There are three types of people in this country today:
1. Those who are between the ages of 13 and 25 or who have contact on a regular basis with people of those ages.
2. Those who read magazines such as "People", "Us", "InTouch", the rags such as "The National Enquirer" or watch television shows like "Entertainment Tonight", "Extra", and the like.
3. Anyone else.
As all of the people in categories 1 and 2 are acutely aware, the cinematic phenomenon known as "New Moon" arrives in theaters at the stroke of midnight tonight. The continuing saga of star-crossed lovers Edward the Vampire and Bella the Simpleton is an extension of the "Twilight" film, and is the film adaptation of the second book in the series of the same name. And this movie promises, based on the extraordinary amount of hype that it has generated, to blow past the original and set a new standard for vampire-movie box office receipts.
I must confess that I have not read the books. Of course, being a male in my mid-40's I do not know if I would have even been permitted to read them as I am clearly out of the saga's demographic. I did, however, watch the first movie on DVD with my daughters. And while I thought it was a decent movie, I did not believe that it was "all that", as so many teens and twenty-somethings seemed to believe.
Of course, movie adaptations often do not do justice to the penned versions of the stories, so we can assume that the book was far better, at least in its exploration of the depth of its characters, than the movie. To me, however, the movie was little more than a love story between good, confused girl and bad boy, with the added twist that his skin glistens like diamonds in sunlight and he prefers drinking blood over beer. And the vacant stare of the vampire's eyes could be equalled only by the vacant space inbetween poor Bella's ears.
As everyone in categories 1 and 2, above, are aware, Bella falls madly in love with Edward despite the fact that he is, as was so eloquently stated by the late Michael Jackson in "Thriller", the seminal man/creature - human/woman love story, "not like the other guys". And to show the (lack of) depth of her character, there is no rhyme or reason to the love, other than to have us assume that he uses some type of hypnotic power over her.
Here's how I saw it - Edward and his siblings walk into the room. They are all dressed in black, but he is dressed all in white - symbolism alert, people!! She sees him again later in science class, and tries to engage him in conversation. He then disappears from school for some time - coincidentally, right about the same time as the little town in Washington experiences an apparently unprecedented three straight days of sunlight.
That's it. I guess that the "playing hard to get" theory really does work sometimes. He returns to school when the clouds roll back in, and she's smitten. Sure, he stopped that truck from hitting her with his lightning-fast reflexes, but there was nothing else. Yet, he becomes her everything, even in the face of the obvious vampire-person conflict. Other vampires try to kill her (or make her into the undead) and still she is undaunted. Even Edward's own family members check out her pasty-white skin and visualize it as an appetizer. I guess the underlying reason is that she really, really hates her father and really, really does not want to live with him.
And then there is her friend, the wolf-boy. I am, of course, partial to him (the last name, get it?) and it certainly appears that he and his shirtless chest get much more airtime in this film. At least that is what the previews and commercials would have us believe. The actor playing the wolf, Taylor Lautner, has apparently already eclipsed (moon joke, get it?) Edward/Robert Pattinson as the new teenybopper heartthrob.
More importantly, however, every boy and man should be jealous of him because he is, according to all of the reliable sources (People, ET, Extra, etc.) dating singer Taylor Swift. Other than Kanye West, I defy you to find a single person who has a bad thing to say about Ms. Swift. The girl is utterly adorable. Lucky wolf-six-pack-washboard-abs boy.
Tonight, when the clock strikes 12, fans across this great land of ours will stream into theaters to be the first to witness this piece of celluloid magic. Included in that throng of fans will be a certain 21-year old friend of mine, who has already made plans to see the movie three times this week and every weekend thereafter until it closes. Of course, she sleeps with a giant life-size cut-out of Mr. Edward in her bedroom (a gift from yours truly) so she's a little, how shall we say, obsessed. Also included is a 24-year old friend of mine, who assures me that he is going to the movie with seven female friends. As such, I cannot question his manhood, and only hope for his sake that at least one of the women needs some form of comforting when the drama strikes.
There's a "New Moon" out tonight. And then tomorrow, the world will be full of tired teens and twenty-somethings. Let's hope that the film lives up to its pre-release press. At least for the fans' sake. And, moreover, for the sanity of their parents and boyfriends.


Salon.com
Comments
The guy playing Edward (the character I most liked) sucks big time. I really wish someone else had been chosen. The young girl playing Bella is doing a banner job.
