Albert Cossery was not a son of the poor. Or, to put it in the street vernacular of his characters, the "son of a dog." That's just one of the many epithets they use for each other, constantly, in Arabic translated into French--its closest meaning in English being not the literal "son of a bitch" so much as the much stronger and earthier "motherfucker."
Cossery was born in 1913 in Cairo, the son of a property owner, which made his family of the same class that became the dreaded targets of his later fiction. He was also of Greek Orthodox and Lebanese descent--a double bourgeois whammy since many of the ruling order in Egypt at the time were of foreign Middle Eastern background. Egyptians themselves, like in so many colonial zones, were regarded as little more than dirt by the owners and landlords who ruled directly over them.
The class divisions of the pre-Nasser era in Egypt dominate Cossery's writing. From his first effort, a loosely stitched together group of stories called Men God Forgot, to the posthumously translated A Splendid Conspiracy, Cossery's output over seventy years was meagre and harsh. Much like the thieves, prostitutes, and unemployed he chose to write about, Cossery was sullen when it came to the prospects for change in his native Egypt. He left early in life, like so many writers between the wars, for the relative safety and cultural stimulation of Paris where he settled for the rest of his days. He died in 2008 at the age of 94.
He wrote all of his fiction in French, although he said that he still "thought in Arabic," and in fact his writing shows the unmistakable mark his homeland made upon him. The dilemmas of his characters, and the superstitions and personal mythologies they suffer under, are all Egyptian to the core. Only Egypt, with its millenial history of brutal oppression, first by Egyptians, later by outsiders, and later still by Egyptians once again, could have produced an artist who wrote so intimately and so minutely about misery. His acidic outlook earned him the title from critics of the "Voltaire of the Nile."
Egyptians themselves have a love-hate relationship with Cossery. He belonged to that generation who saw the fight against the colonial powers as the final test of Egyptian independence. Few institutions in Egypt recognise him, even though several leading scholars there have translated and celebrated his work. Cossery was sanguine about the results of the post-independence governments, and remained dedicated to the poorest of the poor. But some of his work, written in the days leading up to the last revolution in his homeland, echo events today with an eery prescience.
In one of the stories in Men God Forgot, "The Barber has Killed his Wife," a character is thinking about the future of the country and its people. A resident of one of the poorest quarters in Cairo, Chaktour the tinker, is trying to connect two seemingly unrelated events, the recent murder of a woman by her husband, an otherwise perfectly sane man, and the revolt by a group of street-sweepers against the government authority that keeps them in an abject state of near-starvation (many of them are too poor to afford shoes). Chaktour is convinced that the man who killed his family, Saadi, was acting out of desperation, from a life that left him no place to go. While the street sweepers' battle against police over a few lousy pennies--one of them picks up their supervisor and throws him through a plate-glass window in an upscale shopping district--represents another side of the same profound frustration. Chaktour explains the link between the two events to a man he meets:
"'I should like to know...'
'What?'
'What the semblance is between Saadi's crime and the sweepers' revolt.'
'Do you think there's some connection between the two things?'
'Not a connection but a similar wish. A very simple wish, that I feel everywhere around me, but that I cannot identify. We must be several to do that. All of us, with our wives and children. Then it will penetrate into our hearts, it will become terrible and it will grow in us. And when it becomes immense in us and we can no longer support its presence in our hearts, we too will commit deeds that seem senseless to us today, but which at that moment will be simple and just.'"
As Cossery's fiction matured over the decades, and it became obvious that there would be no release for Egyptians under their new Egyptian rulers, he turned increasingly in his depictions to subtler and even more controversial methods of resistance. Even laziness, the withdrawal from society and refusal to work, became a potential way out. This led some critics to regard Cossery as a relic, a dandy, a "misanthropic old sot." But he never abandoned those on the lowest rung of Arab society--beggars, the disabled, pimps, prostitutes, drug addicts and those who are just too frustrated, and too imbued with some vaguely defined sense of remaining dignity, to submit to the terrors of a state and a society set on breaking them.
It remains to be seen whether the protestors in the streets of Cairo and other cities in North Africa and the Yemen are willing to recognise this group--all those who do not fit into the reigning, U.S.-supported regimes and the deeply divided societies they foster--and do something about their long enduring misery. As Slavoj Zizek and others pointed out during the uprising in Iran, it is to these people, the despised, the dispossessed, the "left out," that any real revolution must look. With the global economic depression squeezing all the regimes in the area, skyrocketing food and fuel prices threaten to drive millions more, who barely maintained some standard of living up to this point, into the shadows where Cossery's characters trudge through a sort of living death.
This sense of immediate necessity, beyond the false sense always offered by a heartless system of wage and land exploitation, has created a window, a chance to break the spell that has hung over millions upon millions of people for centuries. But when all the smoke has cleared and all the slogans have died down in Cairo and Tunis and Sana'a, the "left out," the dispossessed, those whom God forgot, will remain. And the real test of any new order will be met. Or it won't--once again.
