Editor’s Pick
JANUARY 14, 2009 2:17PM

The Pop Icons of the Bush II Era

Rate: 3 Flag
Dixie Chick Targets
 

As George W. Bush leaves office, it is fitting that the mood of the country has softened toward him, at least in some quarters. After all, it is customary to treat outgoing presidents as if they are the guest of honor at a wake. In such circumstances, it is rude to point out how the deceased had squandered his or her life, or made life miserable for others.

Not that this is universal, of course. Some people are openly throwing shoes at him. World leaders actively snub his handshake. He's been beaten up so thoroughly over the last few years that it now seems incredible anyone could have gotten into trouble for publicly calling the man an embarrassment.

And yet, from the safe distance of a discredited war and a now bankrupt economic policy, I think back to Natalie Maines of the Dixie Chicks, who, just 10 days before the invasion of Iraq, got into major trouble for doing just that.

"Just so you know, we're on the good side with y'all. We do not want this war, this violence, and we're ashamed that the President of the United States is from Texas."

This spontaneous, off-hand remark during a concert in London set off a firestorm of vitriol toward the Dixie Chicks. Judging by the reaction to the remarks, one would have thought that she had called for the assassination of George W. Bush, as well as the abolition of apple pie and the immediate internment of all mothers. Children wept, women stamped their feet and men grabbed their guns in their rush out the door to restore the country's honor.

Later, Maines clarified, by saying:

 "I feel the president is ignoring the opinions of many in the U.S. and alienating the rest of the world. ... My comments were made in frustration, and one of the privileges of being an American is you are free to voice your own point of view. ... While we support our troops, there is nothing more frightening than the notion of going to war with Iraq and the prospect of all the innocent lives that will be lost."

This was, predictably, met with more howling and rage. Songs were banned from the radio. CDs were collected and burned. Death threats were issued. Dogs bit children. Jesus wept.

Maines' naiveté led her to a classic mistake. She assumed that because Americans like to brag about their freedom, and invade other countries to bring about such freedom, that this translates into some kind of actual support for freedom. As one protestor said in the 2006 Dixie Chicks documentary Shut Up and Sing: "Free speech is fine as long as it isn't public." Unasked for, the Dixie Chicks suddenly became the public face of the anti-war movement.

At the time, there were plenty of others with their hair on fire, running around saying the war was immoral and that this was going to be a disaster. There were peace marches around the globe with tens of millions of people trying to get the attention of someone — anyone — who would listen. There were scores of public watchdogs (dismissed as unserious) begging the media to wake up and do its job of questioning the official line.

But something about the Dixie Chicks entry into the fray seemed to finally get people's blood up. Maybe it was because they are a country group, and their fan base is so naturally conservative. Maybe it was because they are women and therefore deemed easier targets. Maybe it was because they didn't back down or make nice.

While other pop artists cowered behind their PR managers, hoping they wouldn't have to take a stand, or worse, sang enthusiastically ugly songs about putting our boots up foreigner's asses, the Dixie Chicks bravely shouted: THIS IS WRONG.

On principle, I immediately went out and bought one of their CDs. And I was pleasantly surprised when I found myself enjoying their music. Not a fan of modern country, my only prior exposure to them was once catching their video about some guy named Earl at a BBQ place. I remember being impressed that they could make the murder of a wife-abusing husband so funny and cheerful. There was something to these chicks.

The new album had "Travelin' Soldier" on it, a song about a soldier who headed off to Vietnam and did not make it back. I remember thinking at the time that it was a nice little nostalgic song, and how insulated this generation has been from that kind of thing. And yet, it became a prophetic piece, as this generation has since gotten to experience all that and more, thanks in large part to all the people screaming themselves purple for the Dixie Chicks to just shut up.

One thing that I did not fully appreciate before Iraq War II was the extent to which war makes people scary. It is at least understandable for soldiers, who are put in positions of immediate and deathly danger, and are also heavily armed. But what I had not encountered before then was how insane an entire population can become once a war has started.

Free speech becomes treason. Principled pacifism becomes cowardice. Patriotism is twisted around, sometimes determined by one's willingness to ignore or subvert the very principles we claim we are fighting for. I remember how scary and depressing it was to see people I had admired succumb to mob fever in the run up to the war, throwing reason and decency out the window and blindly following our president into the abyss.

