Nobody is a villain in their own eyes.
James Baldwin
In the movie Three Kings, about the first "Iraq War," a black soldier, asked why he's serving in Iraq answers: "I come from Detroit. I'm on vacation."
The "inner city" of Detroit used to be home to over two and a half million people. Today, if the statistics are correct, the same area is populated by a half million. In its "golden age"--the 1950's--as my father used to say it was tied with Brooklyn, N.Y. as the fifth largest city in America.
The last time I visited "the old house on Lawrence," it was the last house standing for five or six acres. It looks a lot like Berlin after the war or Gaza today. We were on the "near" East Side. The tower beside the original G.M. Headquarters was visible from my bedroom window. The other houses in the neighborhood, once the proud residences of a proud community, were burnt out hulks. There was a corn field where the houses that used to shelter the prettiest girls you ever saw once lived.
Today, we talk about New Orleans and the terrible disaster brought about by Katrina, the neglect of the "city fathers" to protect the city from a natural disaster, but what about Detroit--by far the greatest "disaster" an American city has suffered in the nation's history--but aside from the latest political scandal, the causes go unmentioned, unexamined, and not on any radar I've seen--even as the auto industry is going under.
When I grew-up the problems were beginning. The city was increasingly ruled by gangs--white gangs, black gangs, Spanish gangs, Arab gangs, motorcycle gangs. Anybody from any ethnic group that gathered in numbers of more than one had a gang. There was no longer a sense of civic community.
By the time I was fifteen I'd been in a half a dozen fights where it was pure luck I survived. The stories don't deserve telling any more--they only bring it all back. Some of my friends and their parents or relatives did not survive. The city was divided into invisible territories--pity the kid on the wrong turf without staunch companions.
The worst offenders were often the cops, most of whom were ill equipped for their task--including my own uncle and godfather who turned out to be a life-long racist. The city became known as the "murder capital," until the riots in the late 60's when any semblance of civility was wiped off the charts--and still "nobody knew nothin'."
When the drug epidemic arrived, the city was a stewing goose with swollen veins. The citizens of old Detroit were witnesses to humanity turning against itself in a lethal display of ignorance, naivete, racism, over expectations, self-destruction, and a disparate culture that still hadn't decided what it had in common, and what was worth saving.
It's important to note the country itself was then undergoing a cataclysmic transformation in which it totally re-defined itself in ways that are just now coming to fruition. Detroit and the working class cities attached to it may well have been it's greatest loser. The Catholic Church, for instance, one of the most stabilizing influences in the city was about to see most of its priests and nuns walk out the door, and an institution that had maintained itself all through the formative years of the city would never be the same. (I'm not saying that's the reason for the downfall of Detroit, only one example of the shifting of the "old order" that too frequently goes unmentioned.)
What's also peculiar is this wasn't a time of scarcity, but the greatest abundance the city had ever seen. The American auto industry had yet to be challenged and beaten at home and abroad by the Germans and the Japanese. Perhaps, it simply taught more than has been fully recognized, since everyone knows its plight and to admit it is to admit their own powerlessness.
It doesn't fit the simplistic economic analysis. That much is known. While the labor/management battle had been under way since the 20's; the finger pointing was a way a life then as it is now--the battle in the streets seem hardly noticed by the leadership of the city, and when it was--it was too little, too late. My grandfather was a politician and my father lived in that same house for 50ty years. Neither of them had a clue what was going on.
When I came home beaten and bloody, his attitude echoed my friends' fathers. "What'd you do--call somebody a name?"
"No dad. What do you think I am--dumb?"
"People don't start fights for no reason. You must have said something."
It was denial on a collective and individual basis. The same kind of denial seen all over the world when one people are subjugated by another at one time in their history and take it out on whoever gets in their way. My family had been in the city for three generations, and before that three generations on the farms near the Ohio border. The newcomers had something to prove--as newcomers always seem to do.
The city provided a wealth and freedom not known to the recent arrivals from any background, but it didn't make up for the repression they had suffered--the shame that had been dealt them they wanted to rid themselves of at any cost.
What I am arguing for here, and probably not making many friends doing so, is a way to look at the seemingly indecipherable and intractable conflicts that break out here and elsewhere in terms of a simple human axiom.
The oppressed will oppress in a seemingly endless cycle of repression until a few individuals start to wake up and speak out, or conditions become unavoidable that there has to be another way. I wonder if that isn't finally happening in the Middle East, and yet there are those who still can't quite make up their mind what to do next. This suffering has got to stop and I believe it's important more Americans start to look at it in terms of our common humanity.
Coming from Detroit, I learned the lesson a lot earlier than most. A repressed collective, regardless of their race, will not respond logically; they will not follow the "ideals" projected upon them by an unaware and incredulous world of outsiders--who only make matters worse by reacting themselves--as the established population of Detroit did when they panicked and ran en mass to the suburbs and abandoned the city to the mob mentality.
It's so endemic to the human condition it is hard to explain why it's necessary to be brought up, but it does if there is to be any understanding in the future. I've been writing about the Middle East lately and been called a lot of names for it--I think mostly by people who are themselves in the grips of a fear that is irrational and they will steadfastly deny. Instead, they will only make more enemies and more victims defending actions that are reprehensible and ultimately self-destructive to themselves and the nation they hold dear.
