I grew up on stories of writers rowing tirelessly against the stream of rejection. Romantically, they died before being published, received no more than a pittance for works later deemed “classics,” or died trying to write a second novel after a glorious first. I relished the kind of story in which the writer tries and tries, papering a small bathroom with rejection letters from The Atlantic and The New Yorker, and on the day when she is taking her last quarter to buy an orange and a loaf of bread she discovers a letter in her mailbox telling her that her manuscript has been accepted. It never occurred to me that it would be easy, this publication thing, but I always had a secret pilot light of hubris that made me think that I was special and possibly immune to Business As Usual. Although I am usually self-critical to the point where I can barely leave the house for fear of exposure as a fraud, I have allowed myself florid fantasies of publication, critical acclaim, book tours and (gulp) a bespectacled and literary sort of fame.
For years there was a standoff: I thought maybe I could write something good enough but I was pretty sure I couldn’t write anything good enough. I wrote all the time – papers about John Donne and Watteau, then papers about asbestos litigation and moot court briefs, and finally real briefs. My need to put words in some elegant and persuasive order was satisfied throughout those years, and I mostly forgot about writing for myself, to say something important to me in the hopes that it might set fire to another soul. Quite honestly, writing about asbestos litigation has that kind of effect.
In the past year, I have come back to writing for myself, and my writing has caught the eye of people willing to pay me for words. Not my words, mind you; I have spun their ideas from straw into gold, following directives as to length, tone, and level of complexity. Occasionally I write something and submit it for publication. Always I have the fantasies again about being Discovered, vindicated, feted and worshipped. Always, I get the rejection letter and accept it with a chastened gulp of acceptance. I would not, after all, want to join a club that would have me as a member.
Recently I wrote a piece I really loved. It was a story I held back, even when I was at my lowest ebb and felt a desperate need to push “publish” on Open Salon and dull my pain with the crack that is approval. I polished it, put it away, went at it again and sent it to friends who are astute readers and writers in their own right. I accepted their criticism, made some changes, and sent the piece out, aiming as high as Icarus with his fatal, waxy wings. As I waited for a response, I sometimes let myself imagine an acceptance. Immediately afterwards I reminded myself that publishing is brutal these days, that everyone and his uncle thinks they can write, and that most bestsellers are written by Sarah Palin's ghostwriters rather than by Michael Chabons. And I’m no Michael Chabon, on my best day.
One week and one day later, it appeared in my inbox. “Dear Ann Nichols, Thank you for your recent submission. Unfortunately…” It wasn’t going to happen, this time, my dues were not yet paid, my wings were reduced to drips of hot wax by the heat of the sun. I sulked, briefly, and then resolved to get back on the horse that bit me. I was not yet a candidate for some new Algonquin Round Table, but maybe I could shop it around to magazines. Every story about a struggling writer has at its heart a real person who wanted not to become an inspirational story, but to become a published author. Every one of them had that bright flame of pride and hope, and every one of them suffered when it sputtered in the darkness of rejection.
I will try again, this very day. I can’t paper my bathroom with rejection letters, because they now come electronically (although I suppose I could print them out). Perhaps, on the day when the paychecks come late due to some bank error, and I leave the house with my last ten dollars to buy a gallon of organic milk and a box of Kleenex with lotion, my phone will buzz and there it will be: “Dear Ann Nichols, Thank you for your recent submission. We would like to include it in…”.


Salon.com
Comments
Ay human nature ...
I had to just Relaunch.
Who is very nasty - Kerry?
Someone needs good therapy.
Maybe Ann can drive a hearse.
Respectfully - Go Pick up editor?
Kerry L. never relates very well.
No danle a cigarette from Ya lip.
If stuck in gridlock? Munch garlic.
`
Edgar Allan Poe can help nasty folk.
He visited burial ground grave yard.
Poe was not a dark shadowy critter.
Folk who are depraved go cutthroat.
Fallen low-creeps are easily discerned.
apology?
Thanks Ann. I may go to a milk parlor.
Someone please haul creeps to burial.
Buy a cheesecake in Manhattan eatery.
Buy editor a soft pet squirrel to eat too?
Someone sure plays the perpetual Nasty!
At this point publishing is in an upheaval, but many of us still long for the approval of "real" editors and agents. We want the gatekeepers to say "yes." More and more I'm becoming convinced, it's not about the gatekeepers, it's about the READERS, and there may be other ways to reach them.
There is a prestigious annual juried illustration exhibit in NYC that I entered seven years in a row, unaccepted. I wanted to show with the big dogs though, and entering it became a yearly ritual. After the first few rejection letters, I stopped opening whatever they sent back until whenever. Paying bills one day, I sliced open what was certainly rejection letter number eight, but surprise, was an acceptance letter that had sat unopened on the hall table for more than a week.
