
Test the actual soil underlying Chicago City Hall.
No one would be surprised if trace elements of ethical lapses were somehow ingrained in the earth.
It’s been that way since the first Indian standing watch one dark night on the shores of the Big Lake watched the first smiling white man jump from the canoe, yell a hearty hello and set the standard price for anything as being ten cents on the dollar.
With a wink and a handshake. It’s always been that way. Because we’ve always been able to pay the cost. Be it in dollars, culture, human suffering, a strange kind of pride or even bottled up rage. We have always paid the cost for turning away from the smoke of the roaring ethical fires.
But now we can’t afford that anymore. The money’s shriveled up. So now it might change.
Yesterday, Mayor Emanuel appointed an Ethics Reform Task Force unlike any ever seen in this city.
A group of four who have made careers based on being ethical.
Their task is to review Chicago's Ethics Ordinance. And then make it work. Make it stronger.
Cindi Canary will chair the Task Force. Cindi Canary is a groundbreaking force in city and state ethical reform. Her former organization is the “Illinois Campaign for Political Reform.” Pore over any tiny or large steps forward in the fight for government accountability in Illinois and you will find her name.
Alderman Will Burns, who along with counterparts like Alderman Ameya Pawar, has been part of the new crop of city leaders. Leaders who focus on social justice organizations ranging from The Mikva Challenge and the Shriver Center for Poverty Law to The Common Pantry---Chicago's longest operating Food Pantry.
And if there is any concern at all that real political change needs more than sunlight to make it work, Sergio Accosta, the third member of the group, is a former supervising U.S. Attorney specializing in areas like criminal civil rights.
Turns out that civil rights violations are still crimes.
But it’s the fourth member of the panel that brings the golden soul of the city into the mix of this new effort. Her name is Dawn Clark Netsch. She’s a former State Comptroller, State Senator and gubernatorial candidate. All facts. None of which give substance to the story of why she could be the soul of the new ethics machine.
It’s a short story---but its telling.
Back when there were only two telephone companies, I opened up the effort to sell the little telephone company, MCI, into Illinois State Government. I found a partner to help me learn the backstreets, darkened hallways and phone numbers of Springfield, a state political capital that made Chicago look like Andy Griffith’s home town Mayberry.
In the rotunda of the state capital, pretty much every door was closed up tight to me and my little telephone company. Most times no one even wanted to talk. And I mean not even talk about the weather. Everyone but Dawn Clark Netsch.
It was a simple thing. She didn’t know me. I never made a deal with her. Never even a formal meeting. But she was accessible. She talked to anybody. Even me. And that simply didn’t happen anywhere else. Not without access. Not without knowing someone who knows someone else.
Flash forward decades. I’m walking my dog in the Old Town neighborhood of Chicago. And she’s walking her dog. She stops. She chats. That regular nodding hello that fellow dog lovers have. She’s still open to the world.
And that would be the first key strategy of the new ethics task force.
Be open to the world.
The Mayor tried to do that in his transition. But he failed. You still had to be in the club. The great blogger driftglass’s 2 rules of Chicago politics:
1. There is a club.
2. You’re not in it.
Those two rules still own the day.
But what if that could change? What next?
Next is a mapping of the problem as a systemic problem. It’s not a problem where catching one rogue rascal with his hand in another’s pocket solves anything. It’s about a system.
And third, it’s about performance standards and measures that sound a bit different from the norm.
Turns out that notions of confidence, integrity, pride and passion really can be measured in the laboratory of opinion.
So the right people are on board. All four of them. Especially my hero, Dawn Clark Netsch.
And the right strategy can be put in place:
1. Accessibility and Transparency from those who serve the public.
2. Mapping the system to really grasp the full problem.
3. Performance standards and measures—to drive the real, concrete action that could produce something none of us have ever seen before, something most of us think isn’t even possible.
A renewed Chicago. Known for the ethical standards we practice.
This group could make it happen. And if they need any help?
I’m ready now.
Course, I don't really know anybody.
But I'm ready and qualified now.
Do you suppose that matters?


Salon.com
Comments
Are you in the club??
:-) / R
Let's see what happens in the Windy City and if anything good blows our way.
Nikki--My parents down the road from you would agree. Beneath those Pine Barren Roads. . . .YIKES!
Proposed first question for the ethics committee: How did Rahm make $18 million as an investment banker in two years after leaving the White House when he'd never been a banker before, no finance training, a ballet major in college. Curious--damn curious.
r
As for your ready & qualified & whether it matters - that's the question, isn't it? The answer will tell us if anything's changed. I know we can count on you to keep an eye out & report back.
