
The Jewish holiday of Passover is less than three weeks away. This is a parody of the January 8thpiece condemning Israel for the Gaza assault written by Glenn Greenwald, a prolific and vociferous critic of Israel.
World concern over, and opposition to, the Hebrews escape from Pharoah’s Eygpt is mounting
International pressure intensified sharply on the Hebrews on Thursday, the 13th day of its Plagues assault, after the United Nations suspended food aid deliveries to Eygpt, the International Committee of the Red Cross accused Moses and Aaron of knowingly bringing down the plagues of locusts and hail and a top Vatican official defended comments in which he compared Egypt to a concentration camp.
The Hebrews have deliberately made it impossible to know the full extent of the carnage and humanitarian disasters because the widespread impact of the Ten Plagues. According to Egyptian sources, there are now 700 dead Egyptians -- at least 200 of them firstborn sons. By comparison, none of the Hebrews have died because they marked their door lintels with lamb’s blood and the Plagues “passed over” Hebrew households.
The unusually worded Red Cross condemnation of the Hebrews was prompted by its discovery, after finally being allowed into Egypt, of the Nile turned to blood, a plague of boils, and widespread cattle disease. Even with the relative "restraint" the Hebrew God is exercising (the damage He could cause is obviously much greater), this is not so much of an attempt to escape Egypt, as it is a completely one-sided massacre.
As a result, much of the world is urging an end to the Ten Plagues and acting to forge a cease-fire -- except the United States. Here, blind and unequivocal support for Moses and the Hebrew escape is actually increasing almost as fast as the Egyptian body count piles up.
The Democratic-led U.S. Senate has enacted a completely one-sided resolution that expresses unequivocal support for the Hebrew escape, and heaps all the blame for the conflict on Pharoah and none of it on the Hebrews themselves. Harry Reid -- who jointly sponsored the Resolution with GOP Leader Mitch McConnell -- proudly proclaimed: "When we pass this resolution, the United States Senate will strengthen our historic bond with the Hebrews." On its website, AIPAC is already patting the U.S. Senate on its head for "for conveying America's unequivocal and steadfast support for Hebrews right to escape."
It's hard to overstate how one-sided this resolution is. It "expresses vigorous support and unwavering commitment to the welfare, security, and survival of the Hebrews as a free people." Why should the U.S. maintain an "unwavering commitment to the welfare" of foreigners? It "lays blame both for the breaking of the 'calm' and for subsequent civilian casualties in Egypt precisely where blame belongs, that is, on Pharoah and his refusal to free the Hebrews." It repeatedly mentions the various sins of Pharoah -- from slavery to murder -- but does not mention a single syllable of criticism for the Hebrews. In the world of the U.S. Congress, neither the Ten Plagues nor the devastating parting of the Red Sea and subsequent drowning of the Egyptian soldiers was even mentioned.
The Resolution demands that Pharoah take multiple steps towards peaceful resolution but demands that the Hebrews do absolutely nothing. It purports to call for a cease-fire in which the Egyptians make all the concessions and the Hebrews make none. Worst of all -- in light of the Red Cross condemnation of the drowning of Egyptian soldiers -- the Resolution disgustingly praises the Hebrews conduct of the escape.
This one-sided "pro-Hebrew" bipartisan inflaming of tensions by the U.S. is nothing new. A Long-time Middle East negotiator, in Newsweek, earlier this week made one of the most startling revelations in some time -- that in all the time the U.S. has supposedly been attempting to forge a peace agreement between Pharoah and Moses over the past 25 years, it never once, in any meaningful way, raised with Hebrew leaders the damage to the Egyptian economy that comes from the loss of slaves. Specifically, said the negotiator: "I can't recall one meeting where we had a serious discussion with Moses or Aaron about the damage that undermining slavery — including the shortage of domestic servants or the cessation of pyramid building — does to the peacemaking process."
The negotiator emphasized that by being so blindly supportive even of misguided Hebrew actions, "the United States has allowed that special bond to become exclusive in ways that undermine America's, and the Hebrews’, national interests." The only way the U.S. can play a constructive role in the Middle East, he argues, is if it is even-handed and, most importantly, willing to criticize the actions of Hebrew leaders Moses and Aaron when they harm American interests and pressure them to stop.
