Clay Farris Naff's Blog

Ad Astra: Science, Religion & Our Future

Clay Farris Naff

Clay Farris Naff
Location
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68502
Birthday
April 03
Bio
Clay Farris Naff (claynaff.com) is a science writer with a special interest in the rational reconciliation of religions with science. You can follow him at Twitter @claynaff, or visit his religion blog at www.huffingtonpost.com/clay-naff An award-winning journalist and author, he has been a science-and-religion columnist for the Metanexus Institute, an editor for Greenhaven Press, and a freelance writer for various publications, including most recently Earth magazine and The Humanist.

DECEMBER 14, 2009 9:03PM

Culture Wars -- The Christmas Edition!

Rate: 0 Flag

The Christian Right Wants to Tell Everyone
How to Celebrate the Holidays

The Cross-mas Tree

     Christmas is fast approaching. Shoppers are shopping, carolers are caroling, and evangelicals are ... declaring holy war??? Yes, the season of joy, peace, and giving knows no respite from religious bigots. They are stirring the faithful with the trumpets of fear and hate.

       "We find ourselves in the midst of ... the days of Sodom ... regarding the abomination of homosexuality," writes evangelist Bob Mondy in the Springfield News Leader."The handwriting is on the wall and if we as a nation do not repent; then we most assuredly will reap the wrath of Almighty God."

        I would have thought that what with thousands of children starving in North Korea, genocide continuing in Darfur, and disease continuing to ravage much of Africa, the Good Lord might have had other things on his mind than homosexuality. It's not like we're running short of people as a result.

    Snuffing out same-sex marriage is the chief preoccupation of the religious rightwing this season, but not the only one. More than a hundred cross-bearing Taliban types gathered in New York City this week to hammer out what they are pleased to call The Manhattan Declaration. It seeks support for three easily decoded propositions:

  1. the sanctity of human life
  2. the dignity of marriage as the conjugal union of husband and wife
  3. the rights of conscience and religious liberty.

    Number one is a familiar religious dogma which holds that a zygote is ensouled at conception and therefore has the same rights as, say, a toddler. As the basis for public policy, this is absurd. A zygote is not a person in any sense except religious, and not all religions agree on that.      Not by a long shot. 

    How do we know there isn't a person in there at conception?  Apart from the obvious -- a zygote has no bodily organs -- as the it develops, some of the daughter cells will become a placenta, which is clearly not a human being. Occasionally, a zygote will split into two and eventually give rise to twins. So it is simply counterfactual to claim that a zygote is a person, anymore than an acorn is an oak tree.

    Number two is the passionate attack on same sex marriage. Note the implication that if two men or two women take vows, marriage itself is robbed of its dignity. If that's how it works, didn't marriage already lose its dignity when Governor Sanford went "hiking" in Argentina? Opponents claim that same sex relationships are unnatural. In fact, science has found that they are commonplace in nature and crop up everywhere in humanity.

    Like the opposition to embryonic stem-cell reseach, the drive against same- sex marriage derives from religious dogma. Interestingly, this is one place where fundamentalists forget their fundamentals. While scriptures contain various injunctions against men "lying" with men, there is not a word prescribing lesbian relationships. Perhaps women just weren't important enough in those days to have their own prohibitions.

    Number three is the most Orwellian: it means the right of the Christian right to impose its crude anti-scientific, authoritarian theology on the public. Mainstream America is all for freedom of conscience and religion -- but like all freedoms, it ends where the next person's rights begin. We don't want government teaching our kids to pray in school, telling us who our Lord is or what he wants from us, or infusing religion into the science curriculum. 
     
    Despite what you may hear from Michael Savage and Bill O'Reilly, no one is waging a war against Christmas. We want the freedom to celebrate it -- or not -- in our own ways. You want to put Christ in Christmas? No problem. Set up a creche in your home and attend your church. You want to put the crass in Christmas? Go right ahead! Buy a "Cross-mas" tree like the one pictured above. Just don't insist that everyone in America do the same.