______________________
Quotation from Les hommes oublies de Dieu, translated by Harold Edwards, City Lights Books, 1963


Salon.com
Comments
R
skinny dave - Homer is on vacation. I'm his much older brother. And I like donuts, just not exclusively.
Sam - You make the most interesting comments. Where to begin with a comparison/contrast of the two authors' work? There are similiarities, but Beckett's people seem to me to be even more fragmented than Cossery's. They're literally breaking down into bits and pieces. Cossery's characters maintain a stubborn solidity in the face of the most awful horrors of their poverty. That's a beginning...
I shall have to read Cossery. I rated this and "liked" it on Facebook, and posted it on a few friends FB posts as well.
We often forget that Nasserism, Marxism, Islamicism, they are all appealing to similar groups of people for similar reasons: poverty, hopelessness and constant, unrelenting imperialism.
r
He's been accused of fatalism. He seems to suggest that there's no end in sight, that pain is an inevitable part of the human condition and we're all on an endless wheel of suffering, being tortured by existence. Then at other moments, he entertains thoughts of some kind of violent release from the torture. Isn't this the violence of futility? Or does it matter? He doesn't seem to suggest a true social alternative in Men God Forgot. I haven't read his later work.\
Rated
I think that Cossery, especially in his later work, finds possibilities in passivity for resistance. Maybe that's the connection with Beckett, too. Both of them find in a radical passivity a way to answer the sense of frustration experienced by people as they come up against an indifferent system again and again. It's beyond the Bartleby option. Some of Cossery's characters make lethargy into an art form. But from this point of view, the violent passage a l-acte must seem attractive. Like a strange country. This is hardly fatalism, at least not a simple one.
Scanner - I would say that Cossery had been there and then back again, several times. He sought out anonymity and obscurity and poverty because he thought that these were the representative conditions of modern life everywhere. Unfortunately he is as right today as ever. Thank you for stopping.
As for the future in the ever-troubled Mideast, history suggests that true democracy will have a difficult time in places where one strongman or another has ruled for millennia. But one can always hope audaciously.
Davey - Thanks for clearing that up. The point goes back to Sam's comment. Out of the mouths of youth...
Dr Lee - I love your poem! "A little man" indeed.
Myriad - What's all this "our view of the world" stuff? It's not my view. I've traveled around the world several times over and I've read literature from most of the places I've been. City Lights and New Directions have been sources for a long time. Crack a book, my friend, or book a flight. Or both. Plenty of Americans don't share that more limited "view."
Thank you.
For those interested, Citizentube, youtube's free user channel is hosting videos from on-the-ground in Egypt right now. Brilliant, first-hand stuff:
http://www.youtube.com/citizentube?feature=ticker
The internet is all lit up tonight over Egypt. Encouraging to see so many people fostering this. They might just have a shot at getting rid of Mubarak after all. Good night.
"So the policeman, this zealous servant of a mighty state, threw himself at the beggar (whose very serenity was a kind of provocation), roundly berating him according to rules of a time-tested art. But the beggar failed to react to these insults, murderous though they were. He was an old man, hideously wrinkled, with a gray beard that swallowed up the whole of his face and a head that vanished under an enormous turban. His eyes were closed, and the thick black circles under them gave him an epicene appearance altogether unusual for a bum. What's more, he was dressed in a fanciful multi-colored outfit better suited to a street acrobat than to a man in his condition. This eccentric old man, the ancestor of his eternally persecuted race, seemed sunk in a deep sleep that even the deafening roar of the countless cars fighting through the intersection could not disturb. At last, realizing the futility of his insults and orders, the cop gave the bum a kick, and then another kick, to knock him out of his infuriating inertia. He was just about to kick him again when he saw the beggar abandon his initial position and slump to the ground, where he assumed the proud and thoroughly disdainful attitude of the dead. For a moment, the policeman thought he'd killed him and was seized with panic at the thought of having lost his prey. A dead beggar was worth less than nothing; it might even get him fired. He needed this bum to be alive. Bending over the old man, he grabbed him by his turban, shaking him with savage fury in an attempt to bring him back to life. This action was both rash and irreparable: as if by magic, the beggar's head became detached from his neck and remained stuck to the turban, which the policeman continued to brandish in the air like a bloody trophy."
From The Jokers, Albert Cossery, 1964.
OS has some good posts sometimes. This one is a treasure to read.
I am stunned for some reason. I guess I am not the only one who reads here and need to remember that.
Egypt is going down to the dogs. Our prez is looking more than slightly sad from trying to straddle too many fences lately. It is not good right now for the people who want what Americans peddle the most: ideas. Never mind the war materials.
In answer to your question...
All I see is a series of ruptures.
Rated.
--Alyson