Yet here we have, yet again, exactly the opposite behavior. At exactly the time that worldwide horror over the Ten Plagues is at its peak, Congress steps up to announce to the world: "this is our war, too; we support whatever the Hebrews do absolutely and without reservations." We thus make the Hebrew’s wars our wars; its enemies our enemies; its intractable disputes our disputes; and the hostility and anger it generates our own. And we embolden the Hebrews to continue further.
As another blogger has written: "We're looking into whether any senator was bold enough to decline to co-sponsor the measure." It will be a surprise if there were any. Many members of Congress still remain pitifully afraid that Moses will accuse them of being anti-Semitic if they dare oppose the actions of the Hebrew God, even in the name of U.S. interests.
Whatever the motives, for America to blindly support Hebrews unjustified behavior does not serve Hebrews interests and -- most importantly -- does not serve America's. Blind support for ending slavery isn't "friendship," nor is enabling destructive behavior like the Ten Plagues. It's subservience. And few things are as harmful or as unjust as the cowardly, lockstep behavior of both major American political parties when it comes to supporting the flight of the Hebrews from Egypt.


Salon.com
Comments
Other than that, however, I find this piece somewhat troubling, parody though it claims to be. Specifically, I find it somewhat morally problematic (and frankly non-sensical) to suggest an equation between the Egyptians of Exodus with the Palestinians currently in Gaza. Indeed, I think your post trivializes the brutality that the Gazans recently suffered at the hand of Israel.
But perhaps I have just been drinking too deeply from the deep well of Glenn's Kool-Aid.
"Specifically, I find it somewhat morally problematic (and frankly non-sensical) to suggest an equation between the Egyptians of Exodus with the Palestinians currently in Gaza."
Oh, I'm not trying to equate the two. I just used that example to demonstrate that as far as Greenwald is concerned Israel can never do anything right. If he were reporting the Passover story, he would blame the Hebrews for disrupting the Egyptian economy by escaping slavery (not to mention the death and hardship caused by the Ten Plagues).
"Read Greenwald more closely and fairly."
Greenwald has an irrational hatred and hysterical fear of Israel and Jews. I'm hardly the first person to point it out.
Really? Or is just that he's criticizing something you hold dear and that bothers you. Greenwald has made some pointed criticisms of the Obama administration that annoyed me because I'm this presidency's success is important to me, being African-American among other reasons. when I read his blog, while I may disagree with some of his opinions, I don't think he's doing it out of an irrational fear of Obama. He's doing what he does. Questioning action or positions he finds troublesome no matter who the party is taking those actions.
By the way the argument could be made that the Israelis are more like the ancient Egyptians than the Palestinians.
"Or is just that he's criticizing something you hold dear"
No, criticism of the Israelis is not off limits. Hysteria, fear and innuendo are off limits. Read his stuff. If you had no idea who he was talking about, it would still come across as irrational and hysterical.
Dr. Amy has a staff.
The whispering soliloquies
comes doesn't proceed from "Amy" Doc.
Who really wears the britches and Yarmulke?
Amy 'stutters' and shows a depth of:`O, I IMPUGN YA!
The commonalities are familiar. The attacks. No humor. Yikes!
There is ugly authoritarianism. Loathe. Parsimony? Oh, Bigotry!
Polemic. Abrasive. Defamation. Character Assassination. UGH!
A base attack from a paid, modern era, 'cut-throat' zapper. Observe.
Ya anti-burgher.
Toffee is distributed?
Liberty. Free @ AIPAC?
GOP and neocon love wars.
Lies. Bloody. Chew flesh. 0.
Gizzard breath. Bloody lips.
Homer depicts. Blatant hate.
anti-truth? huh. O. Tortoise.
Talons in Eagle drop a shell.
Nature clunk on a noggin, O!
Nature. O, ricocheting shame.
O, languish on deathbed, OY!
Wonder on a Judgement Day.
"because Americans who are critical of Israel's policies are never hounded out of the media or kept out of public office in the USA."
