I have been a politico, a policy wonk, a fervent follower of Washington gamesmanship for as long as I can remember. I believe my love for the inner workings of our nation’s Capitol began with a first grade classroom straw poll in which I participated in 1984. My parents, young moderate Republicans, were huge fans of Reagan, whereas I already began to sense my liberal stirrings and wanted to like Walter Mondale more, but just couldn’t. In truth, I would have been happiest to vote for Geraldine Ferraro, but that wasn't an option and in the end bit my lip and cast my childhood lot with the Gipper. Though my vote counted for nothing, I have yet to forgive my lack of foresight.
I have always been a fan of the Sunday morning talk shows, the arm chair quarterbacking about bills, social initiatives and policy speeches. As long as America’s basic common sense and global leadership was intact, I took it mostly in good fun. Of course there are real world implications for any nation’s decisions, but I felt safe in my admiration of the endless game of chess that keeps networks like CNN and Fox News in business.
I have been blogging for about two years and until recent months, a good percentage of my posts have been politically motivated. In my freelance journalism life, I kept up a column for a magazine based in Denver for the better part of a year.
But suddenly, beginning in December 2010 when Obama capitulated to the extreme right wing on the extension of the fiscally irresponsible Bush tax cuts, or if I’m being honest, slightly before that, the wind was sucked right out of my political sails. As the middle class and lower classes sank under the crushing weight of high unemployment, a credit crunch and the disappearance of home equity that are the hallmarks of this Great Recession; as lawmakers from both sides fell out of touch with the real world needs of real people as they became entrenched in partisan squabbles that had little or nothing to do what it takes to get the nation back on track; to quote President Obama, when “compromise became a four-letter word” as the rest of the world looks on in horror while we careen toward the inevitable toppling of our dynasty, there’s nothing to appreciate. It is, in a bipartisan word, revolting.
As it is, a lack of engagement with current affairs has been a casualty of the increasing digitization of our culture. The truly engaged and informed are a diminishing minority, and anyone else who flips on the TV to witness the latest round of partisan posturing from the President or the Speaker of the House is bound to reach for their Kindle or Nintendo DS in short order. Politics is serious business, but let’s face it, also entertainment. And of the many sins of which our lawmakers are in the business of committing, a failure to captivate may be one of the lesser, but it’s clearly a factor in Congress’ 77 percent negative approval rating.
To state the totally obvious: we have major problems in this country, problems that even a vote to raise the debt ceiling, or a last minute Hail Mary that manages to cut spending AND raise revenue, may not solve. The United States is the laughing stock of the First World (and even Third World nations like India are having a chuckle at our paralysis). But no one living here outside of the upper two percent of wealth holders, has a thing to smile about.


Salon.com
Comments
But you gotta keep on truckin’!
I appreciate your mentioning the vote you gave to Ronald Reagan. Funny…the vote I regret most in my life was the one I gave for Ronald Reagan. I was voting against Jimmy Carter…and thought I was being principled.
What I was being was an unthinking asshole! I never truly considered the consequences of “getting my way” on that vote.
I see lots of people here in OS doing that same thing right now…not truly considering the consequences of a vote against Barack Obama; of withholding a vote from him; of encouraging others to do those things.
Anyone who sees progressive initiatives as an imperative…will do no good for the cause by helping bring Obama down. Bringing Obama down does not result in a lesson to future standard-bearers of the progressive agenda…it merely allows those who would do away with the progressive agenda a better operating venue.
Suck it up. Recognize the things you want changed and CAN change…and effort to change them. Recognize the things that really defy change…and deal with them in other ways.
But above all...do not give in to the unthinkable. Do not make another mistake with a vote the size of the one we both made for Ronald Reagan.
Frank is right, though. While I'm disappointed in Obama in a lot of ways, the alternative is out of the question. The alternative is what got us in this mess in the first place.
california's governor jerry brown was quoted today in the LA Times online saying, ""The bigger story is the division in the United States. Our country, which has been the leading power in the world for a number of decades, is facing the dismal prospect of being unable to govern itself because of the deep and continuing divisions between these two parties."
Finally, he went on the local attack: "I saw it in Sacramento, where no matter how hard I tried, no matter what I offered, no matter the quality of wine I served at our meetings, I could not get four votes for a tax. We’re facing a group of people that are in power in some form in Sacramento and Washington who would rather have the empire fall than ever vote for a tax ...
"The dogmatic commitment to no tax is as powerful as the dogmatic commitment to no birth control on the part of the papacy. And in some fashion the Republican Party is acting like a quasi-theological institution."
and major and frank are correct (not that i ever considered another position) and it makes me nutz when my fellow lefties bash the president. of course i'm voting for him again. i'd vote for him a hundred times if i could. none of us right-thinking liberals should consider doing anything else. what we need to do is get the rest of the people in the country to stop voting for the idiots who got elected on the republican side because those guys **are** the problem.