But the Dixie Chicks stood up when others sat down. They didn't slink away from their duty, like Colin Powell did at the time. They did what was right when it cost them the most.

So, as W exits office and leaves behind him a wake of Biblically-sized problems, let us appreciate the Dixie Chicks as the icons of the age. They remained faithful to their country and reminded us that love of country demands that we uphold our own values, even while other people are yelling at us for it. They paid a price for keeping the faith, having faced death threats and continued bile, along with losing huge chunks of their fan base.

They've been out of the spotlight for a few years now, but I hope they find their musical voice again. It would be a shame for them to be yet another casualty of the Bush II Era.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I, too, went out and bought the Chicks album right after all the brouhaha started, although as a fan I would have gotten it anyway. I like your last paragraph, although I think it isn't so much that they have lost their voice as the fact that they lost their audience. Maybe, just maybe, that audience will be receptive once again now that most would acknowledge they were right, or at least within their rights.
Thanks Procopius,

I wonder whether those who fervently supported this war will ever be able to admit they were wrong. It's hard to admit one supported so much death and mayhem -- much easier to justify it or not want to be reminded of it. Perhaps listening to the Dixie Chicks reminds them.

Nonetheless, I hope the Chicks release another album at some point that isn't about the war, and maybe everyone can move beyond it at that point.
I liked what they had to say but I don't like what they have to sing so-to-speak, so I never bought the record. Though I did buy many other records of other bands that spoke out. The Chicks got the national stage, but there have been hundreds of others that did the same thing on a smaller level. Hopefully, the Chicks along with those other musicians and artists will become something more than a mere footnote in history.
Schreiber's best insight is here:

"Maines' naiveté led her to a classic mistake. She assumed that because Americans like to brag about their freedom, and invade other countries to bring about such freedom, that this translates into some kind of actual support for freedom."

We need to come to grips with the fact that Americans, in general--despite all the patriotic bullshit to the contrary--loathe freedom. We despise it. We fear it. It's public enemy number one where happiness and security are concerned. We need to address this contradiction in our collective psyches before we can even begin to imagine ourselves (again) as a nation of authentic moral guides. We are deluded beyond belief, and our collective delusion is part and parcel of the fact that America is a nation that over-reacts first, thinks rationally later. We shriek, we run around like beheaded chickens, then--after much time and expense, both in lives and treasure--we sigh deeply, and assess our rashness. We are pathetic. Were a real threat arise--something on the scale of Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union pushing tanks into West Berlin--we would collapse in hysterics like an upscale bridezilla dealing with fallback mostaccioli. "Greatest generation," indeed.
I believe that the Dixie Chicks were singled out in large part because they were country artists and had to answer to the adherences of a largely conservative, flag waving audience. But there was an additional element to the vitriol they galvanized. Natalie Maines did not just express anger at or opposition to the war. She professed shame. She did not distance herself as an American from the actions of her government, she offered a negative form of identification with them. She suggested that we should all feel bad for what our president had made us complicit in. This strikes me as an especially courageous sentiment to utter. In expressing shame, she took responsibility, as a citizen, for the very policies she so violently deplored. But it was for that reason all that much more controversial, for it implicated her audience, her American audience, as well. I can say I oppose something without making any moral claim that you oppose it too. But if I say I am ashamed of what amounts to a collective or national course of action, I cannot but imply that you too, as a member of the collective or nation, are likewise morally compromised. When I say, as I do, that I disagree with No Child Left Behind, I make allowance for another side to the issue, even if I don't quite see it. When I say, as I do, that I am ashamed of the Bush torture regime, I am specifically denying that a rational, morally sound person could support torture. When Natalie Maines pronounced herself ashamed, she was not saying the war was an error, but an outrage. And even now, I'm not sure that most people in the country would go that far, though I certainly applaud her for it.
I and the Dixie Chicks will only feel good about the damage the Bush administration has done to our Country financial and morally when the War Crimes hearing begin and charges are brought against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, Addington, Feith, Wolfitz, Rice, Tenent and finally charges of Treason to Karl Rove for his part in the outing of Valerie Plame. Americans want to see justice done and not let this gang get away thinking their final attempt to make them sound like all they did was for our good, They LIED!