Annie Laurie

Annie Laurie
Location
Massachusetts,
Bio
Writer, editor, professional nerd and general unemployed layabout blogging from Boston, MA.

Editor’s Pick
JULY 15, 2009 2:50PM

5 Upcoming 3D Movies to Avoid

Rate: 6 Flag

I almost always hate 3D movies. I find the technology distracting and end up spending way more time thinking "wow, there's something else popping out from the screen into my brain, again" instead of actually being able to consider and appreciate movie as a whole. A lot of 3D movies seem to spend more time on those distracting "Check it out! It's 3D shots"-- the obligatory trhrowing an apple towards the screen scenes --  rather then telling a compelling story. Plus, I wear glasses, so wearing a second, giant plastic pair on the tip of my nose is uncomfortable.

There's a huge number of 3D films heading our way in the next few years. /Film just put out a great, comprehensive list of all of them, so I went through and picked out the ones I most dreading the arrival of. Check back tomorrow to see the five I'm actually looking forward to (this was going to be one post but hey, I got carried away...)

Five Upcoming 3D Films to Avoid

1. G-Force (7/24, 2009)

Proving that a lot of talent does not a good movie make. Sam Rockwell, Tracy Morgan, and Penelope Cruz, three of my favorite actors in their respective fields of drama, comedy, and nudity, lend their voices to the titular super ninja rodents in this pandering Jerry Bruckheimer shlock. The trainer managed to induce more winces from me per second then I thought was possible. The real hint: the mole voiced by Nicholas Cage, who become the most reliable indicator of mediocrity in film. He's like the ex your still a little hot for -- yeah, you kind of want to see them again, but you know it's going to end in anger and tears.

I get this as a kids movie, but I doubt even the little 'uns will find any magic in this, 3D or not. 

medium_3722462859_5a17bf0db8_o 

2. Shrek Forever After (5/21, 2010)

Really? We need another one of these? I enjoyed the first one as a broad family comedy, but the second one was already getting tired, and the third one was such a mismash of triology-burnout cliches it completely squanders the charm of the concept (although what a weird freakin' cast.)

But of course, why come up with new ideas when you can run a franchise into the ground. Even if you don't plan on seeing this, you know that the inevitable run up (Shrek limited edition candy! Shrek sings on American Idol! Shrek vomit-green collectable Slurpee cups everywhere!)  is going to ruin your trips to 7-11 for a few months. 

The title seems to tease you with this being the end of the Shrek Saga, but never fear, there are coins to wring from this narrative corpse: 2012 will see Puss in Boots, the criminally unnecessary spin-off of Antonio Banderas' popular(?) Puss in Boots character. And to add insult to injury, it's a prequel.

3. 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea: Nemo (2011?)

Oh. God. Why. One of my favorite books is being destroyed (again) by Disney (again.) The great all-powerful McG, after destroying the Terminator franchise forever (and simultaneously executive producing the not-at-all-bad Chuck and Supernatural) is helming (wordplay!) the take on the Jules Verne tale, conveniently ditching all the actual Jules Verne stuff in order to capitalize on name recognition while churning out another middling slog of unending camera-winking.  

Example: McG's desire to cast Will Smith as Nemo, which proves that McG 1) cares about nothing but sticking the most popular faces in his movies, and 2) can't read. In the books, Nemo is Indian. Even The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen managed not to screw that up (and man, did they screw up literally everything else.) Grab someone from Slumdog Millionaire and let someone else take a turn at saving the world besides Will. Or better yet Naveen Andrews.  Let's all take a moment and consider how awesome that would be.

Here's your Captain Nemo McG. You're welcome. 

Here's your Captain Nemo, McG. You're welcome. 

4. Step It Up 3D (8/6 2010

This boggled my mind. Apparently the 2006 stereotypes find love through dance! retread did not terrible at the box office: $114,194,846 internationally, pretty good fora movie that only cost 12 mil to make. The sequel, Step Up 2 The Streets continued the "let's pretend thirteen year old girls titled the movie" trend, did even better, grossing 148 mil worldwide. (Box Office Mojo)

Still, I don't think that anyone looked at this movie and said wow, this is a story we can tell compellingly with 3D technology. We all know they thought, hey: people watch this dancing shit, and we can charge them more to watch it in 3D. With everyone plopping down an extra two bucks (or more, with the proliferation of pseudo-IMAX)  for a slighty bigger screen size or two cents disposable glasses, they have a much nicer profit margin. It's the use of technology at it's most base.

Plus, it's clearly just a rip-off of the far superior Save the Last Dance. Two Words: Julia Stiles! Admit it, you cried a little. 

