Booknut

Booknut
Location
Washington, District of Columbia, USA
Birthday
March 08
Bio
I am a social activist (not afraid to call myself LIBERAL in capital letters) who is passionate about peace and loves to read, travel to developing countries, listen to/see provocative lectures and plays -- and drink mojitos!

Booknut's Links

New list
No links in this category.
Editor’s Pick
DECEMBER 23, 2009 3:20PM

Why I Want to March in Gaza for my Christmas Vacation

Rate: 7 Flag

[Note that a shorter, less personal version of this post appeared today on Electronic Intifada:  http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article10963.shtml. In tomorrow's post, I'll describe our evolving fight against Egypt, which has taken a stand against the march.]

On Dec. 29, I will attempt to cross into the Gaza Strip along with 1,300 other peace and justice activists from 43 countries. Some of us have traveled to Gaza previously. In fact, for me, it will be the third time since the Israeli invasion, which destroyed or damaged more than 50,000 homes and 90 percent of private industry. 

But this time is different. Dec. 27 will be one year since the attack, and nothing has changed. Due to the ongoing blockade imposed by Israel and Egypt, with the acquiescence of the United States and European Union, no homes have been rebuilt, unemployment is nearing 50 percent, children at two-thirds of the schools are laboring without notebooks and pencils, and babies are suffering from nitrate poisoning due to contaminated water. Enough is enough. It’s time to do something dramatic. It’s time for the Gaza Freedom March.

The idea for the march grew out of a CODEPINK: Women for Peace delegation to Gaza in June. Norman Finkelstein – the Jewish scholar and critic of Zionist racism – envisioned a global convergence of justice activists, arriving the week of the one-year mark to protest the ongoing siege. That “convergence” will soon become a reality – if, that is, Egypt doesn’t stand in the way by refusing to open the Rafah crossing as it is threatening to do. Our 1,300 internationals will be joined by an estimated 50,000 Palestinians in Gaza, when we march on Dec. 31 from Abu Drabo (a community in which nearly every building was destroyed during the invasion) to the Erez crossing into Israel.

Not everyone in my life understands why I am doing this – particularly since I plan to stay beyond the march to donate my skills as a communicator to two local NGOS. After all, on the face of it, there seem to be a lot of reasons why it’s a foolish, futile effort, both personally and on the sociopolitical level.

Personally, I am an unemployed 52-year-old – and I could be a poster woman for the global economic implosion.  Once a high-powered VP at a global diagnostics company, I have now been without an income for almost a year. I have never had to work that hard to change jobs when it was time to move on, but all of a sudden my luck has changed. So one might question (and they have)…Shouldn’t I worry about my own situation and keep trying to get a job instead of going to Gaza? Well, sure. I have been, and I will. But the way I see it, I can also use this “unfortunate” time of my life as an opportunity to contribute to broader human kind in a way that I normally cannot. I can hunker down until my world and my life become as small as my own back yard -- or I can look around and ask, “what else can I do with this enforced time off? What can I accomplish in the meantime?” Fortunately, “pay it forward” is more than a slogan. One good turn often leads to another: My “investment” in my chosen cause inspired more than one person to invest in me – through two grants that are helping to pay my way on the march and help me bring much-needed items to those in need. 

 But that raises the larger, macro question – why this issue? As so many people have asked me, why not help the millions of needy people here at home, instead of a people thousands of miles away who seem destined to be embroiled in a never-ending conflict? Or…how about the Congo, where so many more people have been even more brutally slaughtered? There is indeed a multitude of worthy causes – both domestic and international.  In 2007, the UN's Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), John Dugard, issued a harshly critical report on Israel's human rights record in the occupied Palestinian territories. He addressed this question by explaining: “There are other regimes, particularly in the developing world, that suppress human rights, but there is no other case of a Western-affiliated regime that denies self-determination and human rights to a developing people and that has done so for so long. This explains why the OPT has become a test for the West, a test by which its commitment to human rights is to be judged. If the West fails this test, it can hardly expect the developing world to address human rights violations seriously in its own countries, and the West appears to be failing...” The “facts on the ground” in Palestine have only worsened in the three years since then, culminating with Israel’s disproportionate attack on Gaza.

