No one cares about the Palestinians ... least of all their own leaders. No one cares about the Palestinians ... certainly not their self-proclaimed "supporters."
The blame for almost all Palestinian civilian casualtiesin Gaza can be placed on Hamas. Indeed, the Gaza conflict was incited by Hamas in large part to CAUSE civilian casualties. Even Hamas is not unrealistic enough to think that launching Qassams is going to accomplish any military objectives; this entire operation is a publicity stunt for Hamas, designed to garner praise in the Arab world for "fighting back" and to garner condemnation of Israel among the European Left.
Consider the front page article in the Sunday NYTimes: A Gaza War Full of Traps and Trickery:
Hamas, with training from Iran and Hezbollah, has used the last two years to turn Gaza into a deadly maze of tunnels, booby traps and sophisticated roadside bombs. Weapons are hidden in mosques, schoolyards and civilian houses, and the leadership’s war room is a bunker beneath Gaza’s largest hospital, Israeli intelligence officials say.
Unwilling to take Israel’s bait and come into the open, Hamas militants are fighting in civilian clothes; even the police have been ordered to take off their uniforms...
Israeli officials say that they are obeying the rules of war and trying hard not to hurt noncombatants but that Hamas is using civilians as human shields in the expectation that Israel will try to avoid killing them.
... [E]ven Israel’s critics agree that Hamas’s regular use of rockets to fire at civilians in Israel, and its use of civilians as shields in Gaza, are also violations of the rules of war. Israeli military men and analysts say that its urban guerrilla tactics, including the widespread use of civilian structures and tunnels, are deliberate and come from the Iranian Army’s tactical training and the lessons of the 2006 war between Israel and Iranian-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon.
But the Israelis are doing a great deal to avoid civilian casualties:
The Israelis say they are also using new weapons, like a small-diameter smart bomb, the GBU-39, ... which is very accurate, has a small explosive, as little as 60 to 80 pounds, to minimize collateral damage in an urban area. But it can also penetrate the earth to hit bunkers or tunnels.
A new Israeli weapon, meanwhile, is tailored to the Hamas tactic of asking civilians to stand on the roofs of buildings so Israeli pilots will not bomb. The Israelis are countering with a missile designed, paradoxically, not to explode. They aim the missiles at empty areas of the roofs to frighten residents into leaving the buildings, a tactic called “a knock on the roof.
Hamas tactics are working just fine! Hamas sends its own children into the line of fire and the European and American Left reward them by criticizing the Israelis for "brutality." Because they can be counted upon to reward Hamas for using human shields, they arguably bear responsibility for encouraging the use of human shields. Ironically, the very people who pride themselves on their "concern" for Palestinian children are ensuring, through their actions, that more children will be deliberately used as cannon fodder.
No one cares about the Palestinians, least of all their "supporters." Rather than condemning the people who deliberately arranged for the deaths of innocent people, the European and American Left actually rewards them. The next time any "supporters" of the Palestinians consider how to inform the world of their "support," they might ask themselves the following question: "Will my action, writing, comments, etc. prevent the use of human shields or encourage it? If your action will encourage the use of innocent Palestinians as human shields, you should probably not do it ... but that applies only if you actually care about the Palestinians, of course.


Salon.com
Comments
Is a boycott of Israel in response to the deaths of innocent Palestinians likely to result in fewer deaths of people used as human shields or more deaths?
If you cannot be sure that it will not lead to more Palestinian civilians being used as human shields, why would you do it, especially since there is a real possibility that it will lead to more deaths?
Is criticizing Israel so satisfying that it is actually worth risking the lives of innocent Palestinians?
As an Israeli and as a human being, I wish for all sides to drop their weapons, and for both Israelis and Palestinians to be able to lead normal lives.
I am among the last to claim that everything Israel does is justified. However, people elsewhere seem to blind themselves to all the facts you so eloquently explained here.
Thanks for that, and wishes of peace to all of us...
Adva
"Three years after pulling their own citizens out of Gaza as a good will gesture, now their decision to give an inch looks like a bad one."
What many Americans do not realize is that in large parts of the Arab world compromise is view as a sign of weakness. That judgment applies to both sides. Many Arabs believe that the Palestinians should never compromise with Israel. And they also believe that any time Israel compromises, it is a sign that they are weak and ripe for attack.
That psychology is part of the reason that support among Israelis for the Gaza campaign is extraordinarily high, possibly higher than 90%. Most Israelis have concluded that giving up territory is not perceived by the Palestinians as the first step in reaching a solution. It is perceived as a sign of weakness, and therefore, as the first step toward the destruction of Israel.
"I wish for all sides to drop their weapons, and for both Israelis and Palestinians to be able to lead normal lives."
Most of the Israeli public appears to agree with you.
Those who claim to support the Palestinians should consider what is most likely to actually help the Palestinians. Innocent Palestinians are not going to be helped by rewarding Hamas for using them as human shields.
"It's important to get this type of information out"
It is an unfortunate irony that people who honestly want to draw attention to the suffering of innocent Palestinians do so in ways likely to increase the suffering of the innocent Palestinians.
Obviously, the death of any civilian is a tragedy. However, in light of the Hamas tactics designed to maximize the death of innocents and minimize the deaths of Hamas fighter, it is important to note that Hamas can't even achieve that goal. Almost two thirds of the dead are Hamas fighters.
"i don't think anyone who has seriously looked at the situation actually thinks that they are trustworthy, but that doesn't mean that israel is trustworthy"
That's it a different issue than the one in this post, though.
The issue here is what has the best chance of decreasing the number of innocent Palestinians who are killed by the conflict. Whether one side or the other is more or less trustworthy doesn't matter in determining what action Americans should take if their goal is to help innocent Palestinians.
"israel has unfortunately worked towards removing anyone that they could have actually negotiated with from the equation"
Such as?
"The avoidance behavior in the American Left is especially worrisome to me. "
It is especially distressing because it doesn't even help the people it is supposed to help.
"It takes two sides to fight."
But it takes only one side to ensure the deaths of human shields, the side that deliberately places innocent people into the line of fire.