As the news filtered across the social media sphere about the death of singer Amy Winehouse I found myself strangely saddened by this loss. After all, wasn't this just another celebrity whose life had run amok in a very predictable fashion? But aside from the odd (and perhaps intentional?) fact that she died in her 27th year like the numerous other famous rock stars of the “27 Club” (including Kurt Cobain, Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, Jim Morrison and Brian Jones), something about Amy’s tragic exodus from life struck me in a distinctive way.
Even without knowing the exact cause of death, there really is very little doubt as to what ended the life of the diva most famous for refusing to go to rehab. I’m sure my first impression of, “Well I saw that one coming” on hearing the news was hardly unique.
Winehouse had attended rehab on at least three occasions even though her bluesy and instant hit song “Rehab” emphatically stated, “No, no, no”. Multiple incidences of staggering intoxication during performances and well publicized events of drug-induced insanity left nobody in doubt that this woman was in serious trouble with her addictions.
What really struck me about this death, following so closely on a horrific scene of mass slaughter in Norway was how many people opined that we should ignore Winehouse and focus instead on “real” world events; Norway, Libya, Afghanistan, Somalia, and our own tens of thousands who die from lack of health care at home. After all, what’s the death of yet another junkie celebrity when compared to these horrors?
The answer is of course there is no comparison. While every needless death is tragic, we can still manage to look at all of these terrible happenings in their own light and realize that acknowledging one does not diminish any of the others. In the case of Winehouse, aside from the fact that we all suffer in an important way when an amazing talent is taken so early, my hope is that her death will bring to the fore a new recognition of how a “war on drugs” has left far more casualties than successes.
Since drug abuse in the US alone is purported to cause 19,000 deaths a year, it is clear that this is not a problem we should be ignoring. By outlawing these substances we have only succeeded in criminalizing huge numbers of people with over a million incarcerated in this country every year—the vast majority of which are people of color.
All the while it’s obvious that the criminalization of drugs does practically nothing to stem the bad outcomes addiction wrecks—it certainly didn’t keep Winehouse away despite her own run-ins with the law. Instead black market drug money floods into the cartels, which have murdered tens of thousands and laid waste to countries across the globe, from Mexico to Afghanistan. As we learned the hard way during the disastrous period of the 18thAmendment in this country, prohibition not only doesn’t work, it fosters a criminal underclass of sociopaths who prey on the weak while reaping obscene profits.
Since Winehouse was also an alcoholic, it’s important to note the enormity of the affects of alcohol too. Abuse of booze is reported to claim nearly 35,000 US lives annually with an additional 40,000 killed in car crashes alone. The costs to productivity, health care and society are enormous.
One might ask why I’d advocate for legalizing drugs when we have such horrendous results with our perfectly legal alcohol so I’ll explain the difference.
First of all, alcohol is advertised freely and constantly. The alcohol industry spends over a billion dollars a year on getting the message out to use their products. Per the site USNoDrugs.com:
“Each year the typical young person in the United States is inundated with more than 1,000 commercials for beer and wine coolers in addition to several thousand fictional drinking incidents on television”
Obviously this depiction of liquor as safe, fun, and even sexy has an enormous effect on how much the substance is used and abused, much as the unfettered advertising of cigarettes encouraged smoking back in the day. It’s time for public perceptions to change concerning alcohol and its potential for abuse and the best way is for advertising to be curtailed and education about the consequences of misuse stepped up.
Another important point is that no one is advocating that recreational drugs be advertised. Responsible legalization efforts are clear in their message that drugs should be legal but also taxed and regulated, preferably available in pharmacy type settings with advertising of any kind forbidden. This makes sense.
The argument that a legal source of drugs will make procurement easier is simply false. I’ve have yet to meet a single drug user who had any trouble whatsoever obtaining their product. It’s out there and readily available. The sad fact is that along with the immense violence engendered by the trade, users also suffer great harm from unregulated products that vary widely in potency and are often laced with dangerous substances.
Most importantly we must ramp up our education and rehabilitation networks to have any kind of success in curbing this incredible waste of human lives. If we took the costs we plow into the drug war and directed even a small fraction of it into prevention and treatment, we’d not only save thousands of lives, we’d even help our deficit situation. One estimate is that legalizing drugs could inject $76.8 billion a year into the U.S. economy, with $44.1 billion from law enforcement savings, and at least $32.7 billion in tax revenue. This doesn’t even take into account the savings in health care costs and productivity from drug induced disease and disability. Ten years after Portugal decriminalized drugs they went from one of the worst European countries for drug abuse to cutting their usage in half as well as a huge drop in drug related crimes. One can only hope that the rest of the world will finally wake up and take notice.
Amy Winehouse obviously was a tortured soul who repeatedly failed in her attempts to get clean. It’s a sad fact that even under the best of circumstances not everyone survives their drug and alcohol addiction. She also had an amazing talent that we don’t see every day and this makes her death a great loss for the arts. The skinny white chick with the amazing gutsy voice moved thousands and she is credited with helping launch other unusually creative women artists such as Lady Gaga into the realm of musical success. At the same time, her insanity while under the influence both riveted and repelled. But in the end she simply became yet another poster child for just how devastating an unchecked spiral into addiction can be. Perhaps we can take note of this and move towards changes that can save lives and relieve suffering for millions.
While watching this informal and soulful recording of her singing “Valerie” I was moved by an alternative picture of Amy. Here, instead of the defiant and belligerent rock star, we see a vulnerable and even fragile human being who sadly got caught up in a disease that was simply a lot bigger than she was.
So rest in peace Amy Winehouse. Your battle with your demons is at an end and all we’re left with is the music.
But oh what music it is.


