Sprezzatura

Because neurotic is the new black....

Ann Nichols

Ann Nichols
Location
East Lansing, Michigan,
Birthday
December 31
Bio
I write, I read, I clean up after people and I worry about things. I have a chronic insufficiency of ironic detachment. My birthday isn't really December 31; it's March 22 but it won't let me change it.

MY RECENT POSTS

Ann Nichols's Links

Salon.com
JANUARY 20, 2010 8:24AM

Enough

Rate: 16 Flag

 

IMG00319
Last summer I traveled out of state with a group of 11-13 year olds. We were the "pilot" for a middle school program in faith-based social justice centered on the urban poor, although the organization has offered a "poverty simulation" program for high school students for several years.  I was under the impression that our trip was service oriented, and that we would be in the community doing whatever needed to be done. Mostly, I was wrong. It was a tough four days, and sometimes I was as angry as I've been in many years. Whether or not I agree with the contours of the program, I will say that all of us learned a great deal about what was enough, mostly in the context of food. We learned who has enough (we do), and who doesn't (a huge percentage of the U.S. and world population).

 The night of our arrival, we were tired after driving all day, and the shock of an un-air conditioned building hundreds of miles south of home was quite a shock for those of us who are delicate Northern flowers. We were ushered into a large room with a cement floor, given a bowl of plain white rice and a spoon full of beans, and a cup of water. We ate sitting on the floor. It was, calorically speaking, enough food for any one of us, but it was not what the kids were used to eating, it was prepared without benefit of seasonings, and it was edible in the way that I imagine food in prison to be edible. One eats in order to live, but there's nothing pleasant about it.

Some of the kids refused to touch it, others ate only the rice or only the beans, and by morning, they were very hungry. We were not allowed to keep the food we had brought in the car; it was confiscated and locked away. We were also allowed no snacks. For these children from fairly affluent suburban homes, this was the beginning of learning about"food insecurity," not knowing when or if you would eat again, and not knowing if what you got would be enough. In the morning we were allowed one hard boiled egg, one piece of toast and a carton of yogurt. Again, enough food from a calorie perspective, but some of our group (accustomed to a bowl of Captain Crunch or a couple of Eggos and syrup) complained bitterly about the "grossness" of the eggs, one couldn't eat yogurt for health reasons, and many ate only one or two of the offerings. It was a challenging meal, but I was still calm in the face of the lesson we were learning, confident that no well-padded suburban kid who had eaten at McDonald's the day before would die as the result of one day of eating light.

Around this time, the program's leader taught a lesson centered around the "Manna from heaven" story in the Bible. In case you are not up on your Old Testament, the story is as follows: the Israelites finally got out from under Pharaoh's thumb, and found themselves in the desert. They were hungry, there was no food, and they began to complain, whereupon Moses chatted with God who hooked them up with Manna, a food substance that appeared once a day and was apparently pretty tasty. God told Moses, who told the Israelites, that there would be enough, that they should not try to take more than they needed to be satisfied, and that it would rot if they tried to preserve it. Of course, they took too much and tried to preserve it, and it rotted. Eventually they learned that God would provide enough for everyone, every day, and they got with the program. Whether one is Biblically inclined or not, the message is a valuable one: the resources are present for everyone on earth to have enough to eat, and if no one takes more than their share, everyone gets fed.

After the much-loathed egg, toast and yogurt breakfast and the Manna lesson, we visited a local Freedom School, and went to a community center where we cleaned out a gym, including moving four couches out of the building and sweeping and mopping the floor. We were tired, we were hot, we were hungry, and when we returned to our home base we were given three small boxes of food pantry food, and told that we had to make do with it for the rest of our stay. For 16 people we had three packages of ramen noodles, three boxes of macaroni and cheese, three or four cans of beans, a couple of cans of mixed vegetables, assorted tins of potted meat, a can of Vienna sausages, three cans of tuna, three cans of fruit, a jar of peanut butter and three sleeves of Saltines. With this, sixteen people were supposed to eat two breakfasts, two lunches, and two dinners. We were also told that we were not allowed to use the oven or the stove.

I was livid; this was not what we had been prepared for, and it really didn't seem to be "enough." I was appointed Cook, and immediately divided the available food into meals, preparing to play a very angry game of Iron Chef Poverty. Lunch was peanut butter crackers and potted meat and sausages for them as would eat such things (and most of the kids wouldn't). It wasn't haute, but I knew that if it was possible to die of starvation  from eating nothing but peanut butter crackers, I would have died during law school.

