Sprezzatura

Because neurotic is the new black....

Ann Nichols

Ann Nichols
Location
East Lansing, Michigan,
Birthday
December 31
Bio
I write, I read, I clean up after people and I worry about things. I have a chronic insufficiency of ironic detachment. My birthday isn't really December 31; it's March 22 but it won't let me change it.

MY RECENT POSTS

Ann Nichols's Links

Salon.com
MAY 23, 2011 9:09AM

Dear Ann Nichols, Thank you for your recent submission....

Rate: 39 Flag

I grew up on stories of writers rowing tirelessly against the stream of rejection. Romantically, they died before being published, received no more than a pittance for works later deemed “classics,” or died trying to write a second novel after a glorious first. I relished the kind of story in which the writer tries and tries, papering a small bathroom with rejection letters from The Atlantic and The New Yorker, and on the day when she is taking her last quarter to buy an orange and a loaf of bread she discovers a letter in her mailbox telling her that her manuscript has been accepted. It never occurred to me that it would be easy, this publication thing, but I always had a secret pilot light of hubris that made me think that I was special and possibly immune to Business As Usual. Although I am usually self-critical to the point where I can barely leave the house for fear of exposure as a fraud, I have allowed myself florid fantasies of publication, critical acclaim, book tours and (gulp) a bespectacled and literary sort of fame.

 

For years there was a standoff: I thought maybe I could write something good enough but I was pretty sure I couldn’t write anything good enough. I wrote all the time – papers about John Donne and Watteau, then papers about asbestos litigation and moot court briefs, and finally real briefs. My need to put words in some elegant and persuasive order was satisfied throughout those years, and I mostly forgot about writing for myself, to say something important to me in the hopes that it might set fire to another soul. Quite honestly, writing about asbestos litigation has that kind of effect.

 

In the past year, I have come back to writing for myself, and my writing has caught the eye of people willing to pay me for words. Not my words, mind you; I have spun their ideas from straw into gold, following directives as to length, tone, and level of complexity.  Occasionally I write something and submit it for publication. Always I have the fantasies again about being Discovered, vindicated, feted and worshipped. Always, I get the rejection letter and accept it with a chastened gulp of acceptance. I would not, after all, want to join a club that would have me as a member.

 

Recently I wrote a piece I really loved. It was a story I held back, even when I was at my lowest ebb and felt a desperate need to push “publish” on Open Salon and dull my pain with the crack that is approval. I polished it, put it away, went at it again and sent it to friends who are astute readers and writers in their own right. I accepted their criticism, made some changes, and sent the piece out, aiming as high as Icarus with his fatal, waxy wings. As I waited for a response,  I sometimes let myself imagine an acceptance. Immediately afterwards I reminded myself that publishing is brutal these days, that everyone and his uncle thinks they can write, and that most bestsellers are written by Sarah Palin's ghostwriters rather than by Michael Chabons. And I’m no Michael Chabon, on my best day.

 

One week and one day later, it appeared in my inbox. “Dear Ann Nichols, Thank you for your recent submission. Unfortunately…”  It wasn’t going to happen, this time, my dues were not yet paid, my wings were reduced to drips of hot wax by the heat of the sun. I sulked, briefly, and then resolved to get back on the horse that bit me. I was not yet a candidate for some new Algonquin Round Table, but maybe I could shop it around to magazines. Every story about a struggling writer has at its heart a real person who wanted not to become an inspirational story, but to become a published author. Every one of them had that bright flame of pride and hope, and every one of them suffered when it sputtered in the darkness of rejection.

 

