources
Aliquot posts: reviews (movies, books, websites, etc)
Aliquot posts: science and pseudoscience
Aliquot posts: Science and health, science and food
Aliquot posts: science and art
Aliquot Posts: Science Policy and Science in Society
Aliquot posts: basic science
Recommended links: Science And Art
NOVEMBER 3, 2009 1:06PM

Dialogue: a handbook for communication about science

Rate: 2 Flag

Aliquot Blog is an attempt by a scientist to have conversations about science with both scientists and non-scientists.

 That sentence alone illustrates one of my many concerns: science can be dry and dull.

 Some of the feedback I have received about my posts to date suggests I should make a better attempt at communicating science in a way that relates to all of our lives (outside the lab or the clinic).  Point taken.  In remembering what inspired my interest in science to begin with, I think back to doctor's visits, television programs, nature walks, classrooms...and the frequent moments of thought we all have, when we sit in wonder and ask 'why?'  My goal is to focus on those moments of wonder, not lectures or technical lingo or lists of facts.

Open Salon already has very good science/medicine blogs (Clay Naff, AliciaPhD to name a couple), but other blogs on Open Salon prefer a more politicized, profit-driven or sensational view of medicine or science.  That is certainly one way to get people's attention - but do you keep their attention once you have it?  Is a conversation happening, or an assault?  Is there mutual respect, sharing of information?  I would ask the same questions about some comments that are posted on these same blogs.

 I strive to be accurate and informative, clear and concise, fair and unbiased, and  I am hoping to learn as much from this blog as I hope my readers will learn from it.  But scientists and doctors too often separate their work from people's lives, and living in that bubble perpetuates alienation - do we really understand how our work in science and medicine is perceived??  Hopefully forums like this can help both sides understand each other, and maybe even lead to the understanding that there are in fact no real 'sides', just points of view.  

I hope you'll join me in this conversation.   This week I will post about the intersection of science with art, and FAQs about clinical research studies.

 

Interesting points of view on the topic of science communication:

 

Some things non-scientists can do:

 http://scienceblogs.com/ethicsandscience/2006/07/things_nonscientists_can_do_to.php

 

Some things scientists can do:

 

http://www.genomicslawreport.com/index.php/2009/10/14/we-must-revolutionize-our-communication-of-science-to-non-scientists/

 

http://communicatingscience.aaas.org/CommunicationBasics/Pages/default.aspx

 

http://opa.faseb.org/pages/PolicyIssues/commscience.htm

 

http://www.ashg.org/press/scientist_public.shtml

 

http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/communicating-science_en.pdf

http://blogs.nature.com/nautilus/2008/03/analogies_to_describe_science.html

http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/23189/

 

 A Survey Monkey survey on communicating science to the public:

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=TLZLPBQT_2bwtOCk5c3zyjpQ_3d_3d

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
For me, the key to learning and becoming interested in science was the moment of epiphany I had when I realized that research and experimentation that are the basis of science does not always happen in a laboratory. Yes, in chemistry, or biology, one might be dependant on tools of the trade, a microscope, a test tube, a mortar and pestal, but in the full width and breath of science, especially in the social sciences, the experimentation and research come in the form of interacting with people. Clinical psychology would not be where it is today, nor would psychiatry, if it were not for the real life observations of and interactions with people. Seeing how people act and react in certain situations, to certain stimuli. And if we can broaden the definition of all sciences to how they affect people on a daily basis in their every day life, then perhaps we can move toward a place of de-politicizing science and making it the objective pursuit it is intended to be
Thanks for your comment, Placebostudman. I think you bring up two important points. One, that science encompasses much more than traditional fields like chemistry, physics and biology which we learn in school. The social science are immensely important. Since Francis Bacon coined the term Science in the 16th century, the definition has been in dictionaries but a working definition has been somewhat plastic. Recently the UK's Science Council defined science as:
"Science is the pursuit of knowledge and understanding of the natural and social world following a systematic methodology based on evidence."
Surely psychology, sociology, anthropology and many other sciences are well within in this definition.

Second, I completely agree that communicating science by connecting it to our lives will assist in de-politicizing it, and hopefully will maintain objectivity as well.
a great blog post about the wonder of science:


http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/license-to-wonder/
May I make a suggestion? I notice you have a tendency to post links with little or no indication of what information or insights the linked articles provide. This gives your readers little incentive to actually follow your links.

Although it is a bit more work, you may want to consider giving us a brief summary of the linked articles, or at least the points you yourself consider important. Just a sentence or two can often do the trick. Those of us who wish to read more can then follow the link. Take a look at how this is done by Salon columnists who often cut passages from the linked articles and paste them into their own (properly attributed, of course).

Another way to put this is that we should only need to read your own article to know what you wish to say. The links are just extras for those of us who want more.

Please take this as a suggestion from a fan who wishes to increase your readership.
ruicanuck - thanks very much for your comment. I'll take this into consideration for my next post. My intent for links within the writing, is that they expand on the sentence(s) immediately preceding them. Lists of links at the end of the writing are for further reading, divided up into sections by topic (in this case, for scientists, for non-scientists). Its often difficult to cut and paste sections because I find too many aspects of the web resource to be useful - but a short description of why someone may want to click the link seems like a great idea!
Thanks!!