By dinner I was beyond livid and moving into a sort of hot, sullen malevolence. On the positive side, we were being taught a lesson, and some of the kids were really "getting" the fact that this was how some people lived, including kids who went to school with them. On the other hand, I was feeling that as  adults, we were responsible for the health and welfare of children who might be suburban and spoiled, but who were not guilty of anything other than the good luck of being born into families living well above the poverty line. I made dinner out of the boxed macaroni and cheese (no butter, no milk, hot tap water) and added the vegetables; I would have added the tuna to make sure everyone got enough protein, but there were kids who protested that idea so vehemently that I thought they might use up their limited energy reserves having fits. We had our tuna on the side, along with about 1/3 cup each of the macaroni slop (pictured at the top of the post).

That night, we found that the brief dip into poverty simulation had ended. The kids received a modest portion of popcorn as an evening snack, and the next morning we were back to a hard boiled egg, half a bagel and  yogurt. Dinner was actually quite festive, and we were allowed to eat sitting at tables for the first time since our arrival. No one died of starvation, and several of the kids remarked that they were surprised at how full they got eating the small portions we were given. It seemed, in the warm (and somewhat self-congratulatory glow) of the concluding lessons that we had passed through the valley of the shadow as better, more sensitive people. The next day we drove home, where, after an intense period of disorientation (and a lot of crying on my part) life returned to normal.

And in the end, the question is: what did we learn? I think we all learned the that everyone deserves enough to eat, that we generally have more than enough to eat, and that when one doesn't get enough, it makes it harder to think, to work, and to be a valuable part of society. I had certainly understood before the trip that there are a shocking number of people living in poverty, but I had not personally been hungry unless it was because I was dieting to lose weight...because I had too much food available to me. It struck me, in thinking about our experience, how bizarre it is that so many Americans have to starve themselves to a certain point because we can't help ourselves in the face of the bounty around us, while there are people who are enviably slender mainly because they never get enough to eat.

On the other hand, I had a sense that our experience created guilt in the children without offering clear direction about what could be done to share the wealth. Do they have to give their food away? Should they feel awful every time they sit down to a meal that tastes good and satisfies them? Should I feel guilty because I have the option to buy organic vegetables, and fancy sea salt, and steel cut oats? To make things right on this earth is it necessary for one to renounce all pleasure because others suffer? Didn't (fill in higher power here) provide us with the ability to cultivate and prepare delicious foods?

For many folks, myself included, guilt is only a powerful motivator to the extent that I can actually do something about the source of my guilt. Otherwise, there is a Skinnerian sense of frustration and helplessness, and it is easier to bury the guilt than to dwell on it, knowing that there is no way to change things.

I wish I had those kids back, just long enough to tell them that they don't have to feel bad about themselves; they just need to use what we learned as motivation to make some changes. We can donate food and money to local food banks, or give to organizations like Oxfam. We can grow an extra row or two in the garden and share fresh produce with families that desperately need it to lead healthy lives. We can pick up and repurpose restaurant and retail surplus, and serve at soup kitchens. We can be mindful of what we eat, and maybe even choose to give up a weekly restaurant meal or expensive cuts of meat and donate what we save to feed the hungry.

We can do all of this knowing we are not personally and individually able to redistribute the world's food supplies, and that we are not "bad" simply because we are not impoverished. We are just lucky. I hope that we can do it in a way that avoids the judgements and self-righteousness that often come with "do-gooding," and balances our guilt about our own good fortune against the understanding that we can only help others if our own oxygen masks are firmly in place. I'm not nearly done thinking about all of this, and I hope that the children who traveled with me are still thinking about what they learned. I also hope they understand that they are deserving of every birthday cake, clean bed,  full stomach and quiet night with which they are blessed.  All children are.

