THE WOLFPACK (THREE GIRLS AND A DOG)

Views From the Cynical Side of the Aisle

Andy Wolfenson

Andy Wolfenson
Location
Randolph, New Jersey, United States
Birthday
December 04
Title
Attorney
Company
NJ's Best Little Law Firm
Bio
Frustrated wanna-be sportswriter who, in his spare time from traveling from courtroom to courtroom and driving his kids to soccer games, occasionally pens blogs about sports, the Yankees, and other topics.

Andy Wolfenson's Links

Salon.com
Editor’s Pick
NOVEMBER 19, 2009 9:05AM

There's a "New Moon" Out Tonight

Rate: 6 Flag

     There are three types of people in this country today:

      1.   Those who are between the ages of 13 and 25 or who have contact on a regular basis with people of those ages.

     2.   Those who read magazines such as "People", "Us", "InTouch", the rags such as "The National Enquirer" or watch television shows like "Entertainment Tonight", "Extra", and the like.

    3.   Anyone else.

     As all of the people in categories 1 and 2 are acutely aware, the cinematic phenomenon known as "New Moon" arrives in theaters at the stroke of midnight tonight. The continuing saga of star-crossed lovers Edward the Vampire and Bella the Simpleton is an extension of the "Twilight" film, and is the film adaptation of the second book in the series of the same name. And this movie promises, based on the extraordinary amount of hype that it has generated, to blow past the original and set a new standard for vampire-movie box office receipts.

    I must confess that I have not read the books. Of course, being a male in my mid-40's I do not know if I would have even been permitted to read them as I am clearly out of the saga's demographic. I did, however, watch the first movie on DVD with my daughters. And while I thought it was a decent movie, I did not believe that it was "all that", as so many teens and twenty-somethings seemed to believe.

   Of course, movie adaptations often do not do justice to the penned versions of the stories, so we can assume that the book was far better, at least in its exploration of the depth of its characters, than the movie. To me, however, the movie was little more than a love story between good, confused girl and bad boy, with the added twist that his skin glistens like diamonds in sunlight and he prefers drinking blood over beer. And the vacant stare of the vampire's eyes could be equalled only by the vacant space inbetween poor Bella's ears.

    As everyone in categories 1 and 2, above, are aware, Bella falls madly in love with Edward despite the fact that he is, as was so eloquently stated by the late Michael Jackson in "Thriller", the seminal man/creature - human/woman love story, "not like the other guys". And to show the (lack of) depth of her character, there is no rhyme or reason to the love, other than to have us assume that he uses some type of hypnotic power over her.

     Here's how I saw it - Edward and his siblings walk into the room. They are all dressed in black, but he is dressed all in white - symbolism alert, people!! She sees him again later in science class, and tries to engage him in conversation. He then disappears from school for some time - coincidentally, right about the same time as the little town in Washington experiences an apparently unprecedented three straight days of sunlight.

    That's it. I guess that the "playing hard to get" theory really does work sometimes. He returns to school when the clouds roll back in, and she's smitten. Sure, he stopped that truck from hitting her with his lightning-fast reflexes, but there was nothing else. Yet, he becomes her everything, even in the face of the obvious vampire-person conflict. Other vampires try to kill her (or make her into the undead) and still she is undaunted. Even Edward's own family members check out her pasty-white skin and visualize it as an appetizer. I guess the underlying reason is that she really, really hates her father and really, really does not want to live with him.

    And then there is her friend, the wolf-boy. I am, of course, partial to him (the last name, get it?) and it certainly appears that he and his shirtless chest get much more airtime in this film. At least that is what the previews and commercials would have us believe. The actor playing the wolf, Taylor Lautner, has apparently already eclipsed (moon joke, get it?) Edward/Robert Pattinson as the new teenybopper heartthrob.

     More importantly, however, every boy and man should be jealous of him because he is, according to all of the reliable sources (People, ET, Extra, etc.) dating singer Taylor Swift. Other than Kanye West, I defy you to find a single person who has a bad thing to say about Ms. Swift. The girl is utterly adorable. Lucky wolf-six-pack-washboard-abs boy.

