Curtis Neeley Jr MFA

Curtis Neeley Jr MFA
Location
Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA
Birthday
September 25
Title
5:12-cv-05074
Company
Neeley Publications
Bio
Trying to be a photo artist and require nudity to be banned online by the FCC. Hoping to force the United States to recognize authors' personal human rights to control creation.

Curtis Neeley Jr MFA's Links

My links
NOVEMBER 30, 2011 11:03PM

CENSOR the INTERNET please...

Rate: 0 Flag

CENSOR the INTERNET  or else I will continue to sue google Inc and Microsoft Corporation and the Federal Communications Commission for republishing or allowing republishing of my nude art out-of-context to minors by wire.  This republishing by wire  is AGAINST THE LAWS and public policy of the United States. 47 USC § 230 & numerous portions of 47 USC.

Neeley v NameMedia Inc, et al, (5:09-cv-05151)(11-2558) 8th Cir

 Moral copy+rights ruled NOT to apply to the Internet.

(5:09-cv-05151) Dkt 267 On the bottom of page two it reads as follows.

  • "The Court's interpretation of this rather convoluted rovision is that  106A(2) would not apply to copies of Neeley's hotographs on the internet. "

This absurd ruling is now fully briefed on appeal to the Eighth Circuit.  It is the first ruling involving photographic visual art since the law was passed in 1990 so supreme Court certiorari is likely when the ruling is finally made and has been considered since around 9-19-2011.

PDF APPELLANT BRIEF (56 pages)

PDF  APPELLEE BRIEF of NameMedia Inc (19 pages)

PDF  APPELLEE BRIEF of Google Inc (14 pages)

PDF APPELLANT REPLY BRIEF (16 pages)

The results should be obvious to the common citizen.  The UnReguLated Internet has been illegal all along and the FCC will be ordered to begin regulating Internet wire communications as now required by law.

-------------------------------------------------------------
MEANWHILE at GOOG
-------------------------------------------------------------

  1. curtis neeley site:redbubble.com (Google image search now child safe!)
  2. curtis neeley site:deviantart.com (Google image search NOT child safe!)
  3. curtis neeley site:artring.net  (Google image search NOT child safe!)
    -------------------------------------------
  1. redbubble.com/curtisneeley/portfolio (child safe unless filtration is bypassed like Google Inc did for years.)
  2. curtisneeley.deviantart.com  (child safe unless filtration is bypassed like Google Inc STILL DOES! Dammit!)
  3.  curtisneeley.artring.net   (child safe!)

 

FCC - PLEASE  CENSOR the INTERNET so I can exclusively control how my original figurenude art is presented and so that it is not shown to children, Muslims, or atheists.

This will make the Internet safer for visual artists who reject GOOG control of the Internet WIRE COMMUNICATIONS as defined in 47 USC §153 ¶(52) as is linked and follows for your commissioners who have apparentlyavoided reading 47 USC §§ 151, 152  specifically as follows "... interstate and foreign communication by wire or radio..."

 FCC - IS THIS NOT OBVIOUSLY THE INTERNET? \ /  \ /  \/

(52) Wire communication

The term “wire communication” or “communication by wire” means the transmission of writing, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds of all kinds by aid of wire, cable, or other like connection between the points of origin and reception of such transmission, including all instrumentalities, facilities, apparatus, and services (among other things, the receipt, forwarding, and delivery of communications) incidental to such transmission.

FCC - IS THIS NOT OBVIOUSLY THE INTERNET? / \ / \ / \

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
File a DMCA and shut up.
I filed numerous DMCA notices to Hannah Thiem and after the second monitored DMCA notice, to Robb Rossell of NameMedia Inc. I was accused of violating privacy and the nudes were finally deleted by photo.net. I am not going to "shut-up" until internet wire communications called "the Internet" for disguise or cable television are regulated by the FCC like the Communications Act requires already.
Being someone who has successfully filed a DMCA to have things taken off the net that belong to me, I know perfectly well that they are not a HOAX as you falsely claim. There are channels to have the unauthorized use of your intellectual property online handled, and none of them require the censoring of the free and open internet.

You, sir, are an idiot and a danger to your own freedoms.