No light at the end of the tunnel

Due to budget constraints

Cranky Cuss

Cranky Cuss
Location
Ossining, New York, United States
Birthday
February 28
Bio
I am the author of "Send In the Clown Car: The Road to the White House 2012," currently available on Amazon and CreateSpace. I'm currently semi-retired after 23 years in a corporate environment. My motto: The conventional wisdom has too much convention, not enough wisdom. Corollary: Even Einstein was wrong sometimes, and you're not Einstein.

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
JANUARY 4, 2011 9:44AM

12 Movies I'm Supposed to Love But Don't

Rate: 67 Flag

     

A couple of weeks ago, I posted about a dozen movies that I wanted to see again and considered underappreciated.  Here’s the antithesis: a dozen movies with critical raves, Academy Awards or box-office cash up the wazoo, yet I would rather shoot my eye out with a Red Ryder BB gun than have to sit through any one of them again.

 

bad movies 

(Turn it off!  Turn it off!)

    

Battleship Potemkin: The cineaste inside me says, “Sergei Eisenstein’s silent classic is one of the most influential films of all-time, establishing the power of montage.”  The moviegoer inside me says, “The plot is so one-dimensional and simple-minded that I feel like I’m watching the birth of Fox News.”  Fox News says, “The Odessa Steps sequence represents the Obama socialist agenda (the Cossacks) pushing working Americans (the baby carriage) into an imminent massacre.”

   

Blade Runner: Wait, this is supposed to be L.A, right?  So why is it always raining or snowing and since when do they have an insane amount of pedestrians?  This is science fiction all right!  And why are visions of the future always so bleak - forbidding architecture (dark, oppressive), everyone living in tall buildings?  Doesn’t anyone live in a McMansion?  And if the replicants are so dangerous, why do the police assemble only one (count ‘em, one) agent to hunt them down?  And why am I writing everything in the form of a question?

               

The Blair Witch Project: Seriously, was anybody scared by this laughable piece of crap?  If you knew the gimmick going into the theater, how could you swallow a second of it?  Just shows that you can sell anything with a clever p.r. campaign.  (Personal note: one of the stars of the sequel, Erica Leerhsen, grew up across the street from my parents.  Of course, that was well after I moved out.)

    

Borat: Shortly after this movie came out, I penned a long screed about why I laughed when Sacha Baron Cohen, as Ali G, made political blowhards uncomfortable, but why I didn't laugh when he did it to ordinary citizens.  One example: the dinner party scene where he hands the hostess a Ziploc full of his feces (oh, that’s hilarious), tells another woman she’s not attractive (I woulda slugged him) and then brings in the black hooker in hot pants as his date. Of course, that was supposed to make this dignified white Southern group look racist, but I bet an African-American family would have had the same reaction to the trashy guest.  I also noted how, whenever Borat came upon a politically acceptable group, like the feminists, his own ignorance became the butt of the joke, but when it was anyone else, their “bigotry” was the point.  (Salon posted a detailed article about the manipulations.)

    

Gone With the Wind: “Lawdy, dem slaves sho’ was happy with dey white massas!” A Southern white belle – and not even a nice one - who owns slaves is the heroine of a book and movie 70 years after the end of Civil War?  She’ll never go hungry again?  Frankly, I don’t give a damn!

   

Kiss Me Deadly: A cult classic that, when I finally saw it, seemed laughably overwrought – a noir movie that ends with a nuclear explosion!  But boy, Cloris Leachman was hot when she was young!

    

Moulin Rouge: After 15 minutes of this digital migraine headache, I was screaming, “Turn it off!  I’ve seen better film on teeth!”

    

Out of Africa / The English Patient: Should have been rated “X” – no one will be admitted without an extra X chromosome. 

   

Philadelphia: Yeah, yeah, first major Hollywood film about gays, Hanks is great, yada yada.  But I was thoroughly annoyed by the way Hanks’ family pampered him during his final days.  At a time when many gay men dying of AIDS were shunned by their families, it seemed to be avoiding a harsh truth.   More annoying: After Hollywood liberal Mary Steenburgen, as a corporate lawyer, grills Hanks’ character about his sexual behavior, she mutters to the camera, “I hate this case!” so we stupid viewers will be reminded that she’s just reading scripted dialogue and she’s not really a homophobe. Thanks, Mary, I almost forgot for a minute that you were an actress.

    

Star Wars: Saw this movie three times – on its initial release, on VHS and during its late 1990s re-release, and fell asleep every time.  I need a story at least as complex as Dr. Seuss to hold my attention.  Yeah, I know, whenever I say I hate Star Wars, everyone looks at me like I’ve got one eye in the middle of my forehead.

   

There Will Be Blood!: I’m saying something very profound about capitalism!  Can’t you tell by the strong, masculine images?  Pay attention, or I’ll drink your milkshake! Jeez, you can have my milkshake, I wanted a beer anyway.  Plus why was the climactic scene held in a bowling alley?  Did the producers run out of money and that was the only location they could afford?

    

Waiting for Guffman: Everybody keeps telling me how funny Christopher Guest’s improvised movies are, but except for Fred Willard in Best of Show, nothing has triggered more than a titter or a tee-hee from me.  You know, Chris, just because you’ve assembled a talented bunch of performers, there’s nothing disreputable about the occasional scripted punch line. (And maybe the next time you play a character, you could make him a little less mincing.)  This movie especially irks me because I have a spouse who participates in community theater and none of them resemble any of these characters.  But I guess it’s OK for a Hollywood success to mock we poor souls with lesser talents.

