Yes, Biden Can Talk to Blacks in Ways That the GOP Cannot
The chattering classes are still talking about Joe Biden's "y'all" and "put you back in chains" turn of phrase from a speech that he made last week in Danville, Virginia. Republicans, members of the party of Willie Horton and Birtherism, have lept at an opportunity to call a Democrat "racist." The Democrats are playing damage control and highlighting how Vice President Biden was essentially correct: the banksters and usurious financier classes do in fact want to have their full boots and heels on the necks of the American people--and the Republican Party will free them to do so with full force.
Despite all of the posturing and partisan sniping about Joe Biden's comment, the facts are actually quite plain, all this fuss about chains is really much to do about nothing, a non-controversy.
Why? Because white Democrats in the post Civil Rights era can say things to black and brown folks, and talk about race, in ways that Republicans cannot. The pundit classes are afraid to acknowledge this simple truth because their money is made from drama and conflict.
Part of the challenge here also lies in how Americans are immersed in a culture of false equivalence, one in which every point of view, however ridiculous it may be, is somehow made legitimate and valid.
The decline of traditional TV news programming and the rise of opinion journalism is simultaneously both a reflection of this cultural turn, while also contributing to it.
The craven greed of the corporate media means that they must find talking heads, opinion makers, and others to fill airtime with "interesting" points of view without regard for accuracy, truth, rigor, or substance. From this logic, if there is a scientist who represents the consensus view that global warming is real, then an "expert" who argues the opposite must be interviewed in order to create the illusion that both arguments are equally valid descriptions of empirical reality. The serious economists who dismiss the absurdity of trickle down economics and the Laffer curve have to be "balanced" by Right-wing hacks who argue against the mass of data which suggests that such theories are specious and fallacy laden. And in my favorite example, evolutionary biologists have to share TV time with creationists who believe in magic and other assorted hokum.
Ultimately the phrase "both sides do it" is a lie--although it does make for a nice Twitter hashtag.
The reality based community is left shaking their heads from these post-truth contortionists; those who believe in the fictions offered up these virtual snake oil salesman are emboldened. The Fourth Estate fails once more in its responsibilities.
In all, the culture of false equivalency is a product of the same logic that rewards every kid with a trophy even if they finish in last place.
Despite their supposed disgust with the "self-help" and "feelings" industries--the purveyors of the psychobabble pablum that told us that children should not be subjected to the pressures of competition--"personal responsibility" conservatives are deeply immersed in a parallel cultural project. Every day, millions of them watch Fox News and listen to talk radio, drinking in the toxic ether of the right wing echo chamber. This is a form of group therapy and mass hypnosis on a national scale, what is a mix of old fashioned propaganda and brainwashing, combined with political theater, and where participation is incentivized by the secret edicts and "truths" of a cult that are revealed only to the elect few.
When discussing the the politics of race in America, the lie of false equivalence (and the "both sides do it" defense) is a common redoubt for aggrieved white conservatives and those people who are invested in defending and protecting (white) privilege.
For example, the latter is operative when white folks want to use the word "nigger" and then have the gall to get upset when someone suggests that they ought not to. There are certainly words that our gay brothers and sisters say to each other that folks who are heterosexual best not mutter. I am certain that there are inside turns of phrase spoken between members of certain ethnic and religious groups that outsiders do not have the ear for, or understanding of nuance, to use correctly. As a working class black guy I lose no sleep over these reasonable norms of public and private speech: they all seem like good common sense to me. However, this same set of life experiences also helps to explain why I cannot understand those (mostly entitled and privileged) white folks who would argue the opposite position.
Alternatively, the upsetness at being told that white folks should not say nigger could perhaps just be a result of rank and arrogant privilege; the owners of whiteness and white privilege rebel and bristle at any suggestion that there are things they ought not to do.
The controversy over Joe Biden's comment about chains and debt peonage reminds me of a close friend's wise words. One afternoon, she and I were talking about love and relationships. She made the great observation that relationships are about putting money in a metaphorical bank. Your good deeds are deposits; deeds that hurt or create emotional distance are debits. A successful relationship is the result of how people balance these debits and credits...all the while maintaining one's sanity and self-respect.
On matters of race, the Democratic Party, for all of its imperfections, has built up a ton of credits with the black community from FDR and the World War 2 era, on to the Civil Rights movement, and into the near present with the election of Barack Obama. The Republican Party is the party of the Southern Strategy, naked and subtle appeals to anti-black affect and white racial anxiety, is enamored with xenophobia and nativism, ruled by John Birchers in the Tea Party, drunk on Birtherism, and cannot avoid the addictive rhetoric of "real America" States' Rights Confederacy silly-talk.
Mitt Romney's repeated suggestions that President Obama, the country's first black President, is a lazy, angry, anti-American, welfare king thief have most certainly not helped to improve Tea Party GOP's negative ledger balance with people of color generally, and black Americans, specifically.