Frank - Since you enoyed the books so much, I hope that you also feel that movies do them justice. As far as Pattinson's portayal of Edward, he's pretty one-dimensional and completely creepy. Guess that is what they were looking for.
I watched the first movie on Netflix. I love a good popcorn romance as much as the next girl, but this one just never got off the ground. To quote a friend of mine, I just kept waiting for it to be better than it was, and it wasn't. I couldn't suspend my disbelief and be swept away into a teen vampire movie... spotty acting kept yanking me out of the story and back into my TV room.
The movie is running at 44% on Rotten Tomatoes. I love a good snark in a bad movie review, and here are some of my favorites:
"The Twilight Saga: New Moon takes the tepid achievement of Twilight, guts it, and leaves it for undead."
"This episode is as repetitive as the first, with endless scenes of kissus interruptus punctuated by moody indie-rock songs."
"A juvenile, overly dramatic love story that takes the Romeo and Juliet theme, duct tapes it around a giant, cartoonish hammer, and slams it into your head for 130 minutes."
"The movie includes beauteous fields filled with potted flowers apparently buried hours before by the grounds crew, and nobody not clued in on the plot. Since they know it all and we know all, sitting through this experience is like driving a pickup in low gear though a sullen sea of Brylcreem."
Sounds like a movie that will make an excellent drinking game some day.
Froggy - if the reviews that you are referencing are truly indicative of the film's lack of quality, then there are going to be a tremendous amount of horny and unsatisfied teenage boys out there who have been waiting for their girlfriends to be all excited about Edward and wolf-boy.
Wait a minute, what am I saying? Plot means nothing, apparently. He takes his shirt off in the film, I think. That's all they need. The character depth may be limited to the depth of the ripples in his six-pack abs, which would still be deeper than Edward's.
Still plan on going to see it at some point this weekend ;)
BTW, "she sleeps with a giant life-size cut-out of Mr. Edward in her bedroom" is simultaneously the most terrifying and hilarious thing I have seen written all damn day.
Ash - I will accept your compliment about the cut-out comment, but in reality I found your statement about "vapid teenage bullshit" perhaps the funniest and best assessment I have read all day. Thank you.
Leonde - sometimes ignorance really is bliss.
I listened to the first book, and was interested enough to keep listening. But I truly don't understand how anyone as daft as Bella can keep a guy who's actually nearly 118 interested in her for more than ten minutes. A century of waiting and he wouldn't like someone a little more... sophisticated?
But good post. Rated.
Kathy - you are correct. There are those who will go see it no matter what the "buzz" about the film becomes.
KS - your husband is a brave man. I watched the first one with my girls, but already knew what I was getting into after hearing about it again and again from my assistant - the person I referred to in the blog who is obsessed with the series.
I'm with MWP on this one. It is just big goofy romantic fun. Nothin' wrong with that. I've read the books and I've seen the first movie. I'm waiting for the lines to thin before going to see the second one, but I surely do plan to go see it.
"Vegetarian" vampires that glitter in the sunlight? oh, come ON! haha
And yet ... my now-college-aged daughter was one of the swooning teenaged girls who obsessed over Edward, sneered at Jacob (for being a girlfriend-seducing interloper, I think), and empathized wholeheartedly with Bella's angst. She brought all four books home from her school library so I could read them too, and she and I spent a fine evening on the town together, going out to dinner and then watching a midnight showing of Twilight when it was first released a couple of years ago.
They are dumb stories, yes. But they are also fun, light reading. And what a wonderful springboard they have been to fascinating conversations with my daughter: about how people ought to treat each other, about power struggles within relationships, about the many-a-slip-between-the-cup-and-the-lip that happens when popular books are morphed into popular movies ... and many other things.
Not all characters in books are necessarily role models. You can learn from them without becoming them.
If the books are close to the adaptation of this movie then it would be best that no one ever reads them. I didnt get the hype and maybe cause I am young man in my upper twenties and couldnt find a single female in the movie worth keeping my attention like so many young teenage hearts love the wolf boy and the vampire dude. I think the only part I actually liked about the movie was the brief bits of action, but that is it. Vampires can be cool though, I still remember the WB supernatural series "Angel" pretty fondly.
Darryl - Amen, brother
Ran - seems like we are on the same page - I am sure that your review is far more detailed than mine and therefore considers the actual film's actual merits (assuming there are any) as well as the drawbacks we both seem to have identified, and will check it out now