Asta Charles

Asta Charles
Location
Los Angeles, California, USA
Birthday
December 12
Title
Myth Maker
Bio
I am a comedic writer and real life satirist. I am interested in social psychology, economics, communication, politics, and transition from a religious world to a secular one. Oh, and I spend a lot of time in bars. I wrote a manuscript about the perils of online dating and its ultimate cost to society. It's not published. Meh.

Editor’s Pick
OCTOBER 21, 2009 12:21AM

Weed: Shall Ye Be California's Savior?

Rate: 16 Flag


When I was in macroeconomics class in college, I was a bit of a teacher's pet. Oh fine, I was a fucking kiss ass. Oh how I loved guns and butter, supply and demand, elasticity, inelasticity and public policy. This lead to many after-class conversations about such concepts as marijuana legalization.

My professor was worldly, wise, and not afraid to crack a nasty joke in class. My god...this class was everything I loved. I miss it.

One day, after class, I walked with my professor to her office. I asked her, "what do you think would happen if marijuana was legalized?"

"It doesn't matter what your political and philosophical opinion of it is, the bottom line is that if it were regulated it could then be subject to a special tax, like cigarettes. It would be a huge source of income for the government."

At the time, I was a conservative little pisher. So I wanted to disagree with this, but it made so much sense that I couldn't no matter how hard I tried to spin my mental wheels.

She was a touch before her time. She just needed a little visible hand of Obama to get her idea off the ground.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Have you ever been inside a "medicinal marijuana dispensary"?

In California, it's hardly an illegal-looking operation. It's not on par with illegal abortions, sketchy Mexican plastic surgeries, or buying Viagara from the internet. It's pretty damned safe and regulated. Whatever your position on consumption, it's no worse for the human body (but this is a war between lungs and liver) than alcohol.

There are advisers that know their crop better than their own ass. There are private consultation rooms. A professional cashier. You can be assured that you won't be getting something you don't want. Additionally, you can be sure you'll be offered the healthiest in weed options for you and your condition - that is, of course, if you legitimately have one.

The prices are fair, but they're raking in money hand over fist. In California, state law prohibits these cannabis confectionaries from being "money making organizations".

As of present, the only tax collected from dispensaries is standard California sales tax. Last year, this rang up to $18 million.

That's it? A paltry $18 million? Gee gadz. Seems to me we're missing out. It also seems to me that California has just been handed quite an auspicious gift - the new federal disinterest in prosecuting these dispensaries and other sticky-icky related crimes. Now, the state can decide how these "crimes" shall be prosecuted.

In a time when Los Angeles kindergarten classes receive a $30 a year for supplies, road repairs simply don't happen, and the state budget is simply fucked - isn't this quite the blessing?

This new removal of federal interest in prosecuting marijuana related crimes allows California to act - and possibly fully legalize and tax marijuana. Oh bless this new income opportunity. It's more than a piggy bank. It's a Three Mile Island of cash flow.

Seems like um, dare I say, we should just legalize it.

It does more than just create a source of income, it would eliminate a major money-suck: marijuana possession and distribution crimes. Prosecution, court times, and incarceration are absurd for such a non-violent crime. Legalization would also eliminate the opportunity for marijuana distribution to become a violent crime at all.

I don't smoke weed. This isn't a plea and examination for my own benefit. I hate weed. The last time I smoked, my boyfriend and I ended up slumped over in the corner of some back house on our friend's property. Unable to stand, unable to focus my eyes, and unable to formulate a fucking sentence. I was also convinced at the time that it was a great idea to take a cab from Burbank to West LA (approximately a $60 cost). Yeah. I don't like weed, but I know a lot of people to whom it is a favorable substitution for alcohol. Good for them.

Everybody needs their vice. Everybody also needs a savior. Right now, California needs both.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
There is a fear, Asta, that if we legalize one drug, it will lead to greater tolorance of others ... the benefit of which is doubtful .. or that the permissive use of pot will prompt "stoned" behavior where it is undesirable ... at the workplace, in schools,etc.

