We are raised to see only the good in people. As Americans, we believe in forgiveness so much that we try to do it almost instantly after an apology is given. If a person offers an apology and it is not immediately accepted the aggressors's eyes, the victim deserved the crime as payback for the rejection. Religion trains us to see each of us as flawed beings who only needs another person's help to reach salvation. But what if the other person is not ready to forgive? What if the crime supercedes earthly action? The hurt person isn't wrong for allowing their negative feelings to be known.
However, we as a society push others into atonement as if it will absolve the crime and if it isn't accepted-they are bad Christians. We all make mistakes, but if someone does something bad they should not force someone into spiritual subjugation. My father once (dozens of times really) was caught cheating. His angered response when his mistress wrote a letter to my mother was, "You have to forgive me." He mimed at laugh at me his five year daughter. My mother cried harder and I was left confused. Who was the bad person? A person who betrayed or the person who would not forgive.
Priests touted turning the other cheek in Mass and I wanted to be a good Catholic. Mama never forgave him for his abnormally high number of infidelities and in turn his sisters, my aunts, never forgave my wronged mother. In fact, this act or lack of, turned my immediate family against my father's. They said it was a Cuban faux pas and it would harm us children if she did not accepted his mock apology. But as a wife, she had a right not to forgive him. He broke their marriage vows and humiliated her in front of her Irish Catholic family.
The sweet irony was my Aunt Cuca's husband cheated in her with her best friend Virginia who he later married. At my Uncle's funeral Virginia would not let Aunt Cuca in. Virginia wanted everyone to focus on her and her grief. When my aunt and uncle divorced I asked her on the way to church why she didn't forgive him. All the adults in the car were dead silent. It was such a mixed message for a 8 year old girl. SO what constituted forgiveness? Why was it such a taboo not to forgive someone? Did every action merit forgiveness no matter how heinous the crime?
The word forgiveness is as overused as sexy was in the 90s. It has to stop being compulsive. But how far has it gone? Are we able to get in touch with our feelings, if society keeps negating them? When does it end? Is it an offshoot of our generalized insincerity or something rooted in generations of religion. Catholicism can forbid premarital sex and give us long-standing guilt in return: let us have our precious anger. Sometimes it is the only thing keeping us going. I personally believe we really have to feel things before we move through and over them.


Salon.com
Comments
Rated.
The reason the Catholic Church went out of its way to discourage "legitimate" sex in its early years were legitimate heirs. The Church did not want the money going to these little buggers. There is no reason why the Catholic Church to keep its uptight stance of sex.
The American stance on forgiveness is so solid and has been promoted for eons and it stems from a much more sinister ditch. We have always promoted forgiveness and discouraged revenge for a very powerful reason. Imagine, just as an example, that the descendants of the slaves wanted an eye for an eye. Oops! Excellent piece. R
Forgiving ourselves is vital - probably the most important forgiveness. Jesus said, "Your sins are forgiven," because he knew that God understands us. God is the backdrop upon which we live out our lives. Individually, he was right there from the moment we came into existence. He saw every event and experience that shaped who we became - who we thought we needed to be in order to survive this live, at the expense of the person we really are. Such is the debt we owe to ourselves. Because God understands us through and through - "The very hairs of your head are numbered" - he forgives unreservedly, with no provisos attached.
The problem is, it is much harder to forgive ourselves. But, if we don't, it becomes nigh on impossible to truly forgive others. The way we achieve it is by understanding ourselves. See ourselves in the way God sees us. We can only do that by revisiting the events and experiences that shaped who we are. Going back through the things that were said, or the way we were made to feel, and seeing how such things affect our everyday life today. Such is the nature of true repentance - not having to say sorry, or begging for forgiveness, but a longing that things had been different, a desire to change from within.
It's letting go of the past.
As far as the future, there is no obligation to ignore the past. You can decide if/how you deal with a person after the fact, and it would be unreasonable not to take history into account.
It's the energy and consciousness that is used holding on to the past that makes forgiveness beneficial.
In business there is the concept of 'sunk cost'. It recognizes that the only thing that can change is in the future. The past is done.
It's a point of view, anyway.