“It’s funnier than the promos can show,” said the promo while flashing pictures of Chevy Chase in rimmed glasses sitting behind a college desk.
This Thursday was the debut of the new comedy, “Community,” a sitcom about community college.
Dwayne and I had a couple good laughs, but by 11pm, I was getting more and more irritated over the casting of the show.
The motley cast that makes up the core characters in “Community” is supposed to represent the diversity found at community college.
There is the white thirty-something lawyer who’s had to return to school because he lied about his education. There’s the African American mother. The Indian kid with Aspergers. The African-American jock. The anal white girl. The old guy (Chevy) taking classes for enrichment. The Chinese-American Spanish teacher. And then the “hot girl from Spanish,” a blond haired, blue-eyed, twenty-something High school drop out, who is now dead serious about her studies.
I don’t know what community college the writer’s at NBC are basing the show on, but it surely doesn’t represent the community college I’ve taught at for the last three years, nor the University campus where I live.
True, half the cast on “Community” is a conglomerate of other races, but the two main characters are still white, and the supporting roles are still caricatures.
Forgive me this post for just a moment.
It’s not appropriate, or helpful, for me to categorize the communities where I teach and live by race, but I’m going to right now to prove a point about the casting of “Community.”
Since the Spring of 2007, I’ve taught English at the largest Community College in Southern California. In all of my classes, I’ve been the only white female, save one other white girl in my second semester of teaching.
In each of my classes there’s been no more than one or two white males. The rest of my students are from a variety of socio-economic backgrounds. Some are English Language Learners, but other students have families who’ve lived in the States going back forty-fifty years. And none of them are white.
This past week, I had my students study an essay by Peggy McIntosh called, “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack.”
In the essay she enumerates 25 “conditions” that she describes as the “unearned assets [she] can count on cashing in everyday,” because she is white. In listing these privileges she’s attempting to undo some of the systematic racism that exists in our culture due to the denial of white people regarding their privilege.
One of the “conditions” she names is being able to buy “flesh” colored band-aids at the pharmacy and have them match her skin.
Another condition is, “I can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of my race widely represented.”
The irony of this last “condition” hit me, after watching “Community.”
For my students at the community college and for the students who live and study here at the University where I live, “Community” does not represent their experience at college. It doesn’t represent their life. In short, it doesn’t represent them.
I recently saw a cartoon, which I have been unable to find since, and so will probably botch up. But the gist of it has hung with me.
It showed a line of people standing outside a building, each holding up their own sign. At the front of the line was an Asian-looking man holding up a post that said, “Asian-American representation in the media.” Behind him stood an African-American woman with her own sign. And in front of this crowd stood a Latino man, looking lost. He had a sign of his own but it was dropped along the ground.
The Asian man says to him with a sigh, “Get in line.”
Peggy McIntosh says in her essay that most of us are conditioned to believe that racism is only in “individual acts of meanness, not in invisible systems conferring dominance on [her] group.”
I am a part of that group that has been given dominance. And I’ve seen the power white people have to right the tables. When we’re willing to talk about the invisible advantages and disadvantages that exist according to skin-color, we validate the voices that have been speaking this message for decades.
And so here I am, after watching “Community”, trying to write a blog that will point out the systematic racism at least in this one show, if not in all of Television.
I mean, I just would like to see a show come out that actually represents the demographic make-up of the city I live in.
I’m shocked that the TV industry, which prides itself on being so progressive, so green, so liberal, so counter-cultural, continues to churn out sitcom after sitcom, show after show, in which the main character is most often a man, and nearly always white.


Salon.com
Comments
Can't we just laugh in America without dissecting it?
Sorry it offended you. I have the utmost respect for teachers and faculty of any learning Institution, but it's a comedy.
amen.
But where is this show supposed to take place? A suburb? In what region? What are the demographics in middle America that buy cars, for example? What are the makeups of most county colleges and whree are they located? Before they even write the pilot they've worked out the demograpics and who they want to appeal to, who the advertisers want to reach. Just as there are urban shows, there are suburban shows as well. And it already sounds like the show is trying to reach a divers audience. Maybe they can have an episode where the whites are filled with self loathing too, if that would make you more comfortable.
Sounds good to me. sounds very good.
How low? Nationwide, the average community college tuition is 4.5 times higher than California CC’s. This ridiculously low tuition devalues education to students – resulting in a 30+% drop rate for class completion. In addition, 2/3 of California CC students pay no tuition at all – filling out a simple unverified “hardship” form that exempts them from any tuition payment, or receiving grants and tax credits for their full tuition.
www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/capitolalertlatest/020722.html
www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jun/29/1n29fees225829-two-year-colleges-fees-likely-rise-/
It would be great to see a minority in the lead role. Period. (Rated).