It is my belief that we should each choose at least one cause to which to commit, even if it’s only by helping one affected person or changing one person’s mind. Helping the homeless,  disabled or invalid here in the United States is indeed a worthy cause. However, in this globally connected community in which we now live, “what goes around comes around,” as the saying goes. So many of our insecurities about security stem from the seething resentment on the Middle Eastern “street” over the persistent disenfranchisement of the Palestinian people. Until those grievances are redressed, Americans will continue to be the butt of hostility from Iran to Iraq to Lebanon.

However, self-preservation is not the only reason why the plight of the Palestinians deserves my attention and yours. It’s also because Americans are partly responsible for the suffering of so many innocent people – people I now have come to count as my friends, and who are no more responsible for the bad actions of their government than many Americans were when Bush began torturing and warmongering. American taxpayers give Israel $7 million per day in mostly military aid, with virtually no strings attached – far more than to all the starving countries of Africa put together. Americans are therefore considered by much of the world as responsible for Israeli violations of human rights. In addition, the US has blocked any Security Council censure of Israel – which has violated more UN resolutions than any other country -- 42 times.

But perhaps the most important reason I am going back to Gaza and on the Gaza Freedom March is that ever since I first set foot on Palestine’s blood-and-tear-soaked land in 2007, I have felt embraced heart and soul by the people. The type of society I want to live in knows no borders between the privileged and everyone else. But if lines must be drawn – or, in this case, walls and barbed-wire fences – then I will stand with the Palestinians.

 

 

Author tags:

egypt, gaza, palestine, israel

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Great Post. I admire your efforts. Keep fighting for Justice! I wish I could be there with you. I belong to a group called Alaskans for Palestine and we are planning a March here locally to give attention to the issue. Every little bit helps. The more Americans know about the issue and learn the truth, the sooner they will realize we have all been lied to.
Wonderful! Nothing happens without a reason. I applaud your way and your vigor.
So right to choose the "Palestinian Question" as it is the "original sin" of the modern age. It is key to the entire Middle East.
God speed, take care, and write back.
I admire the fighting spirit you hold.
It's always a warm joy that grows within me when I realize it still exists
I'm glad to know I was missed, Stellaa. This has been an incredibly difficult year for me and sometimes I "submerge" for a while. Hopefully, for the next 3 months I will be blogging from Gaza -- if Egypt lets us in. So far, they are saying "no. If you would like to help, follow these instructions:

Egyptian embassies and missions all over the world must hear from our supporters (by phone, fax and email)** over the coming crucial days, with a clear message: Let the international delegation enter Gaza and let the Gaza Freedom March proceed.

Contact information (E-mail tool with suggested text):
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/424/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1946

Contact your local consulate here:
http://www.mfa. gov.eg/MFA_Portal/en-GB/ mfa_websits/

Contact the Palestine Division in Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Cairo Ahmed Azzam, tel +202-25749682 E-mail: ahmed.azzam@ mfa.gov.eg

If you are in the U.S., contact the Egyptian Embassy, 202-895-5400 and ask for Omar Youssef or E-mail: omaryoussef@hotmail.com
Great and brave work for a people that have been violently dispossessed of their homeland and their homes, and who face a brutal and hungry winter... Thank you for taking a stand, for doing what many are not able to do, and for writing about it here!
I send my wishes for your safety, health, and continued connection. If you don't already know Starhawk, check out her blog and be sure to meet her during the march. Thank you for leading with your heart.
I know of Starhawk, Karen, I just haven't met her yet. Can you give me a link to her blog?
"Israel’s disproportionate attack on Gaza."

I don't mean to trivilialize the plight of Gazans, but it seems to me that this toss-away breezes through a difficult question none of Israel's many critics has taken the time to answer: what would have been a "proportionate" response to the continuous barrage of rocket fire from Gaza at the village of Sderot?

"In addition, the US has blocked any Security Council censure of Israel – which has violated more UN resolutions than any other country -- 42 times."

This is an interesting point. Of course, Israel, which draws "disproportionate" interest from the UN on human rights issues (as opposed to China? Russia? Libya? North Korea? Saudi Arabia? Yemen? Syria? Iran? Really?) has been targeted by the UN for special censure more than any other country, so it is certainly in a better position to violate more such resolutions than countries which, owing to their diplomatic constituencies, get a lot more free passes.