Author tags:

poverty, true story

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I like this post. I like that you point out that guilt can/is a good motivator. I think it is very true, for myself at least. But, I only indulge myself in that for a short time, otherwise it turns into self-pity. I know, what a sicko. By the way - what is a Freedom School?
Interesting reflections. Let's hear it for Guilt Power.
a - Freedom Schools were originally designed to help Southern black children get the education and resources they needed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_Schools. The program we saw was a summer-only program, free of charge, attended and taught almost entirely by African Americans, but not focused on kids who were necessarily poor or academically disadvantaged. It was mostly academic, but also had a daily kind of "pep rally" and lots of programming centered on service, personal integrity, responsibility, etc.. We were told that many fairly affluent parents really wanted their children to be in the program not only for the academic/summer school benefits but because of the chance to be part of that community for a few weeks. I really liked what I saw.
ahp - I'm just not sure it worked. The kids mostly seem to remember the discomfort and the shock, but there was a certain smugness about the program staff that left them all a little cold. I think they came home feeling judged and wrong, but not galvanized to action. We'll see....
I think you and the kids were treated roughly for wanting to help. I remember helping out in high school, painting a shelter. We were treated simply, but beautifully. The soup kitchen food was good and warm after a day's work. Your treatment could scare others away from helping when help is needed most. Guilt is never helpful, only action helps.

I enjoyed your writing. I've had lean times and fat times in my life. I'd rather have extra and I don't feel guilty about it.

Lucy
l - I could not agree more. One of the more horrifying post-immersion revelations was that one of the girls we took on the trip had actually lived in pretty significant poverty for a few years after her father lost his job; I have wondered ever since how that all affected her, and thought they should have screened better and maybe adjusted their perceptions that our group was all "spoiled rich kids" who deserved a psychological beating. Thanks for reading.
"I wish I had those kids back just long enough to tell them that they don't have to feel bad about themselves"

I think you're right, they probably would have benefited from some sort of consolidation after that experience. I think guilt can put people off, especially when these kids were not "guilty" of doing anything wrong. This is an excellent and thought-provoking post.
d - thanks! A de-briefing would have been in order, and I'm kind of surprised there wasn't one, and that the program staff didn't suggest it to the leader of the youth group. I needed some time to get myself together afterwards, and I'm allegedly an adult.
I loved this piece. I loved the lesson and the experience itself. I just do not think guilt should be the motivator. It is just as you say so eloquently here: Everyone deserves enough to eat. It is a matter of those who have, helping those who don't. That is the lesson.
I'm sure I would have been pissy with so little to eat and so little to serve children. But I'm pissy every day to know that in our elementary school, the two free meals some of the kids receive are all they get. On weekends I can't be sure what they do.
Great post. r
b - good question, but there is a reason. They do amazing work in the city where they're located, and the high school level poverty immersion that they run is both appropriate and well done. I think this "pilot" was a mistake, I think they know that (I certainly let them know what I thought) and I think calling them out for one mistake and risking damage to the good things they do would be wrong. If I thought they were trying to grow it, I would definitely speak up.

j - thank you. I was VERY pissy, partly because I was hungry, and partly because I was very much aware of the liability involved in responsibility for 20 children, only one of whom was my own. The screening was not good, and I was worried about the kid with food allergies, the kid who was skin and bones to begin with...the kids whose parents would not have sent them at all had they understood that it was to be partly "poverty immersion" and not a service project. I think that maybe, if I had known what was going to happen, and been better mentally prepared, I could have done more to get the kids through it in a positive and productive way; it is hard to be a great role model when you are furious and on the edge of tears. I would love to see that experience translate into concern for the kids here at home who don't get enough to eat except on school days; I just don't know that that most basic message got through the drama.
I am appalled by this program. The same lesson could have been learned allowing the young people to REALLY help people: how about going to New Orleans to help clean and build during the day, and eating red beans and rice and crawfish (a healthy serving, but certainly not what these kids were probably used to) at night? You can learn about poverty by immersing yourself in an impoverished culture and sharing what they eat every day. This just seemed like "punishment" to the children who were not responsible for their own good fortune.
The questions you ask are indicative of your vision . . . and I like what you see . . . I've been on both sides of the food divide, and I've travelled to third world countries, and guilt isn't enough . . . the debrief would be an excellent addition to the experience. Great post. This'll stick with me today!
I liked this post, too. I think if the children can take away the lesson that they are lucky -- that's a good lesson in itself. Too many kids who are lucky because of nothing except the country and circumstances of their birth don't realize it. There's too much sense of entitlement out there. Showing them that they are lucky to have what they do, to enjoy the things they have, to share when they can -- those are good things to learn. rated
I loved this post. It gave me much to think about. I think your reactions were both appropriate and understandable. I would lean toward less harsh exposure for well-intentioned kids. They seemed to have benefited, however, from the experience.