On a related (if somewhat sunnier note), I see from CBS news -- via Fark.com -- that Rod Blagojevich got 14 years for corruption, becoming the second Illinois governor in a row -- and the fourth in the last four decades -- to get prison time.
Truer words were never spoken, as this 1903 editorial cartoon by famed Chicago cartoonist John T. McCutcheon so aptly demonstrates: http://home.comcast.net/~russ.maheras/McCutcheon-1903-Chicago-Alderman-72dpi.jpg
Keep in mind this cartoon was published 108 years ago (five years BEFORE the last time the Cubs won a World Series).
Doug--you mentioned schools. And starting at home. The Mikva Challenge (mentioned in the piece) focuses on just that. So the tie to schools is there. . .
Con ---Hah! (Try the veal. . .)
You bring up an interesting issue. My take on that (just opinion) is that the Mayor's success on Wall Street was based not on finance or banking---it was based on selling. Selling would have been the key skill set for most people doing what he was doing. And there is no one better at that than him. I can tell you that all of it was earned on commission--not salary. Which, having had to live that way myself, ain't easy. He was a ballet dancer---that's true, but in my house that's a plus as my wife is --like the Mayor--a former ballet dancer.
NC--By being a good person. Weird huh? And you can count on me reporting back as to what comes of this.
B--That is the real question. Why do we put up with it. There is no one answer. And the full answer is systemic. I'd love to get the chance to answer it! As for Springfield. Yep. Gov Kerner, Walker, Ryan and Blag0---and those are just the ones who got caught.
Russ---ANY post that evokes John T McCutcheon is a success. I hope people google what you pasted in there. That man was a treasure. MANY Thanks!
emanuel worked in M&A, brought in clients and did deals, relying on others (because he could) for number-crunching, made most of his money in bonuses for business he generated. he's an exceptionally smart guy, worked 12-hr days, and the company he worked for made a ton of money off the work he did. nothing mysterious or nefarious going on here.
You bring up a very relevant point about the Mayor's work ethic. Living across the street from where his security detail is housed and being his neighbor, I can tell you that his work hours are incredible. He still does those 12 plus hour days. Makes me tired!
Helen--there MIGHT be somebody besides Professor Netsch on that list---but if there is, no names come to mind!
Paul Haider, Chicago
rate
Also---You and Woody Allen. . .or Freud. . .or me
Dr. Lee--Yes. Lots of potential jokes!
Mimetalker---Me too. And it ain't easy, is it?
But everything is relative. Chicago might have the reputation, but Louisiana, West Virginia, and Rhode Island probably set the gold standard.
What remains are ethical issues. And the mapping of ethical gaps have mostly to do with access. And blocking access (whether its intentional or not intentional) costs money, impacts real life and hinders quality delivery of everything. Keeps people from connecting to work. Slows down or eliminates social service.
Not because someone is breaking a law. (Most times) But because there is a club and you are not in it. Ethics is the problem--not corruption.
Usually.
What's different about this situation than the typical "fox in charge of the hen house" is that these four people are actual reformers. Even the Alderman.
In principle, it's a lot like Pat Quinn, a career "outsider" becoming governor.
The key test will be to see whether they "get" accessibility aand transparency. Putting the bank statement on line. Setting up web sites for people to chime in. Bringing in qualified support resources, not just ones who are successful.
We'll see. . . .
I remember a great book ref crime.
John McPhee's THE PINR BARRENS
I may reread. It's about Moonshine.
etc.,
Politicians and speculator City Slicks.
WE need those old gravel roads again.
The book informs about backstabbing.
A term "Pine Barrens" was where to go.
Farmers, loggers, moonshiner, and the:
white collar crime wheeler & dealers go.
The book tells of those "goof hearts"`
`
Who could read Thugs - Not many books.
Read people's inner nature. That's reading.
Thanks. I have a habit of barfing at the news.
Reading blogs is one way to become briefed.
typo
not
PINR
but`
`
PINE BARRENS.
`
I need to practice
exquisite senryu
one word haiku
1
E
i
o
and rail `al`il`
`
silent heehaw!
Wealth without Work
Pleasure without Conscience
Science without Humanity
Knowledge without Character
Politics without Principle
Commerce without Morality
Worship without Sacrifice
As a society, I think maybe we're batting 1000....
And what to you mean you don't know "anybody"???? What are we...mincemeat???