Humdrum Star

being, rather than seeming to be

amittaizero

amittaizero
Location
United States
Birthday
January 22
Bio
Addled spew of a classical liberal pacifist freethinker born and raised in the south. A "never lived up to his potential" student who is now a high school teacher. A limited-in-stature skinny-as-a-rail nerd-o of 25 years. Of English/Welsh?/Cherokee?/African/dubious heritage. Massive sideburns (mutton or otherwise) are a man's best friend. No shaving here. Don't expect Billy Collins. Think of C.D. Wright after Billy Collins donated a smidgeon of his life-force to her. Then, of course, think of a guy. I use dashes and ellipsis...a lot - a lot. Oh, and the name... "Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people." ~ Carl Sagan

MY RECENT POSTS

DECEMBER 12, 2009 9:40PM

Opponents of Atheist Councilman Cite State Constitution

Rate: 7 Flag

In my brief blogging career I have often referenced what it is like to be a non-believer in the evangelical stronghold that is the American South.  My remarks have always been anecdotal and are humbly offered to those who are not familiar with the part of this nation. 

 

In a more particular sense, I am from the great state of North Carolina – I am a native and proud to call it my home, well, most of the time.

 

Today I was disturbed by a story I read in the December 11, 2009 edition of the Charlotte Observer (locally known as the “Charlotte Disturber”).  Cecil Bothwell, an Asheville city councilman, has recently been the recipient of good ol’ self-righteous fury.  At least one of Bothwell’s opponents is threatening to sue the city of Asheville for allowing Bothwell to be sworn in.

 

Why?

 

Bothwell happens to be an atheist. 

 

The Constitution of the State of North Carolina prohibits atheists from holding public office.

 

Asheville councilman challenged as atheist

 

 I'm not sure what's more distressing: the story itself or the comments underneath it.  

Being from the South is like having parents who sometimes forget to wear clothes when they walk outside – you love your parents, you’re proud of them, but like any other child you don’t want to see them naked – you especially don’t want others to see them naked.  Your parents are very fat because they eat bags of sugar all day long – nobody wants to see what they would look like naked. 

Also, they do a lot of really stupid stuff and don’t mind tattooing it all over their bodies.

 

Oh, North Carolina, I love you.  I work for your public school system, I volunteer in your historic sites – I literally tattooed your goddamn motto on my left forearm.  I defend you against unfair generalizations and I even saw you break away from the “Solid South” bloc in the last general election.

 

I love you as the heart of college basketball and the place where my ancestors ran whiskey stills and ran (literally) from the police.  I glowingly refer to your ability to adapt (from cotton to tobacco to textiles to banking & scientific research).  The home of the first public university in the United States and one of the first highly publicized sit-in protests against segregation.

 

Sure, our contributions to the presidency haven’t been very hot (Jackson, Polk, A. Johnson), but South Carolina also lays claim to Jackson and no one remembers the other two.

 

North Carolina.

 

I love you, but sometimes I wonder if you’ll ever love me back.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I empathize with you. I spent all day at the polling place in my precinct yesterday. I love your analogy of fat, tattooed and naked parents.
You describe the dilemma so well. BTW, the Constitution of the State of Tennessee has the same provision.
There was a good article about this in the Sunday New York Times. Apparently a number of states have this provision in their constitutions. The takeaway seems to be that these provisions are patently unconstitutional under the federal constitution but the way it works is first you have to sue, so it sort of a guilty until proven innocent deal.
The Supreme Court unanimously struck down a provision in the Maryland Const. that made a declaration in the belief of God a requirement to hold office in the state. Torasco v. Watkins (1961). As Steve said in his comment, there is no way that clause can survive a Constitutional attack and N.C. would probably never move to enforce it--it's just a pain to amend a constitution I imagine.

Looking at the comments in the article you linked, I think the ploy is to totally destroy the man's reputation. Even toothless discriminatory language can be used to cause harm. Sucks. -e