My summer has been bookended by weddings. In June, my friend N. married the Beautiful Elfin Girl in Bath, England. And this past weekend, the last official weekend of the summer vacation period in France, the boyfriend and I headed to the city of Narbonne for the wedding of our friends Juliette and Arthur*.
The wedding was beautiful, as was the bride’s dress. But though I was happy for Juliette and Arthur, the event wasn’t something I’d been looking forward to. Going to a wedding rarely is.
These last, nuptials-filled months (there was also one my boyfriend attended solo, and a cousin’s engagement party) have made me think more than ever about my complicated relationship with weddings and marriage.
The first wedding I was invited to, I didn’t attend. I was an adolescent when my father and stepmother were getting hitched, and things were tense between them and my mother. Though I love my stepmother, and know she loves my dad, it seemed okay at the time to side with my mom and not go. It’s something I’ve regretted ever since.
Then again, who’s to say I would have enjoyed it? A lot of people, especially friends and family from the US, often ask when the boyfriend and I are getting married, or take it as a bad sign that we’re not already. The fact is, though, I’ve never liked the idea of weddings – well, except for the dress.



Beautiful bridal gowns worn at weddings I've been to. The last one is Juliette's.
I respect what a wedding represents spiritually. I love the idea that two people believe so strongly in their love that they will go before whatever higher power they believe in to sanctify their union and to promise to stay together no matter what. I love that family and friends can share this moment, and I love the fun reception, too. But that's about it.
For one thing, where the spirituality of the occasion is usually sincere, I feel like the religious portion of a wedding often seems to be merely for show - and it's a show most of us don't want to see. For example, I know Juliette and Arthur have spiritual beliefs, but they’re by no means rigorous churchgoing Catholics – yet they jumped through hoops and sucked up and even played down already having a child (which is not at all uncommon or looked down upon for unmarried French couples to do), just so that they could be wed in Narbonne’s admittedly gorgeous cathedral. Even smaller ceremonies I’ve been to have often left me feeling off about the religious element. At one New Jersey wedding, I was surprised that the ceremony was just like a normal Catholic mass, with a few modifications to refer to the couple – who, once again, isn’t overly religious.

Cathédral Saint-Just-et-Saint-Pasteur, Narbonne
The religious ceremony is usually something you’re expected to attend, no matter what your own beliefs might be. And while I’m all for tolerance and open-mindedness, I have a problem with the bride and groom not taking into account that, say, there might be someone of a different faith invited who now has to sit for forty-five minutes and listen and pray to a savior he or she doesn’t believe in. I realize that most people deal with this part of the wedding without a problem, but it always sort of rubs me the wrong way. Though I know the couple doesn’t intend it to be so, it always feels to me a bit like they’re pushing their faith on us. I’ve often thought that if this is the sacred, holy part of the wedding, why not have it be a more intimate affair, with only the couple and close family and friends involved? Instead of having tens of people there, why not have just ten? I’ve attended a wedding where, though the groom is a very devout Catholic, there was only a civil ceremony followed by the reception. The religious part, we were informed, would take place a few days later, and would be between the bride and groom’s immediate family. The wedding didn’t seem to be lacking in spirituality, or in love – and no one had to sit through a ceremony they didn’t appreciate.
But this isn’t the biggest problem for me. Though they’ve always been about ostentation and celebration, weddings today have become huge vacuums, sucking away money in ways our ancestors probably couldn’t have imagined. French weddings are a little better about this, but American weddings, with their gift registries and multiple occasions when presents are required (engagement party, bridal shower, wedding), are rough. And that’s if you’re just a guest. If you’re in the bridal party, you usually have to buy a bridesmaid’s dress or rent a suit/tuxedo; purchase accessories (usually chosen for you by the bride/groom) to go with the clothes; contribute to throwing the bridal shower and bachelor/bachelorette party – and these are just the bare minimum. I feel like it’s most challenging for women, since the bridal shower is only attended by us, and since our dresses are usually much more expensive than the men’s rentals. Bridesmaids are also usually expected to get hair, make-up, and nails/toes professionally done. If you have a nice bride-to-be, you’ll get a say in the bridesmaid gown, and she’ll also try to be sure it and the rest of the accessories aren’t expensive. One of my friends even let us wear our own shoes, as long as they were a certain color. Even if you’re lucky enough to get that kind of treatment, though, you’ll still have other expenses.