You sound just like Greenwald. That particular innuendo is a very good example of the irrationality and hysteria. You (and Greenwald) criticize friends of Israel for exercising the exact same rights that other Americans exercise. The Saudis have lobbying groups, the NRA tells its members who to vote for and how to exert political pressure, and the Pope tries to tell Catholics how to vote. Yet Greenwald makes it sound like the friends of Israel are doing something unusual and sinister. Why is that?
"Is Glenn Greenwald an anti-Semite?"
In my opinion, he definitely is. That's because he holds Israelis and Jews to a special standard that he does not apply to anyone else.
I was just wondering this afternoon if you ever accuse those people in Israel who protested against the unjust slaughter of innocents in Gaza as anti-semitic too? Can you not distinguish between a right wing government in Israel and the right wing government in the United Sates?
You're like a Christian who thinks that anyone who didn't vote for George W. Bush is going straight to hell in a handbasket.
Look, I happen to think Greenwald was correct in his analysis and you're blinded by your faith in a right wing government that is equivalent to Cheney, Rumsfield et al. I don't really care whether you dress up right wing fundamentalist governments as Jewish, as Mormon, as Christian or as muslim anymore. But this crew start wars because they love war. Not because they care about the murder of innocent children. Not because they're really trying to protect the long-term security interests of Israel.
And by the way, I'm Jewish. I trust Glenn Greenwald's analysis of the unjust murder of Palestinians, and wish you could update your thinking and not see attacks on a right wing government as an automatic attack on the entire state Israel.
Real hard hitting commentary (not).
have you seen this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hzqw7oBZT8k
do you hate it?
Should I even ask? The filmmaker is Israeli, but you think your way is the only way of supporting Israel....He has a different way of supporting Israel: by critiquing it where it's wrong.
I'm sorry that you can't admit that you've been on the wrong side of this conflict for months now. I wish you could just admit that you made a mistake and get on with things...You're better than this.
"Please prove your claims of irrational hatred and hysterical fear!"
Among other things, he has asked people who comment on his posts to identify themselves by religion so he can dismiss the ones from Jews.
WTF does that have to do with him writing about hatred and irrational fear? He has not done that, just becuase you say so, doesn't mean it's true, you are a cronic "maker uper of stories", so provide me with a link to his words.
If so, I comprehend completely. I get that a lot.
before you dismiss this report as anti-semitic, consider how the Israeli peace movement--including women for peace in Israel have been marginalized by hawks like yourself. (5:35 in the tape...2000 Israeli women and Palestinian women marching together for peace.)
"Among other things, he has asked people who comment on his posts to identify themselves by religion so he can dismiss the ones from Jews."
where?
"Among other things, he has asked people who comment on his posts to identify themselves by religion so he can dismiss the ones from Jews."-
She can't. She makes stuff up.
How can you support international decisions only when they go one way? And if you support the illegal occupation of Palestine for 40 years what do you see as a long-term strategy for peace in the middle east? Israel continues to build Jewish only settlements in the West Bank and the United States refuses to confront the right wing government's decision to continue the settlement building, which directly interferes with all plans for the so-called two state solution. If there is no two state solution for Israel and Palestine, what is the solution you imagine? And, by the way, many right wing Republican senators in the United States have said as much: they don't desire a two state government in Israel. The right wing government forming now has also stated that it is against a two state solution). So what is the solution? An endless occupation? Generation after generation wasted because they happen to be born to Muslim parents in an illegally occupied country?
I can't believe that any humanitarian would take the position you are defending.
On January 4, 2009 in the comments section for his post Orwell, blinding tribalism, selective Terrorism, and Israel/Gaza, Greenwald replied to substantive comments questioning his claims by writing:
"Do you have any particular attachment to Israel -- emotional, cultural and/or religious -- which makes you view it as more than just another foreign country?"
He didn't address the substantive issues; he asked for personal information about the writers, suggesting that he thinks those characteristics matter, and not so subtly questioning the loyalty of Americans who also support Israel.
Other people called him out on this comment.
