And the King of Texas would prefer we not talk about the fact that he may have killed an innocent man. So much so, in fact, that he's willing to openly quash anyone willing to look in to the matter - anyone with the temerity to suggest that hey, maybe the state didn't get it right this time.
In this case, he booted three people off the Texas Forensic Science Commission, which was gearing up to investigate whether Cameron Todd Willingham got a fair trial. They were due to hear evidence this week from a nationally recognized arson expert, who released a report in August that basically said Willingham did not get a fair trial, and that the evidence introduced was faulty.
And now comes word that one of Perry's new appointees has canceled that meeting, ostensibly to "catch up." Who wants to bet this meeting will be canceled until at least after the Republican primary, where Perry faces an increasingly contentious battle with Kay Bailey Hutchison?
Today, Texas Monthly executive editor Paul Burka used the words everyone is thinking - "cover up."
Let’s call this what it is: a cover-up. The new chairman, Williamson County district attorney John Bradley, is a political ally of Perry’s (see below) who famously tough on crime. It would be a conversion of mythic proportions if he were to agree with the investigators’ criticism. He now controls when the commission will meet, and you can bet that the report will not be heard or discussed in a public forum before the March 2 primary.
Maybe Willingham did start the fire that killed his daughters. But if a review will ultimately prove that, what does Perry have to worry about? That he DID allow the state to kill an innocent man? That uncovering that would likely lead to a moratorium on executions, thereby robbing him of his shiny toy and God complex validation?
At this point, it wouldn't shock me at all if Perry, when faced with the news that Hutchison has beaten him in the primary, decided to pull some sort of cronyistic maneuver that negated that outcome. Replace the entire elections commission? Unending recounts ala Franken-Coleman?
I'll say it here. Perry shouldn't win another term. In fact, I'm nearly certain he's veering toward impeachable offenses. After all, did he not repeat an oath that requires him to uphold the law?
But nobody will have the cajones to ever do that. So come March, and then November, the voters of Texas must.
The Texas gubernatorial election just became a matter of life and death.
Update: It's gone national. Swell.


Salon.com
Comments
I wonder, too, if this is connected with Perry's delusions that he might be part of a national ticket some day. This probably wouldn't hurt him in the primary (hell, this would probably be an asset in a GOP primary) but I think that this story would hurt, even if it hung fire till 2012. I'd like to see it hurt him sooner than that--say, next year, if he survives Kay Bailey Hutchison's primary challenge.
For supporters of the death penalty, you need to decide: is it acceptable to have a few innocent people put to death along the way?
Clatie Williams (running against Ann Richards) : "On rape. 'It's like the weather. If it's inevitable, relax and enjoy it.' "
Bill Clements, former governor and chairman of the board of governors of SMU told the NCAA he was cleaning up the program, lying about it as he was still paying the football players. When confronted with the lie after SMU received the NCAA Death Penalty "Well, there wasn't a Bible in the room."
Then we all know about the frat boy George...wait, I think it was actually Karl Rove who was the governor in an uncredited role during W's time here...W the man who was an abysmal failure his entire adult life.
Now Rick "Perfect Hair" Perry shows he's cut from the same cloth.
The sad thing is that the people of the great state of Texas, when taken individually, are usually nice and polite and good people, but wtf is up with the majority of them thinking that a Republican governor has ever done anything to benefit the people of the state. They pretty much have been bent over the couch goatse whores for as long as I can remember.
http://open.salon.com/blog/skeletnwmn/2009/09/30/rick_perry_for_governor_yeah_right_whatever_you_say
It's probably not ethical, but its not as bad as a Governor letting somebody die and then covering it up.
I think maybe I should go eat some dinner LOL
As horrible as this injustice was, it may provide the gold standard of anti-death penalty arguments, a provable wrongful execution. But there are lots of folks whose convictions were shoddy, whether or not they were really innocent, and that's what everybody ought not to find unacceptable, even the supporters of the death penalty. How much data do they need to admit this isn't working?
We need a federal death penalty for Governors and prosecutors who fight to kill people who are later found innocent. Maybe they can cop to life.