BELLEMEADE BOOKS

writing about reading
JULY 27, 2011 9:40AM

Jagger is ... 68? Naw! That means I'm ...... oh. Yeah.

Rate: 2 Flag

Mick Jagger, Denmark 1963


Difficult as it may be to believe, Mick Jagger is 68. (At the same age, Frank Sinatra in 1984 released L.A. Is My Lady.) The frontman for the Rolling Stones gave pop culture a whole new level of sex and suggestiveness that shocked parents and seemed to liberate teenagers in a way the moptop Beatles never could.

Whether one wants to imagine the aging Stone still gathering no moss, at least onstage, Sir Mick has always been quick with his lip in interviews. While he squirmed at the idea of sitting still for interviews he always knew their value as publicity and gamely cooperated -- unlike Dylan or even Mick's partner in rock, Keith Richards, for example.

Here's Mick in 1995, talking to Jann Wenner at Rolling Stone magazine at the ripe old age of 52, looking back at a professional career that even then had spanned 33 years. And although the Stones are more an industry than a rock band at this late date, who's to say that Mick, Keith, and Charlie won't still put on a show as long as there's a five-pound note left in the Bank of England's vaults?
 
Sir Mick, 2011

 
 
WENNER: What did you think was going on inside you at 15 years old that you wanted to go out and roll around on a stage?

JAGGER: I didn’t have any inhibitions. I saw Elvis and Gene Vincent, and I thought, “Well, I can do this.” And I liked doing it. It’s a real buzz, even in front of 20 people, to make a complete fool of yourself. But people seemed to like it. And the thing is, if people started throwing tomatoes at me, I wouldn’t have gone on with it. But they all liked it, and it always seemed to be a success, and people were shocked. I could see it in their faces.

WENNER: Shocked by you?

JAGGER: Yeah. They could see it was a bit wild for what was going on at the time in these little places in the suburbs. Parents were not always very tolerant, but Keith’s mum was very tolerant of him playing. Keith was an only child, and she didn’t have a lot of other distractions, whereas my parents were like “Get on your homework.” It was a real hard time for me. So I used to go and play with Keith, and then we used to go and play with Dick Taylor [who was later in the Pretty Things]. His parents were very tolerant, so we used to go round to his house, where we could play louder.

WENNER: What was it like to be such a success at such a young age?

JAGGER: It was very exciting. The first time we got our picture in the music paper called the Record Mirror – to be on the front page of this thing that probably sold about 20,000 copies – was so exciting, you couldn’t believe it. And this glowing review: there we were in this club in Richmond, being written up in these rather nice terms. And then to go from the music-oriented press to national press and national television, and everyone seeing you in the world of two television channels, and then being recognized by everyone from builders and people working in shops and so on. It goes to your head – very champagne feeling.

WENNER: You became quite the pop aristocrat in swinging London.

JAGGER: Well, it’s quite a while until all that. But the earlier bit was even more exciting. The suits, the ties and getting ready for “Thank Your Lucky Stars,” the innocence and naiveté of it all, and famous photographers wanting to take your picture and being in Vogue. In England they were very ready for another band. It was funny, because the Beatles had only been around a year. Things happened so quickly. Then there were a lot of popular bands, and all these bands were from the North of England. Most people in England don’t live in the North, and people are snobby in England, so they wanted a band from the South. We were it. ...


Jumpin' Jack Flash, 1980

WENNER: Can you define rock & roll for me? What is it about? Is it about sex, violence, energy, anger?

JAGGER: All those things: energy, anger, angst, enthusiasm, a certain spontaneity. It’s very emotional. And it’s very traditional. It can’t break too many rules. You have certain set rules, certain forms, which are traditionally folk-based, blues-based forms. But they’ve got to be sung with this youthful energy – or youthful lethargy, because youth has this languorous, lethargic, rebellious side to it as well. So they can be sung as an alternate mode of thrashing, this slightly feminine languor, the boredom of youth as well as the anger, because youth has those two things. To represent those emotions, this form seems to work very well.

WENNER: Boredom and anger, which are both a form of rebellion.

JAGGER: Yeah, a statement of rebellion. Drawing the line where your generation is. ...
 
 
Keeping things interesting, Mick has a new supergroup with Eurythmics legend Dave Stewart, reggae star Damien Marley, jazz soulstress Joss Stone and Indian musician and producer A.R. Rahman. There's no plan for a Stones tour as the second decade of the 21st century rolls on, but there's always a fan's hope.
 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Damn, Mick was beautiful in 1963 (we all were) but he looks like the devil now.
And at the time they were the "nasty, ugly Stones" compared to those lovable Beatles! Maybe at 68 Mick as the devil has earned a little sympathy after all these years :-)
I love seeing the tributes to Mick rolling out!
Wait a minute!! He can't be 68, I'm 39, he's 11 years older than me, so he's 50 at the most. I swear, you people better get you birthdays right, because I'm 39 dammit, and that's my last word on the subject, except to say, Happy 50th Mick Jagger~~