I haven't updated my blog in months. Not because I didn't want to. Because I had a health crisis that was chased like a cat by a terrier by a financial crisis. I had neither the time nor the energy to write. Not for no money.
But I just ran in to a work related thing that won't go away if I don't exorcise it by writing about it. I'm losing sleep, so money or not, better I pound it out here.
A certain client of mine hires thousands of contractors. They kindly provide a message board for these people to interact. A couple of days ago someone started a thread on this board about how guilty they felt working at home because their kids get ignored.
Huh?
A big part of the reason that I became a contractor was that I had a million kids and I wanted to be around for them. But my work time? The kids always knew that unless there was blood or the communists invaded that mommy's work time was mommy's work time. I had no guilt over telling/teaching them to deal with their own drama. I chose to be there so I could be there when it was really important. But "Mommy play with me, I'm bored."
Not really important.
Where did women get the idea that to be a good mommy you have to pay attention and cater to your child's every little whim?
Historically the SAHM is an anomaly. At least the SAHM June Cleaver, Donna Reed approved mom. They didn't exist in any numbers that are statistically significant. Most of history you had to be rich to be wife and mother and nothing else. Women have always worked. The 1950s housewife is a myth. Or at least so rare that she might as well be.
The ability to stay at home at cater to the spawns every whim is a luxury. Throughout history women have worked their asses off. I'm pretty sure that 1850s women didn't get all guilt stricken because they couldn't play aughts and crosses with little Johnny.
I've decided that guilt is a choice these women make based on a skewed view of history. It has to be. Historically women birthed the babies and then worked their fingers to the bone to make sure they had enough to eat so they would survive.
Guilt over play time is a brand new thing. It isn't bad, exactly, but if you have to work for your grocery money you ought to realize that feeding your kid is more important than playing with them if it means playing with them will lower the money you have to buy groceries.
Seems simple, yes? Apparently it isn't.


Salon.com
Comments
As a SAHD, I have to agree that the kids get shortchanged on the play time, though I admit to having an easier time than most SAHMs. I've volunteered a lot of work, and done middling amounts of work for pay, but mainly because of my good fortune in marrying a ceo I didn't have to make money...but work is a good thing for everyone involved, including the kids who need to learn self reliance in a self indulgent world.
Nice to see you again.
I'm a stay at home dad with a 19 month old. I'm currently applying for part time work and volunteering and serving on a nonprofit Board. So I have some "work time" during the day. It's hard because I'm not giving her all the attention she requests. Obviously, she's a young toddler, so I'm not completely ignoring her. But I admit, I feel damn guilty when I plop her with some toys and snacks while I get out "just a couple more" emails.
Whether SAH or working M or D, kids need to be kept safe, fed, educated, stimulated and busy (oh, okay, and clean too). When I was a kid, I played with my siblings and other kids, not my mom (and certainly not my dad).
Does anybody remember Mrs. Cleaver playing a board game with the The Beave? Of course there should be parent-child interaction and attention, but today's "helicopter parents" are doing their kids more harm than good.
My husband likes to say that someday our kids will be on the couch telling a shrink, "My parents gave me too much 'quality time'. "
This guilt crap has just Got to stop. The 50's are SO over.
But if it's an 8-year-old who wants to play Monopoly, sure they ought to be able to amuse themselves until mommy or daddy is done for the day.
Hope these dark times pass quickly.
The whole "fetishization of parenting" in modern American middle and upper classes is really annoying, and as Sally has already noted, somewhat damaging. Sure, when the little guy says, "Mommy, come PLAY!" I want to. I want to make him happy. But there is not a damn thing wrong with me doing what I need to to make me happy too -- even if it means that he gets disappointed some of the time. In fact, happy mammas make for happy kids.
And when it's a choice between not eating and disappointment, well, that's not really a choice, now is it?
I like to point out positive guilt to my clients, as signs of progress in therapy.
(The term "positive guilt" is a term I learned from my wife, by the way. Credit where credit is do.)
And yes, I completely agree. I feel guilty about working, and then I think that I have to get over that -- I have to work, my daughter has a wonderful caregiver, and we do the best we can. I do wish society would make us feel better instead of worse, though.