I happen to like it. But I know I have no business being out in active society when I use it. My reflexes are seriously below par. As much as I hate it being illegal ... and rediculously expensive ... I'm not sure I want it more accessable either. Just say'n.
Asta- Good commentary. The libertarian in me leans toward legalization. The enforcement of drug laws bring a lot of federal and state dollars to local law enforcement agencies and judicial systems. It is also easy PR , with quantifiable metrics that play well in the emida. (e.g., we seized X million worth of drugs last year) They are not ready to give up that cash cow. I believe that is why they fight legalization after all what is there to enforce if it legal ?
replace emida with media, typing too fast this AM :)
It might surprise you to know that William F. Buckley was long in favor of legalized prostitution (for obvious reasons such as being a man) and the legalization or at least the decriminalization of marijuana. California better move fast however because the high taxes and user fees on things like utilities and property are driving the wealthy out of state....and with them they are carrying the jobs.
It needs to be legalized. That and if you ingest it, it is no longer bad for the lungs. (the bad side to that is I've never heard of someone overdosing on smoked weed. I'm not sure that would be equally true for ingestion. Seems like it would be fairly easy to overdo it before people became familiar with the dosing.)
On the whole prohibition has had nearly 75 years to work. It hasn't. We've created a class of criminal that has become the bread and butter of l;aw enforcement and the prison economy that Reagan left us with. States are broke, the Federal government is broke and some bit of racist tripe left over from the Great Depression is keeping a strangle hold of on a source of revenue that would likely help fund those road repairs and boost the funding for the Kindergartens. Like it or not, the evidence I've witnessed by my own view is that marijuana may be a drug like all others and that controls are needed to restrict the access of teens and others, it is no worse than the alcohol that seems to be pushed at all age groups. Truth is that even if pop culture show people swilling down large drinks and functioning this is not the case. People who are drunk, do not function better and drunks are not the witty, raconteurs that they imagine themselves to be. Of course neither are pot heads, they at least know they are stoned and act accordingly. I say legalize it, and tax it and take it out of the hands of those who would distribute it to all comers.
The big news when legalization finally rolls around will be large industries using the properties which have made hemp an essential part of the world economy for thousands of years. Specifically products which we presently equate with petroleum and chemical manufacturers. And textiles. And paper. And medicine!

And as far as "if we legalize one drug" thinking, the "drug war" has failed miserably because once kids figure out how savagely they've been LIED TO about dope, they figure that the same degree of bullshit applies to every other drug, many of which pose real dangers.

I wrenched my back something fierce a year or so ago. I didn't consider visiting any medical marijuana dispensary. I don't trust anything like that at all.

I would love, however, to be able to grow a couple of plants alongside my tomatoes. I wonder if I'll live long enough to see the laws changed so that a weed is just a weed again.

The stupidity of modern man is truly boundless.
I don't think that legalizing marijuana would have quite the tax benefit that people hope for. No pun intended, but marijuana grows like a weed. If it were legalized there's nothing that would keep people from growing it in their back yards, thus avoiding both the cost of it and the taxes.

I know a lady who is a medical marijuana patient in the state in which I live. Every year she grows a couple of plants in the back yard, and that takes care of her for an entire year. Other than regular watering and fertilizing and an occasional dose of organic insecticide it requires little care. I think it is fair to say that marijuana takes less work than having roses. It is simple to harvest and it dries in a couple of weeks. It takes a little work to trim the buds, but overall is probably less work than making a batch of homebrew beer -- and less expensive. It requires little space, and someone in an apartment could grow it outside in a container on the back patio.

If it were legal, given the ease and low cost of production (for small quantities) I don't see why people wouldn't grow their own, especially since they could save a hell of a lot of money by so doing.
If it were legal I would'nt buy it, I would GROW my own. Why pay a high tax when it is as simple as growing a flower in a garden. The government would make a lot of money on the tax, but not as much as people think. Brewing beer isnt all that easy and takes effor, but planting a seed and adding water is easy, stoner easy.
What Mishima said - people who smoke marijuana are not going to pay taxes on it.