When Joe Biden spoke last week in Virginia there were black people in the audience. They heard his code switching and responded positively to it. If Biden had disrespected them, or African-Americans in general, we are most certainly capable of raising a stink and a fuss. Despite what tragic black conservatives and their white masters would suggest, black folks are not on a Democrat Plantation. We are shrewd political actors who are capable of making sophisticated choices about our politics, and possess a deep understanding of the realities of Power and white racism in the present.
Joe Biden can keep doing his thing. When he gets out of pocket, black folks, and those others with "money in the bank" on these matters, will certainly chime in and check him. Until Republicans get their own house in order, I would suggest they shut up and get to work on purging the racists from their own political party.


Salon.com
Comments
However, the intellectual heft of this post is light enough to elevate to another EP. Therefore, congratulations in advance.
Once I got out from under that obligation, I lived debt free for over twenty years, but in the last two years I've spent nearly a month in hospitals and been through three surgeries just to keep breathing. Now I'm 63 with nearly $200,000 in debt and I'll probably die in the "chains" of that debt. I'm quite literally the poster boy for Obamacare.
The skin color of whoever is in the audience doesn't matter; because the Republicans and Romney/Ryan have got no "dog whistle code" that will help anyone except the folks who want to make more money from the misfortune of others.
What I don't get is how anyone, even an idiot, would describe what Biden said as "race baiting," much less "explicit race baiting." Fortunately, we have an idiot in the thread who will, hopefully, explain how it was "explicit race baiting."
Romney certainly doesn't represent All White People nor does Wall Street. The statement doesn't degrade blacks or whites. I don't see it, but maybe the dumb guy will explain how that works.
So, Chris, summon all of your intellectual heft and describe why Biden's words were "explicit race baiting." To be fair and realistic, we'll lower the bar to merely summoning your heft. I wouldn't want to task you with 2 impossibilities.
Apparently you know perfectly well how to bait. What’s interesting is that you (and Chauncey) don’t consider “. . . gonna put y’all in chains . . .” race baiting.
That’s OK, Paul. You and Chauncey deserve each other. You two are closely matched in both hypocrisy and inanity.
I have to consider my audience just like Joe did. In this case, the wisdom of not dealing with your 'giant intellect' keeps me engaging with you on this issue.
See you next post, Bud.
The Chris explanation of race-baiting: "It's race baiting!"
Yup, them thar is sum powerfil intellekshul chops.
The present crop of republican extremists and their inbred cousins the TeaBaggers are like Slinky toys: useless, but fun to watch going down stairs. The Slinky toy will stop at the bottom of the stairs. The rep/TeaBaggers reach the bottom of the stairs and start digging a basement.
Cheers.
Since Karl and his dark money have come on the scene it appears to be their modus operandi.
Your words were very informative for me. Thanks.
Is your comment supposed to have meaning?
"(Mitt) Romney wants to let -- he said in the first hundred days, he's going to let the big banks once again write their own rules. 'Unchain Wall Street.' They're going to put y'all back in chains."
Had I been in that audience, I would have laughed at Mr. Biden's double entendre. Since the audience (Institute for Advanced Learning and Research) was presumably multi-cultural, had I been in it I would have thought Biden was playing off the "unchain" in the GOP's mantra, and the chains Biden meant were the chains of underwater mortgages, foreclosures, unemployment and hopelessness.
This is truly another example of the right pouncing on every opportunity to deliver its coded messaging to their belligerent base.
Chauncey, as usual, you have made a seldom stated point: Biden, Clinton and many other Democrats do have the "cred" to say things the others wont' get away with within the black community. I agree 100%.
Lezlie
Didn't I read somewhere that you studied or your work involved etymology? If so it surprises my you are so free at limiting speech and word usage. Words evoke emotion which is purely in the mind of the listener. Take CDV, all he hears is racism which is clearly in his mind
The gist of my remarks were that there's absolutely no relationship between what Joe Biden said and the practice of race baiting and suggesting otherwise indicates a profound ignorance of our racial history.
"Joe Biden can keep doing his thing. When he gets out of pocket, black folks, and those others with "money in the bank" on these matters, will certainly chime in and check him."
You explain exactly who inhabits this country -- whores, perfectly willing to service you -- but not for free.
While you're amazed "...evolutionary biologists have to share TV time with creationists who believe in magic and other assorted hokum," I'm ashamed I live in a country where my freedom of expression is conditional while yours is absolute.
Good things came when Rome fell; and good things will come again soon.
Racial sensitivity isn't something you adopt. It's something you earn in the cauldron of your life's experience. Joe Biden has that cred from 30 years of working closely with black organizations. Joe has earned the right to use certain words that Mitt Romney doesn't have the moral right to use because he has been in that cauldron with the rest of us.
Desnee rode her own hobby horse to this rodeo when she introduced the question of immigration - which wasn't germane to anything - into a discussion of whether Joe Biden had been racially insensitive or inciting to riot. I understand her comment, but I don't understand exactly what she's disagreeing with.