    

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Kiss me Deadly is a hoot... I have a noir fan here and I have seen a lot of those funny but supposed to be serious films.
How they got made I will ever know.
I agree with you about Guffman but GWTW??
bit your tongue man hahaha
rated with hugs
B I T E.. better clean my glasses hahah
I disagree with two of them, I won't say which two, but eight of them are right on. I wouldn't watch them if I was running the projector at the movie theater!
I agree with you about Gone with the Wind! I have major debates with one of my sisters about this all the time! Glad to see I'm not alone.

But I must vehemently denounce your non-appreciation of Blade Runner.

And I would defend Star Wars, but the prequels have hurt my case.
"The Blair Witch Project" was a frontal-lobe-asphixiatingly boring, and "Borat" just plain painful--I've tried twice to watch it and the winch-factor got me both times. The others, well, at least I was able to view them to the final credits. Your clever commentary, Cranky, is worth far more than these movies' admission prices.
What a list! I never pictured Mary S as a homophone either. You know I love you, but that was funny!!!
Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep, pretty much til we get to Waiting for Guffman, because when Jamie Lee divorces him, Mister Guest will be mine.
Greenheron: And Jamie Lee will be mine.
Some of them I agree with. Not Waiting for Guffman, however. I love that movie, and I saw it as one of the few intellectual comedies that were definitely needed for its time. That they've been able to continue this process with even more remarkable areas is fascinating to me. Sorry you didn't like it, but I loved it.
Blair Witch did scare me, I thought it was never going to end. "Aaaaa sticks in the woods, what kind of fiend would put sticks in the woods? It's so scary!" I couldn't help but compare it to Mtv's Road Rules where a bunch of whiny yuppie pups get together to bitch and complain, but at least they all got killed in the end.
Awesome list! I totally agree with you about "Star Wars," and was pleasantly surprised to see someone admit they didn't like it.

On the other hand, "Gone With the Wind" is absolutely not cool in terms of its portrayal of slaves for the most part, but the fact that Scarlett is such a bitch, is exactly the appeal! You love to hate her, and you want her to win even as you see she deserves a strong comeuppance.

Also, "Moulin Rouge!" is for me a perfect movie to show people why the Belle Epoque was cool. As a huge fan of this time period, I feel like the movie really captures the mood of that era - not the actual historical look of it, necessarily, but the spirit. But I could see it being hard on the eyes.

Lastly, I was hoping to see "It's a Wonderful Life" somewhere on your list - I HATE that movie; people for some reason find it inspiring and for me it's just really depressing, no matter how gorgeous James Stewart was.

Okay, whew, I'm done. Great post, great idea, and some great picks!
Sorry, Alysa, I love "It's a Wonderful Life."
What greenheron said. Corky alone is worth the price of admission in that Christopher Guest romp. Moulin Rouge? I've seen better films on teeth. And I love Baz Luhrmann.
I know I'm "nit-picking" but you said Scarlett Ohara owned slaves. She didn't. She was only 19 years old when the war ended, freeing the slaves.
I'm with you on all of them except "Waiting for Guffman." It's not my favorite Guest movie, but i love them all, and just include it under the umbrella of "Good Because It's Guest." We saw "The Blair Witch Project" in the theater; it was one of the first times we got a babysitter and went out when Sam was really little, and it was a big deal picking the ONLY movie we'd see in thetaers for probably the entire year. What a waste of money. We found it alternately disappointing and, honestly, hilarious. It was The Emperor's New Clothes of film making.
Great list and I have a new one to add: Black Swan
To which list I'd add "Easy Rider". Except for the soundtrack, it's ludicrous. Tried to watch it again a few years ago, and quit about 20 minutes into it.
I'm with you on more than half of these (and I'm not saying which half)!

With films like Potemkin or Birth of a Nation, etc., I watch them not for enjoyment necessarily, but for seeing something done for the first time, something that influenced everything that came after. As Roger Ebert said, watching sometimes involves "an act of cooperation with the film - even active sympathy."
Now I have to see some of these just to make sure you are right...like
I don't have enough useless enterprises going on. Sheesh:)
I agree with most of these --
and will add that anything with Tom Hanks makes my skin crawl--
he is the smarmiest of smarmies
Nothing by Chaplin makes me laugh. To that I would add just about everything by Luis Bunuel. Fell asleep during "No Country for Old Men." Hated "Titanic." "Inception" left me cold. I could go on and on... Good list.
Except for Gone with the Wind, which I saw about 24 times one summer as a teenager, I am in complete agreement. And what a great way to say it, as usual.
I could not agree more about Blair Witch. We anticipated, and looked forward and actually went to the theater. Blech. Why? I hated Star Wars, but lately, seeing them with a 7 year old boy, I kinda like them...
I kind of agree with you on a lot of the sentiments and admire your courage for taking on so many that are beloved. I hear you on Borat. I do find the man very funny,at times, and I hate that he gets so cruel and political . He picks on too easy targets too often.

I semi loathed his newer fashion movie, whose name is escaping me, becuase of the reasons you mentioned. He makes it an indictment against republican types or hicks when humor should, you'd think, indict all political parties and types,
Great post and though I can't say I found the same faults in these films I can't say I don't get where you are coming from, as a whole.
Oh ho! I am laughing. I take it you love A Clockwork Orange.
Best Wishes,
Blittie
Imma have to disagree on about half of these.

Loved There Will Be Blood, though the ending degenerated some. I also enjoyed The English Patient though I'd never sit through it a second time.