On first reflection, I think it was a good exercise, but possibly could be used for a different audience. I would like to see this sort of exercise put in place for certain members of congress, for example, or other privileged leaders, who have decision-making authority. For that sort of audience, a month would be barely adequate.
v - I share your objection; the worst part, for me, is that I believe people feel greater sympathy for any group of "others" when they actually work with them, speak to them, and break down barriers. The fact that we were in s dangerous area of the city and had to be locked in and monitored at all times, with no engagement with the people living in poverty in the place where we actually were simply served to reinforce the alienness of the "poor people." Not intentional, I think but unfortunate.

o - thanks. I have struggled with that "vision," all over the place from abject guilt to righteous fury.

trb - I think that, if nothing else, they did learn that. That makes me feel a little better.

s - I think the week-long poverty immersion they do with high school students is a much better plan; middle schoolers can really still be children, in many ways. I totally agree with you about members of Congress - I'd like to pick.
Wow, Ann. This is a wonderful and thoughtful post.

I have been very involved in a local organization that rescues food overprepared and perishable food and repurposes it into about three thousand meals a day for people who don't have enough to eat--including hundreds of kids. Food insecurity is shocking...

...which doesn't mean we should all feel guilty. It does mean we ought to think about what we eat and how we grow food and how we distribute it. The fact is, 27 percent of all the food we produce in America is either thrown away or plowed under. That's the equivalent of a pound of food, every day, for every man, woman, and child in the nation.

Also: 10,000 children in the world die every day because they live in poverty. They don't have to die. Saving them would not be simple, but I'm not sure what's more important.
f - you are doing exactly the kind of thing that I hope these kids will care about, and do in their own lives. I value saving children living in poverty above most anything else, and it is shocking to me that we can't move ourselves as a country (as a world?) to do those "not simple" things that would make such a huge difference. I think we have to be mindful of teaching our children the harsh realities of poverty in such a way that they become inspired and responsible instead of becoming numb and throwing their hands up at the futility of it all. It starts, I think, with meaningful dialogue about things like wasting food, equitable distribution and being content with "enough." That is where the poverty immersion program meant to go, and I think it failed, but I still have years to teach my son those things and to show him the value of service; I hope others do the same.
Reflective. Was feedback shared after the experience? If so, it seems this "live by example" experiment would have more developed objectives. Interesting read.
I bookmarked this to share with my 11 year old daughter. The concept of kids who do without is abstract to her; this will certainly be good a place to start a conversation. Well-written, thought-provoking piece.
s - not formally, no. I know that I wrote to the program director about my observations, and that I talked with the kids I drove home (9 hours) off and on about their experiences. At that point, they oscillated between saying the things they thought they should say, and wanting to pretend it hadn't happened. My sense is that the whole thing was a "hot potato" for all adults involved, that everyone knew it wasn't quite right, and that no one wanted to revisit it. I think feedback could have helped them shape a better program....

l - it is abstract to most of them, unless they have lived it. I would really, really love to know what she thinks about it all.
Regarding guilt - I think it is a peculiarly American trait to believe that guilt is something we must *do* something about, pronto, leading to the tendency to think If you can't solve the problem, creating the guilt, the ignore it.

I see many ,many lessons in this trip. The kids are spoiled and entitled. That is baggage they don't need. They got to see how the luck of their birth does not entitle them to feel superior or deserving of anything - it was luck and nothing more that landed them in the land of plenty. It's something to think about - they don't have to DO anything about it right now, thinking about it, being *aware*, is enough. The awareness is relevant - in a few short yeras they will be voters, faced with voting on measures deciding how/where tax dollars go to support the needy. It's relevant for the kids to be thinking now, how do they plant to 'give back' as they grow older and get more independence and means?

The kids on your trip certainly don't have to feel bad about themselves - but another lesson here is, they don't really have reason to feel superior to others simply by dint of their socioeconomic status. Many people feel a repugnance for the poor, and shun them out of fear. It's important to grapple with this tendency, and defeat it. Poverty no one's fault any more than being born into a nice upper middle class family is anyone's entitlement.

I think it is up to each of us in situations like this to decide what we can take away from the encounter. The most valuable lessons are rarely learned with any sort of primer. Concrete actions (donations etc) like those you suggest are great, but reflection on one's own circumstances and adjusting your sense of who you are in the world is just as valuable. Wouldn't it be great if we wanted enough for everyone, and were willing to put our vote, our money, our compassion and our actions to serving that desire?
Stumbled to this after not checking OS for quite a while...and then had to read all of your pieces. Your writing is not just beautiful...it is pure and clear and honest and rich. I've added you as a favorite so I won't miss what you have to say here.