I have a whole other list of why pot shouldn't be legalized, most of it hinges on the fact that pot is a complex drug that can be as harmful as it is helpful. We use cocaine and opium in medicine, but I don't see anyone asking for them to be legalized.
Marcelleqb, cocaine and opium are used legally for medicine in IL, but marijuana is still not.
Legalization, as you say, makes obvious sense. I just have a feeling Pharma will get it in pill form before the smokable kind gets legalized. And it'll never go generic.

R
@ Mishima:

The same could be said of tobacco too -- especially with cigarettes at nearly $7 a pack here in Michigan, but you don't see many people growing it. You can buy loose tobacco to skim a few bucks and roll your own, but you don't see many people doing that either.

Pot is not as easy to grow as you say it is, from my own personal witness. I've never grown any myself, but I know two guys who have, both with minimal success. The first guy was a dude I dated in my early 20s who constantly had the light on in his bedroom closet and I couldn't ever figure out why (I was so adorable!) and the second guy was my ex-boyfriends brother, who couldn't tie his own damn shoelaces, but knew everything there was to know pretty much about weed. If anyone could grow weed it was this guy, and every time he tried it was an epic fail for the most part. The weed just sucked. I don't know: California climes are much different than here in the Mitten, but it's still expensive considering the fact that plants need almost constant light, and that you have to keep the males and the females seperated (isn't that right? I'm drawing on old knowledge here.)
Having a green thumb is a gift. I can't even keep my philodendron alive on my nightstand, which is supposed to be THE plant for the gardening deficient. As we do with cigs, I'm sure there are people out there who will just say 'fuck it' and pay the tax.
After revisiting your post and reading the comments I would like to point out that actually the majority of the comments are correct. People would grow their own BUT...if caught it would be the same as being caught with prescription meds without a prescription...heavy fines and possible imprisonment...so where is the CHANGE? Best solution is decriminalization.
Great post.

Where I live, there are 20 pot collectives and only three McDonalds . . . .I smell trouble . . .

Seriously, I think its past time to legalize it!

Rated!
Just want to point out that tomatoes are easy to grow but that doesn't stop them from being sold everywhere.
Regarding those who wouldn't buy weed and pay the tax: what if it was criminal not to do so? Sure, it's legal to grow your own tomatoes and make your own beer, but that doesn't mean that it has to be legal to grow your own MJ. The legislation is open right now, it's clay for our molding!
marcellqb and mishima,

buying pot today is horribly expensive and dangerous due to the criminals you have to deal with and the risk of arrest.

Still, pot heads have not planted every open acre with seeds to enjoy free weed.

How come?

Because people are lazy, especially pot heads.

People would pay a fair price to the producer and a fairly unfair tax if it was legal.

At least that is how I see it.
My dad's been smoking pot his entire adult life - it's cheap and easy to come by and it is about as hard as growing corn - that's where my dad used to grow it - amongst the corn. Pot isn't something that requires a lot of effort to grow. Tomatoes are probably harder. Tobacco is much harder to go from leaf to end product - it has to be picked, cured on racks and then shredded. It also does not grow everywhere and prefers a certain type of soil. Pot grows nicely outdoors and indoors and you only need to pick the flowers and let them dry. Laziness is not the same as a lack of motivation and potheads are motivated to make pot.

I don't have a problem with pot being used medically. I didn't realize that it was illegal in this manner in other states. I think it's foolish not to use it in that manner. When I talk about legalizing pot, I'm talking in terms of legal like tobacco, as they are arguing here in California. I don't believe it should be as legal as tobacco. I'm also not for putting drug users in jail, whether they are addicts or recreational users. You can be fined for being drunk on the street, I see no difference.

