If you really believe the breathless propaganda from the NY Times that the Army only recently "discovered" vast mineral deposits in Afghanistan, I have an oil free estuary in Louisiana to sell you.
You also need to read these:
No, U.S. Didn’t Just ‘Discover’ $1T Afghan Motherlode (Updated) [Wired]
and
The Mineral Miracle? Or a Massive Information Operation? [Atlantic]
Afghanistan's mineral find and the Washington clock [Politico]
The public is starting to wake up and realize that hope and change is really just more perpetual war and lies, so of course the riches of Afghanistan are "discovered" to stiffen our greedy resolve.
Never mind that we've known about the minerals since the days of our proxy war against the USSR in the 1970s. Read the first linked article and learn how American geologists have been working with the pentagon for over 25 years on this and have even published books on the mineral wealth there.
For those too lazy to click over, here is the salient quote from Wired:
One retired senior U.S official is calling the government’s mineral announcement “pretty silly,” Politico is reporting. “When I was living in Kabul in the early 1970s the [U.S. government], the Russians, the World Bank, the U.N. and others were all highly focused on the wide range of Afghan mineral deposits. Cheap ways of moving the ore to ocean ports has always been the limiting factor.”
At least two American geologists have been advising the Pentagon on Afghanistan’s wealth of mineral resources for years. Bonita Chamberlin, a geologist who spent 25 years working in Afghanistan, “identified 91 minerals, metals and gems at 1,407 potential mining sites,” the Los Angeles Times reported in 2001. She even wrote a book, “Gemstones in Afghanistan,” on the topic. And Chamberlin worked directly with the Pentagon, after they commissioned her to report on sandstone and limestone caves mere weeks after 9/11.
“I am quite surprised that the military is announcing this as some ‘new’ and ’surprising” discovery,’ she told Danger Room in an e-mail. “This is NOT new. Perhaps this also hints at the real reason why we would be so intent on this war.”
And Jack Shroder, a geologist at the University of Nebraska, told the Associated Press in 2001 that mineral deposits in Afghanistan were so rich, they could be vital in rebuilding the country. He’s collaborated with Pentagon officials since the 1970s, when he worked on mapping the country. In 2002, Shroder was approached by several American companies who hoped to start mining the country.
How stupid does Obama's administration think we are?
How does massive mineral wealth make our unjustified war moral or legal?
Killing for minerals is just as evil as killing for oil.


Salon.com
Comments
How does massive mineral wealth make our unjustified war moral or legal? This war began under a different president. It is unjustified, continues to be unjustified. As for moral, that is relative to the person. Legal, I believe our stupid Congress voted to make this legal under the previous president. Think it was about that pipeline that was denied to the US prior to 9/11?
Killing for minerals is just as evil as killing for oil. Blood diamonds? Children mining for emeralds? I agree with you. But again this idea is not limited to one country. It is a worldwide issue. I would even argue that coal, strip mining mountain tops, is simply evil too.
It just never stops.
Thanks for posting the other side of the story.
Actually they probably have a very accurate opinion about that particular issue, and in honor of the fearless poster Behind Blue Eyes I have selected his page for an update of P.T. Barnum's ancient aphorism...
Nobody ever lost an election by underestimating the intelligence of the American public.
Though I feel that all war is essentially illegal and immoral, I also feel that illegal and immoral are often irrelevant when greed and need enter into the picture.
Then again I am not of the belief that these 'resources' have anything to do with why we're there.
That's a story for another fire, though.
As for minerals, we take, we rape and we don't stop until there's nothing left.
Before I go off on some kind of insane rant, let me merely end with well done.
Rated.
In addition, where are people getting the idea that this "news" is meant to justify the war? The administration is attempting to combat the idea that Afghanistan has no hope of becoming more than a fractured war-torn region. This news is meant to give us a sci-fi vision of a future, prosperous Afghanistan. Of course it's nonsense. I'd submit the Congo as a more likely model for a future mineral-rich Afghanistan. Still, building the case that Afghanistan has a hopeful future is not about justification. The administration has already made their case for the war, they simply want enough support to continue it.
Thumbed.
Regards,
Larry
kohls printable coupons
Brian - Southwest promo code