Couldn't agree more on Borat. It's right up there with the Jackass movies as a sign of the pending apocalypse.

When I was 16 I took my girlfriend to Gone With the Wind and we made out in the balcony all through it. (Remember balconies?) I experience my first cast of blue balls. Had to get up and walk around the lobby for 15 minutes in the middle of it.

Fun post.
Oh ho! I am laughing. I take it you love A Clockwork Orange.
Best Wishes,
Blittie
Per usual, Crankster, you provide a really well written and entertaining review - nicely done. I have to say - I don't HAVE to say, I WANT to say - that I disagree with some of your assessment of Philly - particularly the part about the pampering family. In fact, while alot of gays and lesbians et al ARE shunned by family members, there are many of us, MANY, who when we came out to our families heard responses such as, "Thank GOD you finally noticed - your dad and I have known since you were five!" or "Well, I don't understand it but I have always loved you and I will always love you." In short, I think, while certainly familial rejection is very real in the gay and lesbian community, many of those families are rejecting of other family members as well, just for other things - and the vast majority of families are embracing of their gay and lesbian family members.

And you may recall - it wasn't just some of the family members who were rejecting of some of the AIDS patients - it was very much a cultural thing for a time. I remember I used to share an office on alternate weeks with another therapist. I went in the office one afternoon to get some papers and the room reeked of Lysol. My office mate explained he had had "an AIDS infected client" and needed to fumigate. I can assure you, I was much more offended by his remark than his client!

Incidentally, many other groups with AIDS were also stigmatized - I facilitated a group of AIDS survivors in the early 90's - we had not a single gay man in the group).
With you on all save Borat. it's brilliant and hilarious, tho i think bruno is better. r.
I will stipulate to all except Star Wars and Kiss Me Deadly. Star Wars because of the changes in special effects. Kiss Me Deadly for the reel to reel answering machine, the corvette, and Cloris Leachman...

I thought she was HOT in Last Picture Show, too, but then ,I was 16.
I have only seen about half of these. I have to agree 100% on Borat. The stupidest, most unfunny movie EVER. (Except for maybe "The Waterboy" which my family laughs at every time it is on... Must disagree on "Gone With the Wind." Loved the book, loved the movie. My family hates this one. They rarely watch movies with me.~r
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
oy!
Sorry, gotta disagree with your take on "Gone with the wind!".
It remains the greatest film ever!
And the preface to "Blade Runner" specified that the environment was in chaotic disarray.
You nailed the rest of the pack though.
I saw Potemkin and thought it was a very good piece of Progressive Agitprop. It really made the concepts of class-consciousness, the dangers of ethnocentrism, the self-centeredness of the wealthy and the plight of the working classes come alive on the screen.

The whole concept of the Battleship Mutiny, in many ways, is a metaphor for a revolution in a country itself and how this concept can spread to others. Contagion, if you will.

I was very moved by it.
Disagree on Battleship Potemkin, Blade Runner, and Star Wars. All excellent films, and I cry every time I see the Odessa steps scene. I would include Patton--I think it's cheesy and ridiculously over the top--and Terms of Endearment--for the same reasons but in a different vein. And anything by Chevy Chase. Except for his Weekly Update bits on SNL, he should be stricken from our memories with the flashy thing they used in Men in Black. And oh yeah, Men in Black.
I live in complete and endless shame for not loving "Lost in Translation." In fact, this is the first and only place I've admitted it. I liked it, but love?

Hopefully, I can redeem myself by absolutely adoring "Apocalypse Now" since I'm a chick and not supposed to. But "Waiting for Guffman?" My boyfriend didn't like that film either and I almost broke up with him.
OK, it's Weekend Update. So. It's been years since I actually watched the show.
I have a couple of movies that were must sees, such as "Mama Mia" don't get me wrong I love the music of "Abba," but if you must listen to "Abba" while watching a movie. May I suggest "Muriel's Wedding." But the idea of Meryl Streep singing on top of tables and having the mid-life fling is a little too far flung for me. If I am going to watch mid-life people doing mid-life things I would vie for other more mature stuff like "Sinfeld" or "In The Middle." Let me not bore you with his guff, I hope all the movies that are ill with no illumination not be viewed not even on rainy afternoons. Hows that for old age and wisdom lol:))
I agree with you on a few, like Blood and Guffman. Much of the reasoning makes me scratch my head.

Potemkin is influential, because it invented so many techniques which we take for granted today. If's not made for contemporary audiences, and you are likely to only enjoy it as a learning experience of where modern film came from and how it developed.

Gone With The Wind has often been described as being set in the civil war, but allegory for and really more ABOUT the Great Depression. It could hardly have been more relevant in 1939. Or today. Look past the costumes at the struggles of the characters.
I was with you until the last one - but then again, both "A Mighty Wind" and "Best in Show" were far better than the "Guffman" movie.
I agree on all counts. Wonderful reviews.
rated with love
Whew! I was worried that A Clockwork Orange was going to be on your list. I think you are wrong about GWTW. Maybe it's a chick flick.
So you called Out of Africa and the English Patient "chick flicks." I'm a chick. Loved 'em!

I, too, have failed on several attempts to get through a complete viewing of Star Wars, but my classmate Harrison was in it, so: Loved it!

There wasn't enough Dramamine in my purse for me to get through The Blair Witch Project!

Didn't see a couple of them; loved Philadelpia and There Will Be Blood.