I will try again, this very day. I can’t paper my bathroom with rejection letters, because they now come electronically (although I suppose I could print them out). Perhaps, on the day when the paychecks come late due to some bank error, and I leave the house with my last ten dollars to buy a gallon of organic milk and a box of Kleenex with lotion, my phone will buzz and there it will be: “Dear Ann Nichols, Thank you for your recent submission. We would like to include it in…”.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Keep going. And remember, publishing is a disaster, from what I've read by OSers in the know, and other sources. Many times it comes down to who you know, or if you're a reality TV star (maybe try to become one of those first?). The important thing is that you're writing something you believe in. Self-publishing seems like a second choice, but it's becoming a more and more viable and respectable way to go. At least it would allow you to get your words out there. Whatever you choose, I hope you know that quality isn't always what gets you published - and that believing in yourself and your gift is the most important thing of all. Be thankful you can put your thoughts into words so beautifully, and use that to bring joy to your life every day. The rest is just a bonus.
Well, they say that getting the rejection letters means your on your way. Got to get them out of the way first. I must say it is discouraging, though, when a writer as good as you gets rejected...I know there's no hope for the rest of us. Keep fighting the good fight - you are definitly good enough!
Thanks Ann Nichols. That Anglican John Donne was a healthy and sensual poet.
Ay human nature ...
I had to just Relaunch.
Who is very nasty - Kerry?
Someone needs good therapy.
Maybe Ann can drive a hearse.
Respectfully - Go Pick up editor?
Kerry L. never relates very well.
No danle a cigarette from Ya lip.
If stuck in gridlock? Munch garlic.
`
Edgar Allan Poe can help nasty folk.
He visited burial ground grave yard.
Poe was not a dark shadowy critter.
Folk who are depraved go cutthroat.
Fallen low-creeps are easily discerned.
apology?
Thanks Ann. I may go to a milk parlor.
Someone please haul creeps to burial.
Buy a cheesecake in Manhattan eatery.
Buy editor a soft pet squirrel to eat too?
Someone sure plays the perpetual Nasty!
You have readers, tons of them. And you have been published -- here on Open Salon. Money would be nice of course, but few writers make enough from their writing (especially if it's fiction or poetry) to live on. Years ago I was in an MFA program that had some big names on the teaching staff, writers whose work I loved. I don't think they were there for their purely for the fun of it.

At this point publishing is in an upheaval, but many of us still long for the approval of "real" editors and agents. We want the gatekeepers to say "yes." More and more I'm becoming convinced, it's not about the gatekeepers, it's about the READERS, and there may be other ways to reach them.
Never let the fear of rejection keep you from reaching your dreams.
You get used to it. No one will discover your beautiful light beneath your basket. You have to take it out and send it to every person who ever edited.

There is a prestigious annual juried illustration exhibit in NYC that I entered seven years in a row, unaccepted. I wanted to show with the big dogs though, and entering it became a yearly ritual. After the first few rejection letters, I stopped opening whatever they sent back until whenever. Paying bills one day, I sliced open what was certainly rejection letter number eight, but surprise, was an acceptance letter that had sat unopened on the hall table for more than a week.

In the beginning, it is good practice to send work to places that aren't the Atlantic or Knopf, and learn how to separate yourself from your commercial work, because that's what publishing does, make your work a product. I know that sounds harsh, but thinking about publishing that way takes the sting out of rejection. It means they can't market it to their particular audience and make money.
Well, you just deflated my fantasy with this post. If you are struggling with getting published, I know I will NEVER get published. Your writing is so polished, professional, and intoxicating compared to mine. I find it's hard to get critiqued here on Open Salon. Even when I've asked readers to critique my writing, hardly anyone will.
My first rejection thrill was from the poetry editor of The Atlantic, decades ago. It was handwritten and signed by her (I hope - can't imagine a secretary using the word "oblique"). Phoebe was her first name. I have the note somewhere, you'd best believe, but I'm not sure just where to look for it. She thanked me for my submission, then said my poems were "clever but oblique." This startled me, as I'd not been trying to be oblique. Admittedly, I had to think about what she meant and have been worrying that bone every since. My conclusion now is that maybe some day "oblique" will be back in fashion - or finally come into fashion. She also noted that one of my poems, about a spider in the shower, frightened her. Ah, Phoebe, wherever you are, in retrospect I do believe you made my life. Muah!
You capture the unrequited love relationship with the writer and publisher so well! Did you catch the piece on self-publishing in the NYT book review yesterday? Definitely something you should try if you crank out a book...
For what it's worth, "I love how you write." -R-
The reason they have the rejections to paper anything is because they send their work EVERYWHERE (not just NYer and Atlantic--there are LOTS of magazines that would take the sort of essays you write--Sun, Georgia Review, VQR, Creative Nonfiction, the NY Times Lives column, and about a dozen more topnotch lit journals pay nicely enough and don't require the resume that the glossies want before they'll look at your work). One great way to find a given year's high profile journals is to look in an issue of Best American to see where their pieces come from (check the Notables in the back too).

It's not just that publishing is in the doghouse. Editors' needs are specific and merit doesn't mean anything if you send an essay about your father and they already have a father essay in the wings, or if they have eight pieces written by women and one more slot for the upcoming issue and it had better be a male writer or they're going to pigeonhole themselves eternally.

