Booknut

Booknut
Location
Washington, District of Columbia, USA
Birthday
March 08
Bio
I am a social activist (not afraid to call myself LIBERAL in capital letters) who is passionate about peace and loves to read, travel to developing countries, listen to/see provocative lectures and plays -- and drink mojitos!

Booknut's Links

New list
No links in this category.
JANUARY 14, 2011 12:43PM

Disaster tourism: Honest altruism or insensitive voyeurism?

Rate: 2 Flag

Just as humans by their very nature tend to “gawk” when driving by traffic accidents, people seem to gravitate to places that have appeared in the news for all the wrong reasons. Thus, the term “disaster tourism” has been coined, describing the phenomenon of travellers visiting areas devastated by natural catastrophes, such as the South-East Asian tsunami and Hurricane Katrina. In the aftermath of the hurricane that destroyed much of New Orleans, for instance, guided bus tours began visiting neighborhoods that were severely damaged by storm-related flooding.

At the bleaker end of the scale, there’s dark tourism (known to the Germans as Gruseltourismus, or ‘shudder tourism’), referring to travel to areas associated with death and disaster. This includes visits to former concentration camps (a staple of the “Holocaust industry”), battlefields and crimes.  Perhaps the most famous contemporary example is the fact that Ground Zero in New York has become a prime tourist attraction.

ground zero 

Ground Zero 

The West Bank has long been a prime attraction for Western supporters of Palestinian rights, with tours offered by Sabeel, Interfaith Peacebuilders, Global Exchange and others. They are not billed as dark tourism of course, and the visits are packed with highly informative talks with vital organizations such as the Israeli Committee Against Home Demolitions (ICAHD) and Combatants for Peace. But in some respects, they are: The participants are drawn to the region to witness the devastating impact of Israeli crimes against humanity, so that – in part – they can go back home and tell their friends where they’ve been and what they saw. And – to a significantly lesser degree, due to the obstacles created by Israel and Egypt – the Gaza Strip has become a target as well. One of the less principled participants in the 2009 Gaza Freedom March who opportunistically jumped on board the lone bus that was able to enter the Strip (Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak prevented most from entering) told one cameraman on hand for her arrival that “now I can say on Facebook that I’m in Gaza!”

The question then becomes, is there any real benefit, beyond the interest/”titillation” of the participant? Most tour participants return home to educate many others about the “facts on the ground” and the imperative that their home governments pressure Israel to end the occupation and siege. It is only through changing public opinion and moving as many people as possible to action (contacting their legislators, etc.) that the muscle of the pro-Israel lobby will finally be counterbalanced. However, the challenge to all activists is to reach beyond the “choir.” The audiences who attend our report-backs in friendly progressive venues are largely already knowledgeable and in agreement. People who are opposed, or who simply do not pay attention to this crisis and do not understand why they should, don’t come to such events. Instead, we need to be going to them. (One of the most effective, albeit controversial, activities in which I have participated is a regular vigil in front of Washington DC’s Holocaust Museum, directly across the sign that reads, “Think about what you saw the next time you witness hatred/see injustice.” A large volume of tourists visit the museum, and although a number are already set in their opinions, others are coming to learn and are curious about our posters and handouts. To a lesser extent, the same can be said about protests in front of stores selling products made or marketed by companies benefitting from the Israeli oppression. The traffic isn’t as heavy and shoppers aren’t in the same “learning” frame of mind, but at least they aren’t the choir. )

The other challenge for activists who have already traveled to the region once to consider when it’s time to stop going merely to learn and start volunteering. There are several organizations that offer this opportunity, and although most (including ISM) prefer stints of 1 month or more, others --including ICAHD (which puts participants to work rebuilding demolished homes) -- offer “packaged” opportunities of just a week.

Jean Athey, a leader of the Peace Action chapter in Montgomery County, MD, who volunteered in the West Bank in 2008 and participated in the Gaza Freedom March in 2009, defends both education-only trips and speaking to “the choir.”

“I do think that seeing things for yourself, firsthand, is what makes for change when people return home. That's why Israel spends so much money bringing groups to Israel from the U.S.-- they want people to go back to the U.S. and talk to all their friends about the terrible security situation in Israel and to donate to Israeli causes and vote for legislators who will support Israeli policy,” explains Athey.  “I also think that speaking to the choir isn't all bad and is maybe essential. We all need reinforcement for our views and the sense that others are in agreement with us and working in tandem with us. So, these presentations help, I think, to solidify struggle and bring people together in a way that can make us all stronger.”

