Pearls Before Swine

Charging bravely into the muck

MY RECENT POSTS

Behind Blue Eyes's Links

Salon.com
APRIL 5, 2010 4:07PM

Collateral Murder: Wikileaks video US tried to suppress

Rate: 10 Flag

 

 

 

This is the video US Intelligence and the State department tried to suppress.  Watch it while you can.

Amongst other things, it shows the murder of a Reuters employee and the good Samaritans who tried to help him as he crawled wounded on the sidewalk in the suburb of New Baghdad. 

Approximately 12 civilians were killed in the 2007  attack, including two journalists, Namir Nour El Deen and Saeed Chmagh, who worked for the Reuters news agency.  Two children were in the vehicle of the good Samaritans who stopped and they were wounded.

What is important about this video is the lengths the US Government has gone to to keep the truth from coming out.  

At the start of the video, US soldiers claim they are taking fire from a roof top in the area.  The helicopter sees as group of men on the street and claims they have guns and RPGs.  Having watched the video, the long slender items could be camera tripods and the so called RPG could be video camera equipment which is in fact what they turned out to be.  The helo crew blow the men away. 

You get to watch the wounded reporter crawl along the sidewalk while someone in the helo begs him to "pick up a weapon" so they can kill him.  8 minutes into the video a mini-van stops to help and the helo crew blows the van away, killing the wounded man and the people who had stopped to render him aid.  Remember this is a suburb where people live and cars drive.

At 13:30, US soldiers on the ground discover there is a wounded child in the mini-van.  17:21 a soldier ont he ground says a little girl is wounded to the belly.

The helo crew hears this and at 18:00 says "It's their fault for bringing their kids to a battle." 

At 18:54 the helo crew laughs about one of the US vehicles on the ground running over a body.

The helo crew decides they see armed men (maybe a rifle) entering a building and blow it up with three hellfire missile strikes.  Before the first strike you can see a pedestrian walking down the street in front of the building and he is injured if not killed at 34:50.  At 36:40 before another missile strike you see people running towards the building, perhaps to render aid.  They are blown away.

From Wikileaks:

Reuters has been trying to obtain the video through the Freedom of Information Act, without success since the time of the attack. The video, shot from an Apache helicopter gun-site, clearly shows the unprovoked slaying of a wounded Reuters employee and his rescuers. Two young children involved in the rescue were also seriously wounded.

 

From the Al Jazeera article about the video:

Nabil Nour El Deen, the brother of the Reuters photographer killed in the shooting, condemned the attack as a "crime" committed by the US military.

"Is this the democracy and freedom that they claim they have brought to Iraq?

"What Namir was doing was a patriotic work. He was trying to cover the violations of the Americans against the Iraqi people," he told Al Jazeera.

"We demand the international organisations to help us sue those people responsible for the killings of our sons and our people."

 

I've been watching and of the cable news, MSNBC is just now showing the video.  

 

More about Namir Noor-Eldeen, 23, and Saeed Chmagh, 40: The two Reuters staff members killed in the Wikileaks video 

 

SUPPORT Wikileaks. They work on a shoe string of a budget and with the media being increasingly unlikely to invesitgate and report, Wikileaks' role in helping whistleblowers is vital.

If you don't have the stomach to watch the full video, here is a shorter edited version:

 

Here is a still of the Good Samaritan's mini-van, the one that had two kids in it on their way to school:

Iraqi good samaritans mini van

 

 

Author tags:

wikileaks, murder, war crimes

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
It took them (MSNBC and anyone else picking it up)forever to pick this story up because it was pretty well known the vid was going to be released today. I won't say anything else about this but damn...Humans are ugly creatures...
If someone dies and they are not American then nobody died. Great foreign policy, huh?
Change the title to "Jesse James and Tiger Woods on American Idol" and it might make the front page.
As you already know BBE, I've posted about this video and the surrounding story at my blog too. When I saw that it was released I first looked at your blog since I figured you were right on it. I was right.
I agree with what kevin lee said...

ug.
Horrific. I am "digging" this for what its worth.
I suppose if there is any good news here it is that this video has made the "front page" of MSN.com
Personal feelings about this war (war in general) aside, it is war all the same and war is not pretty for anyone (save perhaps the materials manufacturers) least of all those in the middle of it who are simply trying to do 1) the right thing, 2) what they're told and 3) stay alive so they can see home again.

Any news we 'not there' get is news given to us by another source, perhaps reputable, perhaps plying their own agenda. Stay aware and be thoughtful and discerning - what we're shown is not always what is everything of the matter at hand.

