In the four months I’ve been a member of the Open Salon community, I have read some seriously good material; entries written on a skill level that exceeds that of any of the other writing communities I have been affiliated with.
From the political commentary of many of those here, to the short fiction of folks like Torman and Scanner, to the humor of Kristy CC and Mister Comedy, to the poetry of Chicago Guy, Caroline Hagood, and femme forte, to the reminiscences of people like At Home Pilgrim and FusunA, there is so much quality writing that I spend far too many hours reading here and neglecting my own writing and conventional reading (books—remember them?)
But, old-school anal retentive that I am, I can’t help but notice the pervasiveness of elementary errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling across the OS landscape. Let me be clear: I’m not specifically referring to any of the folks mentioned above. In fact, you would have to roam the ends of the earth to find a more beautiful and precise use of the English language than that found in Caroline Hagood’s entries. I’m speaking in general.
A post with obvious errors is like a beautiful woman who has long, wavy, lustrous hair, flawless complexion, sparkling, lively eyes, and a divine figure sheathed in haute couture apparel—and who reveals two missing front teeth when she smiles.
You need to indulge this man rapidly closing in on sixty. I learned the skills of the mother tongue for many years at the hands of Roman Catholic instructors: the Sisters of Charity, the Brothers of the Christian Schools, and the Jesuits. What they may have lacked in spontaneity and creativity in tutorial methods, they more than compensated for with a relentless discipline and dedication to inculcating the fundamental skills of using the English language.
I learned spelling and grammar in the days before Spell Check—heck, I learned them before the advent of the personal computer. In those days, I was required to understand the rules of the language by memorizing the parts of speech, by diagramming sentences, by learning how to use a dictionary, and by incessant practice. Perhaps, given this background, you can understand why fundamental errors in English usage make me reach for my blood pressure medication.
Allow me the liberty of pointing out three errors I see repeatedly on Open Salon (and, to be honest, on all “writing” sites.)
- § It’s vs. its: This error, and its ilk, is quite possibly the most commonly abused mistake, and one that is easily corrected. It’s is a contraction of it is. Its is a possessive pronoun, indicating that whatever follows the word belongs to the noun that preceded it. The rule also applies to the similarly tortured misuse of you’re and your: the first means you are, the second means something that belongs to you.
Examples: It’s a poor reflection on its author when an entry contains numerous grammar errors.
It’s cold out: you’re going to need your heavy jacket, hat, and gloves.
- To vs. too: This happens often enough that I’m becoming convinced it’s just a typographical error, but, for the record. To is the first word in an infinitive, followed by the verb. To run, to write, to correct others. Too has several usages, including as a synonym for also and as an indication of excess: too cold, too many.
Examples: It’s important to proofread your writing because Spell Check allows too many errors.
I have to drive to the store, and I’ll be stopping at the library, too.
- Breath vs. breathe: I’ve begun noticing this one only recently, but it’s definitely proliferating like rabbits in the springtime. Breath is a noun; breathe is a verb. A breath is what you take when you breathe.
Example: I need you to take a deep breath; breathe slowly.
In this age of txting, IM’ing, and tweeting, the rules of grammar and spelling have taken hits unlike any in the previous three centuries of English usage. You may choose to ignore my fixation with the rules of language as the obsession of a man whose time has come and gone. Be that as it may; let me just say this.
You can present your writing to your peers as professionally and as perfectly as possible.
Or, you can be the pretty girl with the missing teeth.
It’s your choice.
If you enjoyed this, you might also appreciate this article in The New York Times. If you didn’t, please come back in two days for Fiction Friday!
© 2009, Kenneth M. Rhodes
All rights reserved


Salon.com
Comments
One error I've noticed, quite frequently, is the spelling, "definate" instead of "definite." I also see "loose" used in place of "lose," sometimes. If you have a loose tooth, you will probably lose it. How hard is that?
Just my two-cents.
@ Eva T.: I've never noticed an error in any of your delicious entries. I appreciate the meticulousness of your use of the language.
And I definately agree with you on your contributions. I wish people would loose these offensive errors! :-)
I was thinking: "Oh boy, I wish I could get our old buddy, CC in here to read this and respond....what a damned hoot that would be!"
Well done my friend and I look forward to Fiction Friday and your offering.
L8ter
My typical mistakes are usually related to the use of prepositions. I´m always double checking on prepositions, and sooner or later I´ll be caught using an "in" instead of an "on"... Prepositions in English are hard for us Spanish speakers.
Very interesting post, thanks a lot.
@ Torman: Ah, our grammatically challenged, shift-lock-addicted CC String... a genre all to himself! Thanks for taking some moments away from sweet Melinda's arms to read my little offering.
@ Nick: Thx 2 U 4 reading!
@ Marcela: You need not fret nor worry about your eloquent posts. Your command of our strange, bastardized, and well-nigh impossible to learn language is admirable and should shame more than a few native speakers and writers!