Steve France, a Maryland activist and organizer of the vigils at the DC Holocaust Museum, cautions, however, that “blowback” can occur when visitors to the Occupied Palestinian Territories return and, when speaking to others, magnify the severity and danger  of the conditions for better effect. “This can make their listeners feel simultaneously more sorry for the people there and alienated from a population that seems strange and frightening. Instead of taking action to help, they want to flee or devote their time to something more hopeful.” The Palestinians often feel offended as well when they read descriptions of their lives that don’t match their reality. For example, Gazans hate it when someone asks “can you get [some type of basic consumer good] here?” They are quick to set you straight and assert that you can find just about everything you want in Gaza; the problem isn’t quantity, it’s that most are either of poor quality or are too expensive for many to afford. (And if the concern is poverty, there are equally miserable conditions in Egypt.)

Gaza has been more or less isolated from such “tourist” visits, due to the rigid control over its borders by Israel and Egypt. Groups entering have mostly been limited to aid convoys, which are often irritatingly focused on getting aid and people in rather than on breaking the siege so that Palestinans and their exports can get out.  At any one time, there are about 200 foreigners in Gaza, some journalists, occasionally government representatives from different regions of the world, and – mostly -- employees or contractors for international aid agencies like the United Nations Relief & Works Agency (UNRWA), Oxfam and Mercy Corps. (Most, it should be added, live in what could be called a “Green Zone” – the secure area by the UNRWA headquarters, close to the still-lovely sea.) However, there is a steady, albeit still very small, stream of independents who make it into Gaza. CODEPINK: Women for Peace brought in one of the first such groups after the last major Israeli invasion, in March of 2009 (with me among them – my first trip to Gaza). Since then, it has returned twice and another small delegation will attempt to enter at the end of this month. Although Codepink had a specific task on its first two trips – solidarity with fellow females on International Women’s Day, then to build playgrounds for children – the last visit, and the upcoming one, could be accused by some as being merely the dreaded “dark tourism.” The mission is primarily to show first-timers the still-ruined buildings and hear from NGOs about the struggling economy.

 Ivan Illich, a Mexican author and activist who spoke out in the 1960s against “misplaced idealism” had this to say, “Next to money and guns, the third largest North American export is the U.S. idealist, who turns up in every theater of the world: the teacher, the volunteer, the missionary, the community organizer, the economic developer, and the vacationing do-gooders. If you insist on working with the poor, if this is your vocation, then at least work among the poor who can tell you to go to hell. It is incredibly unfair for you to impose yourselves on a village where you are so linguistically deaf and dumb that you don't even understand what you are doing, or what people think of you. I am here to entreat you to use your money, your status and your education to travel in Latin America [or any other stricken region of the world]. Come to look, come to climb our mountains, to enjoy our flowers. Come to study. But do not come to help.”

I asked a number of admittedly random Gazans what they thought of such groups of foreigners, who “parachute in” for a look-see then just as quickly leave. On one extreme, some (including one who was reacting primarily to the promotion for the trip) didn’t like being regarded as “zoo animals to stare at” or questioned the actual benefit beyond satisfying participants’ desire for “adventure.” In the middle, there were many who hadn’t really thought about it and were more or less indifferent. Still others – the majority, especially after pondering the question – said, “welcome!”

“When people from around the world come to Gaza, then go back to their countries, they will be just like ambassadors for Gaza and Palestine,” says Ashraf Hamad, an entrepreneur in Gaza City. “They initially may not have anything to do, but when aggression happens (against us), they will talk, they will scream, they will take action.”

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I don't agree. People have a variety of reasons for being what you term a "tourist" at a disaster sight. Often it is to see first hand what TV doesn't do justice to to feel the full impact of a disaster or major news story.

Sometimes the people have family or friends whose lives were directly impacted (or even ended) by a sigificant or tragic event on the sight and people want a sense of closure.

Still other times it could be people returning to a much changed location from where they lived, worked, or visited just weeks ago.

I'd bet that the majority of the time a visit to such a location has nothing to do with their political beliefs or a desire to "educate" others.
The point of the post was to get people to think about why they go, and to be sensitive to the perceptions of the people living there. Perhaps I should not have mentioned Ground Zero, because what you say does apply to that site of interest. I would argue that if people go to Palestine, politics definitely enters into it. And it should.
I think there must be value in seeing the horrors of Gaza in real life. To inspire people more, to work against their government's atrocious policies.
Yes, well, that is the key...do you DO something when you return?
I think the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is something that confuses most Americans; I might be wrong about that. But I don't think most Americans even understand the complexities of America's problems. How could they comprehend the situation between Israel and the Palestinians? Going there and seeing things might help, but it's probably on a case-by-case basis, not anything resembling a one-size-fits-all knowledge acquisition.