This is to say: Don't just send your piece out to #2 on your list--however good your work is there is an element of lottery to the whole affair. Give it its best chance; send it out widely and don't sit around waiting to hear: write the next thing.

Sorry, I moonlight as a walking Writer's Market.
I gotta love any post that manages to allude to Groucho Marx, Rumplestitlskin, the myth of Icarus, and the Algonquin Round Table. Ann, you are such a fine writer I'll bet you could give even abestos litigation pizzazz.
I have great confidence in your talent, and that someone with cash money will likewise have that confidence. And you must keep writing . . . no question about it . . .
Having grown up amongst a family of successes and being the black sheep who started taking writing seriously late, I say keep on keeping on. You are seriously impressive. Don't believe the haters. You can do it! if anyone can.
Someday, you will be compensated for your writing.
You should consider ePublishing. I know many writers want acceptance from the NYC literary mafia, but they have become very risk adverse and parochial. Some people have even made a living at it. The pros is that is that if you already have a book manuscript, then you're 90% there. Design a nice cover and hire a proofreader (for God's sake hire a proofreader) and convert to Kindle or upload. You can make up to 60% of the cover price.
These days, I rarely get that overwhelming urge to have my ego deflated so deftly. But, when I do - i just have to submit for publication and just wait to feel that stab of inadequacy. Keep at it and something is bound to happen. I remember finding a great little book once of funny rejection letters to famous authors. It definitely made the sting hurt a little less.
As I wrote in my post about semi-self-publishing my book The Disappearing Cemetery, the mainstream publishing business is a place for manuscripts and unpublished authors to die a long, lonely death.
Talent and determination are powerful allies. You should be published, and no doubt will be, whether you wait it out or do it yourself. Meanwhile, you are out there, people are reading you and appreciating you, someone will find you or you will find someone -- as long as you keep at it. (Meanwhile, enjoy!! You are doing something you love Ann, and doing it so very well.)
Good luck, Ann! You've already gotten much further than most. Your essay here was very enjoyable, humorous and honest. I wish you good luck in your pursuit!
I remember there was a discussion at another post, I believe flw's, discussing the difference between writing and publishing
(for yes, there is a huge difference among the two)

Most people would think that being published legitimizes their claim as a writer. That they can call themselves authors without feeling like posers. Though I have been published I do not think this is necessarily true. In fact, I've read superb writing online. The fact that a person does not receive a meager (trust me, meager) royalty check does not make him/her less of a writer.

My book received excellent reviews. Does that mean I can give up my day job? Hell, no. Unless I want to starve.

From my limited experience in publishing this is what I can offer (and considering I work in another cultural market)

Keep writing. There's no other way around it.
Keep sending out your work.
Broaden the field, publish in other online spaces. Broaden your audience.
An author not only must sell "him/herself" as Laura Miller points out, an author "creates" him/herself.

And remember, after all is said and done, an author usually makes 10% of the cover price of each book SOLD. Established, famous (or notorious) authors (or their agents) negotiate author's advances.

Good luck.
I recognize that letter! I remember being delighted by the handwritten ones...and then later, after I'd thought about it...deflated. I mean, is it worse to be good but not good enough? Or merely "unsuitable for our audience"? All you can do is keep on writing pieces that please YOU, and hope that an audience will follow. I know you have a rapt audience here!
Glad I never had the ambition to be a "writer" - that is, one who gets paid for it. I write because I'm an old retired guy who enjoys it.

I'll stay happy with my shareof "R"s, an occasional EP and a now and then acceptance from Haggard and Haloo.

Keep writing / R
Hey Ann. I've been published often and it just takes persistence. Send stuff out often and some of it is sure to get published. You seem like a very good writer.
When I reached the point that I could wallpaper the entire inside of my house with rejection letters, I decided not to worry about it. I threw most of them into the BBQ pit and set fire to them, to send their negative energy back into the cosmos.

However, I did save a few. I started collecting the most interesting and bizarre letters. Some were about 23RD generation copy machine. Some were cryptic notes, scrawled on little slips of paper. A few had Dear_________ with a had scrawled, Mr. WhistleBerries.

Standard theme was: “Unfortunately, your material does not suit our present needs. However, we wish you the best of luck placing it elsewhere.”

There are all of these proprieties and rules – about submitting only to one publisher or magazine at a time. Then, one waits six to nine months to get that curt rejection. To heck with that!