"my fundamental question for you is this: if you agree with the international decision to establish Israel in the first place (which I also happen to agree with) then how do you intellectually defend the internationally determined illegal occupation of the west bank for 40 years?"
What's illegal about winning territory in a defensive war? Why didn't anyone complain about the "illegal occupation" of the West Bank when the Jordanians conquered it? Why did the Arabs launch several wars to destroy Israel BEFORE the West Bank was captured?
Read that carefully, and reconsider your comments.
At least twice as many.
Funny.
Doc Amy, you too often mistake fair criticism from activists as "the judgment of the international community." For every crime ever committed, anyone can find an example of someone else who got away with it. You know that such 'evidence' is morally bankrupt.
Actively criticizing Israel's actions against Gaza and Lebanon in the latter part of this decade is no different than criticizing the U.S.'s actions in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan or standing up against the Russian invasion of Georgia or Robert Mugabe's reign in Zimbabwe or China's horrendous human rights record. Criticism alone is not 'holding a country to a different standard.' Besides, just like with all those above mentioned cases, none of the powerful aggressors are being held accountable by any sort of international body. The only ones speaking out are the relatively powerless protesters. I agree that some critics of Israeli policy hold that country's government to an higher standard than other nations, but I also think that there are many critics with important things to say that are vocal and fair in their critiques of the Knesset and other domestic and foreign governments.
"the fact that Israel is judged by a different standard than all other countries"
Fact? Proof? Data?
None.
Anyway...
Nice Job Dr Amy!
Masterful Trolling!
Bravo!
*clap clap*
Take a look at this link -- it's a good discussion of leftist anti-Semitism, coming from a leftist himself:
http://www.yale.edu/yiisa/workingpaper/hirsh/David%20Hirsh%20YIISA%20Working%20Paper1.pdf
how about
-- the claim of "Israeli apartheid"
-- campaigns to boycott Israel (and no one else)
-- claims that Israel has no right to exist as a Jewish state
-- incessant claims about "Israeli war crimes" (where are the similar complaints about Sri Lanka? or about the battles of Falluja in 2004? or the fighting in numerous parts of Africa?)
-- when an errant Israeli bomb kills 20, it's front-page news and everyone gets outraged -- and when an errant U.S. bomb kills 80 in Afghanistan, no such news
-- strong tendency to assume the worst about Israel (the non-massacre in Jenin, the non-bombing of a U.N. school ...)
-- the issue of "proportionate response" -- how come we never heard such complaints about Iraq?
-- count the number of critical articles about Gaza vs. Darfur
I could go on and on.
Every year we sit down by the Seder Table with friends and family and ask ourselves, Why is this night different from all other nights?
We ask this as we follow ancient rituals and create new ones, designed to remind us of the bitterness of slavery and the sweetness of freedom, and we consider how all of this might be relevant in our world today.
Some make the connection to the Israeli occupation; others hold it in their hearts, but do not bring it up for fear of the response they might get.
This year should be different. This year all of us should ask and listen as well.
Why is this year different from all other years?
Because there is a new government in Washington that opens the door, ever so slightly, to a diplomatic agreement.
Because there is a new government in Israel, with a hardened heart, that intends to close that door shut.
Because so many Palestinians have lost their lives or their homes in the last year in Gaza.
This year is different. It will be different if we make it so.
We have asked Rabbi Lynn Gottlieb, co-founder of Shomer Shalom and a member of JVP's Advisory Board, to reconsider the 4 questions in light of the struggle for a just peace in Israeli and Palestinian. The result is this powerful one-page Haggadah insert that you can download, print out and read at your Seder.
We can't imagine a more powerful place to start asking questions.
On behalf of all of us at Jewish Voice for Peace, we wish you a Chag Sameach!
Happy Holiday!
Jewish Voice for Peace
alright Doc. You've made you're point. The wisdom of the ego is not something for public display. And that's the only kind of wisdom you display in these political posts.
The Wisdom of the Ego by George Vaillant
Dr. Tuteur, read it!
And Glenn is no anti-semite. He may be guilty of letting his ego's wisdom get the better of him but it's understandable when as a jew he has to maneuver around the lie that Israel represents Jews.
It absolutely does not.