I know a man who aligns himself with Israel because his mother was Jewish. He doesn't necessarily consider himself Jewish, but he professes a pro-Israel perspective. His entire view seems based on some narrow-minded bias that is not based on anything factual, as I have learned after getting him to reveal to me some of his opinions. I don't know how such perspectives can really be changed. People tend to cling, even to the point of complete unreason, to their beliefs; religion is an especially strong support for that point.

Having said all that, I still think a post like this one would do a lot of people some good if they are planning a trip to that area, or even some of the other areas you mention. It's good to see things first hand, and doing so with an open mind is especially helpful. I just wonder how many open minds are out there.

RATED
I think that the key is, as Pam pointed out, ACTION - what do you do with what you've witnessed and experienced. Tours, whether they are for study/information gathering (like the ones Pam mentioned) or relaxation, are still tours - there is no action implied. Don't misunderstand - the tours to I/P are much needed to raise consciousness. But unless action results from that raising of consciousness, the individual is nothing more than a disaster tourist. - and too often a perpetual one. Those of us who go and see have a responsibility to become a voice for the voiceless; permanent ink for those who are being erased. If we don't fulfill that commisison, we are nothing more than disaster tourists and we fail our Palestinian brothers and sisters miserably.
These "tours" are intended to confuse, not enlighten. At no time is there a discussion of the historical and legal basis for granting land to Jews in order to establish the Jewish State from the Jordan to the Mediterranean.

At no time are the 900,000 Jewish refugees who were literally forced to leave their homes, most of them coming to Israel with nothing but the clothes on their back. All their property and possessions were confiscated.

At no time are the facts about Koran-mandated demonization and hatred of Jews.

At no time do the "tourists" see the constant hate propaganda that spews out of the Arabic language anti-Israel media.

At no time are Jewish victims of Islamic terrorism mentioned (except perhaps in a way that legitimizes their harassment and slaughter).

The entire "Palestinian" enterprise is based on a lie. If we don't have a legitimate claim to the land that was ceded to us in 1922, by International law, then NONE of the many Islamic states that have been waging cold and hot war against us since the 1920s have a right to occupy the lands where they are.

Respect for our rights, under International law, is the first requirement for steps towards a just and lasting peace. All the land from the Jordan to the Mediterranean is designated for the Jewish State - not "a state of all people".

Let those who want to force us to give up our property apply their standards and demands to Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, and all the Islamic-dominated states who demand that we cease being a Jewish State. When Jews can move freely, own property, and live in genuine peace in those lands, we might start thinking about a different scenario. Until then, SHEKET!
There are far too many inaccuracies and disputable points in Mr. Nafsah’s post for me to address in a blog post. However, I must point out that Judaism is not Zionism (Zionism is an exclusionary political ideology) nor does Judaism equal Israel. Judaism is very straightforward about how we, as Jews, are to deal other people. The commandment to treat the “Other” as ourselves (which includes the affording of all legal, civil, and political rights that Jews enjoy) is the most oft repeated commandment in the Hebrew scriptures, appearing 36 times (36 also being the number of double “chai” or life). Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians is in direct contravention of this commandment – worse, Israel’s treatment of Palestinians makes a mockery of this commandment and of all the prophetic injunctions to pursue justice and to do justice. There are no “Jewish” rights apart from human rights – rights that are afforded to all.
Historical and current-event facts that are easily available to anyone who bothers to look for them are not "inaccuracies".

Torah contains a set of relatively simple moral "rules" for Human life and is the foundation upon which ALL "Western" traditions are based. But even a superficial study of the texts shows that the Torah is a specific set of instructions on how to live IN ISRAEL.

There are no Torah-mandated injunctions to spread the Torah to the entire world. We are supposed to follow Torah in a very specific (and very small) geographical area.

Every effort to assimilate requires a distortion of Torah principles and ultimately results in tragedy for Jews. American Jews will end up in the same situation as Jews in 1930s Europe. The only way to avoid this horrible fate is to make Aliyah.

American Jews: open your eyes to what's happening around you. You are precious to us and we urge you to come to your natural home and help us continue the project that our ancestors carried on in spite of pogroms, Inquisitions, and Shoahs.