     Tonight, when the clock strikes 12, fans across this great land of ours will stream into theaters to be the first to witness this piece of celluloid magic. Included in that throng of fans will be a certain 21-year old friend of mine, who has already made plans to see the movie three times this week and every weekend thereafter until it closes. Of course, she sleeps with a giant life-size cut-out of Mr. Edward in her bedroom (a gift from yours truly) so she's a little, how shall we say, obsessed. Also included is a 24-year old friend of mine, who assures me that he is going to the movie with seven female friends. As such, I cannot question his manhood, and only  hope for his sake that at least one of the women needs some form of comforting when the drama strikes.

   There's a "New Moon" out tonight. And then tomorrow, the world will be full of tired teens and twenty-somethings. Let's hope that the film lives up to its pre-release press. At least for the fans' sake. And, moreover, for the sanity of their parents and boyfriends.

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Her family must not like him. That makes him irresistible. (And your daughters aren't making you take them??? Lucky guy!)
I'm 73...and I have read all four books and loved 'em. (The first was a bit tough to take, but the series grew on me.)

The guy playing Edward (the character I most liked) sucks big time. I really wish someone else had been chosen. The young girl playing Bella is doing a banner job.
Pilgrim - my oldest is going with a friend tomorrow - I assume that it would not be "cool" to go with parents. But if she comes back with a good report, odds are that the other two may ask us to take them. So don't completely count me out yet.

Frank - Since you enoyed the books so much, I hope that you also feel that movies do them justice. As far as Pattinson's portayal of Edward, he's pretty one-dimensional and completely creepy. Guess that is what they were looking for.
I read the books. I kept seeing my students passing the books on the hallways and curiosity got the better of me. If you didn't like the movie the books will not fare much better. It's a teenage phenomenon that spills over to older women because they all remember what it was like to be in love with the school's bad boy. The vampire is the quintessential bad boy. And women are archetypically drawn to him because they are meant to "save him". But if anyone likes the genre there are better books out there, indeed. Good article.
You would think that the books would contain greater exploration of the characters' depths, but no. Edward is perfect and shiny. Bella cares only to be with him and seems to have no other interests or desires.
Ladies - thank you - now, even if I had an inkling to read the books, I know better. Although I must admit I am surprised that there is no depth to the characters in the books - I understand the difficulty in deep exploration in a two-hour film, but the books should contain so much more, one would think.
No depth of character in 700 pages? None. The whole thing is about how Edward thinks he's a soulless monster and Bella is his angel. Oh, and about collarbones and "planes of icy chest." Honestly.
I read the books on vacation this summer while we were camping in Olympic National Park... it just seemed to fit since we were there where the books take place. A bit silly. No, a lot silly. I love books, my house is full of them, and I realized that after vacation I just didn't need to give house room to these. I donated them to the library.

I watched the first movie on Netflix. I love a good popcorn romance as much as the next girl, but this one just never got off the ground. To quote a friend of mine, I just kept waiting for it to be better than it was, and it wasn't. I couldn't suspend my disbelief and be swept away into a teen vampire movie... spotty acting kept yanking me out of the story and back into my TV room.

The movie is running at 44% on Rotten Tomatoes. I love a good snark in a bad movie review, and here are some of my favorites:

"The Twilight Saga: New Moon takes the tepid achievement of Twilight, guts it, and leaves it for undead."

"This episode is as repetitive as the first, with endless scenes of kissus interruptus punctuated by moody indie-rock songs."

"A juvenile, overly dramatic love story that takes the Romeo and Juliet theme, duct tapes it around a giant, cartoonish hammer, and slams it into your head for 130 minutes."
Here's another bit of wonderful snark from Roger Ebert:

"The movie includes beauteous fields filled with potted flowers apparently buried hours before by the grounds crew, and nobody not clued in on the plot. Since they know it all and we know all, sitting through this experience is like driving a pickup in low gear though a sullen sea of Brylcreem."

Sounds like a movie that will make an excellent drinking game some day.
V - maybe "planes of icy chest" have their proper time and place, although I cannot think of any examples right now.

Froggy - if the reviews that you are referencing are truly indicative of the film's lack of quality, then there are going to be a tremendous amount of horny and unsatisfied teenage boys out there who have been waiting for their girlfriends to be all excited about Edward and wolf-boy.