Speaking from the perspective of one who had a brother in 'Nam and lived through the 60's (an era of protest if ever there was one) I can only say that this too shall pass, as all things do. Whether each situation passes as we would like it to is another matter, and only each one's personal conscience can determine their stance, actions and reactions. Just be ware of 'drinking the cup', no matter who is offering you the repast..
"What Namir was doing was a patriotic work. He was trying to cover the violations of the Americans against the Iraqi people," he told Al Jazeera."
looks like his wish came true, in an unspeakbly tragic way. time will tell if he died in vain or not....
Speechless. Thanks for posting this here.
This video makes it obvious that carrying a camera tripod while Arab in Iraq is cause for summary execution.
Seer: I'd like to think about being one of the family members of the civilians who were shot down in cold blooded murder by our troops. This isn't war, this is murder. How dare you be so cavalier about these murders. Did you even listen to the dialogue?
This is what our hard earned tax dollars buys. Murder, slaughter, butchery. At least no pregnant women were killed, that we know of.
american voters have it in their power to stop this. continuing to legitimize the rule of politicians makes you complicit.

just tell your masters you want democracy, and until you get effective and accessible citizen initiative, you won't be voting for them.

until you do this, you, and obama, and rumsfeld, and dubya, are all on the same team.
Dennis Loo, please don't accuse me of being cavalier, I am well aware of the pain and fruitlessness of war - any war - as aware as I am of the futility of trying to stop war of any kind, as long as humans are human we will likely have war, our past centuries attest to that. What you see in my post is my considered opinion (yes, my opinion, doesn't have to be yours) of mankind and the ages of this world that move on with or without us regardless of what we do or don't.

Conversely I also have great admiration for mankind, as a whole and individually, we are as capable of greatness as we are of atrocity. I'm not sure what that means, other than that we are a rather immature species still.

I'm simply saying that outrage is easy to rouse, propagandists know this, so know your sources - know them, not just think you do, not just take their word for it, or the word of friends, even trusted ones.

Truth is not black and white, it is gray and always more than what we see at any given moment, and anyone can make their own use of it. I certainly meant no disrespect to any faction and apologize to those who misunderstood my pragmatism.
Oh my goodness. This is horror. sickness, and something that perhaps I should not have watched. But all wars have atrocities and mistakes and innocent lives lost. The only way to prevent this is to prevent war. Will there ever be peace in any part of this sick world?
bbe,
heard of wikileaks for the first time when i read a post you woprte last week about the slaughter in afghanistan of 97. anyway, heard about the iraq vid, collateral murder on npr this morning. watched the vids from msnbc. julian assange and wikileaks give me hope. posted the vids on my blog as well and sent it to all my friends on my email list.:)

mr. assange said they will be releasing the vid from afghanistan soon. right the f**k on!!!
mary
As depressing as this is, it's better to know that it is occurring. I think you do a solid job with this. Keep up the good work.

RATED for TRUTH
Seer: You write: "as aware as I am of the futility of trying to stop war of any kind, as long as humans are human we will likely have war."

Wars are not declared by people. They are declared by governments. There is a difference. You and I didn't declare war on Iraq and Afghanistan. Our "elected" leaders did this. George Bush who was never actually elected (I've written about this in, for example, "No Paper Trail Left Behind: the Theft of the 2004 Presidential Election" and am one of the national experts on elections theft) in fact, but even if he had been, he lied us into this war by deliberate deception and conflating Hussein with 9/11. If he and Cheney and the oh-so cooperative media hadn't repeatedly and insistently perpetrated this fraud on the American people we wouldn't have gone to war with these two countries.

It isn't in human nature to wage wars. These wars are waged for profit and for empire.

What upsets me in your initial remark was your "all these things will pass" attitude. When you said wars are not pretty for anyone "least of all those in the middle of it who are simply trying to do 1) the right thing, 2) what they're told and 3) stay alive so they can see home again" did it occur to you to apply these words to the Good Samaritans who attempted to help the Reuters driver who was injured by the unprovoked attack on them by our soldiers from their Apache helicopters?

These people were 1) trying to do the right thing, 2) and trying to stay alive so they could see home again - which in their case is that very neighborhood that IS THEIR HOME that the US MILITARY HAS INVADED AND REIGNS DEATH FROM THE AIR UPON THEM.

You say these soldiers are doing what they were told. Does it bother you that they have been given orders to commit war crimes? According to the military code, you are obligated to refuse to follow orders that call for you to commit crimes against humanity and war crimes. The "I was just following orders" was the defense offered by the Nazi war criminals tried at Nuremberg. The verdict at Nuremberg was that "just following orders" is no excuse.
Please read my post again - I did not identify who I was speaking of with my three points - those words could be used for either 'side' as well as the civilians **and that was exactly how I intended them**.

I continue to stand by every word I've said - every word.

I find it almost (I said ALMOST) amusing that there is such a 'hue and cry' now that GWB is out of office.. where was all of this public outrage during his 8 years of mayhem?

Make no mistake, I am not for this war, I am not for any war. As far as the old saw 'people don't wage war, gov'ts wage war' - who do you think 'gov't' is? Astounding to find it so difficult to converse with a sociology professor.

I know better but I try anyway. Silly me.

Please forgive my interruption, carry on :).
Seer:

You are almost amused at the hue and cry about this and wonder where the outrage was when Bush was president: I, for one, was a leader of the move to impeach Bush. Where were you? There was much more outrage, unfortunately, when Bush was president then now. And there ought to be just as much now.

You say that your remarks earlier could be applied to either side and that either side. This is what you said: "all those in the middle of it who are simply trying to do 1) the right thing, 2) what they're told and 3) stay alive so they can see home again."

How does #2 apply to the civilians living in this suburb of Iraq? Who is telling them what they should do? Is that the way your civilian life goes?

Stay alive to see home again - this IS their home. Your comment makes no sense if it was not with reference to the foreign invading troops of the US.