A couple of weeks ago, I posted about a dozen movies that I wanted to see again and considered underappreciated. Here’s the antithesis: a dozen movies with critical raves, Academy Awards or box-office cash up the wazoo, yet I would rather shoot my eye out with a Red Ryder BB gun than have to sit through any one of them again.
(Turn it off! Turn it off!)
Battleship Potemkin: The cineaste inside me says, “Sergei Eisenstein’s silent classic is one of the most influential films of all-time, establishing the power of montage.” The moviegoer inside me says, “The plot is so one-dimensional and simple-minded that I feel like I’m watching the birth of Fox News.” Fox News says, “The Odessa Steps sequence represents the Obama socialist agenda (the Cossacks) pushing working Americans (the baby carriage) into an imminent massacre.”
Blade Runner: Wait, this is supposed to be L.A, right? So why is it always raining or snowing and since when do they have an insane amount of pedestrians? This is science fiction all right! And why are visions of the future always so bleak - forbidding architecture (dark, oppressive), everyone living in tall buildings? Doesn’t anyone live in a McMansion? And if the replicants are so dangerous, why do the police assemble only one (count ‘em, one) agent to hunt them down? And why am I writing everything in the form of a question?
The Blair Witch Project: Seriously, was anybody scared by this laughable piece of crap? If you knew the gimmick going into the theater, how could you swallow a second of it? Just shows that you can sell anything with a clever p.r. campaign. (Personal note: one of the stars of the sequel, Erica Leerhsen, grew up across the street from my parents. Of course, that was well after I moved out.)
Borat: Shortly after this movie came out, I penned a long screed about why I laughed when Sacha Baron Cohen, as Ali G, made political blowhards uncomfortable, but why I didn't laugh when he did it to ordinary citizens. One example: the dinner party scene where he hands the hostess a Ziploc full of his feces (oh, that’s hilarious), tells another woman she’s not attractive (I woulda slugged him) and then brings in the black hooker in hot pants as his date. Of course, that was supposed to make this dignified white Southern group look racist, but I bet an African-American family would have had the same reaction to the trashy guest. I also noted how, whenever Borat came upon a politically acceptable group, like the feminists, his own ignorance became the butt of the joke, but when it was anyone else, their “bigotry” was the point. (Salon posted a detailed article about the manipulations.)
Gone With the Wind: “Lawdy, dem slaves sho’ was happy with dey white massas!” A Southern white belle – and not even a nice one - who owns slaves is the heroine of a book and movie 70 years after the end of Civil War? She’ll never go hungry again? Frankly, I don’t give a damn!
Kiss Me Deadly: A cult classic that, when I finally saw it, seemed laughably overwrought – a noir movie that ends with a nuclear explosion! But boy, Cloris Leachman was hot when she was young!
Moulin Rouge: After 15 minutes of this digital migraine headache, I was screaming, “Turn it off! I’ve seen better film on teeth!”
Out of Africa / The English Patient: Should have been rated “X” – no one will be admitted without an extra X chromosome.
Philadelphia: Yeah, yeah, first major Hollywood film about gays, Hanks is great, yada yada. But I was thoroughly annoyed by the way Hanks’ family pampered him during his final days. At a time when many gay men dying of AIDS were shunned by their families, it seemed to be avoiding a harsh truth. More annoying: After Hollywood liberal Mary Steenburgen, as a corporate lawyer, grills Hanks’ character about his sexual behavior, she mutters to the camera, “I hate this case!” so we stupid viewers will be reminded that she’s just reading scripted dialogue and she’s not really a homophobe. Thanks, Mary, I almost forgot for a minute that you were an actress.
Star Wars: Saw this movie three times – on its initial release, on VHS and during its late 1990s re-release, and fell asleep every time. I need a story at least as complex as Dr. Seuss to hold my attention. Yeah, I know, whenever I say I hate Star Wars, everyone looks at me like I’ve got one eye in the middle of my forehead.
There Will Be Blood!: I’m saying something very profound about capitalism! Can’t you tell by the strong, masculine images? Pay attention, or I’ll drink your milkshake! Jeez, you can have my milkshake, I wanted a beer anyway. Plus why was the climactic scene held in a bowling alley? Did the producers run out of money and that was the only location they could afford?
