Blue in Texas is

living Blue in a Red state

Laura Deurmyer

Laura Deurmyer
Location
Texas,
Birthday
December 22
Bio
Mom, foster mom, wife of an artist/ artisan, progressive, former urban professional marooned in the sands of West TX

MY RECENT POSTS

Laura Deurmyer's Links

Salon.com
NOVEMBER 10, 2009 4:07PM

My conflicted feelings about our military

Rate: 11 Flag

As I type, I am listening to the roll call from the Fort Hood memorial service.  Ironically enough, I was running all over town at the noon hour getting a veterans’ day tribute poster printed for our company lunch room, so I was really late going to lunch; this delay landed me in the lunch room during President Obama’s moving speech honoring the Ft. Hood dead.

I realized as I listened to him name off the victims that I am deeply conflicted in my feelings towards the military.  On the one hand, I had to choke back tears as he listed all the promising young people – many leaving small children behind – who were senselessly killed.  On the other hand, I could not help but think of my cousin, who lost his wife in the Oklahoma post office shooting.  Sure, people were sympathetic, and there was news coverage, but the outpouring of support was nothing like that these service people are getting.  Was my cousin’s wife’s victimization – the same type of death by gunshot at the hands of a mass-killing crazy – any less dreadful?   Why is this so different?   It’s not like it was a military attack on a US installation.

Our military occupies a special place in our society.  Most of us who are not in the military couldn’t begin to fathom how or why they bring themselves to enlist in the first place.  Many of us think that killing, even in the name of peace, is horribly wrong.  Others of us simply couldn’t imagine voluntarily placing oneself in harm’s way for the pittance of a salary that our service members are paid.  Nevertheless, despite whatever personal misgivings we may have about the way our government uses them, or about the personal choices they make when they join, we almost universally respect, honor and love these men and women.

One of my friends is a Marine wife.  Her spouse was injured – not seriously, but seriously enough to keep him from deployment to Iraq – and I was so happy for her.  I expressed my feelings, letting her know how glad I was that her husband wouldn’t be in harm’s way.  Her incredulous response:  “You’re GLAD my husband’s career is destroyed?”  Rather than celebrate his continued safety here on American soil with her and their three daughters, she was mourning his loss in not being able to be in the field doing his job with his comrades in arms.  I could never, ever in a million years be that unselfish. 

I’ve said many times that if our son talks about enlisting, I’ll tie him to a chair until his craziness passes rather than let him go.   I know that’s not what I’d do though.  Rather, like another friend of mine whose nineteen year old son (who had never before left his small West TX town before enlisting) deployed to Afghanistan last month, I would find some way to cope.  She is coping by distributing care packages from members of our community to the service men and women in her son’s unit.  As the President read the listing of shooting victims I said a silent prayer of thanks that this one young man was not on the list.  It will kill his mom if he gets killed.  I know it in my soul.  Watching her live with the torture of his decision to enlist, followed almost immediately by witness of her pained, resigned acceptance of his deployment is almost like watching a plane crash in slow motion.  Even if he comes back unscathed except for painful experience, it will have been agonizing for her and for his father.

One thinks of agony when thinking of military service, sacrifice and tradition, but the words honor and glory always come up too.  It may partly be that mythos of honor through combat, memorialized in our traditions from the earliest Greek, Spartan and Roman mythology, Bible stories of Hebraic kings triumphant and legends of knights’ derring-do that tempts people into service.  When assembling the photo collage for our poster this morning, I couldn’t help but note the shining pride on the then-much-younger faces of my co-workers.  They were living history, not reading it.  They were in the game, and they knew it. 

I know that’s part of what lured my very young uncle to enlist at the beginning of the US involvement in WW II.  He had been raised on stories of war – his great-grandpa in the Civil War as a drummer boy, his crazy Uncle Charlie in WWI.  After WWII, my uncle continued in the military.  He served as a medic in Korea and in Vietnam.   Once of my earliest memories is of my mother watching combat footage of Vietnam on TV, scanning for any sight of her beloved older brother.  He came home from that war, mostly.  My aunt says he was never the same again – the nightmares and the stress after Vietnam were different she said, much worse than that of WWII or Korea. 