Thrice a bridesmaid…

Even just being a guest doesn’t mean you won’t spend a lot of money to attend a wedding. This summer alone, the boyfriend and I have spent nearly 800 euros on airfare, train tickets, taxis, and hotel rooms in order to see different pals tie the knot.


Lovely locations…but it’s not cheap to get there!
You could say that it’s all worth it, though, to be there with your friends. The problem is that weddings have become such ceremonial, codified affairs that the bride (and often the groom) is completely stressed out and so busy that you only get to chat for a few minutes the whole evening. All the pressure of planning the wedding, making dozens of minute decisions, posing for countless photographs, and trying to be sure the guests are happy, definitely takes a toll. Jill* is one of my best friends, admired by everyone who meets her for her sunny, upbeat nature. The day of her wedding, as her other bridesmaids and I helped her don her dress and veil, I was shocked to see her snapping at her mother, rolling her eyes, and just generally behaving like…well, like someone who’s not very nice. By now, though, after having attended a few more weddings, I know this is pretty much de rigueur. There are exceptions, but most of the brides I’ve dealt with aren’t at their best on the big day, despite how beautiful they look.
And that’s the shame of it. Here you have this huge party where you’re side by side with the love of your life, surrounded by friends and family, and you’re too stressed and frustrated to really enjoy it. Juliette and Arthur are normally so easygoing and fun to be around. At their reception on Saturday night, though, they spent hours wringing their hands about the DJ’s music choice and wondering why not every single person was up and dancing. Meanwhile, us guests were having a good time, and wishing they would, too.
French and American/Anglo-Saxon weddings have a few differences. One of the main ones is, while most American/Anglo-Saxon weddings I know of usually officially end around midnight or 1am, French wedding receptions go on all night. It’s a point of pride to have guests hobbling home at sunrise. Around dawn, the tradition is to accompany the bride and groom to their room, harass them outside the door, make them drink a concoction of leftovers, and then return to the reception and have a bowl of onion soup. Having seen the exhaustion of the brides and grooms at American/Anglo-Saxon weddings, I could not imagine how destroyed Juliette and Arthur would feel by the end of all that. And I wasn’t able to see it, actually; like a lot of people, we had to leave at about 4am, because our train home the next day was at 10, and we needed to get a little sleep.
As we said our goodbyes, Arthur looked at us both, genuinely moved. He thanked us for coming, and told us it meant so much to him and Juliette. I thought of all our grumbling and the stress leading up to the trip, and felt guilty. Then, when we said goodbye to Juliette, she also thanked us for coming, and added, “There were some people who said they couldn’t make it, and we were really disappointed.” Though I know what she meant, a part of me felt a little rankled. Obviously she hadn’t really thought about how much it cost to go, or how inconvenient it was that anyone coming by train wouldn’t easily be able to get to the site of the reception (a beautiful vineyard lost in the countryside), unless they rented a car, or, for those of us who don't drive, spent loads of money on taxis. She didn’t think that in these hard economic times, maybe some people couldn’t afford acceptable clothes or to give a gift (in France, this is traditionally money in a card). No, like just about all the brides I’ve dealt with, Juliette felt like she was the center of the universe – despite normally being one of the most understanding, laid-back friends I’ve ever had.
From the first one I attended (my mother’s ill-fated second marriage), to this most recent one (my first French wedding), I’ve never had a completely wonderful wedding experience. While I always feel joy for the couple, and while I’ve usually had a good time celebrating, the stresses of bridesmaid duties and/or budgetary concerns, as well as the transformation of most brides into terrible people for the night, repulse me.
Ceremony and elaborate parties and locales are great, and do serve a purpose, but they don’t guarantee a couple will stay together or stay happy. Real, lasting love is something far more rare than the perfect wedding reception, far more beautiful and difficult to find than the most stunning bridal gown. A wedding is just a lot of trappings – some that become genuine entanglements for everyone involved.
Many people see weddings as a way to formalize and share their love – and that’s the part I like and respect. But what I prefer to see is those couples in their everyday life, laughing together, having fun on an evening out, sharing a special moment, supporting each other, in some cases having a longed-for child. Those moments don’t cost anything, or take any preparation or rehearsing, but they're the most meaningful of all.
______________________________________________
*All names have been changed.


Salon.com
Comments
I have always enjoyed the significance of the religious aspect of weddings especially when they have been different than my own. I especially loved the one at a Jewish synagogue.
Too each his own.
The last wedding gown is absolutely gorgeous!!