I don't understand Sammyvine's comment at all. It seems to go off at a tangent to the discussion. The term "money in the bank" has nothing to do with prostitution. It has to do with having credibility on the basis of previous work or experience.
I'm getting old and foggy. What am I missing here?
CDV has every right, as do I, to have racism in his mind, but that is a ridiculous comment coming from someone I have thought was a reasonable thinker --you. Chauncey chooses to write about matters of race which is not and never has been synonymous with "racism." You've been hanging around this place long enough to have read many explanations of the difference, and I know you understand it.
Did you actually read this post? Chauncey was actually refuting charges of racism being lobbed at Biden by Republicans.
As for your comment about words evoking emotion, I have no argument with that. That is exactly why people strategically place certain "emotion-evoking" words out there -- to stir up that emotion in order to cloud any semblance of reason their so-called base might possess.
Lezlie
How did this even become a racial issue in the first place?
What I see over and over again in this debate are people who have stopping thinking about the issues and react to everything the Democrats do as if the Devil made them do it.
Race wasn't an issue in the Biden Speech until the Republicans injected it.
How did this even become a racial issue in the first place?
What I see over and over again in this debate are people who have stopping thinking about the issues and react to everything the Democrats do as if the Devil made them do it.
Race wasn't an issue in the Biden Speech until the Republicans injected it.
Continuing his speech the next day, Sumner singled out three men in particular: Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois, a major proponent of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Senator James Mason of Virginia, and Senator Andrew Pickens Butler of South Carolina.
Butler, who had recently been incapacitated by a stroke and was recuperating in South Carolina, was held to particular ridicule by Sumner. Sumner said that Butler had taken as his mistress “the harlot, slavery.” Sumner also referred to the South as an immoral place for allowing slavery, and he mocked South Carolina.
Listening from the back of the Senate chamber, Stephen Douglas reportedly said, “that damned fool will get himself killed by some other damned fool.”
Sumner’s impassioned case for a free Kansas was met with approval by northern newspapers, but many in Washington criticized the bitter and mocking tone of his speech.
A Southern Congressman Took Offense
One southerner, Preston Brooks, a member of the House of Representatives from South Carolina, was particularly incensed. Not only had the fiery Sumner ridiculed his home state, but Brooks was the nephew of Andrew Butler, one of Sumner's targets.
In the mind of Brooks, Sumner had violated some code of honor which should be avenged by fighting a duel. But Brooks felt that Sumner, by attacking Butler when he was home recuperating and not present in the Senate, had shown himself not to be a gentlemen deserving of the honor of dueling. Brooks thus reasoned that the proper response was for Sumner to be beaten, with a whip or a cane.
On the morning of May 21, Preston Brooks arrived at the Capitol, carrying a walking stick. He hoped to attack Sumner, but could not locate him.
The following day, May 22, proved fateful. After trying to find Sumner outside the Capitol, Brooks entered the building and walked into the Senate chamber. Sumner sat at his desk, writing letters.
Violence on the Floor of the Senate
Brooks hesitated before approaching Sumner, as several women were present in the Senate gallery. After the women left, Brooks walked to Sumner’s desk, and reportedly said: “You have libeled my state and slandered my relation, who is aged and absent. And I feel it to be my duty to punish you.”
With that, Brooks struck the seated Sumner across the head with his heavy cane. Sumner, who was quite tall, could not get to his feet as his legs were trapped under his Senate desk, which was bolted to the floor.
Brooks continued raining blows with the cane upon Sumner, who tried to fend them off with his arms. Sumner finally was able to break the desk free with his thighs, and staggered down the aisle of the Senate.
Brooks followed him, breaking the cane over Sumner’s head and continuing to strike him with pieces of the cane. The entire attack probably lasted for a full minute, and left Sumner dazed and bleeding. Carried into a Capitol anteroom, Sumner was attended by a doctor, who administered stitches to close wounds on his head.
Brooks was soon arrested on a charge of assault, and was quickly released on bail. "
This, very, very, very instructive pre-cursor to Joe Wilson says it all. The last straw for the authoritarian? His poor honor was insulted by the details left out above, that is the true, true, true, well can't even call it an accusation, just TRUE- fact that racist Southern white men spent 400 years raping black women at will, for fun, for sport, for profit, and simply because they could and they were scum.
This is what's under it all, guilt; and fear of retribution.
While you and I agree on some things and differ on others there is a huge difference between you and CDV.
When you write about something you may see race. You may not. It depends on the issue and the point. CDV on the other hand only sees race. He hears what what he thinks is code words. He admits to trolling websites, some are known hate sites some not, looking for "hate". IMHO, if he could not find something he could call hate he would go through withdraw.
You call them like you see them he only see things through his glasses.
I also agree with Biden if he was indeed referring to the chains placed on the average family by debt and poverty. I feel those chains coming for Americans -- as Republicans' (it will be a Paul Ryan-sponsored bill) next "great idea"/fallback to the old days: Debtors' Prisons.