During the years I dated The First, we lived hundreds of miles apart for all but the earliest days of our relationship. One of the corny but comfortable things we did was watch TV "together" over the phone, discussing plot points and otherwise long-distance snuggling.
One of our mutual favorite shows (back then it was not a pale shadow of its former self) was Law and Order. Both the daily re-runs of even better, earlier seasons and the Wednesday-night first-run episodes.
One night we watched a particular episode; I'm pretty sure it was this one. Due to (still today) hideously inadequate stalking laws, a woman fakes an attack on herself, hoping to get police attention back on the search for her stalker, who remains unapprehended. Her stalker does eventually murder her, and the previous faked attack on herself makes the investigation and trial a difficult uphill slog for the good guys.
This is one of the seasons during which the late, great Jerry Orbach as seasoned older partner Lenny Briscoe was paired with Benjamin Bratt as supposedly attractive (I'm a Chris Noth as Mike Logan and Jesse L. Martin as Ed Greene girl, myself) younger partner Rey Curtis. Even though the guilt of the defendant is in no de facto doubt, as the investigation and trial wear on, piece after piece of evidence gets thrown out for Law and Order-type reasons that probably contribute to my irrational fear of law enforcement (I can't watch the show anymore, despite how much I used to like it).
Anyway, Briscoe and Curtis prepare to testify, both feeling plenty guilty and frustrated that they don't have a slam-dunk case even though they know the defendant is guilty--and so do the judge and the defense lawyer--one of those cases. Curtis gets on the stand and does everything exactly by the book, admitting what they don't know, admitting that the deceased faked the prior attack on her, and so on.
Then Briscoe takes the stand (it could be the other way around in terms of sequence; it's been awhile). His own daughter's life is at risk because she's going to testify against her drug dealer; she is murdered a few episodes later. He regrets not having been able to protect another person's daughter.
Briscoe has been a cop for something over 20 years at this point. He knows about guilty and not guilty. He also knows about right and wrong. He shades his words so that he's not really committing perjury, but pretty much commits perjury, casting more doubt on the previous evidence than was ever presented, suggesting that the faked attack might not have been fake, making himself and his police skills look bad, and so on.
I want to say the defendant is convicted, but I don't really remember. I do remember Lenny and Rey having this very tense, "I did what will allow me to sleep tonight." "So did I." conversation at the courtroom door.
The First said to me, "See, you're like Curtis. You follow the rules because they're the rules, and trust that somehow things will work out right."
I responded, "Yes, and you're Briscoe. You do what you think is right because you think it's right, and you don't wait for anyone to send you an invitation, and you don't depend on anyone else's approval. I wish I were more like you."
It's six years later. I'll be 30 in a few months. And I am more like Lenny Briscoe and The First (and also The One, who never backs down from his opinions ever, and has been a better and stronger influence on me in that regard than I think he really knows).
Professionally, politically, religiously, socially, baseball-ly . . . my principles are my principles are my principles, and I'm not going to change them for any reason.
I don't need "evidence" to know that everything that outside parties have added to higher education ("assessment," "stakeholders" not named Van Helsing, "student-centered learning," "outcomes," "alignment"--if all this means nothing to you, count yourself lucky) in the last few decades is utter nonsense. I fill out what paperwork I need to, but I don't let any of it infect what I actually do in the classroom or in my scholarship. I do not need "the research" to tell me anything about the state of my profession; I'm a sentient being working in the profession, and that is enough.
I don't hide these opinions in faculty meetings, and this has made me some very interesting allies on campus and throughout the profession. It's also led some assessment-Kool-Aid-drinking types to tell me, politely enough, to shut up. You'll have to wire my jaw shut.
I don't need "research" or "statistics" or "financial projections" to hold my social and political beliefs. I'm an ordinary citizen, not a think-tank research associate or congressional staffer. My beliefs are based on my and my loved ones' personal experiences, on others' experiences I've observed either firsthand or through various news outlets, and on my own principles. None of that comes from statistical tables either.
