Thursday, October 29, 2009

In his new book, The Audacity to Win: The Inside Story and Lessons of Barack Obama’s Historic Victory, David Plouffe, the chief campaign manager for Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, confirms the decision to pass on Hillary Clinton for vice president. Obama couldn’t figure out how to make a former President named Bill part of his new White House family, ABC News reports.
Said Obama: “I think Bill may be too big a complication. If I picked her, my concern is that there would be more than two of us in the relationship.” Ouch.
TIME also runs a brief excerpt from Plouffe’s new book.
So, to all the angry Hillbots still seething at President Obama for giving the number two job to Joe Biden, please direct your rage at Bill Clinton.


Salon.com
Comments
R
Could it be that you're not giving Hillary OR Barack Obama enough credit? Could it be that she didn't want the VP spot?
How do we know that she didn't purposely and affectedly negotiate that SOS position at the private meeting at Diane Feinstein's house? Her full support for that position?
And considering the way she's doing her job presently, clearly, that assumption, that Bill would be the VP instead of Hilary, is complete crap. I believe she's doing that job she has now by herself. Wow. Just like any other person doing a job would.
I wish eventually we could eradicate the sexist crap as well as all the rest.
odetteroulette -- And I wish I was a Kennedy with a trust fund. I think you should travel beyond Salon and see some of the insane comments from the Hillbots charging Obama with all sort of criminal behavior for not selecting Hillary including "misogyny." That's the problem with PC speech. It's too narrow.
And I get out plenty; thanks for your patronizing advice. I know. I'm a woman. We're so dumb; can't do anything without our man. I know that's the feeling of many.
But just as it's important we have gay rights and gay marriage and equal rights and good behavior towards people of color, I think it's pretty damned important we recognize the problem of sexism in our country. Don't you?
What you've posted is an excellent example of sexism. I'd prefer to stay out of the 1950s, frankly, in terms of the attitude you're discussing, thanks.
Mr. Pluffe - the man who, with Axelrove at the lead cheated their horse to the finish line. Michigan and Florida folks. She won. They REFUSED to count those states. Gore 2000 Democrat style. Super Delegates. They depended on your naivete during all the lies (NAFTA, FISA, deaf dumb and blind in church for twenty years, didn't borrow a speech from Patrick) and they depended on your forgetting about Michigan and Florida - the trashing of our system of government. The boys club had their candidate and he was gonna win no matter how he popped out of nowhere with no money and no experience and only his black populous support. Even with them, their trashing of her, their money and all the money they found for him, their Super Tuesday ambush by about five of them - he still lost. But, I must say, he can lie like the guy before him - and, with more than a smirk... with smiley face. Can't blame him. He put it over on everyone.
So I don't think anyone in this article is deliberately being misogynistic; I think maybe you are looking at it from the wrong angle.
Just my $0.02.
"Since David Plouffe was on the ground, with Barack Obama over a two year period, and this is his book and his words, Mr. Toscano, then I think we can feel fairly confident that there is a high level of veracity."
Of course, Mr. Di Spirito. Mr. Plouffe is most definitely a primary source. You, however, are not; and neither am I, nor is anyone else here who comments on the few paragraphs you wrote about this book (i.e. your "piece"). So, my first question remains: Why speculate further? Why not instead write a book report, or even a book review? Of what particular value is repeating Mr. Plouffe's words? Better to say, "I read this book. I liked it. I think you might like it, as well." Forget the words of warning to the so-called Hillbots. Those words signify nothing more than an angry attempt to exacerbate a dead battle.
I'm inclined to agree with thinksfast. A Democrat wonk told me that HRC could not win the election. Apparently sexism is more endemic in our society than racism. Of course, winning is everything. I don't think it was about Bill. Hillary was the more qualified, experienced candidate. Putting her in a subordinate role like VP would have been like reinacting the Bush-Cheney administration, except of course Hillary isn't as ruthless as Dick.
Yup, but that was, and has continued to be, her choice. Third-wave feminism demands that we not "judge" (i.e. offer advice against or criticize) a woman's choices, but it cannot protect her from the inevitable consequences of poor choices.
Personally, I'm glad Hillary didn't become the first woman vice-president. I'd have hated to see her held up as a role model to my future daughters.
(and I voted for Obama and similarly hated the obamaphiles name calling during the election...)
christopher di spirito I really like the story of your grandmother. but a feminist doesn't "have to" leave or stay with a cheating spouse. the whole point is that they can decide for themselves based on particulars that likely nobody but themselves and their partners will ever know.
But do you see how unfair it is to judge a politician on the basis of whether or not they leave their spouse for cheating? I didn't vote for Hillary but I do respect her ability to ignore all the vile things that are said about her, including those by liberals. And whatever her decision was based on in maintaining her marriage is firmly in the far-be-it from me to judge category. Let's get on with judging people by the work that they do and not our warped perceptions of their personal lives.
-Nikki-
I voted for Obama. Name-calling is just name-calling. There are smarter ways to make an argument.
These days Bill's pretty busy doing good things around the world--did Obama feel threatened by Hillary's competence? She could have shortened his learning curve!
Listen.. I´m not Bill and neither are you..
so why can you respect" me.. but not Bill ??
I´ve been pissing into other pots and so have my 2 wifes.... encountered other pissers....
If you look at the animal world you´ll find that all males make it with other females because they get "sidetracked" and so many females go side- track because of lack of attention.... Hey.. you didn´t know ??
Donah & the GripeVine....
If anyone cheated in Michigan and Florida it was Clinton who kept her name on the ballot after all the candidates agreed not to participate because those 2 states moved the dates of their primaries. They broke the rules, and they could have just as easily had their delegates disqualified. Clinton wanted to change the rules in the middle of the game. That's cheating. Using the rules to your advantage is politics. Thinksfast should be pissed at the people who wrote the DNC rules (controlled by Clinton allies and supporters) not at Obama.
It's ironic, the one year where it mattered more to be later, FL and MI broke the rules and moved up, costing them a chance to be more relevent than ever.
(full disclosure: I live in Iowa and caucused for Obama. Say what you will about the Iowa caucuses, but the rules had us going first, and FL and MI where they were originally scheduled.)
From the GripeVine....