Culture Sandwich

from the so darn wondrous to the so darn weird

Caroline Hagood

Caroline Hagood
Location
New York, New York,
Birthday
November 23
Bio
I'm a poet, writer, and full-time book, movie, and blog maniac. I'm also a lover of offbeat humor and offbeat everything, really. My poetry and articles have appeared in various publications and I'm currently working on a book about my adventures in the land of writing. http://carolinehagood.typepad.com/ https://twitter.com/Caroline_Hagood If you'd like to get in touch regarding work, please contact caroline_hagood@yahoo.com.

SEPTEMBER 28, 2009 2:04PM

The Best Advice on Writing a First Novel: Do

Rate: 16 Flag

 Writers are warned about the fiasco of their first novel before they even begin covertly scratching bits of dialogue on legal pads during business hours, much less birthing characters and their capers.  Of course there are many good reasons why writing and sending out that first novel can be hairy at best, but before images of the martyred writer start dancing in your head, consider the six little words that have sparked many a revolution: what have you got to lose?

If you fear that your book will not make you a literary celebrity, that's probably true; but you have more of a chance of remaining in anonymity if you aren’t finishing and sending out that first work.  The worst that will happen is that that your novel will be forced to endure the writer’s spring cleaning, taking up residence in the sock drawer with the sobering knowledge that the socks are more likely to get a publishing contract. Just remember the old adage, though, that the first novel is meant to function as a sort of lubrication for the next tome to come shooting out of the writing mind. 

Besides, you’re a writer and must be prepared to make a living off being a glutton for punishment. The act of creating even the briefest anecdote involves a number of verbal sacrifices and downright word deaths. Each term is chosen over countless others that could have filled the same slot. You are the alchemist who can convert your joy and pain into words, but you dream of the impossible: of placing your thoughts down whole on the page.

The crux of the writer’s pain, then, is that, although you have articulated some part of your imaginings, you know those images will always exceed that attempt, remaining imprisoned in your head. However, the real artistic impasse is that, although the image will not make it to the other side whole, it won’t make it there at all if it’s not translated. This makes the art of a writer like a creation myth, as the idea must be sacrificed before it can be resurrected into words.

Writers are doomed to repeatedly undergo this perverse exercise in order to make their art.  Ultimately, what you hear when you read is the torture music of the author caught in the midst of the painful process of expression.  Let me leave you with one thought: if you live with this ache every day, you can handle the rejection letters, my friend.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
To further the intelligent conversation that John Blumenthal's very funny post began:

http://open.salon.com/blog/randomidiociesblogspontcom/2009/09/21/the_best_advice_on_writing_a_first_novel_dont
Good post, Caroline, but of course you're wrong. (what did you expect me to say.) Tell me about it after your first 40 rejection letters come in.

R
Yes! Do it anyway. The truth is: if the Muse pestering you about it--- writing the novel is essential to who you are.
John, See, the great thing here is that I have proving you wrong as yet another motivating factor. Thanks for the great post that inspired my response.

Right on Berrycomposer
How about if I classify my "first" novel as my "last" novel?
There are folks who can do it just for the money, filling in the boxes, sniffing up the hottest genre's ass, but for better or worse, I'm not one of them, and either are the folks I call writers as opposed to entertainers in the writing business. You can see it all here on OS. Who is telling their truth, and who is procuring--and who can tell the difference?
Writing a novel is like on the job training. As long as you're doing it in a way that you are learning (like you are seeking and getting good feedback and learning from it), it seems fine.

The classic fantasy is someone who may or may not have been an English major in college slaving away at their computer and producing the next great American novel or the next bestseller (depending on their fantasy).

That's kind of like assuming if you can make it as a sport star without ever having had a single lesson or session with a coach.

Write the novel, but just expect your first try to be publishable. There are lots of resources for getting good feedback without paying a professional to do it for you.
After reading blumenthal's, this post helped me to stop drawing the warm bath and flush the hemlock down the toilet. :)
Wayne Gretzky said the number of goals he made without attempting a shot was zero. Same goes for everybody. If nobody tries, then no more new authors. That ain't gonna fly!
Ben Sen makes an important distinction: 1.) The novelist who is making art, and 2.) the novelist who is entertaining to make as much cash as possible. The two types rarely reside in the same body. Much relies on what the author sets out to do. I am all for making money. I do that with my own music, but most of what makes money is not my best art---it is functional, serving a purpose for tv and film producers. That is where the real money is---for composers and authors. Do what you need to do, but don't expect it all to be worthwhile.
I agree. Just go ahead and write it. Remind yourself that no one gets to read the very first draft. Write it just because you enjoy writing down in words what you want to say. Later on you can decide if anyone gets to read it.