Salon.com
Comments
We need to be more informed on the biological aspects of addiction and methods that help over a lifetime, including pharmaceutical interventions along with support and counseling. Those who manage to stay "recovered" have my admiration and respect. Those who don't, like Amy Winehouse, have my compassion and pity. "There but for the grace of God go I," has always seemed like a good attitude to take in this sort of situation.
As far as the awful events in Norway, our hearts are big enough to grieve for everyone; but unless we have someone we love murdered we'll never know, truly, what these families face.
And we'll never know the daughter this singer's parents have lost. It is near impossible to force an adult into treatment or mental health care. Thank you for your wonderful post. I thought there was nothing I should add to it, but there I've gone and commented anyway. But it wasn't needed. Your words were perfect.
You have described exactly the things I have been feeling around the death of this tough/fragile/woman/girl.
~r
Thank you for writing this. I commented on Cranky's piece on another blog, and I raised the same issue you did, that Amy had been previously diagnosed with bi-polar, with alcholism and opiate dependency as added factors. Her death reminded me that the world held the same "death watch" on Britney Spears after her famous head shaving incident. That was when I suspect Britney was likely bi-polar, and turns out she is. I still think Charlie Sheen remains undiagnosed. The moods swings of bi-polar is the underlying cause to "self-medicate " and Robert Downy, Jr. is another living example of a bi-polar who looked like a drunk and drug addict to the world, and who would deny his on screen genius? For many, even major movie stars, it takes them getting into the hands of a good psychiatrist who can treat the depression as the primary disease, and the addictions as secondary, not the other way around.
The difference between (the personal lives) of Brittney and Amy is Spears' parents stepped in legally on all fronts. Through a court order got the horrible pap she had "adopted" out of her life, asked the court to place her under gardianship until she could manager her finances, and made sure she was taking her meds.
The poor woman had to endue being strapped on a gurney with helicopters over her house filming, during one trip to the psych ward.
I'll never be a fan of Britney Spears' music, but I congratulate her and her family on staying alive, which in the awful world of celebrity is cause to celebrate. She gets to see her children grow up.
People have to manage their own issues. If you have a genetic predisposition to addiction, then you need to be especially careful not to use addictive substances.
If we say genes absolve you of responsibility, then we are telling the Amy Winehouses of this world that they can't change.
And we open the door to the the idea that maybe someone else --- the Gov't, perhaps? --- should manage us, instead.
Neither is a scenario I like.
I was in Viet Nam the year that Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin, and Jim Morrison died. Their deaths left a huge hole in our lives then and I'm sure Amy's death will leave a similar space in the lives of twenty-somethings now.
As to legalizing drugs, all for it. Eric Weiner in his book The Geography of Bliss, said that smoking hash in a drug cafe in Rotterdam just didn't give him the same thrill that doing a doobie did in college.
Then there's the revenue possibility. A whole legal hemp industry could arise with taxes on the smokable part. The drug cartels wouldn't like it, but maybe that whole drug problem in Mexico would be controlled. Win/win.
The United Nations has an interesting report on worldwide drug conrol. (It can be found at http://www.unodc.org/documents/
wdr/WDR_2009/WDR2009_eng_web.pdf) Just the preface has a lot of info. The UN believes in more controls on organized crime and drug trafficking. They also believe addiction is a health condition, and those affected by it should not be imprisoned; and at the same time, their lives should not be sacrificed (by having no drug laws) just to lessen the strenght of the mafias. They see it as a human rights issue, that each life needs to be protected. They also point to the problem of cities out of control, and say that nations need to build infrastructures and invest in people – especially by assisting the youth, who are vulnerable to drugs and crime, with education, jobs and sport.
Portugal is interesting. Their initiatives came about because they had an extremely high rate of HIV among IV heroin users. Drug growing, trafficking, and selling is still illegal. People who buy or possess drugs (10 days' or less worth--not dealers) are brought before a social worker, a psychiatrist, and an attorney, and given either community service or rehab/treatment (depending on if they are a recreational user or an addict). Portugal has developed a network of clinics across the country, and a very extensive methadone maintenance program.
Their goal, to decrease the rates of HIV among IV drug users, has succeeded, and more people are getting treatment (at the same time it seems a little unclear if lifetime drug use has actually gone up or down).
Thanks so much for this thoughtful post...it raises a lot of difficult questions, with no clear or easy solution.
That beening said, I believe that illegal drugs is wanted by the government because it gives them power in a police state and money. If a cop think you have money on you from drugs it's gone. It's up to you to prove, later to a judge, you just sold your car or something.
Making drugs legal will not get people to go and try them. Raise your hand if you are waiting on drugs to become legal so you can try them. To the best of my memory, I believe I saw a study that said getting away with something will prompt teens to try them.
Finally, why is it that the agent, parent, GAL or somebody stepping in with people like Wine house, Spears, MJ, Vick Elvis and saying no? Are they afraid it will cut ff the cash cow? How often do you see a football player or rapper walking around with groups of people or body guards and they won 't tell them no. If I was the agent for Wine house and I got a cut of what she brought in, I would make sure she had a babysitter. I don't care if she is 7,27 or 107. When she started to self destruct I would have potted my investment by protecting her, if she liked it or not.
♥R
well, no. not more than millions of others, but they aren't famous, and are disproportionately brown and poor, so right off the american radar.
america runs on the well-tried and simple principle of 'everyone for themself, and devil take the hindmost.' indeed, this principle is explicit in the republican party platform, and submitted to by all.
winehouse couldn't handle drugs and alcohol? better dead than alive in a nation that reveres selfishness and carries war retail and wholesale to other lands in the name of 'self defense.'
Unless you have solid evidence that she did this, why bother to mention it at all? According to people who actually knew her, she was excited about attending a wedding last Saturday. Hardly the actions of someone who planned to take themselves out.
& thanks for "Valerie."