Wait a minute, what am I saying? Plot means nothing, apparently. He takes his shirt off in the film, I think. That's all they need. The character depth may be limited to the depth of the ripples in his six-pack abs, which would still be deeper than Edward's.
In just a few short hours, the RottenTomatoes.com rating has fallen from 44% to 34%. Looks like a serious stinker.
Froggy - it could go to zero - and it won't matter. I was just speaking to one of my "Twilight-ers" and he indicated that the reviews for the first one weren't good either. Nothing is going to stop these kids from plunking down their $11 (give or take) to see the movie. And that doesn't even count the millions of $$ to be made from merchandising such as t-shirts, etc.
My daughter was hooked on the books, so I read them and really enjoyed them, so my husband (50+) read them and really enjoyed them. As far as the movies, neither of the two stars can act their way out of a wet paper bag. At least in the book Stella DID have a personality - what's her bucket has one facial expression - EVER.
Still plan on going to see it at some point this weekend ;)
Oh gag. Vapid teenage bullshit wrapped in syrupy anti-feminism. Just what I want to waste my time on. :roll.

BTW, "she sleeps with a giant life-size cut-out of Mr. Edward in her bedroom" is simultaneously the most terrifying and hilarious thing I have seen written all damn day.
Blue - you'll have to report back on how the movie fared vis-a-vis the book.

Ash - I will accept your compliment about the cut-out comment, but in reality I found your statement about "vapid teenage bullshit" perhaps the funniest and best assessment I have read all day. Thank you.
I read the first book and loved it. I suffered through the other 3--they lacked the inspiration of the first one. But I enjoyed the movie and plan to see New Moon (although I won't be rushing out at midnight tonight--even if I wanted to I'd be too tired after taking my daughter to the Miley Cyrus concert!) And the best thing that came out of my reading of Twilight was my discovery of True Blood on HBO--now that's something the underaged set can't go near.
I'm definitely in the number 3 category...and there are enough sucking people in real life, no real interest in the movie. I heard it advertised on the radio in the car but until I read your blog I didn't know it was about vampires...rated.
Karin - Miley and "New Moon"? - the teenage girl's double header.

Leonde - sometimes ignorance really is bliss.
He is the "Ken Doll" of every little girls' dreams, even better than a Unicorn 'cause he doesn't sport any sort of member. Little girls grow into big ones and their tastes seem to atrophy at about the age of 12.
Somehow... I think I'll be able to give this one a miss. Anyone who makes the undead sparkle has already lost a large part of my implicit reader to author trust.

I listened to the first book, and was interested enough to keep listening. But I truly don't understand how anyone as daft as Bella can keep a guy who's actually nearly 118 interested in her for more than ten minutes. A century of waiting and he wouldn't like someone a little more... sophisticated?

But good post. Rated.
Went to the midnight movie--it was so-so, two thumbs sideways. Those who love the series will likely like it. It's neither wow nor horrible, tends to be somewhat slow for the most part.
Earlier this year, my husband added Twilight to his Netflix queue. He likes vampire flicks. I was surprised because I'd heard of the awful books and wondered why he'd add it. When I asked him about it, he had no clue about the books or the story. He doesn't like to know anything about movies before he watches them, so he only finds out the basic story. I decided not to tell him about the books. Movie arrives and he watches it. I asked him how the movie was. He says something along the lines that it was a piece of crap movie for teenage girls. I think he was expecting something more like Blade. We both got a good laugh out of it. I don't think he's going to fall for New Moon this time.
Shiral - looks like you won't be missing much. I thank you for your kind words and for your recognition of Bella's lack of character or depth. Some people, however, seem to believe that she is a true representation of teenage girls. If that is the case, we are in trouble.

Kathy - you are correct. There are those who will go see it no matter what the "buzz" about the film becomes.

