I need to organize my closet

Ann Rhys Matthews

Ann Rhys Matthews
Location
Arizona,
Birthday
October 08
Bio
Not necessarily in this order: mother, wife, daughter, doctor, laundress, patient, writer, displaced OSU Cowboy by way of Texas, New York, California and now Tucson, AZ.

MY RECENT POSTS

Ann Rhys Matthews's Links

Salon.com
Editor’s Pick
JUNE 26, 2008 11:43PM

What Are They Smoking?

Rate: 18 Flag

 

 

True Story -  A 72 year old woman at an Arizona Pain Management Clinic.

 

“I couldn’t  help notice that yellow Hummer in the parking lot,” she says to the physician after he injects medication into her back. “If you doctors didn’t insist on having such fancy cars, maybe healthcare wouldn’t be in the crapper.”

 

The doctor helps steady her as she limps toward her walker. She has been in pain for a long time.  He leads her into his office - a space he shares with another physician and two nurse practitioners - and asks her to have a seat.

 

“More bad news?” she aks.

 

He nods and types several commands on the keyboard until Mrs. Smith’s file appears. “Can you see this?” he asks.

 

She leans her weight onto her forearms and peers through her reading glasses at the computer screen. “It says $48.47.”

 

“$48.47 is what I was paid to spend thirty minutes with you in this office and to provide an injection in your back. $48.47 is meant to cover the medicine I injected, the salary of my medical assistant, the rent on this building and the gas for my 1998 Volkswagen rusting out there in the parking lot.”

 

She leans back in her chair.  “I had no idea.”

 

 

 

Most people don’t. The wealthy physician driving a Mercedes to the country club every Wednesday afternoon is a thing of the past, yet according to what I read and remarks from patients such as Mrs. Smith, many people still perceive physicians as overpaid components of our failing system.

 

But physicians are merely the public facade associated with the problems of healthcare. We are tangible beings in a world of nameless, faceless telephone voices. We are also the individuals who daily witness people struggling to make copays, opting against regular health screening and selecting which prescriptions they can afford to refill each month. 

 

So why in this election year with phrases like Universal Healthcare and Single Payer System breathlessly bandied about by politicians, do physicians appear so reluctant to join in on the excitement?

 

Perhaps it’s because we’ve already worked closely with a single payer system: Medicare. And it’s sucking money like never before.

 

In Arizona where the Medicare population is immense, we are witnessing an alarming trend: medical providers are “opting out” and dropping their participation status in the Medicare system. It’s a big deal. Seniors living on fixed incomes are finding it increasingly difficult to obtain basic medical care in a state which prides itself on retirement opportunities. 

 

The medical community cites poor reimbursement and unreasonable compliance standards as their reasons for exiting. The paperwork required for Medicare patient visits exceeds what other health insurers require and the penalties for non-compliance with these administrative demands are steep: up to $10,000 per violation.

 

Ten thousand little reasons to opt out.

 

And although the actual hands-on providers of medical care may be shaking their heads at the catastrophic failings of the current system, there is one group who is delighted with Medicare: Big Pharmaceutical.

 

The senior prescription drug plan, Medicare Part D,  was designed in such a way  that the federal government would not be permitted to negotiate prices of drugs with the drug companies.

 

Say What?

 

It’s true. The Pharmaceutical Industry has been able to maintain a healthy profit margin partly due to the fact that the Federal Government simply pays whatever the drug companies charge for their drugs. Where else is pricing competition so blatantly ignored?

 

Not at the VA.  The Veterans Administration negotiates drug prices and on average, pays 58% less for drugs than Medicare Part D.  For example, in 2007, Medicare paid $1483 for an annual supply of the cholesterol lowering drug Zocor while the VA paid $127 for the same tablets.

 

Senator Obama is already promising to repeal this loophole which enables the upper management teams of big Pharma to purchase more yacht fuel but I’m skeptical that he’ll enjoy any success against the high-powered pharmaceutical lobbyists.  Do we really expect that any self-respecting corporation would give up a 17% profit margin without a fight? 

 

Big Pharma insists that without a large profit margin, no new medications will be developed and cancer will never be cured. As it stands, only the wealthiest can afford to have cancer.

 

If the current Medicare system is a portent of what we can expect from current plans for Universal Healthcare, I’ll be waiting for a second opinion.