    But perhaps a touch of humility and tolerance would better fit the spirit of the season. After all, Christmas was originally a pagan holiday of Northern Europe, a time to push back against the darkness of the winter solstice with a festival of lights. America likewise is not a nation that follows a single star, but a place where everyone has the right to live and to celebrate according to their own lights, provided they respect the rights of others. That's the American way.

    But not according the gospel of the religious right. To take just one example, here's Paul Cook writing in the Augusta Chronicle this morning: "Sadly, there will be millions of people who will not celebrate Christmas this year. Yes, they will gather together with family and friends, they will eat and drink, they will laugh and tell heart-warming stories, and they will gather around a Christmas tree and exchange gifts. But the name of Jesus Christ will never be mentioned, and when Christ is taken out of Christmas there is no real celebration."

    Says you! With "spirituality" like this, I'm starting to feel like Charlie Brown had it all wrong about Christmas -- bring on the commercialism! Or better yet, bring back the spirit of giving, sharing, and celebrating. That's something we can all share in.

                                                              *    *   *

Writers Need Readers -- If you like this, please pass it on. 

 

joomla statistics

Author tags:

belief/religion, news, science

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Aren't there some Christian sects that oppose celebrating Christmas—e.g. Jehovah's witnesses?
I'm sure everyone would be happier in your dull, unsuperstitious, creepy athiest paradise, Clay.
God will punish you for this....don't blame me when you end up in the big litter box.

All hail Techno Bast!
I grew up brainwashed to be unaware of how arrogant it is to presume that YOUR religion is so superior that it's okay to mash it onto others and to freely judge beliefs that you know nothing of. Perhaps the most arrogant bumper sticker I've ever seen said "Not perfect, just saved." In other words, I don't have to be good to still be superior to YOU.
Loved it Clay. I was pondering the mention of zygotes and the debate over their human denotation... please accept my final thought exactly as I intend it, curious inquiry.
I found this statement on line at the American Association for the Advancement of Science website:

"Opponents of hESC research hold that human life begins as soon as an egg is fertilized, and they consider a human embryo to be a human being. They therefore consider any research that necessitates the destruction of a human embryo to be morally abhorrent.

Proponents of hESC research, meanwhile, point out that in the natural reproductive process, human eggs are often fertilized but fail to implant in the uterus. A fertilized egg, they argue, while it may have the potential for human life, cannot be considered equivalent to a human being until it has at least been successfully implanted in a woman's uterus."

I think it would be very interesting to see a poll asking women and men if they would be willing to give up a zygote to stem cell research were they to discover they or their significant other had one traveling down the fallopian tubes (the blastocyst would develop from the zygote several days after fertilization and that's what would be used for stem cell research). I don’t think I could bring my self to giving that up for science, regardless of what its final destiny may be. What say you Salon patrons.

…keep in mind stem cell research does not actually involve doctors reaching up your uterus to grab hold of a blasocyst, my understanding is that it’s done outside the body, please correct me if I’m wrong.
Ed, some Protestant denominations, especially the Calvinist styled ones, used to pretty much downplay Christmas. Even the more Catholic-styled Church of England didn't make such a deal of it. Note that in Dickens' "A Christmas Carol", Scrooge is able to send the boy in the street to buy a turkey (or was it a goose?) because the shops are still open on Christmas Day.

Harvey, I always wish I had a plain label and a Magic Marker handy when I see that bumper sticker, so I could change it to "Not perfect, just SMUG".
Thanks, all. About hESC, the irony is that most come from fertility treatments, which produce an excess of embryos. There are some who get all weepy about the frozen embryos that don't get selected, and you may remember the "Snowflake" program that sought to have them implanted for adoption, but they are no more than potential human beings. For that matter, sperm and eggs are potential human beings in search of their better halves, but speaking for myself, I've never wept over spilled sperm.

Regards,


Clay