Waiting for Guffman: Everybody keeps telling me how funny Christopher Guest’s improvised movies are, but except for Fred Willard in Best of Show, nothing has triggered more than a titter or a tee-hee from me. You know, Chris, just because you’ve assembled a talented bunch of performers, there’s nothing disreputable about the occasional scripted punch line. (And maybe the next time you play a character, you could make him a little less mincing.) This movie especially irks me because I have a spouse who participates in community theater and none of them resemble any of these characters. But I guess it’s OK for a Hollywood success to mock we poor souls with lesser talents.


Salon.com
Comments
How they got made I will ever know.
I agree with you about Guffman but GWTW??
bit your tongue man hahaha
rated with hugs
But I must vehemently denounce your non-appreciation of Blade Runner.
And I would defend Star Wars, but the prequels have hurt my case.
On the other hand, "Gone With the Wind" is absolutely not cool in terms of its portrayal of slaves for the most part, but the fact that Scarlett is such a bitch, is exactly the appeal! You love to hate her, and you want her to win even as you see she deserves a strong comeuppance.
Also, "Moulin Rouge!" is for me a perfect movie to show people why the Belle Epoque was cool. As a huge fan of this time period, I feel like the movie really captures the mood of that era - not the actual historical look of it, necessarily, but the spirit. But I could see it being hard on the eyes.
Lastly, I was hoping to see "It's a Wonderful Life" somewhere on your list - I HATE that movie; people for some reason find it inspiring and for me it's just really depressing, no matter how gorgeous James Stewart was.
Okay, whew, I'm done. Great post, great idea, and some great picks!
With films like Potemkin or Birth of a Nation, etc., I watch them not for enjoyment necessarily, but for seeing something done for the first time, something that influenced everything that came after. As Roger Ebert said, watching sometimes involves "an act of cooperation with the film - even active sympathy."
I don't have enough useless enterprises going on. Sheesh:)
and will add that anything with Tom Hanks makes my skin crawl--
he is the smarmiest of smarmies
I semi loathed his newer fashion movie, whose name is escaping me, becuase of the reasons you mentioned. He makes it an indictment against republican types or hicks when humor should, you'd think, indict all political parties and types,
Great post and though I can't say I found the same faults in these films I can't say I don't get where you are coming from, as a whole.
Best Wishes,
Blittie
Loved There Will Be Blood, though the ending degenerated some. I also enjoyed The English Patient though I'd never sit through it a second time.
Couldn't agree more on Borat. It's right up there with the Jackass movies as a sign of the pending apocalypse.
When I was 16 I took my girlfriend to Gone With the Wind and we made out in the balcony all through it. (Remember balconies?) I experience my first cast of blue balls. Had to get up and walk around the lobby for 15 minutes in the middle of it.
Fun post.
Best Wishes,
Blittie
And you may recall - it wasn't just some of the family members who were rejecting of some of the AIDS patients - it was very much a cultural thing for a time. I remember I used to share an office on alternate weeks with another therapist. I went in the office one afternoon to get some papers and the room reeked of Lysol. My office mate explained he had had "an AIDS infected client" and needed to fumigate. I can assure you, I was much more offended by his remark than his client!
Incidentally, many other groups with AIDS were also stigmatized - I facilitated a group of AIDS survivors in the early 90's - we had not a single gay man in the group).
I thought she was HOT in Last Picture Show, too, but then ,I was 16.
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong
oy!
It remains the greatest film ever!
And the preface to "Blade Runner" specified that the environment was in chaotic disarray.
You nailed the rest of the pack though.
The whole concept of the Battleship Mutiny, in many ways, is a metaphor for a revolution in a country itself and how this concept can spread to others. Contagion, if you will.
I was very moved by it.
Hopefully, I can redeem myself by absolutely adoring "Apocalypse Now" since I'm a chick and not supposed to. But "Waiting for Guffman?" My boyfriend didn't like that film either and I almost broke up with him.
Potemkin is influential, because it invented so many techniques which we take for granted today. If's not made for contemporary audiences, and you are likely to only enjoy it as a learning experience of where modern film came from and how it developed.