For, as it turns out, there is one area where diversity is disdained within community colleges. Diversity of OPINION.
Especially diversity of political opinion among faculty. The campuses have become entirely controlled by liberal/progressives, with folks holding diverse viewpoints almost never being hired.
I speak on community college campuses in San Diego as a limited government advocate -- and I speak VERY seldom. Indeed, I inform the students (and the professor agrees with me) that it's quite likely that in their entire college experience, I'll be the only libertarian/conservative they will hear on campus.
Some diversity.
While I understand that my own personal experience does not necessarily represent the statistics, when I attended community college (in Seattle, not know for its diversity), I had a similar experience. Not only was the school very racially diverse, but there were people from all over the world, of all different ages and physical abilities. If only I could have had the same experience when I eventually transferred to a four year college. Academically, I may have gotten more out of community college than state college or even grad school.
Comedy is supposed to be funny. That's its job. My husband dissects jokes for less than accurate descriptions, the way that your essay attacks this show for failing to meet your ideals. It ruins the moment.
Personally, I appreciate that we could have an Asberger's guy of any race in a show and folks would know what that means.
Anyway, it was funny to me and showed a smarmy guy finding his way to a better life. You might have noticed that if you hadn't been so busy judging and evaluating. Killjoy.
All sitcoms are unrealistic. If they wanted a real representation of the community college it would not have a lawyer attending since most CC are two year and do not offer pre-law. Also half of the people attending would be either in their 40s and 50s and trying to retrain for the workplace.
It's a sitcom which means you cannot over think it. Is it racist, sorry don't see it. The lead is white and his love interest is white, so what. The supporting cast is always a caricature of some odd behaviors. Could be white or black does not matter they are there for filler to make the leads look normal.
I'm not a white supremacist by any stretch, but I'll tell you -- ALL of my favorite comedians happen to be white (of course, white still comes in lots of subtle flavors: some are British, Jewish, Australian, Redneck, Canadian, whatever, but still). Why? Because I like their jokes better. If you've watched any amount of stand-up, you'll notice that there are very few funny 'ethnic' comedians. Maybe it's a culture or language barrier, but, my best guess is that they casted those characters for some reason other than you're attributing.
I think the show has potential if you back off and recognize it's, again, not a documentary.
However...a funny story that relates to a sitcom's appealing to us and our lives. I was teaching basic Poli Sci to a community college evening class which, just incidentally, wound up being a group of 10 black women. One evening two came into class giggling and slapping hands and I asked if we could join in. Well it turns out everyone one was HUGE Roseanne Barr fans and never missed a show. I was stunned and decided to explore it a bit further since at that point no african americans had showed up in the program. ALL of them said they related to Roseanne. She had:1) money struggles like they do; 2) smart ass kid troubles including 'boinking while in the house"'; 3) seemed to take 3 steps forward and two back....all of the above while managing to hold the house/home intact in very real ways as revealed in the working class dialogue used in the sitcom. To them Roseanne was a powerful woman who was just trying to catch a break and do better...like them.
Maybe Roseanne was more 'real' than 'community'.
Anyhow that was a fun class that night and I even managed to weave it into the notion of power, who had it, who's got it and who wants it.
Did you ever see "Freaks and Geeks"? Hilarious show, didn't make it though as it was too real. People couldn't relate.
I'm just sayin'... A LOT of unanswered comments.
Seriously, a good essay. It's completely true that diversity on tv is all about stereotypes and then a bunch of white people. It's ridiculous. Thank you for talking about it.
Voicegal: You raise a very good point about the show reflecting the demographic of the rest of the country. It's true, I live in one of the most diverse and integrated counties in America, although arguably there are still divisions across socio-economic lines.
Johnny White, I take your point regarding Jefferson's and other all black shows. But aren't these sorts of TV shows a backlash against the predominantly white programming on broadcast TV? Aren't they a place where minorities voices are trying to be heard? Would there be such polarization in TV programming if Networks worked to put out more integrated shows to begin with?
DocAustin: You say it's a widely diverse nation of ours, but then you admit that the four comm. colleges you work at are 70% white. That doesn't sound like diversity to me! But besides this point, I think the truth is that communities in the rest of the nation ARE actually diverse, but they're just not integrated. Meaning the communities cluster around racial lines. At least this was true of my hometown in Indiana. The Latino population was actually the fastest growing population in our county, yet none of the ethnic communities were integrated. They worshiped in separate churches, and shopped in separate stores. About the only place we saw each other was at the single public high school in town.
Richard Rider: I take your point that there are more types of diversity in comm. colleges than just race. I chose in this post to focus just on skin color, as focussed as that might be, to make a larger point about the segment of culture that TV explicitly markets to: the white, upper-middle class.