 

 

Next topic:  Managed Care Organizations

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Interesting post. Thanks. I have the impression that specialists do much better than primary care providers under Medicare. I look forward to your managed care post.
My dear Mademoiselle Docteur Jones ~

It is a pleasure discovering your essays (and those of Monsieur Docteur Parikh) and the opportunity for a glimpse into the oft-times frightening world on the other side of the operating table.
What would be a better solution? Something like the federal employees' system that gives them a choice of health care provider and is subsidized by the government? Or a Canada-style national health care?
I'm trying to learn more about the Federal System. My understanding of it now is that it is contracted out by state to varying MCO (managed care organizations) who then charge high monthly premiums and provide limited benefits to their "members". If the government is unable to meet the costs of Medicare, I don't understand how they can meet the costs of this for the general public. I'm not convinced anybody has worked through the math on it (except the MCO's who are greedily rubbing their palms together, no doubt)
Hi Ann, it seems I've fallen behind in getting a Tricare story written this week. But you are on a roll here. If you wanted to reiterate for general consumption what you wrote to me earlier, I think you covered it as well as I could. Tricare coverage and quality varies from place to place. I think Farmer has plenty of experience with these inconsistencies too.
Thanks, Ann. I am not that old (really!), and I have had at least six doctors retire or find other positions in the last 10 years (all my age or younger) because of insurance. One started a cosmeceutical company, but the rest either got university jobs or just really retired because the whole situation got so awful. And my primary care doc just had his practice shut down, and he moved in with some other docs, and I found him in his building on a Saturday, moving his own office. This is not a way to get rich anymore.

The only good news is doctors are an educated and still semi-powerful constituency for health care reform. But I admit: it will be hard to get right.
I was gonna guess the Hummer belonged to a drug salesweasel.
Great post. Infuriating situation. Apalling ignorance. Nauseating greed.There are countries where these systems work, but not here. In America, every form of government aid is hobbled by this profound bureaucratic unwillingness to actually help. People in New Orleans spent hours and days filling in forms and waiting on line for aid after Katrina. All they should have had to give the government was THEIR ZIP CODE. My daughter is a social worker who spends most of her time guiding people through these same diabolical labyrinths at HUD. The underlying point is Social Darwinism right out of the Herbert Spencer playbook: if you need help there's something wrong with you and you should be punished. The one candidate who actually tlked about fighting the pharmaceutical companies (and the other Proprietors) was John Edwards. He laughed at the 'bi-partisan negotiations' and 'compromises' Obama describes. He knew it would be a war. People don't give up power. You have to take it away from them. His mistake was being honest. The Proprietors did everything they could to elimnate him, and -- what a surprise! -- he's gone. When he was running third in the primaries the Pugh people called me with a lengthy set of polling questions. If Barack did this and Hillary did that, would you approve of Hiollary if this and Barack if that ... Finally I said -- what about Edwards? THERE WASN'T A SINGLE QUESTION ABOUT EDWARDS. The bland phone-bot on the other informed me that he 'wasn't the subject' of this call. Two nights later I hear on the news how Edwards was 'scarcely registering' in the polls. Yeah, because they excluded him completely! This country will have to be pushed more farther toward utter ruin before people wake up to what's happening. And that's how revolutions occur. Meanwhile, I'm sticking with the George Bush medical plan: pray that you stay healthy.
It was a travesty how the drug lobby made out with Medicare D and the name "Billy Tauzin" pops up right away as a symbol of why we got stuck with this mess. He certainly managed to enrich himself handsomely at taxpayer expense after landing the lucrative job with Pharma. On another note, I'd say all of the general practitioners I know in my area are hardly hurt for cash either, but I can safely say that their salaries aren't up to the level of Billy Tauzin's either.
I should have added last night that the only GP I know personally is struggling to make it and has been for about seven years. Coincidence?

The Norman Rockwell image of the country doctor who will take a bushel of apples and a couple of chicken dinners in exchange for services appears to be coming back. Only this time, it's not sentimental American iconography, it's the continuing devaluation of skilled professionals in favor of corporations suffocating America with the help of their government puppets.
When I was in the restaurant business, the most lucrative private parties were the oness put on by drug companies for physicians. Money was no object. They'd order high end wine and provide an open-ended menu for the doctors ($75 steak? go right ahead). Well, times have changed here as well. Aftr talking with my old friends from those days (10 years ago) and a few pharmaceutical reps, I hear the well has dried up. No more expensive parties, no more sponsored vacations. Who's making the money?
The CEO's are making the money.
My GP has been crying the blues for years about making less than $60,000 per year after paying for general overhead.

The same was true for my GP in Australia 8 years ago -- she made the equivalent of $35,000 US in a country with nationalized medicine. She took a sabbatical -- not sure if she ever went back. It would have been a shame as she was the best GP I ever had...