So, Cranky, please never invite me to go to a movie with you...K?
Raging Bull--but maybe I just don't like boxing movies.
blade runner is an excellent movie based on an excellent (iconic, really) novel by a world class sci-fi writer. in addition to all the elements of the movie you describe (and are unimpressed by), it asks us to really think about the nature of our existence, our mortality, and even the certainty that we really exist and are human (and whether that can be improved upon)

respectfully,

richard (your friend in ossining)

(you never recognize my e-mail)
p.s.

borat is funny as hell

(bruno... not so much)
blair sucked pond water.
scarlett was a skank.
moulin rouge had no spark.
period.
r
Crank I want to add:

Anyone who imagines that horrid 'The English Patient' was a modern 'Casablanca', or anything remotely close to it, should be locked away for his/her own good.
Showing my ignorance of "film," but I haven't seen half of these. Of those I have seen I mostly agree with you. I was laughing hard during Borat but longer I was away from he theatre the nastier it seemed. A friend of mine edited the English Patient but I still think it was boring (and Jeez, enough already with the burned off face.) Moulin Rouge was extremely irritating.
I have only seen four of those movies, it seems a couch anchor would have done better...
I guess I just instinctively had the same feeling about most of them as you. Of course I could never have written such a hilarious review. Your post was much funnier than any movie I've seen recently.
I did think Blade Runner was interesting, but should have been much better, and yes, I love Star Wars.

kurt -r-
I will confess I haven't seen a lot of those movies, so maybe your intuition carries, although I have to like Star Wars, just for the time and place, although I though Blade Runner was really cool, if a little slow, like twenty minutes less would have been more, but ... everyone's a critic :).
Ok, so Star Wars was a cheesefest. But what about Empire Strikes Back? That was at least decently directed. (Trying to save the franchise here....)
How could you do this to me?? Kiss Me Deadly just arrived, and I haven't taken the wrapper off... Spoiler!
With you on Blair Witch, Borat, and Moulin Rouge (assuming you mean the Baz Luhrmann monstrosity--actually did like the John Huston one from the 1950s)... but none of those received universal critical raves. Especially disappointed with BW since an ASU film student had highly recommended to me--I was sooooo frickin' bored throughout its amateurish production and couldn't understand why I was supposed to be scared of sticks... but give the filmmakers credit for duping lots of Americans and making millions off this crap.
I'm always happy to find another (rare) person who dislikes Blade Runner. When the most memorable thing about a movie is its set design ....

Star Wars' dialog makes me want to rip my ears off.
O yeah... I HATED The English Patient too... actively rooted against it winning anything during the Oscars, so was disheartened when it took the top prize. But that's pretty common experience--hated Gladiator and A Beautiful Mind... and thought Crash was VERY ordinary.
I agree with all but three: "Blade Runner," "Star Wars" and "There Will Be Blood." I get your criticism of all three, but still think those picks are, overall, good movies (not as good as "The Empire Strikes Back," but still good). Of course, if there were a sci-fi movie starring Daniel Day-Lewis, I would be first in line, so perhaps I'm biased!
Star Wars used archetypes from myth and religion in the ways advocated by Joseph Campbell. Its importance isn't in the micro-psychological, individualistic sense applauded by modern Anglo-American individualists. Its importance is in the macro, issue-sense. And the group-dynamic sense.

It also advocates Revolution and Rebellion in ways all children can understand. In this sense, it is good. Those in power are not good and those fighting power are not bad.

And the powerless folks in the Rebellion actually win! HOORAY!
But you have to admit the score for Philadelphia was rich. RRR
Back to rate and comment on GWTW. It's a "period piece" and that period isn't post-Civil War, it is the racial pre-civil rights days of the south. I like the book better but I love the film also, saw it on the Big Screen for the first time when I was ten. Fiddle Dee Dee.
Amy: Yes, as a Bruce and Neil fan, I loved the music. Plus the aria.
Hah! You lived up to your name on this one Cranky!

I don't really agree with a couple of them - for all that its dystopia has been copied, Bladerunner still has a unique signature that noone has ever been able to "replicate", including Ridley Scott. And the only thing dated about that is how young the actors in it are. But i know plenty of people that are "Bah!" about it.

And Star Wars? I am making rude gestures right now. Ok, done.

And the other ones I might disagree on - well i take that back not really disagree - are mainly because they were considered particularly important and signficant at the time they were made, such as Potemkin and Gone With the Wind. I don't care for the movies either as far as enjoyment as well, but I think they were important at their times. They have use when you look at them as far as techniques and composition. You could add something like Citizen Kane to that... which is impressive when you consider that the techniques and styles behind it were revolutionary. But the movie is turgid and boring as shit.

There was a brief character on a recent episode of "The Office" a teen kid who was working as an intern for the office, an aspiring film maker. Asked his favorite movies, he said "Citizen Kane and Boondock Saints." HA, whatadouche.

Right on about the Chris Guest movies. I've never gotten their appeal either, aside from Fred Willard, who is just funny. And since those movies are mostly improvised, he gets to be himself.

You want some more movies I would include in that list for me?
Schindler's List
Blue Velvet
All Woody Allen movies aside from Annie Hall (which is great)
Every Stanley Kubrick movie aside from Clockwork Orange (which is mostly good)
Nearly all Marlon Brando (including his younger days) or James Dean movies.
I didn’t realize movies could make people so fired up!

Nick: If I didn’t make it clear, sci-fi is not my thing.

LuminousMuse: That was the word I’ve been looking for about Borat: mean-spirited.

Duane, Ann: I may be in the minority about Guest. Having spent a lot time with local theater folk, I took Guffman personally, as if he was saying, “Look at these silly heartlanders who think they can act and put on a show.”