"It’s also because Americans are partly responsible for the suffering of so many innocent people"

Americans as individuals, by the decisions each of us makes with his or her wallet nearly every day, are far more complicit in the injustices visited upon the victims of Chinese repression, such as the Tibetans and the Uighers (where is the outrage from the Muslim community on their behalf, by the way?), so I'm afraid I don't buy the special pleading from special American responsibility as the rationale for your focus on the Palestinian cause. If it is the reprehensible behavior of your government that drives you, I think you need to explain why that government's complicity in the suffering of Palestinians is more compelling to you than, say, the ongoing disaster that is the condition of many Native Americans, to say nothing of the immediate, continuing crisis in New Orleans, both of which are more directly tied to the behavior of the American government than is the condition of the Palestinians.

The passion for justice for the Palestinians aroused in Americans, who live comfortably in homes founded on a centuries-long exercise in expropriation and extermination far more effective than anything Israel has perpetrated against the Palestinians, is endlessly fascinating to me. The compelling need to justify this passion and the extended disquisitions such justifications seem to require, replete with convenient omissions and elisions, are in themselves quite revealing.
David, if I get into Gaza, I will likely be blogging a lot on the subject. I already know you can't feel sympathetic for the Palestinians from this and past posts. So please don't comment on every single one. We know where you stand on this issue.
Actually, you have no idea how I feel about the Palestinians as such, or about the merits of their struggle for self-determination. If you've read my blog at all, you know I pay particular attention to the behavior and pronouncements of particular people. The fact that you can't distinguish between a questions about whether Israel's conduct is being assessed fairly in both its local context and in the larger world context, on the one hand, and the perfectly valid effort to obtain self-determination and an independent state for Palestinians on the other, however, says a great deal. The rather strong inference I draw is that you view the conflict as susceptible only to zero-sum solutions. I don't, but I greatly fear that the ultimate outcome will be determined by those who do -- those whose behavior and pronouncements I call out on my blog.

Nor have I failed to notice that, rather than address the specific questions I raise, you move immediately to shut down dissent. I thought the whole shutting down dissent thing was exclusively the province of those who raise the question of antisemitism, no?
Book nut: Good for you!!

David: how about this, in response to your first question to Book Nut - how about Israel not violating the cease-fire in the first place? How about Israel not targeting everyone in Gaza in a free-fire zone which constitutes, of course, a war crime? If you can't or refuse to see the actions of Israel upon Gazans in which they were told to get out of the way, but there was nowhere for them to go, as crimes against humanity, then there is no way to have a reasonable dialogue with you because you refuse to see the most obvious facts.
Hello, Dennis,

To your first point: I think it's far from clear that Israeli ceasefire violations predate the pattern of launching rockets onto Sderot. This indiscriminate shelling of civilians actually dates back to the beginning of the Second Intifada in October, 2000, and has never, to my knowledge, been effectively constrained by ceasefire agreements, since Hamas long stood by the (now transparently false) claims that the rocketeers were independent actors outside of Hamas' control.

To your second point: I do think that a fair-minded investigation of the behavior of both parties would be salutary. I just don't think there exists an organization anywhere on the planet capable of carrying out such an investigation. As I've suggested above, the hysterical behavior of the UN towards Israel, cynically perpetrated by a global community studded with an appalling range of bad actors who not infrequently profit by diverting attention from their own horrifying records of misconduct, simply precludes any likelihood of fair and impartial judgment.

You ask, "How about Israel not targeting everyone in Gaza in a free-fire zone which constitutes, of course, a war crime?" This, of course, is as evasive as Karen's free-floating and reflexive assertion about Israel's "disproportionate response" was in the first place. It really does not answer the original question: what *would* have been a proportionate, effective response to the continuous rocket barrage on Israeli civilians? (I note as a point of information that seems to be of little interest to either you or Karen, that, at least for the time being, Hamas has ceased launching rockets at Sderot -- a target, I might add, that was never of tactical value.)

I tend to agree that exchanges like this quickly exhaust the possibilities of what you describe as "reasonable dialog." Sadly, the fact that the path of "reasonable dialog" where the safety of Jews is concerned has historically been remarkably short is the primary rationale for the existence of Israel in the first place.
David: It's a settled point in the law, both domestic and international, that a response should be proportionate to the offense. If someone comes into your store and steals a candy, you aren't allowed to take out a shotgun and blow their heads off, and you aren't allowed to blow their children to smithereens. If someone comes up to you in the street and slugs you, this doesn't give you the right to go to their house and kill all of their children and their spouse.
Wow! I'm glad you're going. I know of another activist who I've met who will be there as well. It's so important that this march is happening.

In solidarity,
-Jill
Booknut,
I will email for you (from my university account for oomph). Hoping that the project will go forward and be a force for sanity.
Bless you.