So, Universal Health Care or not, the GP's struggle in my limited observation of the system...
I though that it was the insurance companies and "providers" who were making all the money these days. They're the ones who get final say now on whether you get to have the treatment prescribed by your doctor.
Great and thoughtful piece.

I'm always entertained wtih pharma make the arguement that a free market system ensures innovation while simultaneously protecting the free market from real competition from Canada and other countries, from which we could import drugs and therefore which could help reduce drug prices
We pay a lot for our medical care as a percentage of GDP, much more than other countries (they pay more taxes, we pay it to private companies). Yet we don't have universal coverage, nor even the closest to having the longest life expectancy. Where in other countries, people have to wait for surgeries, here they can't get them at all because they can't afford them. And in both places, bureaucrats may deny you care, it's just here, it's HMO bureaucrats, whereas there it's gov't bureaucrats. What's the diff?

What we need is to know a lot more about how those other countries make these things work and still have highly trained and highly skilled doctors.
LeCastor - I agree. We need more information. I think (hope) healthcare can be available to some degree for everyone in this country, but it's going to require a paradigm shift in many areas. Researching other countries and their systems is an excellent place to start-
I know that there are problems with universal health care, but I also know that the problems with our existing system are beyond bad. My oncologist felt I needed "dose dense" chemotherapy, which meant I had infusions every 2 weeks. The only way I could have this was to get a shot that would boost my production of white blood cells. A very small amount of clear liquid in a syringe--maybe 1 or 2 cc at most?--that cost $4,500 every time I got it. My insurance covered it, but plenty of people could not get it. They had to wait longer between chemo rounds, a wait that might allow the cancer to spread and become incurable. I would rather have a system that makes us wait a bit for things like knee replacement but makes sure everyone who needs it can get the proper cancer treatment.

Ann, I really appreciate that you are not trying to claim to have all the answers or that you are not open to considering different solutions. I think that if more people had your attitude, we might be more likely to come up with a workable solution.
The insurance companies and pharma companies are the ones who make the money.

The doctor is just another front end employee who is told what he can expect to get paid for a procedure he's got to get approved.

I'm for single payer because it would eliminate all the crap that goes on now in doctor's offices, where depending on what insurance company you have, they have to get approval for various procedures or fill out various forms to get paid.

Oh, yeah, and insurance companies being profit making entities, they delay payment as long as they can to make more money on interest.

Let's also keep in mind that universal healthcare is NOT single payer.

You are required by law to have car insurance, right? But you've got hundreds of companies competing for your business.

The same thing has happened in Massachusetts, where everyone has to buy insurance and the poor get help paying for it.

But that is NOT single payer.
I believe the profitability of the insurance companies has as much or more to do with the failure of American health care than big pharma.

In 2006 United Healtcare Group Inc's CEO William McGuire drew $8 million a year in salary plus bonus, enjoying perks such as personal use of the company jet. At that time he had also amassed one of the largest stock-options fortunes of all time with unrealized gains on stock options totaling $1.6 billion in April 2006.

As Wall Street Journal reporter George Anders pointed out, "Dr. McGuire's story shows how an elite group of companies is getting rich from the nation's fraying health-care system. Many of them aren't discovering drugs or treating patients. They're middlemen who process the paperwork, fill the pill bottles and otherwise connect the pieces of a $2 trillion industry."

Trace McGuire's windfall to the increasing market dominaton of the U.S. health insurance market. A report from the American Medical Association documented the increasing consolidation of the US health insurance market, as reported by the Baltimore Sun, "in each of 43 states, a handful of top insurers have gained such a stronghold that their markets are considered 'highly concentrated' under US Department of Justice guidelines, often far exceeding the thresholds that trigger antitrust concerns. The study also shows that in 166 of 294 metropolitan areas, or 56 percent, a single insurer controls more than half the business in health maintenance organization and preferred provider networks underwriting.
Wonderful, troubling piece, Ann, as usual. I am going to blog some tips I've compiled from the patient's POV. I hope you and Rahul will tell me what you think.
When I visit my GP of some 20 years or so---I always feel like I'm stepping back in time to that Norman Rockwell world---you know, the one that never really happened. And I NEVER leave without getting him to say out loud "No, I'm not ready to retire"---because just like Ann said---these folks are becoming relics of another age.

My question is: does anyone forsee a day when it would again be possible for medical professionals to operate on their own?

Think of the movie "The Real Dirt on Farmer John"---a compelling story of how a guy who wore a Dr Suess hat while he plowed his fields---managed to flourish despite "Big Ag." Is there a Doctor Farmer John out there anywhere?