There has been a serious drop in the quantity and quality of my posts lately, and that's mostly your fault. But let me qualify that title by saying, I don't have any idea what happened on 9/11. I've never seen any official version or conspiracy theory that makes complete sense. But I googled myself today, and apparently a few weeks ago I got drunk and left a long, rambling comment on an article called "The Six Most Misguided Causes Ever Made Famous by Celebrities" at Cracked.com. I have to admit that as far as drunken internet posts go, this one was pure gold. I guess I was just angry at Cracked for using Rosie O'Donnell to disprove the 9/11 inside job hypothesis. Here is my response, as well as the two favorable responses I received:
What? How did 9/11 get in here? Way to do a strawman debunking. You know, I used to ridicule the conspiracy, then when I looked into it I realized you absolutely cannot disprove that 9/11 was an inside job. And I don't mean in the scientific sense that you can't disprove something didn't happen. I mean the evidence about the third building, building 7, that collapsed for NO REASON. It wasn't hit by a plane, and it was in fact the first steel-framed building in human history to collapse from a simple non-jetfuel fire. And now we have new proof about Silverstein, the man who bough the WTC complex three months before the attack even though he would have to pay a billion to remove the asbestos from both buildings. He made a call on the day of 9/11 asking if he would still get the insurance if building 7 was destroyed in a controlled demolition. Rosie didn't make that up. A 30 story steel tower in j*pan was completely engulfed by flames for ten hours and it didn't collapse. Building seven had isolated fires on a few floors and fell at free fall speed starting at the top, where the penthouses collapsed about three seconds before the rest of the building. Then there was the whistle blower from Able Danger, Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, who lost his security clearance for trying to tell the 9/11 commission that the FBI knew about the hijackers. Also, why did the Pentagon burn Shaffer's book without letting it be read by the public? Then there was sec. of transportation Norman Minetta, who claimed Dick Cheney watched the plane fly 50 miles toward the pentagon, and when someone asked Cheney if "the orders still stand", he replied, "Of course they do. Have you heard anything to the contrary?" What orders did Cheney give? The orders to send jets to shoot down the planes that were hijacked, or the orders to launch the anti-aircraft missiles stationed on the pentagon? Wait, neither of those things happened even though only Dick Cheney's PEOC office could have ordered them. I usually love this site, but how dare you use ROSIE O' DONNELL as evidence that 9/11 wasn't an inside Job? That's just weak. And you know what? It doesn't matter either way, because of the CIA Operation Cyclone, which funded and trained the Taliban in the art of hijacking airplanes during the 1980s. That's right, Operation Cyclone. Look it up. And Osama B's CIA code name was Tim Osman. He worked for us, and 9/11 was a group of Saudis funded by the ISI in Pakistan. Why didn't we invade those two countries? America created the Taliban, so it doesn't matter if 9/11 was an inside job. Either way it was America's fault.
props dude. Also, the smoke coming from the twin towers was black meaning less oxygen was reaching them. There's also evidence that thermite was used on the steel frame that would have easily ignited form jet fuel fires and torn down the whole building. Also that janitor form the basement who claimed to have felt explosions but while on a campaign to make his knowledge known suddenly "committed suicide" and a host of other f**king things that make no sense and its complete bulls**t that this website not only claimed that the cause to reveal 9-11 is misguided but that fact that it takes the whole thing to be without necessity to prove otherwise is actually insulting for people who have done some f**king research.Waste of an article. Lazy or no research. I think you went maybe 1 for 6 on these being "misguided" causes. You show extreme lack of knowledge in numerous areas, and it just kind of makes me sad.
Information that took me under a minute to find on the internet:
9/11:
Please note that steel is not flammable. You can burn and pour jet fuel on ONE steel I-beam for weeks and it won't melt. Also, building that don't get hit by airplanes don't perfectly implode into their own sub-basements (Building 7).
Leonard Peltier:
"The tribal council, not the local or FEDERAL government, has jurisdiction over reservations. Different reservations have different systems of government, which may or may not replicate the forms of government found outside the reservation."
Now I have to get back to work.
Keep exposing the Bilderberg, and watch the price of silver over the next six months. I'm guessing ten dollars up. Bill out.


Salon.com
Comments
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/29/george-bush-thought-9-11-plane-shot-down
I'm not sure what this means, except how cute it is that Bush thought he had the power to shoot down the airplanes. Only Cheney had that power.
theres a phenomenal amt of stuff out there now that opens up the whole thing. theres a good youtube video of this guy who tried to melt steel using a hot fire & bldg materials. its impossible. theres a lot of new info with the NIST FOIA results that came out. there is audio evidence of explosions that seems to have been intentionally deleted in prior publicly released NIST videos. theres a tape of an FBI director asking firefighters about 2ndary explosions, a theory they were working on on that day at the site. theres a new chemist who analyzed the nanothermite residue. etcetera. lots of stuff for those with eyes to see. yeah, at 1st its like waking up in a soup of amniotic fluid with the robot about to flush you down the tubes. life goes on. like that crazy strutting grape sings, we will survive.
We don't know the half of it yet.
People are just too damned lazy to find out more. Al it would take is some brief research, yet we're all afraid to do it. Afraid to see what's become of our world, our lifestyle, even our security.
I take it very seriously, indeed.
R