I attended several writers’ conferences, where the guest speakers included name authors, magazine and book editors. In their seminars, the editors and publishers spoke of the ‘readers’ who give everything the first glance, and that is all it is, a glance. The college students hired as readers glance at the first page or two. Are there any typo’s or grammar mistakes? Yes – can it on the spot. No? Pass it to the next level.

If you want the manuscript back, be sure to include sufficient postage and a self-addressed envelope. After a bit, this grows very wearisome, and costly.

With the advent of e–publishing where more and more writers will have access to publishing their work, many people in the publishing business will be out of of a job. They might lament being so mean-spirited in the past.

I write articles and fiction on a regular basis. I now have dozens of short stories, but selected 35 of them – 84,000 words, 260 pages, and it will become a book – my book, and very soon.

So Ann, keep writing, even if it is just for your own enjoyment.
Ann, if you decide to publish it yourself, I bet I know where you can find some eager book buyers...
It will come if you don't give up or get distracted. You have tremendous talent.
I'm betting your book will one day be on all of our night tables. ~r
I'm thinking of entering as a contestant for Survivor. If chosen, I'll lose a ton of weight and stand a chance of being on GMA. Then everyone will hang on to every stupid thing I write... for a couple of days anyway.
I'm with Trilogy. If you, the fabulous Ann Nichols are having a hard time getting published, it must be VERY rough out there. I'm not saying I had any illusions about my own work being good enough to get a shot, but if I had even a glimmer of hope it is stamped out now :)

Seriously though, you must keep trying, even if it's just to keep ME satisfied. You are being rejected simply because there's no longer a market for great writing, or the market is so limited that all the publishing houses are just using the same people. Meanwhile Sarah Palin's ghostwriter is being paid handsomely. That burns my arse!
Just to revise a bit...I had no business making the definitive statement, "You are being rejected simply because..." That sounds too much like I'm some kind of publishing expert who knows what the hell I'm talking about. I am nothing of the kind...never even submitted anything for consideration. However, I am an avid reader who has some idea of what's out there and what isn't.

I might have said...perhaps the only reason they would be rejecting a fine writer such as yourself is that there seems to be little publishing space left for anything beyond tabloid fare. Perhaps it's like Hollywood where they keep selling the same films (billed as sequels) and actors...those which have earned well in the past. No room for risk-taking. Everything is being dumbed down for the all mighty dollar. Now that I can say with conviction.
I do think asbestos was meant for fire killing, so, your sense of humor is still intact and I laughed - two good things already.

Your submissions are always accepted here, so that's the beauty of this place but it's wicked for true believers to hit 'publish' and then not get an instant EP...I'm familiar with a few folks that sit and wait, like a cat watching a squirrel, and if it doesn't come... well, you described it so well already - no point in me going on about it. It may be true that we must follow our bliss, but when the bliss goes out of it I don't know what to do either. Does bliss depend on validation, or do we just need to feel we've been heard? It must depend, in part, in getting paid for what we've done. Everyone needs to earn a little sumnsumn for their efforts. JK Rowling said she couldn't stop her writing from just pouring out of her, as though she were just the scribe most times. I don't have that genie in my bottle, and I know it, so I guess I've made peace with it and just write when the mood strikes, knowing maybe a few people will read it and comment in a public forum... but mostly it's just for me. I've got years and years of journals with pages and pages of writing. Is it publish-worthy? I don't know, but more to the point, I don't care. For you my dear writerly friend, I can't wait to learn that your phone has buzzed, or your e-mail box contains that 'congratulations' salutation and that there's a check in the mail. It's not for lack of talent or trying. Bliss would be nice.

(if it's your last $10, splurge on ice cream-- then, either way, you've gotten some pleasure from the whole exercise ;)
I have an idea for a book we can write together, Ann. At least I have an idea for the title and format. A great title might be something along the lines of...oh, I dunno...maybe A Multitude of Shades of Black and Blue. Something with color or lack of color or something in it anyway. It should be about sex, because we all know sex sells. We could take turns writing chapters or even pages. You write one and then I pick up where you left off and write one and back and forth and back and forth. You can start out being licentious and I'll be the prude, then we switch roles and back and forth and on and on. I'm thinking trilogy, but trilogies are a dime a dozen. How's about a sextet? Huh? Is that the ticket or what? OK OK, don't call 911, I'm going now...
I always like to remind myself of JK Rowling, going from publisher to publisher to find someone to pick up on Harry Potter or Sylvester Stallone hitting every movie studio in Hollywood with his little movie about Rocky Balboa. All is not lost unless you stop writing. I love to read what you have to say!