My family finally moved to the suburbs in my last year of high school, after one of my sisters had been nearly accosted. That was the last straw for my mother. We were among the last of the "old" families to go. She moved us to Royal Oak in a matter of months and told dad he was welcome to come along. (The poor man had the shit scared out of him by the Jesuits, but he was no fool.)
It was a lillywhite neighborhood--part of the "white wall" that surrounded old Detroit and still does. They said a black family lived near us, but I never actually saw them. One day a lady from the NAACP came to class to talk about racial equality. I knew instantly she was of mixed race, and intermediary at a time when that took a courage that is hard to imagine.
When she was done explaining the radical truth that we are all created equal, she asked if there were any questions. The pimply kid sitting next to me raised his hand. "Do Negroes have tails?" he asked--with not a fucking hint of sarcasm.
My stomach formed a hard knot. Back in "old Detroit" the bloodbath would have been begun in a matter of minutes. Race was as forbidden a subject as sex. I couldn't imagine what the woman was going to say. I hadn't known how deep the divide was--how much ignorance there was among those who had not been exposed to what I had been exposed to.
"No," the kindly woman said. "Negroes do not have tails. Thank you for the question." And neither do Palestinians, or Hamas, or any other of the demons that arise when the soul of a people is squashed.


Salon.com
Comments
I wonder if the rapid population growth resulted in a "rootless" population that no longer had a real sense of community, or as one prominent politician may have put it: it takes a village, but the village was no longer there. Once law and order seemed to be under threat, far too many who might have led the way to make improvements opted for the easy way out, and moved to the suburbs...can't say I blame them, either.
The census statistics also show that the metropolitan area continued to grow fairly impressively until the 1970's, even after the population within the city proper stagnated around 1940. That would indicate that new arrivals avoided the city, an unhealthy circumstance that tends to create an oligarchy that an environment that can foster corruption.
The same kind of dynamic was at work in other big Midwestern cities, but in Detroit everything was magnified.
It's incredible what happened to Detroit, isn't it? I have a manuscript I've been trying to sell about three years now, and the response has been overwhelmingly negative. Who cares? That's seems to be the consensus (so far) among the purveyors of our popular history.
As for racism in the South, I'm not offering my analysis as an attempt to "explain" (if it can be "explained" that's not the right word) but as an analogy between what happened it Detroit, and what has been happening in the Middle East. I see it basically as the same phenomenon, and not without precedents right here in the good old USA.
I want to bring a "refinement" (forgive me) to the discussion that is more than simply political, which I see as the mere surface of events. It is undoubtedly a hopeless task on my part, but I enjoy the intellectual exploration, and it's interesting to see what it brings up in readers. Thanks for participating. I do not send out requests to read anything I write, so those who show up are more likely to do so out of their own interest given the topic.
My dad's best friend worked in Detroit in it's heyday in the 60's through the 70's and he went back a year ago and he didn't recognize the place. He literally said what you eluded to, that it appeared, in places to have gone through a war. I could see the sadness in his eyes. He also followed that up with, "as if it wasn't rough enough back in the day." That really hit home with me.
(rated)
Take Care,
Greg
From the ground view, after the riots, the new growth was looked to be almost exclusively to the environs of the city. That was also when the Arab populations increased to become the largest in the US, mostly in the area of Dearborn, which was famous in my day for a Mayor named Hubbard who made no bones about keeping out blacks.
Why didn't the newcomers join in the community as the did in the past? That's my question. What happened to what was called, The Spirit of Detroit? (named after a statue that was erected at the time)
If there was been a study of any real merit, I haven't seen it.
All we've got is intuitions and hunches--yet it was an unmitigated disaster. Those homes and neighborhoods, for instance, that were destroyed were single homes, and two family flats--not the projects of Chicago and other cities where people were herded into apartment complexes. If I remember correctly, there were more Cadillacs sold in Detroit than any other city.
And was it part of a greater breakdown in the culture that was happening at the time? It was, for instance, contemporary with the breakdown within the Catholic Church where the "old order" came to an end and hundreds if not thousands of priest and nuns hung up the habits--and the old city was heavily Catholic, with an educational system that rivaled the public schools. (It's mostly gone now, and only a mere skeleton survives.)
How much of it eventually was part of the watershed that became the 60's, and turned the nation toward the polarization that has defined it ever since? These are questions I think worth asking as we seem more definitely than ever moving toward a new era, where quite possibly the reactionary forces we have seen control this country for so long have been at least temporarily put on hold.
Obviously, you can tell by now I'm not a historian or "ologist" of any kind Proscopius, but I do enjoy asking questions that for some reason escape the conventional analysis, (if you can all it that) and I've found the internet a place to ask them since it is so free of the commercial and ideological restraints that control the media. generally.
The source of my ideas is a philosopher named Eric Neumann. His book "THE HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF CONSCIOUSNESS" is the source of my theory. It's only the application that is mine.
As an aside, it's interesting to me that you say that Detroit's slide into crime and racial problems began while the City was booming. As I read along, I was nodding in agreement, remembering my own native city's (Youngstown, OH) descent into poverty and turmoil when the steel mills closed, an action which affected Detroit as well. I expected that this was the reason for Detroit's ills as well. My father was a truck driver who used to haul steel from Youngstown to Detroit and many times, he would sneak me along. I still ache thinking about the losses these towns have suffered and from which they are still unable to recover.
As for the Middle East, no even members of Hamas don't have tails. An excellent parable and reminder that all human beings are in fact human beings. If only so many--on both sides--didn't seem to forget that so often.