A great post for thought!
This my dear was one hell of a shindig hahaha
HUGGGGGGGGGGGG
I can imagine you retiring to the boudoir after the main course and emerging in your bridal dress, just in time for the sweets course! Cake and champagne, what else??
As far as the religious component, even if I'm not a follower and neither is the couple, I appreciate that part of the ceremony as the one point where the seriousness of the couple's commitment is meant to sink in.
I'd have loved to have you at my N. California wedding: we married outside under the apple tree, family and closest friends as guests in a circle for the ceremony with our dogs at our feet, we had hand-written vows. Guests in flowing dresses, suits, shorts, Hawaiian shirts (those Oregonians have no idea how to dress up!)... Many more invited for the reception, also simple and outside, with gorgeous scenery of sun, meadow and woods all around, farmer's market flowers...a delightful day. No bank accounts drained. Still smiling all these years later. : )
Love the photos you included!!
These are beautiful spots.
Best wishes to all your friends for many years together with broad smiles lasting.
I did have an epiphany here as I read your piece. I have often said that the reason I have been married so often is that I like the ceremony. Actually, I think it is more that I like the dresses. You and I have that in common, also.
Again, however, even with the dresses and the sometimes stellar music and all, why would two people stand up and swear by all they hold sacred that neither of them will ever have sex with anyone else for the rest of their lives until one of them dies? That remains a mystifying question for me.
I rarely look at my wedding photos, but when I do, I see faces that have been absent from my life for a very long time, and I'm glad we all had that day together.
Also, a wedding is only important if you feel that's what you need, in terms of commitment, for the next phase of your life. If you need more emotional or legal permanence in order to free yourself to think beyond where you are now. I won't say it's unimportant, but it needs to be personally important to YOU, not important as a generic "step" or proof to others.
Maybe marriage should revert back to the old economic transaction it used to be, when a woman learned her exact worth in terms of livestock. You can't beat roasted goat over a fire and week-old wine for a celebration.
I like weddings. I like that for one day everyone believes everything is going to be okay. I like the rituals and seeing how different people apply their own styles.
I think your friend was just disappointed because in my experience you wish everyone you know could be there to share it with you. I think she was just disappointed that for whatever reason, life had interfered with their ability to come. If she said "dissapointed in them," that is a different issue, but if she was just sorry they weren't there, I think it's nice to know she cared enough to miss them.
who can come up with a wonderful
(honest) (true!) line like
"Though I know the couple doesn’t intend it to be so,
it always feels to me a bit like they’re pushing their faith on us. "
Plus the ripping of the veil off the bride's sanctified
sanctimonious sweet little face!
Only three weddings i EVER went to was a sister's
and two cousins’, at ages 6 (sister)
and 4 and then 14 or so (cousins’).
At the cousins’ I 1) crawled out the window of the church during the ceremony,
according to mom, and 2)got stupendously smashed at the reception
by stealing everyone’s leftover wine surreptitiously.
At my sister’s , I was the little ringbearer, and did a damn fine job.
Got that ring up there. The little flower girl was cute, I remember shyly noticing. Hm.
…………………………………………..
I have decided when it comes time to marry, I will become some kinda damn
minister or maybe captain of a ship and marry myself. Don’t see why
I couldn’t!
but perform the act of marrying , myself. between myself
and some hapless woman.
As far as the religious part being uncomfortable to those guests who don't share the faith is concerned, I agree that it's wrong to have full length church services (as opposed to a ten or fifteen minute religious ceremony) with all the guests invited. If you want to have an hour long Catholic wedding Mass, let that be just for the people who really want to attend (either because they, too, are Catholic or because their desire to share the moment overrides any discomfort they might feel about not fully participating).
When I have officiated religious weddings, I have always made it clear that all participation (saying prayers; singing hymns) on the part of guests was optional.
My feelings about marriage and me (as you'll know from my own posts) have changed over the years. I was legally married to my ex husband but, now that same sex couples can marry in New York, I don't plan to marry Lady Lucia (though we will have a church blessing of our union - with our church community - followed by a party with all our friends). If you're coming to New York, let me know. We'll invite you to the party (no date yet but probably some time in the Spring).
Oh. You were a gorgeous bridesmaid. All 3 times.