But here is my main concern: THC, which is getting stronger in pot, causes psychosis. In young men under the age of 30, this can lead to schizophrenia. (I've only seen studies on men, I don't know what it is for women.) I know & have known more than a few people who become aggressive and/or paranoid when they smoke pot. It is not all peace love and happiness. I cannot in good consciousness vote that pot be as legal as tobacco when it can, in a single use, cause mental illness.
http://psychcentral.com/news/2008/07/08/marijuana-may-trigger-schizophrenia/2568.html
“These findings may provide insight into the biological basis of why cannabis use worsens schizophrenia, and, as a result, identify a novel target for new drug development that could improve treatments available for schizophrenia,” said Dr. Lewis.

(Thanks Marcelleqb, I hadn't heard about that link)
I'm still in favor of legalizing it, but maybe it needs an legal age to it, like alcohol has.
I'll second the motion! And like alcohol, food and sex, it's all about moderation. Oh scratch, sex. Excess ok there.
Yes! This would turn this state budget deficit around in a New York second! All for it! I'd rather take a legal toke from time to time than be addicted to prescription medication. Can't stop thinking about our Native American Indians, sitting in a nice friendly circle, passing the "peace pipe." Damn right they figured out how to achieve peace! Then the Euro transplants came over and screwed that all up! And then some. OK, I'll go quietly now. Like your post very munchie!
@mishima666 Tobacco products are legally sold in the U.S. but smokers don't feel the need to grow it in their garden. Not to mention, it's illegal to do so without proper licensure, isn't it?

Just saying, I don't think most people would go through the effort of growing, waiting, harvesting, etc. when the store is in constant supply.
Marcell,/

that ludicrous smear is belied by the simple fact that fifty million people in the states have smoked and schizophrenia is virtually unheard of.

Pitiful that you would repeat such foolish propaganda.
Neilpaul, there is a link, scroll down to the actual journal papers:
http://www.schizophrenia.com/prevention/streetdrugs.html

It doesn't make someone not prone to that condition all of a sudden get the disease, but it does seem to push along a weakened system.
however " It is also notable that some research suggests that alcohol abuse is a stronger predictor of psychotic symptoms than regular cannabis use (by a factor of four)." you don't see anyone talking about the need to ban alcohol because it causes schizophrenia.
NeilPaul, it's a pity that you believe anything negative about pot is "propaganda".

From the BBC, 2005:
"Award-winning researchers have claimed that smoking cannabis trebles the risk of becoming schizophrenic.
Scientists from Cardiff University studied the life patterns of 50,000 people who carried out national service in Sweden over a 27-year period.
The study found that people who had used cannabis more than 50 times before the age of 18 were three times more likely to develop schizophrenia."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/4425730.stm

"Evidence has been around for some time linking marijuana use to psychoses; the debate concerns the nature of the relationship. Here are some theories:
The gene that puts a person at risk for schizophrenia may also predispose him to use marijuana, sometimes called cannabis. A study of Swedish military enlistees found that cannabis use might increase the risk of schizophrenia by as much as 30 percent in people who are genetically susceptible.
...Cannabis use triggers schizophrenia and other psychoses. Evidence is mounting to support this theory. For example, a recent review of studies that examined schizophrenia risk for cannabis users found that people who used marijuana by age 18 were more likely to develop schizophrenia than those who did not. Other studies report that people who have used marijuana more than 50 times were six times more likely to receive a schizophrenia diagnosis.
...Schizophrenia and Other Drugs
Studies that have examined the relationship between schizophrenia and other drugs are less common. Alcohol is the substance most often abused by people with schizophrenia. While alcohol can cause a relapse of symptoms, there is no evidence to suggest that alcohol use causes schizophrenia. And stimulants, like cocaine and amphetamines, are linked to types of psychosis, while heroin users were actually at a lower risk for developing psychoses."

http://www.everydayhealth.com/schizophrenia/drug-use-and-schizophrenia.aspx

"Interest in the association between cannabis and schizophrenia received a major boost from the Swedish Conscript study, a large historical, longitudinal cohort study of all Swedes conscripted in 1969-1970 (Andreasson et al., 1987). Since Sweden mandates military service, 97% of males aged 18 to 20 years were included. Individuals who at age 18 reported having used cannabis >50 times were six times more likely than nonusers to have been diagnosed with schizophrenia in the ensuing 15 years. Adjusting for other relevant risk factors, including psychiatric diagnosis other than psychosis at conscription, reduced but did not eliminate the higher risk (odds ratio [OR]=2.3) of schizophrenia conferred by cannabis use.

