"Being single is pretty good. It's a nice sense of irresponsibility."
~ Michael Douglas

My daughter, skipping solo across the Moeraki Boulders, NZ - 2010
∞∞∞∞∞
I was perusing Sunday afternoon and into the early evening, apparently in a contemplative mood, because I was struck by this invitation...
"I invite you open callers to reflect ... on your feelings of love, friendship, loss and rejection". ~Oryoki Bowl
I read her most recent post and had some thoughts of my own, some of which made it into this response to her open call on love...
∞∞∞∞∞
In a story of infidelity, JD Smith spoke about sexual betrayal and one crass individual who produced a list of his office conquests, including one of JD's married friends. Later, as she shamefully apologizes for her indiscretion and plans to tell her husband, I returned to the days, then years, of my own marriage, thankful I never had to have that discussion with my own long ago spouse.
I can hear Sinatra crooning, "Regrets?..I've had a few", and I surely know one of mine is that I wish I had held out for the kind of love where that question - infidelity - just never comes up. For two reasons. I cheated myself, and I cheated our children.
I knew it then, the moment we married. We didn't share the kind of love we needed to have before making vows of marriage. We married b/c we didn't want to be alone, still two singletons several years out of college. We were uncommonly fond of each other, happy in one another's company, we had common interests, rarely argued, and we were simpatico - the two of us.
There was philia between us, a brotherly love of friendship, best friends, and the sense of comforting fellowship that's part of being with someone you enjoy. Of course, philia is wonderful but it's not reliable, held captive by the sifting sands of situations, perceptions and expectations. Everyone has had friendships that waned or were severed because of time, distance, harsh words, hurtful actions, etc.
He and I, we didn't have the sexuality or intimacy of eros or the selflessness of agape. Two children later, the love of a family surrounded us but as time wore on, this storge was not enough to sustain a partnership.
I had no business standing up with another person in marriage knowing, and I did, that we didn't share an inclusive, spiritually connected love. Love in spite of, not just because of. Love in the ancient sense, a bond of agape that is marked by an ardent intention to be the best and to want the best for one another in all things, above all things.
Infidelity doesn't take root in the loam of this type of love. Even when the winds of reality beat down, intention rules the day. Storms can take this love to a deeper, stronger place.
I've been fortunate to see agape in marriages I've known over the years. Not every celebrated marriage has this kind of foundation - some people are just really stubborn - but where agape exists, it will run off thoughts of destructive acts that will take a marriage apart.
Mistaken love can leave the soft underbelly of marriage exposed, giving the disenchantments, resentments, and frustrations that occur in all relationships a chance to grab hold, then work like acid and rust, eating away at the one-time feelings of closeness we thought would take us all the way.
I think I'll always regret my half baked decision to marry without the necessary kind of love. I would have liked to have given my children the gift of confidence in love, and security in knowing love can last. Having lived without agape in my life, I'm aware my outlook and attitudes have been harshly influenced at times. Relationships have run a predictable course, ending in the usual tears. Cry a river, build a bridge, and get over it was the lesson they learned from me.
Of course, on the flip side, there are other things to consider...
"In this world there are only two tragedies. One is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it." ~anonymous
∞∞∞∞
Author's note - I recognize marriage as a spiritual union and make no assumptions about its legal requirements and limitations under the law, as they currently stand. I hope people in the GLBT community will read and share their experiences as well.
Words and photo by Gabby Abby - All Rights Reserved, March 2011


Salon.com
Comments
now you have me thinking about writing one too....
~rated~
Yea, I know, been awhile since I've been around to your posts, so here's a few more, spread them around where you want them!! ;)
Like this definition a lot: "Love in spite of, not just because of." Yeah; that sounds right.
You have made me thoughtful this morning....
Tinkles, you left me a gift! your regrets. great. now I have enough to count between yours and mine.
Joan, after I published it I realized it was practically blog hogging length, and I couldn't stop the train of thought that continued on after I left the page. So, here it is (again).
AHP - amen, I completely agree, eros, philia, storge and agape were the words used by the Greeks back in the day, describing the differing types of love. Kind of like Eskimos describing snow, ;)
Ann, hehehe. Warning: marriage can be hazardous business
Matt, !!! you do good comment
Alysa, not to worry as it's not written in that vein. It's OK to have regrets. I might not trust anyone who said they didn't keep a few around.
Satori, a quotable quote no one has come forward to claim which is surprising. Maybe I'll just appropriate it. I'm still waiting for my 15 minutes in the sun.
LL2 - I'm enjoying that irresponsibility Micheal Douglas talked about. When I'm solo, there's no one to disappoint.
A good relationship has a pattern like a dance and is built on some of the same rules. The partners do not need to hold on tightly, because they move confidently in the same pattern, intricate but gay and swift and free, like a country dance of Mozart's. To touch heavily would be to arrest the pattern and freeze the movement, to check the endlessly changing beauty of its unfolding. There is no place here for the possessive clutch, the clinging arm, the heavy hand; only the barest touch in passing. Now arm in arm, now face to face, now back to back -- it does not matter which. Because they know they are partners moving to the same rhythm, creating a pattern together, and being invisibly nourished by it.
May I write something tonight that I would not go far as to call a "rebuttal," but that does not necessarily align to your logic here?
I totally respect your point of view here, and logically it is sound....but I'd like to share a little different side of the story.
Deal? : )
JD
hahahahahaa!!!
Now I must revisit JD's post and attempt to respond to his question, which I am a bit puzzled by...it's always about puzzles, is it not?
I guess the words I've expressed in this little essay is more about not being a better person myself, more honest when it really mattered; and so having made some fundamental mistakes, I was able to share certain things with her, and with my son, that have hopefully informed them in their lives out in the world. To their advantage, and their betterment.
It is a puzzle, but every now and then a piece falls into place ~ I really enjoyed reading your comment and share your POV.
Thanks!
And Eros is chemical breeeding evolution, Filia is simple affection..fondness, Agape is a rumor, but X is still illegal.
TRUE:
–verb (used with object) /in this case LOVE/
1. to make true; shape, adjust, place, exactly or accurately: to true the wheels after striking a pothole.
2. to make even, symmetrical, level: to true up the door.
In order for agape to exist, there has to be somebody on both ends of the rope, pulling. If one puts it down and walks away, the game is over. Sometimes that happens.
What I don't accept so easily is that if both partners are pulling for one another, truing their interactions every day, making them straight as best they can, I don't accept that infidelity is a possibility in that space.
Once either of you drop the rope, choose not to do the things that true the relationship every single day, then it is no longer true' loving and after that stops, anything can happen. And that is what this post was about when I wrote it.
Just lovely and well said, I love meeting people who take this leap of faith with another...
You write so well, your way with words invites reflection...
1. a bond of agape ... is marked by an ardent intention to be the best and to want the best for one another in all things, above all things.
2. Not every celebrated marriage has this kind of foundation - some people are just really stubborn
They also used the word when they were trying to convince Catholics "God" wasn't out to fry 'em, but only show us love.
My source in these matters is Marion Woodman, prophetess of "the black madonna" who is coming to consciousness now to teach even good boys and girls it's ok to screw. It may not all be about sex, but if you throw under the rug it comes back to bite you with its deadly fangs...ask all those poor priests