In the beginning, it is good practice to send work to places that aren't the Atlantic or Knopf, and learn how to separate yourself from your commercial work, because that's what publishing does, make your work a product. I know that sounds harsh, but thinking about publishing that way takes the sting out of rejection. It means they can't market it to their particular audience and make money.
It's not just that publishing is in the doghouse. Editors' needs are specific and merit doesn't mean anything if you send an essay about your father and they already have a father essay in the wings, or if they have eight pieces written by women and one more slot for the upcoming issue and it had better be a male writer or they're going to pigeonhole themselves eternally.
This is to say: Don't just send your piece out to #2 on your list--however good your work is there is an element of lottery to the whole affair. Give it its best chance; send it out widely and don't sit around waiting to hear: write the next thing.
Sorry, I moonlight as a walking Writer's Market.
(for yes, there is a huge difference among the two)
Most people would think that being published legitimizes their claim as a writer. That they can call themselves authors without feeling like posers. Though I have been published I do not think this is necessarily true. In fact, I've read superb writing online. The fact that a person does not receive a meager (trust me, meager) royalty check does not make him/her less of a writer.
My book received excellent reviews. Does that mean I can give up my day job? Hell, no. Unless I want to starve.
From my limited experience in publishing this is what I can offer (and considering I work in another cultural market)
Keep writing. There's no other way around it.
Keep sending out your work.
Broaden the field, publish in other online spaces. Broaden your audience.
An author not only must sell "him/herself" as Laura Miller points out, an author "creates" him/herself.
And remember, after all is said and done, an author usually makes 10% of the cover price of each book SOLD. Established, famous (or notorious) authors (or their agents) negotiate author's advances.
Good luck.
I'll stay happy with my shareof "R"s, an occasional EP and a now and then acceptance from Haggard and Haloo.
Keep writing / R
However, I did save a few. I started collecting the most interesting and bizarre letters. Some were about 23RD generation copy machine. Some were cryptic notes, scrawled on little slips of paper. A few had Dear_________ with a had scrawled, Mr. WhistleBerries.
Standard theme was: “Unfortunately, your material does not suit our present needs. However, we wish you the best of luck placing it elsewhere.”
There are all of these proprieties and rules – about submitting only to one publisher or magazine at a time. Then, one waits six to nine months to get that curt rejection. To heck with that!
I attended several writers’ conferences, where the guest speakers included name authors, magazine and book editors. In their seminars, the editors and publishers spoke of the ‘readers’ who give everything the first glance, and that is all it is, a glance. The college students hired as readers glance at the first page or two. Are there any typo’s or grammar mistakes? Yes – can it on the spot. No? Pass it to the next level.
If you want the manuscript back, be sure to include sufficient postage and a self-addressed envelope. After a bit, this grows very wearisome, and costly.
With the advent of e–publishing where more and more writers will have access to publishing their work, many people in the publishing business will be out of of a job. They might lament being so mean-spirited in the past.
I write articles and fiction on a regular basis. I now have dozens of short stories, but selected 35 of them – 84,000 words, 260 pages, and it will become a book – my book, and very soon.
So Ann, keep writing, even if it is just for your own enjoyment.
Seriously though, you must keep trying, even if it's just to keep ME satisfied. You are being rejected simply because there's no longer a market for great writing, or the market is so limited that all the publishing houses are just using the same people. Meanwhile Sarah Palin's ghostwriter is being paid handsomely. That burns my arse!
I might have said...perhaps the only reason they would be rejecting a fine writer such as yourself is that there seems to be little publishing space left for anything beyond tabloid fare. Perhaps it's like Hollywood where they keep selling the same films (billed as sequels) and actors...those which have earned well in the past. No room for risk-taking. Everything is being dumbed down for the all mighty dollar. Now that I can say with conviction.
Your submissions are always accepted here, so that's the beauty of this place but it's wicked for true believers to hit 'publish' and then not get an instant EP...I'm familiar with a few folks that sit and wait, like a cat watching a squirrel, and if it doesn't come... well, you described it so well already - no point in me going on about it. It may be true that we must follow our bliss, but when the bliss goes out of it I don't know what to do either. Does bliss depend on validation, or do we just need to feel we've been heard? It must depend, in part, in getting paid for what we've done. Everyone needs to earn a little sumnsumn for their efforts. JK Rowling said she couldn't stop her writing from just pouring out of her, as though she were just the scribe most times. I don't have that genie in my bottle, and I know it, so I guess I've made peace with it and just write when the mood strikes, knowing maybe a few people will read it and comment in a public forum... but mostly it's just for me. I've got years and years of journals with pages and pages of writing. Is it publish-worthy? I don't know, but more to the point, I don't care. For you my dear writerly friend, I can't wait to learn that your phone has buzzed, or your e-mail box contains that 'congratulations' salutation and that there's a check in the mail. It's not for lack of talent or trying. Bliss would be nice.
(if it's your last $10, splurge on ice cream-- then, either way, you've gotten some pleasure from the whole exercise ;)