A reanalysis and extension of the same Swedish conscript cohort reconfirmed that those who were heavy cannabis users by the age of 18 were 6.7 times more likely than nonusers to be hospitalized for schizophrenia 27 years later (Zammit et al., 2002). The OR for cannabis use and schizophrenia remained significant (1.2), albeit lower than in the original study, despite adjusting for a number of confounds, including low IQ and stimulant use. Further, the finding of an increased risk of schizophrenia conferred by cannabis use persisted after controlling for the possibility that cannabis use was a consequence of prodromal manifestations of psychosis."

http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/display/article/10168/49641?verify=0
I want some of that weed you smoked the night you ended up slumped over in the corner of some back house on our friend's property!
And drinking too much makes humans vomit, gives humans cirrhosis, and generally causes loads of diseases or gives one a preponderance to them. I feel like I can also liken this argument to the Bush/Kerry election. How can you choose between two pieces of shit? Well, I guess in this case, you shouldn't have to. We should get to enjoy them both.
Weed = Money.
Your Post = Rated.
Marcell,

causation/coincidence.

Could it be that some schizophrenics are self-medicating with weed?

Schizophrenia is rare, marijuana use is ubiquitous. The alleged link you point to is puny and barely relevant in any event given the rarity of that disorder.

It is only ever talked about because Drug War assholes are desperate to justify the horrific expense of their war given the incredibly benign nature of cannabis. Any comparison with alcohol reveals that people like you are anti-weed because you are anti-weed, not because of general concern over adverse effects of drugs.

Or are you interested in reinstating alcohol prohibition?
But Asta, you are talking about excess. Excess of anything can do you harm - even drinking too much water. I'm talking about casual use. I can drink and not get drunk, I can't do pot and not get stoned. It's not fair to compare excessive drinking to occasional pot use.

For me, this isn't about politics or human behavior or what is the lesser of two evils, but about science, in particular, the effects of pot. After much consideration and study, I came to the conclusion that cannabis is a powerful, complex drug and should be treated with respect, that it should be used medicinally, but that it should not be treated casually and be as easily available as cigarettes or alcohol.

I didn't come to this conclusion lightly or make a flip decision based on rumor. I've grown up around pot and it wasn't/isn't a forbidden thing. I have many friends who use it and I never tell them that they shouldn't or even debate the merits of it - it's never come up in conversation and it would be rude of me to tell them how to live. I don't think less of my friends who smoke pot and I never disparage someone for the choices they make in life. People who smoke pot claim that it's harmless and even that it is good for you. I'm going to debate that, but I'm not going to tell them they can't or shouldn't smoke pot, or be dismissive of their views because they don't agree with me. If there was a law passed that said all drugs are available for anyone over the age of 28, I'd vote for it because I feel that at that age you are fully an adult, physically and mentally, but I won't vote for something that can harm a child or a young adult.
I have been making the point for a long time that although pot is illegal in the US and has been for decades, you can buy it in any neighborhood from coast to coast. Nobody has ever died of an overdose of marijuana. And although it would be irresponsible to suggest that using for recreational purposes on a regular basis is anything but dumb, there is reasonable evidence that many patients may benefit from its use.

From my perspective the issue is not whether we are winning or losing the war on drugs. It's whether or not we are responsibly and reasonably dealing with human nature and personal responsibility.

Legalize it, tax it, move on. That works for me. You said it much more eloquently than I could. Great work!