I have to admit I have a sneaking fascination with American bridal magazines. But I also see the pages and pages of glossy advertisements for this or that "must have" thing. Brides may want them, but many can't afford them. And that has only gotten harder in recent years. Then I think of the high divorce rates. Are those thousands of dollars spent on an exhausting wedding the couple is too stressed and strapped to enjoy really worth it? Probably not.
rated
It can be very challenging for the bride and groom to be hosting such an elaborate affair with, in many cases, hundreds of their family members and closest friends present. It can make even the most pleasant people stressed because unfortunately there are many wedding guests who delight in finding fault with the entire event and the bride and groom know it.
Eighteen of my nineteen first cousins are already married. Right now my only single cousin is nearly engaged just upon graduating college. I feel more and more pressure from all directions about being single.
When I meet the right man for me, then I will very happily get married and plan a simple ceremony and reception, and a very elaborate marriage. :)
You will make a lovely bride when you say yes.
For my daughter's wedding two years ago, she went to great lengths to keep costs modest. Even she broke down the day before the wedding, because a foul-up almost caused the bridal party dinner to be cancelled.
I'm all for eloping.
You look great as a bridesmaid.
If you aren't going to have one, then attending those of others is not a bad substitute. You get the general ambiance without the stress.
As far as God goes, modern marriage needs everything possible behind it. I'm not much on organized religion, but they do a pretty good job at big life events. Birth, death, marriage.
My fiance and I lived together a year before we got engaged, we've talked a lot about important bits and not-so-important bits, we respect each other, and we're both really, truly happy with what we found. Planning our wedding feels like saying, "We're in love and we're not going anywhere...but we're throwing a giant beach party to prove it." And since we're both fans of beach parties, we're both really excited about the wedding and the wedding planning.
And damn, but do French weddings sound like a blast. Party all night, onion soup for breakfast...that's my kind of people. :)
Just a few things:
@everyone - It's interesting that one of the biggest opinion dividers seems to be the religious ceremony. I don't disagree that it's important to remind people - especially the bride and groom - of the religious aspect to marriage - but I still think it isn't very agreeable for everyone else, including distant friends and family, to sit through a service that they may not enjoy or appreciate. Eva T., it was fascinating to read your experiences with this from the other side.
@Abby - I'm glad to see you here! And I love your idea of how to do a marriage...but I'd replace the champagne with Clairette. Definitely a great idea, though....
@Brassawe - You always, always surprise me - who knew you had a soft spot for wedding dresses?
@High Lonesome - My thoughts on transportation are the same, regardless of how big or small a wedding. I think brides and grooms need to realize that having a wedding where not everyone is from the local area means you have to expect some people won't be able to make it, period. I wish people planning a wedding could take sensitivity training course and realize the full cost to any guest. In my opinion, the only people who really should absolutely show up to a wedding would be the bride and groom's parents - and of course, that depends on their relationship with said parents. Not that it isn't nice to have other friends and family there, of course - but the costs really need to be taken into account.
@Macco - Thanks for the invite! Something tells me that would be one heck of a wedding!
@Leandra - I like your idea about the size of a 50th wedding anniversary vs. a marriage. Very, very wise.
@Stim - Ah, the livestock. A truly sobering judgment indeed. Actually, it's funny you mention these old rituals; I hate the idea of a bride being "given away" by her father (I love my dad, but I'm no one's property!), and no matter how pretty a ring is, I can't imagine wearing the same piece of jewlery day in, day out, for the rest of my life. I am not fit for weddings....
@keri - I appreciate your trying to be so understanding. My impression was that Juliette was making a judgment on the people who didn't come, not that she was disappointed by the situation. If it were the latter, I would absolutely have understood. Whatever the case, I've seen enough brides become hateful people in one night, to know that she's not a bad, demanding person in general, of course, and of course I forgive her. It's like when someone becomes a zombie and they say "It's not her anymore". Luckily, bridezilla isn't a permanent spell!
@James - Actually, marrying oneself (and not another person) might be the best kind of marriage of all!
@Eva - Thanks for the invite. I don't know when I'll next be in New York, though...sigh. Whatever the case, I hope it's a wonderful celebration. I'm sure it will be, in fact! Thanks again also for your very interesting insight on the religious ceremony.
@Shiral - I love looking at the dresses and the magazines, too! Everything is so pretty! That actually helps remind me how some people get really caught up in weddings and expenses. But boy do I love looking at those dresses!
@literaryflower - Thanks for reading. "I keep telling those closest to me -- it's one day -- the marriage is what comes after." - So, so true! But most people get so caught up in planning their wedding, I'm not surprised they won't listen to you, alas...
