From the Left

Christopher di Spirito

Christopher di Spirito
Location
New York,
Birthday
March 12
Bio
Avid blogger, proud gay man, unapologetically liberal, happily married to Jim, my spouse of 16 years. I am a native Californian, temporarily living in New York.

Christopher di Spirito's Links

New list
No links in this category.
Editor’s Pick
NOVEMBER 11, 2009 8:56AM

Destroying the So-Called "Unit Cohesion" Argument

Rate: 7 Flag

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

2399667652_934d2a581d

On this Veterans Day, it seemed like a perfect time to destroy one of the dumbest arguments used by people opposed to the repeal of the viciously homophobic, Clinton-era military policy of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

“Unit cohesion,” as the argument goes, says members of the military might be uncomfortable serving alongside openly gay and lesbian servicemen and women, and that discomfort means a unit may not function as intended. It’s better, the argument goes, to exclude qualified, well-trained soldiers from service in the midst of two wars than to make homophobic soldiers feel ill at ease.

But the evidence to support repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” keeps growing:

A survey of troops who served in Iraq and Afghanistan concluded that having gay or lesbian soldiers in fighting units has no significant impact on unit cohesion or readiness.

The data raise new doubts about the underlying assumption of the congressional ban, namely that military discipline will fall apart if gays and lesbians are permitted to serve openly.

“Service members said the most important factors for unit cohesion and readiness were the quality of their officers, training, and equipment,” said Laura Miller, a military sociologist at the RAND Corporation, a private research group that has long advised the Pentagon, which conducted the study along with the University of Florida. “Serving with another service member who was gay or lesbian was not a significant factor that affected unit cohesion or readiness to fight.”

Three-quarters of the veterans surveyed said they felt “comfortable” or “very comfortable” in the presence of gays or lesbians, and nearly one in five said they already knew of a gay or lesbian member in their unit.

According to the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, 502 gay and lesbian soldiers have been kicked out of the military since President Obama was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2009.

So, on this Veterans Day, I ask members of the Congress and President Obama, what are you waiting for? Repeal the ban — now.

SOURCE: Washington Monthly

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
It's about time . . . if anyone had bothered to research before, they might have come up with the same result.
Ragingly funny, the "unit cohesion" thing. Even the phrase is suggestively repressed. A friend of mine--brilliant guy--once suggested we should add a new category to the Freudian species list of 'anal-retentive' and 'anal-expulsive,' one to cover the type of heterosexual male who feels threatened by gay men. The 'anal-vulnerable' he called it, perfect label for those who worry what will go on in the pup-tents if the Army is de-homophobified.
I was in the Air Force for '77 to '85. There were lots of gays around then. The only people who didn't know who they were, were those who's job it was to care and those who had a problem with gays.

I, for one, never saw or heard of a problem about a gay service member at any of the 3 duty stations where I served. If don't ask don't tell went away tomorrow the fine members of our armed forces would just go "okay" and keep on going.
It's like asking soldiers if a person with freckles makes them feel uncomfortable. Absolutely ridiculous! What does gay have to do with serving in the military??
From everything I've read and heard, all that other soldiers care about is that they stick together, have each other's back, can be counted on, etc. My impression is that this is largely a case of people wanting to pass on their prejudices and fears to their sons and daughters, which nearly always fails. History moves, however circuitously, in one direction.
I've been serving since 01, been deployed three times and I never bought the 'Unit Cohesion' argument either.
I've served with men and women that were definitly gay and it never mattered a whit to me. I don't care what someone does on their own time. If they're dedicated, trained and competent, that's all that matters.
No one stops to ask about sexual preference when the bullets start flying.
Rated.
Do male and female soldiers shower and use latrines together now, too? Gays are attracted to the same sex. Heteros are attracted to the opposite. So why separate the sexes at all? A gay male viewing a naked hetero male in the shower is no different from a straight male viewing a straight female male. So what's NOW's stance on unisex everything?