This Veterans’ Day is the first time I’ve thought through any of this.  I wish our society was less militaristic.  I think that the military-industrial complex is a real thing, sucking the money and life out of our nation when it’s not necessary.  The wars in Iraq and increasingly in Afghanistan seem to me to be quagmires we should rapidly extricate ourselves from, no matter how you feel about the “rightness” of using war to enforce the nation’s will in international situations. 

I also fear that I wouldn’t be able to be a real pacifist; in the face of terrible tyranny like that displayed by a Hitler, I would likely be as apt to support force as anyone.  That’s my conflict with honoring the military too much, with showing strong nationalism or over-the-top patriotism.  Though I oppose much of what US military forces are sent to do, I recognize that we must have a fighting force for those very rare occasions when even a semi-pacifist like me can see that might is right.  It’s as if, as a nation, we are forcing this group of people to do something that we know is morally wrong – kill others on our behalf - but that we know we need to do if we intend to hold onto power, position and our place in the world. 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I tried to write a meaningful comment and found I couldn't do it because I am very conflicted about our military. Thanks for trying to sort things out.
Thanks Janelle. This was a hard one to write - I don't want to be disrepectful of individuals in the military, certainly not on Veterans' Day. But I do think we need to talk about the role of military power in our society.
powerfully and reasonably stated. I can't think of anything I disagree with here. thank-you!
It's not disrespectful to be conflicted; rather, I think it shows that we're able to take a careful look at institutions.

I come from a non-military family. My father is a Vietnam vet who never, ever speaks about what happened over there. The war screwed up his legs and damaged his psyche in ways I'll never understand. It was not uncommon when I was a kid for the whole house to wake up because my father was in the grips of some horrible night terror and screaming his head off.

My husband is the son of two retired Navy servicepeople. His entire family is deeply entrenched in the service, and it still eats him up that his bad eyesight prevented him from joining up.

It's an interesting line to tread; I honor and respect our servicepeople, but I have so many deep reservations and problems with things like the military-industrial complex, the way the military is often given almost a free hand in its actions and budget, and of course the rampant sexism and violence in the ranks.

It's so hard, some days. And I'm sorry to hijack your post, Blue.
It is honorable to be a soldier. It is disgraceful to be a politician sending our soldiers to do dirty work around the world. I have nothing but total respect for anyone who has, or is, serving in the military. My conflict is how to reconcile working within such a system without compromising your morality. Maybe doesn't sound very coherent, but right now I'm pretty pissed that ANYbody is going to Iraq or Afghanistan. Why aren't we in Darfur? Why don't we go to Honduras and pitch out the coup leader and reinstate the democratically elected leader? I'll shut up now.
it depends on what they are doing, and why. after pearl harbor, america was clear about what needed to be done, and did it with whatever powers they had.

but using conscript soldiers for a meaningless exercise in chest-thumping in south east asia let middle america know for the first time that america's leaders didn't necessarily deserve followers.

nowadays those would-be caesars in the beltway know better than to use conscripts. they hire mercenaries, in uniform and out. at the same time they use the language of patriotic defense of the nation, to put a figleaf of honor over naked imperialism.

'mixed emotions' are the result of contempt for the nation's masters, and pity for the stooges they have sucked into the military meat-grinder. the pity is all the greater today, when unemployment is making military recruitment much easier.
Dolores - Thanks so much.

Ash - I can imagine that it would be hard for you to express opinions freely yet stay in your in-laws' good graces. Some of the military-background people I work around completely shut you out if you criticize anything military - budget, culture, treatment of women. And if you dare to question our participation in any conflict, forget it. No high-jacking - just good commenting. Thanks!

skeletnwmn - It certainly would be easier for me to take if we were in places that I could clearly see terrible injustice, like Darfur. Some would say that Iraq WAS such a place, I guess, but that excuse (Saddam) has been gone for a very long time now.