'Pretty is as pretty does,' that's what my momma always said.
*rated*
Once again, very good post (and I read the New York blog on your link, sooooo interesting!)
Thanks a lot
@ AshKW: And I'm glad you went ahead and checked it out. Thanks for reading and commenting.
@ Deborah: Oh, stop-- pleeeze! Your writing is just fine, and this entry was not directed at you at all.
@ Pilgrim: Kudzu?! As if we didn't have enough of that stuff already down here! And where's Rev. Will B. Dunn when you need him?
@ Penguin: Oh ye of little faith! Did you really think I misspelled my title acciden... oh-- you did??
@ coming home: The title was a calculated gamble, and I am glad you stopped by. You have my sympathy and my respect for your efforts with your students. Classroom workers are among the most unsung and underappreciated people in our society.
having been called the "closet grammarian" by my colleagues, and always paying extra attention to my writing because English is my acquired language, I was captured by the title of your post, but knew that it was NOT an error. Thank you so much for presenting this concern. So much truth and wisdom lie within. And the list of "bloopers" keeps growing if we don't stop and remind ourselves, once in a while, as you did here so eloquently.
~R
@ Caroline: You earn that praise with every entry you post. Reading the varied splendors of your blog is similar to thumbing through a copy of "The New Yorker": always a pleasure, always entertaining, and always informative.
*cough* um... I'm sure you meant "with which I have been affiliated."
All in fun, thought I'd jab the nitpicker there for a his own teeny slip (ending sentences with prepositions is held as a grammatical error in most circles). I agree with you wholeheartedly, there seems to be a serious decline in people who proofread properly. So rated. But, please, for the love of all that is Holy, change the title, it's like nails on a chalkboard! :o)
I know I am guilty of some awful errors here in OS.
I do it because of two specific reasons.
1. I do not know any better and I need to get back to my grammar lessons from high school.
2. I think way faster than I can type. Hence, the awful errors with missing preposition and articles.
Aside from that and I am not including myself on this, I think few writers here do it for a certain effect. In my opinion, incorrect syntax and punctuations connect much better with reality than a perfectly written sentences.
// hoping I used effect correctly.
I meant :
"with reality than perfectly written sentences."
:)
I hope you did.
Some of the very best writers on this site play fast and loose with both punctuation and grammar - and their wonderfully brilliant and creative talent still shines through.
Posts such as yours can only serve to diminish or stop their valuable contributions to this community.
Your piece was both patronizing and offensive.
Not rated.
@ Sudesh: You raise a couple of valid points. I use "incorrect" spelling and grammar occasionally in my fiction for effect, especially in depicting Southern modes of speech.
And yes, you used "effect" correctly!
@ angus: Thanks for expressing your opinion. I did not intend to give offense to anyone with this entry, and I apologize if you took any in the reading.
I strongly doubt that my little offering will diminish or stop anyone's contributions to this site. Everyone is free to write in any manner they wish to do.
It's your choice.
People who don't know those rules might be putting out writing that blows your socks off.
At best - PM someone if you think it was a mistake. Otherwise, allow people to express their thought in any way they want to.
And spare me the metaphor of the woman in her fine clothing, who is slim and beautiful enough for you until she smiles and reveals her teeth.
So, your rating woman and grammer at the same time, dude - are they equal in your mind?
I went to school for a long, long time, but, I changed schools 27 times before I dropped out of high school, picking up my education again at age 25. Even with the writing and grammar classes and all of the remedial books I went through at the reading and study skills lab at University of Maryland, I do not completely understand all of the rules. My efforts have a great deal in common with the nature of Swiss cheese, full of holes, but hopefully, the writing is sometimes just as tasty.
txting? hmmmmmm...
@ Cindy: I was laboring under the premise that people might have appreciated a helpful, well-meaning correction to make their good writing even better. Apparently, many do, but some don't. It's their choice.
@ WSFTC: My aim was not to interfere with anyone's creative process. And, like you, I have read any number of outstanding posts that contained some grammar or spelling errors. Like you, I gloss over them and enjoy the writing.
@ Frank: As mentioned in my response to Cat above, I have no real quarrel with that argument.
@ Walk Away: That's the spirit!
@ aim: Thank you for reading and expressing your thoughts. Understand that I had no intention of being condescending in any way. I was simply trying to encourage people to aspire to a higher standard in their writing. Surely you can't argue with the notion of self-improvement? And, as I have said repeatedly in these comments, there are any number of entries with imperfections in English usage that are otherwise outstanding pieces of writing.
As for the metaphor about the pretty girl, this was intended to be, oh, I don't know... humorous, I guess. Before you come into my house and flame me again, try getting a sense of humor implant-- dude.
@ Steve: Fine comment-- I think that will be the final word on the subject.