I will never respect any Major League Baseball expansion team that didn't beat me onto the planet. In the last few years I have been subjected to World Series that included The Marlins, The Rockies (whose mascot is the poor man's Barney), and the Tampa Bay Rays. All three could conceivably make the playoffs again this year. There is nothing good about this. Get going,BoSox, Phillies, yes even Braves, and whoever isn't the Rockies who could win the NL Wild Card.
There must have been a shooting star the night I said, "I wish I were more like you." Because thanks to Lenny Briscoe, The First, The One, The Red Sox, The Yankees (who are evil, and I will never change my mind about that either), The Phillies, and in a roundabout way President Obama (with whom I disagree so strongly on just about everything I can't put up and shut up anymore, which is what I used to do with politics).
When someone would tell me I was wrong--politically, professionally, personally--I used to change the subject or politely extricate myself from the situation. I never backed down about baseball ;-) I'll still be polite--heck, sometimes it's a matter of professional survival, but I'm not going to back down or change my mind on the other stuff anymore, um, ever.
So thanks, guys . . . well, I guess "guys and Mr. President" would be more appropriate. If this sense of mental and philosophical certainty and comfort is one of those benefits of growing older, I accept. 30 is not so scary now that I know that, in my mind and heart, I will think and feel exactly the same 30 years from now.


Salon.com
Comments
Into the feed.
But that doesn't mean all are equal. Some people put in more time studying the history, or have a more intuitive sense of what it's about.
There is one constant, though. People talk politics to air their own views more than to be swayed by others. It's cathartic, even if mildly pointless.
Opinion away, Brit! I think I'll join you.....
re: politics, there's one thing I suspect, though I can't say I'm sure of it: in the best of all possible worlds, most people would prefer their relationship with their government to be one of being left alone. But, since we are not in the best of all possible worlds, there is a role for government.
It's interesting. One of the reasons I've read "Big Salon" right alongside "National Review Online" all these years is that I was open to persuasion. I'm still interested in others' views, and I hope mine are at least mildly interesting to others, but I finally realized a few weeks over, "Nope. My mind is unchangeable. It's not because I have bad manners or anything
AtHomePilgrim: Welcome to my humble little blog and thank you for reading and commenting! And I'm kind of an odd duck. I may be getting ready to turn 30, but really I behave more like I'm about 50. So there will definitely be no mind-changing around casa Britomart. This Curtis has grown up to be a Briscoe.
I'm actually mentally working toward another blog entry based on some fabulous, fictional British women from literature and television who hold their principles because they are their principles. Yes, it's fiction, but by acting on their principles and remaining pretty much untroubled by "the (so-called) facts" or "the way things are done," these characters make things happen both personally and in their wider communities, and I think there's an interesting statement there.
Yes, as another of my old-fashioned, hidebound, traditionalist beliefs, I regard literature and other arts quite unironically as productive sites for the working out of social, personal, moral, spiritual, and other issues.
I read the article you referenced on rwnutjob’s blog,
So I had to come read your blog just to see if you had any other sensible things to say.
Congratulations on your upcoming birthday, you seem well on the way to having your head screwed on straight.
I’m not sure what to say about “Principles” except, never let “The Law” prevent you from “Doing what’s Right” “Knowing what’s right” can be a problem, but that’s why you have a conscience. It’s that little voice that Briscoe listens to and Curtis hasn’t yet learned to trust.
Thank you also for your kind words. I've gotten pilloried on another forum where I hang out recently, and questioned strenuously if more kindly by my actual friends, for this audacious act of growing up and settling into myself.
I can take no credit for "having my head screwed on straight." I was raised by good and loving parents who built into me the tools to say, "This postmodern 'indeterminacy' is nonsense. I'm done being 'open' and 'questioning' now. Time to get moving."
I like your introduction of the "conscience" term to the discussion. I'll have to work Jiminy Cricket into my fictional-characters-based post, you know, "Always let your conscience be your guide . . . "
Cheers!