5. A Christmas Carol (11/6, 2009)

 Let's think this through for a second. You thought it would be a good idea to use the same, optically assaulting "motion capture" technology that plunged the audience into the very depths of the uncanny valley in Polar Express, and use it on a less original story. There have been at least six big screen adaptations, countless tv movies, and more Very Special X-Mas episodes of sitcoms to count. Heck, even the muppets did it. So why revisit it again? Oh, because you think audiences will sit down to any family piece of crap during the holidays just to have a couple of hours without shopping and cooking and screaming kids. And, hey, you're probably right.

achristmascarolfirstscrooge-440x272 

 This time they'll be creepifying Jim Carrey, who's completed the arc from underdog comedian to box-office gold to dramatic force to dangerous moron with his very public campaign discouraging vaccinations because actors think they cause autism. Which they don't. Then, for some reason, Gary Oldman. (A personal note to Gary Oldman: be more selective, dude) Did I mention they're both playing three roles? Because nothing says Christmas like disguising cheapness as cleverness.

Runners Up: The Dark Country ("Lady, I'm Tom Jane");  Hoodwinked 2: Hood and Evil (Now with Panettiere!);  Cats and Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore iIs that suppose to be a Pussy Galore joke? Because if there's one thing kids love it's vagina puns); Guardians of Ga'hoole (stop giving Zach Snyder money, please); The Smurfs 3D (too easy)

 Check out the full list of upcoming 3D movies at /Film. And check back later for 5 3D films I'm actually looking forward to.

Author tags:

film, 3d, movies, entertainment

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Hmmmm.....cheerleaders in 3D. I wonder who the target audience is for that movie?
I wouldn't see any of the abovelisted in 4D!
@ Phaedo -- I was a Jules Verne nut back in the day and this one actually sickened me a bit. It's one thing to both a silly kids movie about hamsters, but this is frickin' literature. And McG just bothers me, although admittedly more as a person then a director (which is saying something...Terminator: Salvation ::coughcough::
I haven't seen a 3-D movie since "The Stewardesses" came out...
Hmmm when was that?

I do remember when the television show, The Medium, made everyone get 3D glasses. Bad.... bad.... bad....
I agree I agree I agree! I love the new 3-D when used appropriately--and in my humble opinion that is in schlocky horror movies (My Bloody Valentine 3-D) or a Tim Burton wonder film (Nightmare Before Christmas). But seriously? Computer generated animated film (thus no depth to expand, as with Nightmare) and no need for shock factor (any horror movie ever made) so just a gimmick to cover up a weak story line. Sad--just more drivel in the world.
Ah, what a pleasure to find such wonderful ranting, and know it's not *me* doing the ranting!

My favorite in the area of "WTF?" sequels is "Final Destination 2" and "Final Destination 3," showing that no amount of grammar (I thought "final" meant, you know, *final*) will keep studios from milking something. I kept wanting them to subtitle the films. "Final Destination 2: This Time For Sure," and "Final Destination 3: It's *Really* Final *This* Time," and so on.
Oh, and let us not forget "Avatar." Will they screw it up even more--other than the original screwup of handing the movie over to M. Night "I had one good idea once, but that was quite a while ago, but they still keep letting me make films" Shyamaylan--by making it 3D, "for the kiddies"? God save us all.
@ Douglas Moran: Ugh, one of the movies that I debated including on this list was The Final Destination, presumably the last of the series, also to be shown in mortality blasting 3D. I didn't include it because 1) I walked out of the first movie (the only movie I've ever walked out on, actually) and didn't have anything to say about the third sequel. And as you noted quite correctly, 3D is at it's best in horror, and while I'm sure this will be a terrible movie, I'm sure a lot of people will enjoy the 3D when it's used here. Just not me.
@ Douglas Moran: Also, the official name of the Avatar direct by M. Night is The Last Airbender, to avoid confusion with the upcoming James Cameron Avatar (no relation.) And yeah, giving it to him will almost certainly prove to be a bad idea.
I LOVE Gary Oldman. Fell in love when he played Sid Vicious in 86. But come on dude...there are only so many bad movies I can go see just because you're in them. Anyone (besides me and my sister) see The Unborn that was out earlier this year...bad. very bad.
God, help us all. If people would stop bringing their damn kids to these movies they might stop making them! But noooo, let's subject our children to less than mediocre schlock solely intended for mass marketing. Oh the humanity.
I've only seen the first Final Destination and it bothered the shit out of me, I don't know why. I'm a fan of the horror movies (not the bullshit "horror" they pump out in spades these days), but those just left a bad taste in my mouth.
@ Indie Girl: I love Gary Oldman too, which is why it's so sad to see him pulled into schlock. I just keep hoping Christopher Nolan will be persuaded to do another Batman so we can see him again, although it sadly doesn't look likely.

@ Asianshoebox: Sadly I think parents are content to just plop their kids down in front of any old thing, regardless of quality. They need to demand better quality for their children, and themselves. Pixar's shown they can make smart movies that enchant all ages-- if only more studios would follow their direction!