Tom Philpott, writing for Grist, reports that the outbreak of this dangerous new swine flu appears to have come from a factory farm in Vera Cruz, Mexico, run by Smithfield Foods, the "world's largest pork packer and hog producer." According to the article, the farm is run by a Smithfield Mexican subsidiary called Granjas Carrol, and that the facility produced more than 960,000 pigs last year.
As a former managing editor of a farm magazine, I can say with certainty that there is nothing sustainable about a single facility that raises that many pigs each year. I saw the emergence of confinement swine facilities in this country that sprang up in the Seventies. The sight of so many living creatures of great intelligence bunched together in appalling circumstances persuaded me to become a vegetarian. I can only imagine the practices in countries where laws are even less stringent than ours.
But now we are learning that such practices are not only bad for the pigs, but bad for us, too. Or at least we would be learning this if the U.S. media bothered to report it.


Salon.com
Comments
Most usually, flu travels from humans to swine, not the other way around. It will be interesting to see how this turns out.
I would expect residents around the farm would not be the carriers, employees of the farm would be the carriers. They would, also, probably live nearby.
Did you know that 500K hogs produce more waste than 1.5 million humans?
http://www.reddirtreport.com/news.php?id=10649
"On Friday, the U.S. disease-tracking blog Biosurveillance published a timeline of the outbreak containing this nugget, dated April 6
"Residents [of Perote] believed the outbreak had been caused by contamination from pig breeding farms located in the area. They believed that the farms, operated by Granjas Carroll, polluted the atmosphere and local water bodies, which in turn led to the disease outbreak. According to residents, the company denied responsibility for the outbreak and attributed the cases to “flu.” However, a municipal health official stated that preliminary investigations indicated that the disease vector was a type of fly that reproduces in pig waste and that the outbreak was linked to the pig farms. It was unclear whether health officials had identified a suspected pathogen responsible for this outbreak."
It is similar to the poultry industry trying to use their litter for the fields, then to find out it affected water quality. It cost too much to haul it distances away. I agree it is a problem that must be dealtt with or chicken nuggets will be ten dollars for a six pack. Which I never eat, btw.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124081528924558633.html#mod=article-outset-box -Buried at the bottom of this WSJ is the info that 2,000 people in Mexico have been hospitalized with serious pneumonia since the siege started. That's a lot of folks.
The issues are: (1) what is the level of lethality (it appears currently to be less than 10% which is much lower than Spanish flu and avian flu H5N1) and (2) how easy is it to transmit human to human. However, the lethality issue could change. If we look at 1918, the first wave of the flu was mild. The next year, devastating. (BTW - I did a lot of research on these issues for a possible book on bioterror years ago.)
Great piece from The Guardian - http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/27/swine-flu-search-outbreak-source
http://is.gd/v0Dv - This is the short link to the piece. Whom do you trust? The people in the community or the factory farm?