Gone With The Wind has often been described as being set in the civil war, but allegory for and really more ABOUT the Great Depression. It could hardly have been more relevant in 1939. Or today. Look past the costumes at the struggles of the characters.
rated with love
I, too, have failed on several attempts to get through a complete viewing of Star Wars, but my classmate Harrison was in it, so: Loved it!
There wasn't enough Dramamine in my purse for me to get through The Blair Witch Project!
Didn't see a couple of them; loved Philadelpia and There Will Be Blood.
So, Cranky, please never invite me to go to a movie with you...K?
respectfully,
richard (your friend in ossining)
(you never recognize my e-mail)
borat is funny as hell
(bruno... not so much)
scarlett was a skank.
moulin rouge had no spark.
period.
r
Anyone who imagines that horrid 'The English Patient' was a modern 'Casablanca', or anything remotely close to it, should be locked away for his/her own good.
I guess I just instinctively had the same feeling about most of them as you. Of course I could never have written such a hilarious review. Your post was much funnier than any movie I've seen recently.
I did think Blade Runner was interesting, but should have been much better, and yes, I love Star Wars.
kurt -r-
Star Wars' dialog makes me want to rip my ears off.
It also advocates Revolution and Rebellion in ways all children can understand. In this sense, it is good. Those in power are not good and those fighting power are not bad.
And the powerless folks in the Rebellion actually win! HOORAY!
I don't really agree with a couple of them - for all that its dystopia has been copied, Bladerunner still has a unique signature that noone has ever been able to "replicate", including Ridley Scott. And the only thing dated about that is how young the actors in it are. But i know plenty of people that are "Bah!" about it.
And Star Wars? I am making rude gestures right now. Ok, done.
And the other ones I might disagree on - well i take that back not really disagree - are mainly because they were considered particularly important and signficant at the time they were made, such as Potemkin and Gone With the Wind. I don't care for the movies either as far as enjoyment as well, but I think they were important at their times. They have use when you look at them as far as techniques and composition. You could add something like Citizen Kane to that... which is impressive when you consider that the techniques and styles behind it were revolutionary. But the movie is turgid and boring as shit.
There was a brief character on a recent episode of "The Office" a teen kid who was working as an intern for the office, an aspiring film maker. Asked his favorite movies, he said "Citizen Kane and Boondock Saints." HA, whatadouche.
Right on about the Chris Guest movies. I've never gotten their appeal either, aside from Fred Willard, who is just funny. And since those movies are mostly improvised, he gets to be himself.
You want some more movies I would include in that list for me?
Schindler's List
Blue Velvet
All Woody Allen movies aside from Annie Hall (which is great)
Every Stanley Kubrick movie aside from Clockwork Orange (which is mostly good)
Nearly all Marlon Brando (including his younger days) or James Dean movies.
Nick: If I didn’t make it clear, sci-fi is not my thing.
LuminousMuse: That was the word I’ve been looking for about Borat: mean-spirited.
Duane, Ann: I may be in the minority about Guest. Having spent a lot time with local theater folk, I took Guffman personally, as if he was saying, “Look at these silly heartlanders who think they can act and put on a show.”
Blu: I like Chaplin and Bunel! As for the rest, feh.
Everyone defending Potemkin: I know. I’ve seen it more than once, and I can appreciate the art and the significance. But “agitptop” is one of my least favorite words in the world. Give me something as complex as “Battle of Algiers.” (BTW, you know the Odessa Steps sequence never really happened, right?)
Kit: Your point is well-taken. I’m sure the creators discussed long and hard about that. They made the creative decision to emphasize that many gays are loved by their families. I can understand and appreciate that. Since it was the first Hollywood film to deal with the subject, though, I was hoping it would be a little more hard-hitting.
Sheepie: Cloris Leachman is still kinda hot.
D Art: Twelve wrongs don’t make a right!
BOKO: Chase was the only thing in Caddyshack that annoyed me.
Sarah C: Sorry, I love Raging Bull.
Slaphappy: Was that a direct quote from Ridley Scott?
Star Wars I enjoyed the three released in the 70's and 80's, but somehow, Lucas failed to make a fan of me. Didn't even bother to see episodes 1, 2 and 3 since the reviews were so lukewarm.
rated
You've got one eye in the middle of your forehead. But I liked your post anyway. ; D
Cheers,
Funny post.
Rated "r" for reely good.