Blu: I like Chaplin and Bunel! As for the rest, feh.

Everyone defending Potemkin: I know. I’ve seen it more than once, and I can appreciate the art and the significance. But “agitptop” is one of my least favorite words in the world. Give me something as complex as “Battle of Algiers.” (BTW, you know the Odessa Steps sequence never really happened, right?)

Kit: Your point is well-taken. I’m sure the creators discussed long and hard about that. They made the creative decision to emphasize that many gays are loved by their families. I can understand and appreciate that. Since it was the first Hollywood film to deal with the subject, though, I was hoping it would be a little more hard-hitting.

Sheepie: Cloris Leachman is still kinda hot.

D Art: Twelve wrongs don’t make a right!

BOKO: Chase was the only thing in Caddyshack that annoyed me.

Sarah C: Sorry, I love Raging Bull.

Slaphappy: Was that a direct quote from Ridley Scott?
Great stuff Cranky. I must confess that I've only seen 2 or 3 of these. And--I don't dare agree with you on "GWTW" because it's one of my wife's favorites. So don't tell her, but I have always found it to be too melodramatic and boring.
I actually read this fearing you'd mention some of my favorite films, like "Citizen Kane" or "2001." So I'm glad you didn't mention those (I hope they didn't just miss the cut-off.) The only film on your list I disagree with is "Star Wars." I was never a huge fan of the film (like everyone else) but I admired its creativity and story-telling. It held my interest. I guess I also disagree with your addition of "GWTW" not because I've seen it recently but I would think the cinematography alone would be enough to spare it your wrath. Oh well. I'm glad to see the anti-Borat sentiment. I have never seen any of his films and pray I never will.
Retalbo: I own copies of Citizen Kane and 2001, so they're favorites.
I'll fight you on The English Patient, but I'm with you on the others. I enjoyed Out of Africa when it was originally released, but seeing it 15 years later... it didn't hold up so well.

Star Wars I enjoyed the three released in the 70's and 80's, but somehow, Lucas failed to make a fan of me. Didn't even bother to see episodes 1, 2 and 3 since the reviews were so lukewarm.

rated
Dear Cranky,

You've got one eye in the middle of your forehead. But I liked your post anyway. ; D

Cheers,
As for Gone With The Wind, "Frankly Cranky, I don't give a damn..."
Funny post.
Rated "r" for reely good.
I agree with some of your movies here but not all...My GWTW story is that I went to see it years ago with all my best GF"s from my home town...Suddenly I heard this horrible sobbing (Iwas crying as wll mind you) from the entire audience. It felt a Jungian expermiment -- this collective sob was hysterially laughable. Put the movie into great perspective, aside from the racial issues, the human and emotional issues were ridiculous esp. in this day and age. I've seen it since and it does evoke tears, but I don;t give a damn either. LOL
Add Forrest Gump to this list. Totally, totally ruined the entire concept of a satirical, biting novel. I could never watch anything of Hanks' again with a kind mind due to this one movie.
Okay, this article made me bite the bullet and finally join Open Salon!

As a African American, I have serious problems with Gone With the Wind. That film perpetuated the heinous myths that black folks were childlike simpletons (Prissy: "I don't know nuttin bout birthin' babies! -- Cue: Scarlett's Pimp Slap!!), that African Americans were happy to live on the plantation, and that blacks elected during the Reconstruction period were corrupt and lazy.

And don't get me started about their depiction of the Klan. They were domestic terrorists, plain and simple, and I have family stories about life in the Old South to prove it.

The only redeeming factor was Hattie McDaniels, who was a match for that spoiled brat bitch Scarlett. Their scenes are about the only thing I like about that movie. And McDaniels deserved her Oscar for transcending the usual maid role most black women played during that period.

Still GWTW, like "Birth of a Nation" a few decades before it, helped perpetuate racism and distorted history about the Old South. The South was not a paradise. An elite class of slaveholders ruled the roost while a much larger number of poor whites and blacks were at the bottom. Heck, they didn't even have many public schools in the South until after the Civil War!

But Cranky I have to disagree with you on "Blade Runner." That is a very deep film which only grows more relevant over time.

Our scientific knowledge of cloning and DNA have jumped leaps and bounds since that movie came out in 1982. We are already engineering new lifeforms -- bioengineered corn and livestock to name a few.

What if we created synthetic humans, as the movie conjectures? Would they have a soul? Would they have a right to live as they chose? Would we envy the fact they were more beautiful and stronger than we are and hunt them down? At the end of "Blade Runner" you are left wondering who was more human, the Replicants or the humans who created them.

Thanks for the great article. Keep writing you Cranky Cuss!
Since I've only seen two movies on your list (Borat -loved it) and GWTW (loathed it - the movie, not the book) I can't really speak to the rest of them. But two worst movies I've seen recently (thankfully as rentals) were The Hangover and Napoleon Dynamite. In my opinion, I seem to be a minority of one.
Was anyone supposed to even like Blair Witch? I thought it was a prank on the movie going public. Kind of the movie equivalent of the old "we switched the coffee at this restaurant to Sanka" advertisement.
My husband and I call There Will Be Blood -- "You Will Be Bored." But I'm seeing your third eye too. We loved Moulin Rouge, and Star Wars??! Gone With the Wind has some problems, but with so many iconic performances, I give it a "must see."
I would add Avatar. It's a blur of green and blue, has no plot or stars. I don't find people with tails attractive. Star Wars I agree with but I don't care for SciFi.
I'm with you on most, but not all. "Borat" and "Blair Witch", definitely. And "Gone With the Wind" makes me want to puke (book and movie both) though I loved Carol Burnett's version. But "Waiting for Guffman" was hilarious to me because I work with people like this (persistant muse, if you see this you must be sworn to secrecy).
Dammit, Crank, I think you and I are finally gonna hafta go to the mat. I haven't seen all of these films and I agree with you on most of the ones I did see that you didn't like, but...