KS - your husband is a brave man. I watched the first one with my girls, but already knew what I was getting into after hearing about it again and again from my assistant - the person I referred to in the blog who is obsessed with the series.
My daughter loved the books and although she reads constantly I am always happy when she is really enjoying a series. So I started reading the books and though I was skeptical I was hooked right away. Very much page-turners. Not great literature, but I have to laugh at people who make such a big deal of this. I have owned my own business for 20 years and I am a feminist, thank you very much. It is just an old fashioned romance! Get over it! It is just big goofy romantic fun. If you don't get it, fine. But there is nothing wrong with it. Bella is strong in her own way. I don't get the whole idea of her as helpless. Though the writing may not be the greatest, the story is very compelling. There is a plot and it was a lot of fun and engaging. I don't think the movies will play well for those who haven't read the books, but having read them I thoroughly enjoyed the movies. Looking forward to the next one!
As a partial follow-up to all of those who have criticized the acting in the movies, last night we watched "Adventureland", which starred the girl who plays Bella - and she actually can act. In fact, she exihibited more range in ten minutes of "Adventureland" than in the entire "Twilight" movie - just an observation.
Criticizing the Twilight stories because they appeal to swooning teen-aged girls is like criticizing Barney the Dinosaur because he appeals to thumb-sucking toddlers. If you're hoping for an intellectually stimulating experience tailored to a grown-up audience, choose something else.

I'm with MWP on this one. It is just big goofy romantic fun. Nothin' wrong with that. I've read the books and I've seen the first movie. I'm waiting for the lines to thin before going to see the second one, but I surely do plan to go see it.
FT44- understand that my main critique, based on my viewing of the first film (and as confirmed by many) is the lack of character development. I simply find Bella to be a bad role model for teenage girls - and as the father of three daughters, it is important to me that they think more of themselves, their abilities, and what they can accomplish in life than this character apparently does.
Hi, Andy. I didn't mean to rain on your blog. Sorry. I actually agree with your take on the story line in New Moon. Based on reading the book, that is; like I said, I haven't seen the movie yet. In fact I think the whole Twilight saga is kind of dumb, from an adult perspective.

"Vegetarian" vampires that glitter in the sunlight? oh, come ON! haha

And yet ... my now-college-aged daughter was one of the swooning teenaged girls who obsessed over Edward, sneered at Jacob (for being a girlfriend-seducing interloper, I think), and empathized wholeheartedly with Bella's angst. She brought all four books home from her school library so I could read them too, and she and I spent a fine evening on the town together, going out to dinner and then watching a midnight showing of Twilight when it was first released a couple of years ago.

They are dumb stories, yes. But they are also fun, light reading. And what a wonderful springboard they have been to fascinating conversations with my daughter: about how people ought to treat each other, about power struggles within relationships, about the many-a-slip-between-the-cup-and-the-lip that happens when popular books are morphed into popular movies ... and many other things.

Not all characters in books are necessarily role models. You can learn from them without becoming them.
I'm a number 3, I could give a fuck!
My youngest daughter dug the Elves in the "Lord of the Rings". This was long before the movie versions. I asked her why and she said that they seemed cool. So far as I was concerned, the elves were a bunch of faggy, selfish dweebs but I suppose everyone is allowed to read what they will into the characters. It pains me that little girls are reading tripe like this ( Twilight) rather than nearly anything else.
@ Andy Wolfenson. I wrote a review about the movie on this site myself. It was awful. I watched the movie at home...online. I am not ashamed to say that either. It would have been a monumental waste of money to see it in theaters. The acting is robotic. The female lead only seems to know how to portray sadness with one type of facial expression. As human beings we can show that we are sad, happy or mad in a myriad of ways but this girl only could show her feelings in one specific facial expression. I began to thing this girl had to be a monster in disguise, there is no way she is that lifeless.

If the books are close to the adaptation of this movie then it would be best that no one ever reads them. I didnt get the hype and maybe cause I am young man in my upper twenties and couldnt find a single female in the movie worth keeping my attention like so many young teenage hearts love the wolf boy and the vampire dude. I think the only part I actually liked about the movie was the brief bits of action, but that is it. Vampires can be cool though, I still remember the WB supernatural series "Angel" pretty fondly.
Scanner - in this case, as I have already said, "ignorance is bliss"

Darryl - Amen, brother

Ran - seems like we are on the same page - I am sure that your review is far more detailed than mine and therefore considers the actual film's actual merits (assuming there are any) as well as the drawbacks we both seem to have identified, and will check it out now