As a African American, I have serious problems with Gone With the Wind. That film perpetuated the heinous myths that black folks were childlike simpletons (Prissy: "I don't know nuttin bout birthin' babies! -- Cue: Scarlett's Pimp Slap!!), that African Americans were happy to live on the plantation, and that blacks elected during the Reconstruction period were corrupt and lazy.
And don't get me started about their depiction of the Klan. They were domestic terrorists, plain and simple, and I have family stories about life in the Old South to prove it.
The only redeeming factor was Hattie McDaniels, who was a match for that spoiled brat bitch Scarlett. Their scenes are about the only thing I like about that movie. And McDaniels deserved her Oscar for transcending the usual maid role most black women played during that period.
Still GWTW, like "Birth of a Nation" a few decades before it, helped perpetuate racism and distorted history about the Old South. The South was not a paradise. An elite class of slaveholders ruled the roost while a much larger number of poor whites and blacks were at the bottom. Heck, they didn't even have many public schools in the South until after the Civil War!
But Cranky I have to disagree with you on "Blade Runner." That is a very deep film which only grows more relevant over time.
Our scientific knowledge of cloning and DNA have jumped leaps and bounds since that movie came out in 1982. We are already engineering new lifeforms -- bioengineered corn and livestock to name a few.
What if we created synthetic humans, as the movie conjectures? Would they have a soul? Would they have a right to live as they chose? Would we envy the fact they were more beautiful and stronger than we are and hunt them down? At the end of "Blade Runner" you are left wondering who was more human, the Replicants or the humans who created them.
Thanks for the great article. Keep writing you Cranky Cuss!
There's something I like about Blade Runner - enuf to allow me to stay awake thru it the two times I've seen it. Not sure what it is, because I agree with your quibbles. Just that there is something. Ambience, maybe? I do rather like Harrison Ford in most of the things he's done.
I sorta liked The English Patient, especially in retrospect after reading the first several pages of the book, which nauseated me.
Liked the first Star Wars. Ford again? Mebbe. The galactic bar scene is priceless. That's about all I remember of the entire movie.
Philadelphia? Seems a tad self-conscious, altho Hanks and Washington did pretty well.
Don't remember if I saw There Will Be Blood or not. Probly not or I might have remembered something from it. The only bowling alley scene I remember in a movie is in Kingpins, and I still burst into uncontrollable snorts when I recall Bill Murray's comb-over.
Other than these minor exceptions, I believe we our friendship remains in good health.
As for Star Wars, I put off watching it until two years ago. I expected to hate it like yourself, but I found it surprisingly engaging.
As for your list, like most folks, I agree wholeheartedly with you on some and disagree just as strongly with you on others. No surprise.
What always gets me in these types of discussions is the underlying assumption that somehow we are actually supposed to agree on these matters, rather than embracing the basic human truth that we are all distinct individuals with our varying likes and dislikes.
It's fascinating to me that people get so offended when you don't share their taste or interests. They seem to take it as some sort of personal insult. Why? I have no idea. But I find it one of the most fascinating human behaviors.
Now don't you dare tell me that you don't find it fascinating, too!
Ditto Star Wars.
Ditto Star Wars
I agree with most of the others as well.
Agreed: Blade Runner, Borat, Moulin Rouge, Out of Africa, The English Patient and Philadelphia. What wrecked the latter for me was the courtroom scene. These by their nature ought to be the high point of any drama. In Philadelphia, the main premise of the movie is that all lawyers are terrified of going up against this powerhouse. But Jason Robards’ somnolent defense made the public defender in My Cousin Vinnie look imposing by comparison. Plus what you said.
No decisions: haven’t seen Potemkin or There Will be Blood. The preview of the latter was enough.
Disagree: Blair Witch Project, Kiss Me Deadly, and Waiting For Guffman. They all had their moments. And you’re too hard on Star Wars. It’s an entertaining, adventure romp. But then, I like Errol Flynn movies too.
Strongly Disagree: Gone With the Wind is a fabulous classic! Great, enveloping, sweeping story, great minor characters, a Pride Goes Before the Fall storyline, gem after gem of scenes and vignettes and in Vivien Leigh, one of the great acting performances in the history of film. OK, a few false moments with Butterfly McQueen, though she wasn’t to blame.
