In every Now there is a thousand yesterdays.
As much as we want to isolate the present, to appreciate it for what it is, the past follows us. If our mother was mean, we can only be conscious about that self-talk she put in our minds, refuting it with positive, constructive self-talk. Our minds swirl around the ether, mixing with the thoughts of others. The atmosphere in the ether is very much the ideas, thoughts, feelings we catch, we pick up from our surroundings. Perhaps where we are most comfortable is where we lived as children...the loving, or critical, environment. If we are critical of ourselves, we are critical of other people. How to advance ourselves? To let go of that harsh voice, to acknowledge it, to name it, and to be kind to it saying, "I no longer am a child criticized by a harsh controlling mother or a harsh controlling wife. I believe in myself."
It is human thing to match people around us? To emulate them? Is that the way we form our hunting and gathering groups? That is why it is of utmost importance to surround yourself with people who support your best, not your worst, characteristics.
I have things that I am good at, and places where I need work. Spiritual discipline, daily meditation, or daily practice is one major thing I need to do. My writing can be my practice, as it was for Natalie Goldberg. she spent years studying Buddhism under Katageri Roshi. She still had Western sensibilities, and was terribly offended that Roshi made the moves on her, rather than seeing sex as another form of prayer. The sacred sexual as in the Kama Sutra. To our western sensibilities, sex equals exploitation.


Salon.com
Comments
so in agreement about letting go of those voices... i call mine the "Mommie tapes"....
My perception of my best characteristics when surrounded by those who support my best; my perception of my best characteristics when surrounded by those who support my worst; the perception of others as to my best characteristics when surrounded by those who support my best; the perception of others as to my best characteristics when surrounded by those who support my worst; and so on... I submit that what we end up with are predictable reasons for why groups succeed or fail, why we have gangs, why cultures based upon the values of the group... perform differently than cultures based upon the values of the individual, and much more.
This is a beautiful way of setting up sample systems that can then be applied to disciplines or subject areas across the board... religious, sexual, political, etc. In each case you could probably predict how the people will function within the group ...which I think supports your point.
I would probably need a whiteboard to clarify this... but I like where I think you are going. (rated)
Harp, Thank you for your long and thoughtful comment. You make some interesting points...and yes, a white board would be helpful to fully understand where you're going. I need one too. And maybe an editor to clarify my thoughts on this which also boils down to "birds of a feather..."