On the Market

In Search of an Academic Job in the Worst Economy since Hoover

ambiacademic

ambiacademic
Bio
ABD in Humanities, on the Job Market, going to the MLA, concerned about the state of education in the nation, and attempting to overcome a long-held ambivalence about academia.

MY RECENT POSTS

SEPTEMBER 25, 2009 7:28PM

Things I Wish They Had Said When I Started Graduate School

Rate: 2 Flag

This is what, as I enter my 8th year of graduate school (shame on me!), I wish I had heard (listened to?) when I started my climb up the Ivory Tower:

  1. Publish.  No, really. Publish. Frequently.  (Read: Even if it won't count towards your future pursuit of tenure, and totally tip your hand research-wise, do it anyway.)
  2. Finish as fast as you can.  Is normative time 5 years?  Then finish in five years.  (Read: Don't linger.  It makes you look lazy.)
  3. A solid dissertation is just as good as an ingenious one. (Read: there's time for you to be innovative later.  Land the job first.)
  4. Read your student evaluations... very very carefully. (Read: otherwise you'll get stuck and be making the same mistakes over and over again.  Then you'll make them in a job interview, and feel like a total ass when you realize that your fatal flaw is something you could have corrected 7 semesters ago.)
  5. Your students are not your friends. (Read: Which is why you shouldn't take them personally. If you do, you will inevitably look like an ass when you go for that job interview.  See #4.)
  6. "Creativity" gets you relatively nowhere. (Read: play by the rules, and only every now and then reveal how brilliant you actually are... or rather, pretend to be.)
  7. Fake it  'til you make it.  (Read: Look great for your classes--taught and taken--, meetings with faculty, your exams, everything up to your job interview;  be on time, smell nice, and smile, dammit.  Everyone knows you're surly and scared, no need to belabor the point.)
  8. Read extensively all the time even when you don't care or don't want to.  (Read: you never know when you'll be asked to teach something you know nothing about.  So keep up that subscription to Obscure Research Journal of Relatively Little Interest.)
  9. Subscribe to professional periodicals about the state of education (Read: Please follow instructions thoroughly before attempting to scale the Ivory Tower.  It is an inhospitable peak on which many people find their demise ever so rapidly.  Come prepared.  Bring Merlot.)
  10. Don't show fear.  Ever.  (Read: Gotcha.)

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I'm a political scientist who's been teaching at a regional university in Kentucky for almost twenty years. I know this is going to seem off the wall, but points 1-3 and 4-7 are prescriptions for misery (I almost put that in caps). If you're a creative person, you should be using your graduate school years to cultivate your creativity in the sense of being more skilled at creative tasks. Suppressing that side of one's personality is a prescription for misery and bitterness. The same is the case with finishing quickly. A lot of people aren't mature enough to handle tenure-track jobs after 5 years of grad school. I know I wasn't and I also know that English departments can be extremely fractious (lots of prima donnas, the comp/lit, creative writing splits, etc) and difficult to navigate for junior faculty. A little maturity could help there. Much like it's better to cultivate your abilities, it's also better to figure out your own pace and go at that pace.

Taking student evaluations seriously is a very good point. So is reading extensively. But my opinion is that a general stance of defensiveness and wariness is exhausting and ultimately counter-productive.
Don't forget: Pay attention to what's trending in jobs when you're choosing your dissertation topic. It doesn't matter if you aren't particularly interested in race, ethnicity, or the U.S. and the World. Those are the only fields in which schools are hiring.
@Ric Caric -- Thanks for your feedback! It's nice to know that not graduating in 5 years (which I haven't) is not necessarily a bad thing. And the idea of cultivating creativity in graduate school is something that I've tried to do, but ended up getting smacked for it when I was on the market last year. Perhaps it's my bitterness talking, but I haven't see a whole lot of budding academics get rewarded for their innovative research in recent years, and so I guess I've divined from that that the better route is to play it safe. But then the game would be a lot less interesting, no?

@Brooklynite -- Indeed. That point was hammered home recently with my research debacle, in which a 2006 article I *should have known about* absolutely ruined a section of my dissertation. Read. A lot. And know the field. Very good point.
I don't know. Who in academics gets much rewarded at all? In fact, academic jobs are tough jobs that don't pay that well in relation to the abilities of the people who hold them. Did I mention the nut cases and prima donnas who fill academic departments?

My point here isn't to be pessimistic about academics. Actually, it's the opposite. In fact, most of the satisfaction that people derive from academic work is "internal." It's working on materials you love, developing your own talents and abilities, helping students move forward, and things like that. Academic work is often intensely satisfying in these ways. I just love it. I have a kind of relentless enthusiasm for my job and am extremely happy I made the sacrifices I made to have an academic career.

But I don't think that academics isn't worth it if someone doesn't have those kinds of satisfactions and I just wanted to caution you about falling into the rut of sacrificing things that are extremely important.

My understanding is that tenure track jobs are very hard to get in English because of the intense competition in a heavily over-crowded field.
I'm really actually not pessimistic about academics in general-- quite the opposite. I've finally "committed" to this particular route after being quite ambivalent about it for many years. The pessimism I'm showing is related to the economy and the difficulties of landing an academic job in a world of dwindling endowments and threatened take-overs by state legislatures of entire educational systems. I know that by choosing this path, I'm going to be making some serious sacrifices, but it doesn't much matter to me, as I've found in my research (and in my teaching, but to a lesser extent) a fine modicum of satisfaction that does tend to keep me on this path.

I know about the prima donnas-- there was one in our department that did some serious damage before s/he left for greener pastures-- and hopefully I won't end up being one of them.

And, thankfully, I'm not in English. I'm in another field that is suffering a bit less than English is, but suffering nonetheless. It's a rough year all around for everyone who is attempting this route which I regard as the road less traveled. Perhaps I should start posting about the bright spots I'm seeing, rather than projecting my fears onto cyberspace.

...If only I were seeing any bright spots. Even one would suffice.
I'm going to continue this as a conversation a little bit and want to tell you what I learned and how I learned it. Beginning in my undergraduate years way back in the 70's, people told me I was capable of original work. Having grown up in a football family, I had no idea what they meant by "original work" and even less of an idea of how valuable that was in someone's life. It wasn't until I had been teaching for ten years (after 13 years of grad school by the way) and was 45 years old that I "got" originality in its full significance as I saw that my students had the same originality I had (if not more) and were just as obtuse about it as I had been. Call me thick, but I had to be in the middle of middle age before my students taught me what I'd been all along. It was at that point that I could see the miraculous and miraculously satisfying character of "coming up with your own stuff."

Obviously, you have to do what you have to do to get a job and I wouldn't want you or anyone to undercut themselves. But deriving "a fine modicum of satisfaction" from your research and intellectual creativity is a great thing--really one of the high points of being human. I think it would be a huge bright spot in anyone's life and shouldn't be underestimated.

End of sermon. Maybe I've been living in the Bible Belt too long.
@ Ric Caric: I'm going to continue this discussion in the next post. You've got me thinking.