Can I nominate The Lord of the Rings trilogy for this list? This orcs are frightening looking but in vast numbers it's as tough as taking on a bunch of mosquitos. It helps if you're a fan aof extended CGI battle scenes.
No, it's that without him to marry her, Donna Reed 1.) wears glasses, 2.) works at the library, and 3.) ends up an old maid!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!
Rated.
Again, well-made, but, for its political blindness and adulation of evil, despicable.
The rest I either liked or haven't seen.
The rest, not so much.
I nominate Pulp Fiction. I am all alone here, I know, but I thought it was appalling. Simply appalling, the attention that has been paid to this atrocity. I don't get it. I hate hate hate everything about Pulp Fiction. Just loathesome.
Also, I did find fault with the screenplay to "Philadelphia," but I wish people would believe there were supportive families in 1993 and I also wish it wasn't labeled "a gay film." I actually don't care for labels of any kind. It's a film about a deadly epidemic and the way society treated its victims. Yes, it's true the main characters are gay, but it's more to do with compassion and fear than "a gay film." Also, I knew many women like Joanne Woodward's character who played Hanks' mother. Not everyone was narrow-minded in 1993.
Last but not least. I must take exception with "Out Of Africa." ANYTHING Meryl Streep does is worth the price of admission. She can bring the quality of any project to a whole new level.
As for the other films, I most definitely agree with you. "The English Patient" was so overwrought and "Star Wars" so over-hyped, and the rest, eh. Although "Moulin Rouge" is the film I really liked Nicole Kidman in. Especially right after her then husband (Tom Cruise) dumped her because she couldn't and wouldn't go the route of Scientology. He's still in the closet..isn't he? Ugh.
I understand how Star Wars changed movie special effects. However, special effects bore me. In fact, science fiction as a genre bores me. My interest is in stories with compelling characters. I can respect the creative sets and cinematography of Blade Runner, the ensemble work in Guffman, even Sacha Baron Cohen's daring in Borat, but that doesn't change the fact that they didn't provide a compelling experience for me. I have much better things to do with my time than watch a film that's going to bore me.
What bothers me most about your comment is the arrogance underneath it that thinks that anyone who doesn't share your taste is somehow inferior.
Hugs, and congratulations on such a successful post. rated and commented upon thrice!
I noted Battleship Potemkin's influence on storytelling and the art of montage; I merely added that it was a bore to sit through (and I've sat through it at least twice, as well as two others of Eisenstein's films). I would not have been shy about adding Citizen Kane, except that I actually enjoy it.
I understand the significance of Star Wars also. That's why I attempted to watch it on three separate occasions. The story failed to engage my attention each time. (Though I enjoy Lucas' "American Graffiti.")
I'm looking at the power of the media to influence the "unsuspecting." Indeed, is there not a "dark side?" Is there not "evil" in a sense that the universe itself is subject to "morality" no matter what the scale of events? It is no accident the genre has been among the most active and creative in the years since, not limited to "special effects," but in many instances replacing other genre (particularly the Western) in their role as arbiters of the values that make us "human"? It laid the groundwork for the Tolkein movies, which even further show the role of myth to the masses in inventing human consciousness. Indeed, you may not be entertained by them and that is totally your perogative, so don't get me wrong, but I suggest in the larger analysis in this age of either dissolution or rigidity they constitute a middle-ground where even the ignorant and uneducated may be versed in something more than violence, gore, and competition.
You see now why I am so unpopular? My personal sensibility is to think they are gross and simplistic. I think I have two reviews on my blog, mostly read by no one. I used to do it for a living, now I could give a shit. Cranky indeed. Keep given 'em what they want and they will love you for it. Challenge the consensus and they think you the fool.
I used to hate the reviewers like John Simon who think as I now do, so be careful who you hate--they are the "dark side," we are in danger of becoming. If you have only ever been a writer, which is all I have ever been, I think you understand me at this point. I wish no confrontation, but I have my truth to tell too.
Blessings for a New Year, I am BS, the maddest of them all,
I like when people take a contrary stance and defend it vigorously, even when I disagree.
Blessings for the New Year to you too.
In other words, like doing posts denouncing Republican leadership on a 90% liberal website. At least I'm ridiculing things that have a lot of supporters here.