There's something I like about Blade Runner - enuf to allow me to stay awake thru it the two times I've seen it. Not sure what it is, because I agree with your quibbles. Just that there is something. Ambience, maybe? I do rather like Harrison Ford in most of the things he's done.

I sorta liked The English Patient, especially in retrospect after reading the first several pages of the book, which nauseated me.

Liked the first Star Wars. Ford again? Mebbe. The galactic bar scene is priceless. That's about all I remember of the entire movie.

Philadelphia? Seems a tad self-conscious, altho Hanks and Washington did pretty well.

Don't remember if I saw There Will Be Blood or not. Probly not or I might have remembered something from it. The only bowling alley scene I remember in a movie is in Kingpins, and I still burst into uncontrollable snorts when I recall Bill Murray's comb-over.

Other than these minor exceptions, I believe we our friendship remains in good health.
I wholeheartedly second "Blade Runner". Great description of "Moulin Rouge". While I appreciated its artistry, I had to give it up due to the migraine effect. As for Paul Thomas Anderson, I say substitute Punch Drunk Love for There Will Be Blood. PDL made no sense at all. For instance, why would Emma Watson be so infatuated by a charmless Adam Sandler. The symbolism of the blue suit and upright piano bored me with their pretensions of French cinema.

As for Star Wars, I put off watching it until two years ago. I expected to hate it like yourself, but I found it surprisingly engaging.
Has anyone mentioned "Blue Velvet" yet? Except for the Pabst Blue Ribbon rant, I found it to be a complete bore. Kyle McLachlan's character is charisma-free.
Ah, my dear CC, I could have told you that movies do get people all riled up. (Hey, sometimes even TV shows do. Just sayin'.)

As for your list, like most folks, I agree wholeheartedly with you on some and disagree just as strongly with you on others. No surprise.

What always gets me in these types of discussions is the underlying assumption that somehow we are actually supposed to agree on these matters, rather than embracing the basic human truth that we are all distinct individuals with our varying likes and dislikes.

It's fascinating to me that people get so offended when you don't share their taste or interests. They seem to take it as some sort of personal insult. Why? I have no idea. But I find it one of the most fascinating human behaviors.

Now don't you dare tell me that you don't find it fascinating, too!
I hate Gone with The Wind too, she's just such a b--tch, I know thats the point but she annoys me. I loved Out of Africa because I had read some of her books and having Robert Redford wash my hair is an all time fantasy. English Patient was slow. I had to get the feel of Moulin Rouge, see it twice actually. Can't watch Stars Wars again. Interesting choices.
The Godfather. Horrible film. It INSISTS on itself (hint hint).
Quite frankly, I don't see the attraction of watching any movie more than once. I agree with your list, it shows you actually have discerning taste and are capable of formulating your own opinions instead of allowing yourself to be force fed a diet of trivial drivel.
I thoroughly enjoyed reading this post and the many comments, and would like to share my view. I'm an avid reader who finishes a book in two or three days, some at one go. It took me three weeks to read Gone with the wind, it was that boring! And the movie that I waited a lifetime to see wasn't much better!
Ditto Star Wars.
yr wrong about blade runner, star wars, and guffman.
I thoroughly enjoyed reading this post and the many comments, and would like to share my view. I am an avid reader who finishes a book in a day or two. Gone with the wind took me three weeks, it was that boring! And the movie that I waited a lifetime to see was not much better.
Ditto Star Wars
I agree with most of the others as well.
In the off chance you’re looking for comments Cranky:

Agreed: Blade Runner, Borat, Moulin Rouge, Out of Africa, The English Patient and Philadelphia. What wrecked the latter for me was the courtroom scene. These by their nature ought to be the high point of any drama. In Philadelphia, the main premise of the movie is that all lawyers are terrified of going up against this powerhouse. But Jason Robards’ somnolent defense made the public defender in My Cousin Vinnie look imposing by comparison. Plus what you said.

No decisions: haven’t seen Potemkin or There Will be Blood. The preview of the latter was enough.

Disagree: Blair Witch Project, Kiss Me Deadly, and Waiting For Guffman. They all had their moments. And you’re too hard on Star Wars. It’s an entertaining, adventure romp. But then, I like Errol Flynn movies too.

Strongly Disagree: Gone With the Wind is a fabulous classic! Great, enveloping, sweeping story, great minor characters, a Pride Goes Before the Fall storyline, gem after gem of scenes and vignettes and in Vivien Leigh, one of the great acting performances in the history of film. OK, a few false moments with Butterfly McQueen, though she wasn’t to blame.

Can I nominate The Lord of the Rings trilogy for this list? This orcs are frightening looking but in vast numbers it's as tough as taking on a bunch of mosquitos. It helps if you're a fan aof extended CGI battle scenes.
I happen to love (read: love to hate) "It's a Wonderful Life" for its pure cheesy sexism: What finally makes George Bailey decide that the world is better with him in it? It's not saving his brother's life, or (indirectly) saving the lives of countless people in Europe, or preventing a bank from going broke, or keeping his hometown from becoming a den of sin.