@Myriad - I like the pagan wedding idea! Very cool!
Lezlie
@ Linnn - I like your style...I may just have to copy you! :-)
@cominghome - I agree that if a person (myself included of course) doesn't feel that the religious part of a wedding would be something he/she would appreciate, he/she shouldn't have to attend. That's kind of my point. Unfortunately, most brides and grooms believe that everyone should be there, regardless of their own feelings and impressions. I am a spiritual person and deeply respect the faith of others - when it's not all just about show and tradition/expectations. I have been moved by some religious wedding ceremonies, but many I've felt were just fake. I wish I'd been able to say, "I'll see you at the reception", but the idea is that you have to be there for it all. "Guestzilla" will probably never exist when it comes to weddings - studies have even shown that despite hard economic times, people are still spending lots of money on attending weddings and giving gifts. The day is for the bride and groom, of course - I just wish our culture could condition them to keep things simpler and just be happy being together and celebrating with whomever can come, and to put much less pressure on bridal party members, parents, guests, and themselves.
Oh, Hell, what am I saying? I forget those charming affairs before the cake is even cut. But who can ever forget someone saying "till death do us part" inside a mausoleum! Thanks for an insightful post, Alysa; some excellent points.
Oh, Hell, what am I saying? I forget those charming affairs before the cake is even cut. But who can ever forget someone saying "till death do us part" inside a mausoleum! Thanks for an insightful post, Alysa; some excellent points.
I love the idea that two people believe so strongly in their love that they will go before whatever higher power they believe in to sanctify their union and to promise to stay together no matter what.
That says it all. Thank you for the lovely post and pictures.
So when are you and the boyfriend...?
the whole institution is up for a radical rethinking. much more on that in my blog for anyone who wants to take the red pill, wink
Your comment about the bride and groom not "thinking" about others who are NOT of a certain, or any, religion being made to particiapte in a religious ceremony is, I'd guess unwittingly, very self-invoved, some would say narcissistic. No one FORCES you to pray, to observe, to take part in any sort of religious anything when you attend a "religious" ceremony. And, sorry, it ain't about.... you.
Elope.
The reason for weddings becoming such a superficial spectacle is because of the rest of us. Sure, we all know how ridiculous it is to pay $3000 for a cake or whatever goes on, but the bride's friends and relatives are pelting her with this diminishing crap. "We just HAD to have Local Jazzartist to play our wedding. Sure it cost a mini fortune but it was our special day and you only get to do it once. What music are YOU planning for YOUR wedding?"
Already, by having the example set by earlier brides, it becomes a runaway train. "What? You're not even having live music? Don't you care about your special day?" Surely if you loved and cared for SO, we are told, you would spend whatever it took to make your day at least as much if not more special than your aunts/cousins/bffs special day.
If you are one of the ones who already spent a fortune on your wedding, you can still admit your foolishness to your soon-to-be-married friends and support their small wedding. Don't feel badly, as others can learn from your mistake.
Oh, and you have every right to feel put off and uncomfortable about the religious aspect of the wedding. Not everybody knows that the entire wedding party doesn't HAVE to attend the ceremony. So they feel compelled to make them all attend whatever ritual is performed. And we attend because we are their friends and want to support them, even though they don't really know what they are doing. So we sit through mass or tea ceremony, or blood letting or whatever they do nowadays and endure it because we are their good friend. And we don't say anything to them about it because we are polite. So you have every right to complain about it afterward to other people. Really, when else would you have the opportunity?
PS - Can I be your date at Dom's son's wedding?
Barbara – I would like to address you because I feel that if you didn’t understand that I was trying to be open-minded about the religious ceremony, there’s a problem. You and I have the same problem – as you write: “I don't like it when people USE religion for the setting”. What you assume about me, you assume wrongly. I am a Christian and have no problem with religions of any kind in general – I do have a problem when the ceremony is not being participated in by a couple who sincerely believe they need to have it – and that this couple would obligate (see Danny OS’s thoughtful remarks on this) others to attend is, to my mind, not cool. I am not horribly offended by these ceremonies, just a little put off. I am also absolutely not self-absorbed or self-involved; if that were the case, I would make it a point to never attend weddings. I have instead attended, and as the pictures show, actively participated in many. This post was a way to gripe, and if it rubbed you the wrong way, you certainly didn’t have to read or comment.
Sally – Thank you very much – I didn’t know about this book/story and will be checking it out.
Thanks again for reading and commenting, everyone!