Kyle - thanks for your comment. I hope your son doesn't have to see close friends hurt or killed in war. I think the young people who come back irreparably emotionally damaged are the saddest cases. My generation (40's) was right between everything - almost no one our age actually participated in much conflict- so we were spared the agony of close friends in that situation.

Al - living in small town TX I have seen the economics of recruitment first hand. There are not a lot of jobs out there for people who haven't finished college and can't afford to do so. At one time, the military was offering pretty large signing bonuses. I know of several young people were drawn in by that. And your point about mercenaries - inside and outside the military is so true. I think most people would be shocked to find out how many Americans working armed duty in Iraq are not US military, but actually contract personnel. Thanks for your comment.
we support the troops
they are good men and women
to keep us all free
Blue, I share your wonder about why certain deaths are mourned differently. These same men and women, who might have been wounded or killed in war, might not have had the same heroic and widely televised funeral...in fact, it might not have been televised at all, and would have been more of an individual mourning experience. They are "heroes" not from fighting, but because they were victims...and yet they might have killed others in war, and we would never think about those people who died. Thanks for sharing a post thinking about the complexities of war coming out of militariness in general...
Sandy - they are good men and women and I do support them. I don't always support what we have them do though, or the fact that we feel we need to use them so much. Therein lies my dilemma.

Melissa - thanks! it is interesting how little we think about all the people (including non-Americans) killed - the civilian casualties as well as our own military ones. I suspect that, as a society, that's the mindset we have to have in order to rationalize.
thanks for your heartfelt post!
Kyle - Every single one of the young people killed is a heartbreak to so many people. It would be hard to watch "your" kids go off to war as a teacher or school volunteer. With our son so little (kinder) it's hard to imagine that we will be there some day.

Dem - Thanks so much!
Hello Blue in Texas:I think one measure of a post's merit might be how long your reader ponders your points -- and even what they might take with them once they've left your post. (rated)

The very first "senseless" killing seared emotionally in my memory would be Charles Joseph Whitman (June 24, 1941 – August 1, 1966), a student at the University of Texas at Austin, killed 14 people and wounded 32 others during a shooting rampage on and around the university's campus. Note the similarity in numbers.

Like the Oklahoma post-office tragedy you referenced, the Austin Tower rampage received immense media coverage. The victims did not have a mass memorial, to my knowledge, attended by the United States President.

The President is commander-in-chief of the United States armed forces , did and was expected to attend the memorial of the victims of Fort Hood. I think that while media coverage followed the president, equal emotional reaction follow all senseless killings.

Thoughts and questions that come to my mind: As a veteran, Charles Whitman was buried with the American flag draped over his coffin. An autopsy revealed Charles Whitman had a brain tumor. Will Major Husan be buried with a flag over his coffin? Should it? Will an autopsy reveal a brain tumor?
Correction: In my former post, the name of Major Hasan was misspelled.
Blue, thanks for a very measured and thoughtful post. I have also been thinking about the dichotomy of the men and women in uniform vs. the politicians who send them into harms way. There's an ad out there now where a kid wishes snow for his dad in Iraq/Afghanistan and the tagline for the ad is, "We live safer and better lives because you are there." I think, no, we don't, but not because of any fault of the troops. We don't blame the rank-and-file employees for the decisions of the CEO of a corporation. Why should we blame the rank-and-file troops for the decisions of our government? But it often seems to be the troops and families themselves who claim that there is no difference. If you are outside the military culture, this is a hard thing to understand. I certainly don't.
Devonia - It will be interesting to see what develops from the investigation into the Ft. Hood shooting. It would certainly be easier to understand if we found a concrete medical reason that an educated person who chose to be in a helping profession would violate his Hippocratic oath in this most terrible fashion. My guess is that the answers will not be so obvious.

Ardee - I absolutely don't blame the rank and file troops. It IS hard however to cope with the military mindset if you are completely outside of it. The backbone of what makes them work - chain of command, following leadership unquestioningly - is so foreign to me that it's like I speak a different language.