No, it's that without him to marry her, Donna Reed 1.) wears glasses, 2.) works at the library, and 3.) ends up an old maid!

NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!

Rated.
Much I agree with here -- I actually died once when at least fifty women stared daggers thru me when I laughed out loud at the end of Gone With the Wind. "But tomorrow is another day" may well be the worse closing line ever.
I'd add the well-made "Reds". The reason? It glorifies a man who glorified men who, even then, made it clear they were out to kill millions. Yes, even, THEN. Can anyone imagine a film that put a young American Nazi "idealist" up on a pedestal and presented him and his cause as wonderful being received and lauded as that film was? No.

Again, well-made, but, for its political blindness and adulation of evil, despicable.
A horror-lover, I am with you on Blair Witch Project, which I consider a total scam. Borat is the kind of passive-aggressive vulgarian I could gleefully kick in the ass. Philadelphia a little too self-importantly grueling for a gay film which did not have the balls to depict even one gay kiss.

The rest I either liked or haven't seen.
Thank you, thank you, I also abhor Gone With The Wind(seriously, a film with black maids and an idiot who wears curtains?), Moulin Rouge (please make them stop singing) and Philadelphia(I'm gay, and this was so not true to life or realistic). People look at me like I'm crazy when I mention not liking them. Must disagree on Blade Runner though, that is one cool movie, lapses in logic be damned!
Blair Witch and Borat - completely agree.
The rest, not so much.
Gone With The Wind haterz: chill. Your politically correct quibbling is just stupid. (I've read the book umpteen times and it has gotten me through some bad patches in life, much more detailed than the movie. And what about those awful, awful 'sequels'???) I've seen GWTW a dozen times and not once was I moved to purchase a slave (though I have recycled beautiful curtains into a dress, so there!) It's like complaining that the Mona Lisa is too drab to hang up next to the Thomas Kincaide pastel cottages...Kiss Me Deadly - short, brutish, and nasty, like its leading man - fun stuff!...Blade Runner - just awesome to look at, why dither about the plot? It's dark and raining because the atmosphere has finally been trashed, and there are pedestrians and no McMansions because there is no economy, stupid - those are the human survivors. (and it has Harrison Ford.) Star Wars - can't touch that, sorry. You are as barking dogs. The original Star Wars movies have gone down in history for a reason (and there's Harrison Ford). ...Moulin Rouge - now here, I agree, I may have to turn in my woman card, but I agree with a review I read once, that it's like being buried under a boxcar full of glitter...Borat - I watched this with my 80 year old mom and we had to turn it off for a while, because mom was laughing so hard I was afraid she was going to have a stroke! But she insisted on seeing it through and said she wouldn't want to watch it again, but was glad she saw it...

I nominate Pulp Fiction. I am all alone here, I know, but I thought it was appalling. Simply appalling, the attention that has been paid to this atrocity. I don't get it. I hate hate hate everything about Pulp Fiction. Just loathesome.
Any kind of Best of/Worst of list always generates great discussion. 2 on your list I adore, the others: meh.
I always say, art is subjective. I agree with just about all of your choices except that I think "Gone With The Wind" (between the casting, cinematography, performances, etc. - especially for 1939) was extraordinary and very close, but not exactly duplicating the novel.

Also, I did find fault with the screenplay to "Philadelphia," but I wish people would believe there were supportive families in 1993 and I also wish it wasn't labeled "a gay film." I actually don't care for labels of any kind. It's a film about a deadly epidemic and the way society treated its victims. Yes, it's true the main characters are gay, but it's more to do with compassion and fear than "a gay film." Also, I knew many women like Joanne Woodward's character who played Hanks' mother. Not everyone was narrow-minded in 1993.

Last but not least. I must take exception with "Out Of Africa." ANYTHING Meryl Streep does is worth the price of admission. She can bring the quality of any project to a whole new level.

As for the other films, I most definitely agree with you. "The English Patient" was so overwrought and "Star Wars" so over-hyped, and the rest, eh. Although "Moulin Rouge" is the film I really liked Nicole Kidman in. Especially right after her then husband (Tom Cruise) dumped her because she couldn't and wouldn't go the route of Scientology. He's still in the closet..isn't he? Ugh.
I'm so glad that I'm not the only one who hated Philadelphia. It felt emotionally manipulative. Rather than being moved, I found myself constantly rolling my eyes. When Hanks is monologuing and over emoting with the classical music I muttered (perhaps not so softly) to my friends "oh, brother, Oscar moment." Sure enough, when Hanks was nominated, that was the scene they inevitably showed.
your criteria are wholly personal. that means you bring no critical perspective. star wars changed the form of sci fi by adding an accurate mythical dimension, blade runner did the same by adding a more naturalistic approach and expanding the genre with crime, and guffman raised the stakes in terms of an ensemble production using improv, which after all is the American contribution to the field of acting. it's when the genre is created or expanded that a film has a lasting value--regardless of whether it appeals to your personal tastes. movie making is not the same after a "great" movie and it is objectively definable. I think I should be getting paid to do this.
I haven't seen all the movies on this list, but of the ones I have, I must agree with you 100 percent. And while it's not yet quite considered a "classic," I'll add the recent The Social Network to this list. After hearing about the great great really great writing and the sharp commentary on our times, all I saw was a weak remake of Citizen Kane, complete with Rosebud (the girl he secretly wanted throughout the film) the attempts to buy legitimate fame (getting into the college clubs vs Kane's obsession with making Susie an opera singer) and the backwards testimony of a man's life, only with a court deposition in place of a cub reporter. There were a few one-liners but that's all Sorkin knows how to write, or most anyone in H'wood knows how to write these days. Yawn!
@Ben Sen: Of course my criteria are personal. I'm not watching these films to get some kind of cinematic history lesson. I'm watching them with my family for pleasure. And these films did not provide enough pleasure for my tastes.