November is National Novel-Writing Month. Write 50k words in 30 days. I dare you. nanowrimo.org
This entry hit me in the solar plexus. It's as if you wrote it specifically to me, as I dilly-dally over my first ms, debating whether it's worth the pain and work and, ultimately, the humiliation and frustration of the inevitable failure embodied in the rejection slips.
Many great writers never got recognized in their life time. For many of them writting was a necessity that had further motivations than money or fame. Baudelaire, the French poet, had to pay money to have his master piece published. It was a fiasco, because his generation wasn't ready to read him. He was a shock to the placide and languide Romantics, with his beauty from the abiss, from the ugliness. His works would stay in the shelves of the bookstores and libraries until the next generation. Other poets like Rimbaud, Mallarme and Vallery would finally take Baudelaire's poetry out of limbo and create by their turn "a poetry for poets". Edgar Allan Poe lived in misery most of his life. Even critics in US didn't see in him any talent. It took Baudelaire translation of his works to French, and many many years for the critics to see Poe as he is.
Clarice Lispector started publishing when she was 23. When she was older, she lived a modest life. She always said that she wrote to avoid getting crazy. She was reclusive. Money and fame were not her priorities.
There was a great writer that said if you wish to write a great story you must be prepared to drown your own babies (an analogy but you get the picture). My novel will crush my Mother and lay flat the lying fiefdom of a Canadian bulwark. I don't think I'm old enough yet... Five more years and it will be so.
littlewillie: that's good; that way you can only be pleasantly surprised.

Ben Sen: And I think that as long as you're not doing it for the money, then you really have nothing to lose. You're going to write it for the sake of writing it and that's that; anything else that happens with it is just gravy.

Malusinka: that's right--as long as you're taking all the necessary steps to grow as a writer, there really is nothing more you can do than just write your heart out.

Gwool: keep the hemlock for the cool literary death reference, but just don't use it. It can go in the sock drawer with the first novel:)

Harry Homeless: no, that most certainly ain't gonna fly. With that sound logic behind you, you'll have a home in no time, Harry.

berrycomposer: this is good conversation Ben sparked. It's such a balancing act because you have to be able to have some income (if writing or composing is what you do for a living), but you also have to be able to make the work that will most likely not make the agents come a-calling.

catnmus: good point: there's no harm in getting it out of you; you can always decide what to do with it later. Also, great challenge. I accept.

CarolinaBlue50: I'm so glad to hear that. I think the most exciting thing for me as a reader is to read something that reminds me that I'm not alone in a thought or feeling, and my favorite thing as a writer is to do that for someone else. Keep on truckin'; you have our support.

austinstranger: I've always like that line of thought: you don't have to feel like a failure because perhaps you'll attain posthumous success as a writer. Hey, if it worked for Clarice Lispector, whose mind was positively phenomenal, then it's the way to go.

Darryl: I eagerly await the crushing arrival of your tome.
RATED!


The great events of the world have often been discovered by those who were prepared to take the risk whatever the discouraging words surrounding them.

There are those who will dream their dreams, but the dream means nothing unless one prepares to live the dream.


My own inspiration in writing can be found in a series of posts at

http://open.salon.com/blog/jonmagee/2009/06/02/paperback_writer_the_beatles_the_omnibus_edition
I agree! I think there is a lot of dignity in fighting an uphill battle, i.e. taking into account the possibility that you may well fail at your endeavor but perservering anyway.
Adrian and jonmagee: sounds like you're ready for the revolution.
Caroline:

There was a time when I think the novel could come from the heart and the world listened. In England especially I think of the Victorians. This is when I think the form took hold in the imagination that still reverberates in the minds of those few who can actually tell the difference between art and conventional morality.

Today, if you look at the list of what is being read if one in ten are more than entertainments at any one time it's a stretch. Kind of like plucking the golden ring from the merry go round while the little horses bob up and down.
Ben Sen: well put. For all our sakes, I hope you're wrong.
I'm with you. Go for it, and if publishers don't want it, go lulu.
Lea: I'm going to remember your advice and that phrase; whenever someone doesn't approve, they can go lulu.
I loved this - it is so "American" in some ways. The word American just rings true somehow for me...we're told we can do anything in this country. Now, because the odds are difficult, we shouldn't try? I just can't prescribe to this...(Rated).
Kate, that's so interesting that it sounded American. I guess it must be the secret writing cowboy inside me laying down the law:)
You and John are not the ying and the yang; forever paired as opposites in the world of novel writing
Question is...should a novel be written about it...and you both disagree. : )
Nice, you eternal optimist !!!
J D, we certainly came off as the yes man and the naysayer in a way that bordered on the theatrical.
Oh, yes! I'm working on my second novel and it's leaps and bounds better than the first. If I do say so myself and I do.
Good for you. I would be curious to know what they're about. Comment or PM me if you have a chance.