Now O.S. Editor Kerry is soliciting photos of people showing their "Farrah Fawcett hair" and he is going to devote the entire front page to these photos - Huh??? On a related note: Given that, as of today, advertisements (a "kinder, gentler" way of 'blog whoring', one with financial benefits to O.S.?) are now inserted into our posts and comments section, perhaps I was prescient (translation: divinely omniscient) when I posted this last week:
So here is my OPEN CALL to O.S. Members: How might the new ads that are now inserted into our blogs tie into the above-mentioned post on "The Tyranny of Mediocrity," particularly as related to the concept of the (literary/informational) "Modern Megaconsumer"? Since I am a poet, I usually only get a few views, and fewer (yet priceless) comments from my small but loyal readership. Yet the above-referenced post has garnered over 600 views and 60 comments to date; however, it cannot be found on the "Most Popular" list for this past week (strange...) - Well, I can rest easy knowing that our Editors seemingly have their finger on the "mass-market" pulse of what "writers, photographers, and artists" looking for a "smart home" are TRULY most interested in reading these days (sigh).


Salon.com
Comments
This is a serious subject that deserves serious analysis.
My hair is certainly able to embody Farrah like charisma & volume, but i choose not to. It is a moral issue.
Farrah was not on my wall as a kid, but i remember that poster well. It was a boon to the surging hormonal evolution of my, and my boon companions', being. She was a sexual icon. She knew it, and gloried in in. So far, nothing wrong here....as if "wrong" has any meaning for me any more...
What is wrong is humiliating her. I've seen her humiliated a few times lately, and i abhorify it. Literally. Scenes of her wasted shell, once so appealing & youn & ...um, well, i guess inspiring ...to gals and guys everywhere...
this is base behavior, and it shall be rewarde...someday..anyway...the OS thing---the call to bare hair--- is a dream of still-pubescent women, or adult women feeling out their pubescence. If our eyes really truly want to see such a spectacle, then by all means have at it. Have at fucking anything...who really cares...it will be swalled up by
Time, Mother Night, as Farrah's body was...it will pass away & we'll be on to the next thing, with bigger teacups to roil up tempests in i hope...like....
how bout the boys do their best dylan? good goddamn luck...that sly weasal has got more faces than even thou, ms simonette..yet...let us all puton a bob dyaln face....
mine is not blonde on blonde", tho it was for many yrs...i shall craft a fine "blood on the tracks look", cuz somewhereinside i'm still virile & despondently poetically acerbic, though lately all this love in the air has put me to the carpet...
ethereal dylan masks, boys! hop to it...
jim
there is an air-head.
No, not Farrah's hair but theirs.
The hair of those who chose
to pose as pin-up sinners
while the pre-nup winners
made off with the spoils.
For every fluff-haired pin-up girl, there's some poor churl who toils
alone and under-compensated
for the sweat of her thin, hair-pinned brow.
Now, weepy readers stream crocodile tears
of vicarious sorrow.
Tomorrow
another icon of sublimated lust
will bite the dust
forlorn
and sorely mourned
by those who never knew her at all:
just her name
and her fame
and a poster on a wall.
These melodramatic media wakes serve a purpose, no doubt—although I doubt it’s ours. There’s always been something so disturbing about people who keen over strangers puffed to godly proportions, while ignoring the homely souls of their own neighborhoods as they died undignified and pitiful deaths. Every death diminishes, yes, but one death doesn’t diminish more than another’s, solely because they’ve lived a glittered life.
The topsy-turviness of mainstream values is probably best-illustrated by the treatment of Lady Di’s death versus that of Mother Teresa’s. Both died on the same day. Di’s death triggered paroxysms of grief worldwide, while the mother passed quietly in the shadow of the Princess.
—Melissa
Well, if some of us do not protest the tyranny of mediocrity then as a "collective" we are in danger of eventually mistaking the mediocre for true visionary, artistic/literary, soul-enhancing "meat" - WE ARE NOT MEN: WE ARE DEVO! D-E-V-O! (You get the drift. Although I loved that band. Saw them live once in a tiny club after their hey-day but they were still loads of fun...!)
EXCUSE ME!
You forgot to respond to my comment re. Farrah's hair.
This is a serious breach of OS etiquette.
Also...
Above, you say
you are "not lacking a sense of nostalgia"...
I'm not quite sure I believe you, but as yet I have no proof.
Hence I won't call you on it. However...
please realize that I shall be ob-
serving your comments with
a proverbial fine-tooth comb,
which I bought at Walmart
($4.99 + tax) today for
the express purpose
of teasing out the
hint of a nostalgic
sentiment...
If you come up short on nostalgia,
I will (privately) inform you of
this, as I know that nostalgia
is important for you to ac-
quire. I got mine at home,
because, after all,
nostalgia means
"homesickness",
according to the 1916
Merriam Websters...
(Gr. "nostos" = a return home
+ "algia" from "algos"= pain)
James
(ha. gotcha. had no idea where this comment was going
til i looked up the word. wow.
weird. like
genius un-
folding...
me, i mean.
you're in oahu)