THE WOLFPACK (THREE GIRLS AND A DOG)

Views From the Cynical Side of the Aisle

Andy Wolfenson

Andy Wolfenson
Location
Randolph, New Jersey, United States
Birthday
December 04
Title
Attorney
Company
NJ's Best Little Law Firm
Bio
Frustrated wanna-be sportswriter who, in his spare time from traveling from courtroom to courtroom and driving his kids to soccer games, occasionally pens blogs about sports, the Yankees, and other topics.

Andy Wolfenson's Links

Salon.com
APRIL 7, 2010 12:06PM

Why Won't The Stupid "Rate" Button Work?

Rate: 21 Flag

I tried to "rate" some of the posts that I read this morning. Really, I did. I clicked on that stupid thumbs-up sign multiple times, but for some reason the little number next to it never increased. And I felt a little guilty, since I know that some of the writers on this blog measure themselves, at least in part, on how many "ratings" they can amass (including, by the way, yours truly - guilty as charged).

So I am left to my comments - which, due to a lack of caffeine, have been lacking. But I've tried, I promise.

Others are able to rate; I've seen the numbers increase on some of the blogs that I had visited. And I don't know why I am being shut out of the rating fun. Some type of conspiracy, I guess, so that others get mad at me for not rating them - and then they will, in turn, not rate my posts and drive me to depression over the lack of love for my thoughts.

I hope that this little glitch is fixed soon. I find that I am able to spend precious little time on these pages lately, and want to ensure that others not only feel my presence, but the respect that I have for their writing.

But I'm afraid to even look at Sally's blog today. Whenever I don't push the "rate" button immediately, she hits me with the guilt that can only be passed from one member of the Tribe to another. Maybe with this explanation she will cut me a little slack.

And maybe someone will take pity on me and rate this post. Even though I am unable to rate your pages, I won't believe for a minute that you are having similar problems. Feel free to rate away; it will renew my faith in the blog, which has been dealt a cruel blow by my inability to properly contribute.

Author tags:

technology, comedy

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Andy, I have the "rating" problem too. If it will help ease your guilt, I can send you my Paypal address and you can send money instead ;)
If it's any consolation, I could/did rate your blog, but not the other 2 I tried to rate this morning...
I seem to be able to rate posts today where I couldn't last night.
rated... really. I have had the same problem today with the rating situation. there's got to be a boss or somebody to blame around here somewhere! ;-)
Hey Andy, it worked! Yeah, my guilt brought me back ;)
Our tech team was on top of this, and ratings should be fixed now. (The 8 ratings this post has already gotten seems to be good proof.)
This is an effort by Open Salon to keep writers humble.
Bonnie - thanks for both the "mind" rate and then the actual one.

Amanda - I feel the pain, obviously.

Catherine - see, the guilt is real. Perhaps you had a hankering for matzah this last week and couldn't figure out why?

Blue - consolation? I feel special.

Kissing - thanks for the support. And it seems like we have rattled a cage or two.

Stellaa - wish that I could, but when I was Bar Mitzvahed those 31 years ago I apparently agreed to feel guilty about a myriad of circumstances, some of which aren't really all that important in the grand scheme of things.

Poppi - excellent! thanks!

Judy - thanks - but it appears that you did not see fit to rate - that seems like sour grapes to me.

Now I am off to rate some others. I hope it works for me now.
It's been slow all morning, but what it does do is delayed rating. That is, you push, you think you didn't rate, but it shows up later.

It worked fine for me here, definitely rated your post.
Sheepdog - humble? If we were that humble we would think that nobody cared about our thoughts and would keep them to ourselves. So a nice try, but that alone won't work.

Kathy - thank you - I've been noticing that some of the ones that I tried to rate before did work - they must have kicked in some time later.
You got my rating, do it proud! Hah!
Well said. I liked your comment also on the negative chick's post. Everytime I read her I get "hostile". Not you. I like your style.

People can be kind and still professional. The others..well they just seem angry in general! Cheers. Rated.
*Not "I get hostile", but rather, I read her as such*
I had some pain about this too, but it was liberating in a way just to get the comments for awhile.
It does seem to be a bit more glitchy lately.
Scanner - thank you. I will try my hardest to justify your faith.

Christine - it's funny - I just read the comments on the other post; it seems as though Ms. Stellaa, in giving me credit for coining a new phrase, has completely misinterpreted the sarcasm that runs throughout this post. I get a kick out of seeing people's comments and ratings, true, but I am such a peripheral player on these pages that they rarely amount to much anyway. My little attempt at fun has apparently taken on a life of its own.

Lea and Bill - true to both of you and thanks for reading.
We are the victims of technology, Andy.
Pilgrim - yes, at least this morning many people were judging by the comments of others here.
I was able to rate, but not favorite you. Hmmm, I'll try later. :)
itk - I know that I have arrived when you post a "comment" - thanks for reading and come back soon.

sweet - thank you - but perhaps not being able to "favorite" me is the new extension of the conspiracy. Or does that merely make me sound paranoid? Make sure you try again soon.
I love sarcasm for so many reasons. :)
measuring one's self or writing by OS ratings is simply asinine. everyone knows self worth is measured by page views ;-) . . .