I understand how Star Wars changed movie special effects. However, special effects bore me. In fact, science fiction as a genre bores me. My interest is in stories with compelling characters. I can respect the creative sets and cinematography of Blade Runner, the ensemble work in Guffman, even Sacha Baron Cohen's daring in Borat, but that doesn't change the fact that they didn't provide a compelling experience for me. I have much better things to do with my time than watch a film that's going to bore me.

What bothers me most about your comment is the arrogance underneath it that thinks that anyone who doesn't share your taste is somehow inferior.
I've sorry about my arrogance Cuss, but this is film school 101. If you like movies as you indicate you do the least you could do is understand the form as it exists. I mean nothing personal by my comments, (I write for the theatre more than the movies) but I like movies also, and it is distressing when so many who think they are somehow "experts" are no such thing. I guess they'll have to start to call me Cranky Ben Sen.

Hugs, and congratulations on such a successful post. rated and commented upon thrice!
P.S. You know nothing about my tastes as I have said nothing about whether or not I actually enjoy any of these movies personally, or what it is that I think of them. I am speaking from a perspective that has nothing to do with you or me or the opinions of anyone. I didn't used to be like this, but the more I see people don't really understand the distinction, the more evident it becomes the point at least should be made and may even be of interest to some movie lovers.
@Ben: But all I have been talking about is whether I enjoyed these films personally. I picked on many of them specifically because they have some significance in film history. My main motivation was to say that sometimes "the emperor wears no clothes," that it's OK to say about some critically acclaimed piece of art, "meh."

I noted Battleship Potemkin's influence on storytelling and the art of montage; I merely added that it was a bore to sit through (and I've sat through it at least twice, as well as two others of Eisenstein's films). I would not have been shy about adding Citizen Kane, except that I actually enjoy it.

I understand the significance of Star Wars also. That's why I attempted to watch it on three separate occasions. The story failed to engage my attention each time. (Though I enjoy Lucas' "American Graffiti.")
Definitely agree on Moulin Rouge. Definitely disagree on Philadelphia.
Love your take on things, Cranky, even when I don't agree. (But I'm with you on some, including Out of Africa/The English Patient.)
What was wonderful about Star Wars is how it introduced fable and myth to American filmaking in a way it hadn't been seen before, re-inventing the genre. It wasn't simply a matter of visual effects, which is inconsequential in the greater scheme of things in "my" view--admittedly a minority report. At least one other of your commenters made this point. It takes the mind of a child to break through pre-conceptions, which is why the everything, including art proceeds by stages. Hold a child's hand while you watch the universe open in the opening scenes and at least you can get a taste of it.

I'm looking at the power of the media to influence the "unsuspecting." Indeed, is there not a "dark side?" Is there not "evil" in a sense that the universe itself is subject to "morality" no matter what the scale of events? It is no accident the genre has been among the most active and creative in the years since, not limited to "special effects," but in many instances replacing other genre (particularly the Western) in their role as arbiters of the values that make us "human"? It laid the groundwork for the Tolkein movies, which even further show the role of myth to the masses in inventing human consciousness. Indeed, you may not be entertained by them and that is totally your perogative, so don't get me wrong, but I suggest in the larger analysis in this age of either dissolution or rigidity they constitute a middle-ground where even the ignorant and uneducated may be versed in something more than violence, gore, and competition.

You see now why I am so unpopular? My personal sensibility is to think they are gross and simplistic. I think I have two reviews on my blog, mostly read by no one. I used to do it for a living, now I could give a shit. Cranky indeed. Keep given 'em what they want and they will love you for it. Challenge the consensus and they think you the fool.

I used to hate the reviewers like John Simon who think as I now do, so be careful who you hate--they are the "dark side," we are in danger of becoming. If you have only ever been a writer, which is all I have ever been, I think you understand me at this point. I wish no confrontation, but I have my truth to tell too.

Blessings for a New Year, I am BS, the maddest of them all,
Ben: I think I was challenging a little consensus in this post, so I understand what you are saying, and I appreciate your passion. My thought has always been that if you express an opinion and everyone agrees with you, then it really wasn't much of an opinion.
I like when people take a contrary stance and defend it vigorously, even when I disagree.

Blessings for the New Year to you too.
you don't like Star Wars???!!! oh, i don't know if we can be friends anymore...
Hm. This is kind of like shooting fish in a barrel, isn't it? I mean, you take this hugely pompous attitude about a really simple subject. But that seems to be the essence of all your posts...
"Shooting fish in a barrel is an idiom, describing an effortless or simple action, with guaranteed success."

In other words, like doing posts denouncing Republican leadership on a 90% liberal website. At least I'm ridiculing things that have a lot of supporters here.
As a P.S. to your further discussion in Comments with Ben Sen -- I actually majored in film, and could also tell you why some of these movies (and even more so, many others that people often say they hate or find worthless) are "important" in some way to understanding film, but I think that's meaningless in discussions of personal taste. We enjoy what we enjoy, and there's no point in trying to convince someone otherwise!
Nelle: I thought of including "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari" but 90% of the people wouldn't be familiar with it. Just because I understand its importance in German Expressionism doesn't mean I ever want to sit through it again unless I'm in a classroom.