Susanne Freeborn: I enjoyed the show. It made me laugh. No critique here about the comedy. I found it fresh and funny. I just think it would have made the show even MORE fresh had the lead character and/or the "hot girl" not been white. Now that would have been a breath of fresh air!
MTodd: I find your attitude cavalier. As white people we have the privilege of whether or not to engage this discussion. As part of the dominant culture, the media is playing to US. For this reason, we have the luxury of ignoring those who are "outside" the media's target group. I think it's an easy answer to say that "it's just a sitcom." As if bad behavior is okay, as long as it makes us laugh.
I think it's a stronger argument to say what GWhizz and Ben have said, that it's not supposed to be a documentary, is a "loose-loose" situation. I take this point.
But again, I'm not asking for a documentary. I'm asking for ONE show, just one, that acknowledges that the "white" experience in America is not a normal experience for everyone who lives here.
Patie: What a great story. Your illustration proves how story has the ability to transcend race. May this be true! May this be true for the very best TV shows, Films, songs, etc.
You commented, “I take your point regarding Jefferson's and other all black shows. But aren't these sorts of TV shows a backlash against the predominantly white programming on broadcast TV? Aren't they a place where minorities’ voices are trying to be heard?”
Considering that The Jeffersons and other black sitcoms of that period had no black writers on their staff, I question whose voices were being “heard”. Unless you are referring to the fact that there were black people in front of the camera speaking scripted lines.
Not cavalier, just a realist. TV especially network TV, is a mass media. Therefor it caters to the masses. The majority of network TV watchers are white, middle to lower middle class and retired. So you will see the majority of programing reflect the largest audience. The target is usually by age and income not race. Advertising effectiveness and cost is measured by cost per thousands.
Plus, there is race specific programing now that is directed towards black and Latino audiences. In addition with the advent of satellite and cable network TV is becoming the odd man (sorry odd person) out because each station can tailor program to its demographic.
It's business. If I tell a client to advertise on a particular station, the first question is will it meet their customer base for the most effective cost per thousand. If their customer base is black, the shows with the highest black audience is selected and so on.
As for being privileged race, sorry, I am neither self loathing or feel obligated to right wrongs done by someone who happens to be white. Never owned slaves, nor did my parents, grand parents, great great grand parents. I am responsible for my attitudes and actions and do not carry the burden of any race on my back.
As for the show, it pretty much nailed the demographic of who goes to CC, or at least from my experience working with the local CC in my area as part of the business community. Sitcoms are fluff not meant to teach valuable moral lessons.
They have a name for shows that get preachy or dwell on a heavy social message. They're called cancelled.
But to analize a network comedy because it's tokenism isn't pure enough is a bit absurd. Fox makes subversive cartoons, the other networks make comedies written for children, ironically enough. If they want a sucessful comedy, ABC, NBC and CBS should consider growing a pair. And writing something thats above a third grade level. One thing you can say about Rupert Murdock, he really lets Fox put out anything they want to the point its HBO without the swearing. The major networks write comedies like the fucking Hallmark channel. Then wonder why no one watches them. Because they are pedestrian and safe. Grow a pair or get out of the comedy business.
One of my favorite experiences from my time attending a community college was when I took an American Government and Politics class. One of my classmates was an elderly(white) man in his 80s, taking classes for free (seniors got free space-available tuition) out of sheer boredom.
When we were doing a unit on Hoover, Roosevelt, the Depression and the New Deal? He lived it, and even voted for Roosevelt in 1944. Same goes for the rise of Hitler and the outbreak of WW2, the end of the war, the Marshall Plan, the Red Scare and McCarthyism, the Civil Rights movement, Watergate. He lived through all of those things and was able to provide us with a perspective that no textbook could ever do.
We learned more from that guy than we did the professor, and the professor was kind enough to let him talk, and as a result, I got more out of that class than I have out of any other before or since.
I never said it was a bad show! I've never thought it was badly written. Just having read McIntosh's essay on white privilege I was extra sensitive to the perpetuation of white leads in TV.
Lovin' the discussion! G'night to y'all. Christin
I went to a community college in my hometown up north. Guess what. Predominantly white.
I walked through a community college here in DC the other day. Guess what. Predominantly black.
It's almost as if "Community" took a sampling from community colleges all across the nation, a string from each piece of fabric of the American quilt.
I'm not saying the show isn't horrible. It's as tacky as anything you'd expect the star of National Lampoon movies to be in. I'm just tired of this smarmy rhetoric about a half hour situational comedy built on stereotypes as most comedies are.
Ever watch Telemundo? Guess what. Predominantly hispanic.