
The Lieberman senate health care bill is not reform. It does not provide competition to profit-driven insurance companies. And the American people lose. So progressives and liberals should put this dog down, and now.
Sure, it prohibits exclusion for pre-existing conditions and keeps insurers from dropping people when they get sick. But frankly, that's not reform. It is what should have been the case all along. And, in fact, Congress has already addressed this issue with regard to group plans (e.g., plans that your employer buys to cover all employees), but failed to completely solve the problem.
In 1996, Congress passed a law known as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act or HIPAA (also known as the Kassebaum-Kennedy Act), which went into effect on July 1, 1997. HIPAA was designed to allow employees to move freely from one job to another without the risk of becoming uninsured for their most serious health problems. HIPAA also has protections for individuals who move from group plans to an individual health plan.
Under HIPPA, when you are otherwise eligible for health care services under an employee benefit plan, you cannot be completely excluded from the plan (except in the case you enrolled after the enrollment deadline) on the basis of any of the following:
If you are under a federally-regulated health plan, twelve months is the longest period of time that your plan can exclude coverage for your preexisting condition. Some states -- such as California -- have even stricter limits.
So the Lieberman senate bill merely extends what has already been implemented. It does not do anything truly new, except for one thing:
PEOPLE WILL BE MANDATED TO BUY INSURANCE PRODUCTS OR FACE A DAUNTING FINE.
There is no competition for the profit-driven health insurance corporations.
There is no limit on the ability to deny coverage for "organizational purposes." An example of that is defining a particular type of policy into which a company funnels certain groups of applicants. Even though coverage will supposedly be mandated, the company will not be prohibited from simply deciding that it will limit coverage in certain poliy lines, or even cancel those lines, completely!
And that's just the beginning of the shennanigans that will go on under the Lieberman bill that mandates we all pay insurance companies and provides no caps on premiums, no competition for the profit corporations, no mandated coverage, and no enforcement mechanism to ensure that sick people are actually treated fairly and equally.
The Lieberman bill has a pernicious and invasive cancer. And so, since the Senate seems unable to cure the sickness, it is time for liberals and progressives to do the humane thing and euthanize this bill. Kill it, for all our sakes. Better no bill than a bill mandating purchase of insurance with no true reforms in place.
Congress can mandate coverage for pre-existing conditions and can keep insurers from dropping sick people by amending HIPPA. We don't need a phony "reform" bill that makes only insurance companies healthy.


Salon.com
Comments
Earlier today on a news channel they reported about Obama meeting with Congressional Dems, the goal of which meeting was just to agree on SOMETHING, ANYTHING. But if it passes now in this perverted and bastardized form there very well could be riots in the streets; a class war with blood and violence. I for one will be amongst the rioters since I will refuse to pay a for profit legal organized crime syndicate i.e. Aetna, Blue Cross, etc...
This post has been rated.
Thanks for explaining this in a manner I can understand.
BTW-where have you been?
dolores: you hit it on the head. Salon has a great piece today cast as a letter from a congresscritter to constituents, which brings home the fact that the public is not the real constituency of politicians, the moneyed interests are. So they never care about us.
Jeanette: Thanks! And good to be back...sorta. I mean, sorta back. We'll see how it goes. :-)
Ladyfarmerjed: What do you mean where have I been? I've been right here! ;-) Actually, I left here because I had a bit of a stalker problem. It seems to be gone. I'm hoping it stays that way.
BehindBlueEyes: I do not think jail time will make it into law, although the insurance industry would LOVE that. So, maybe it will, after all. After all, the insurance chiefs are creaming their skid-marked tighty-whities right about now.
Nikki Stern: You're probably right. And what we'll be left with is basically an amendment to HIPPA, touted as breakthrough health care reform. Obama is starting to look very Jimmy Carterish to me.
What I meant was, "The fact is, unlike most voters on Open Salon..."
I can be such a ditz...
This is to call attention to the situation that the slimy Liebermans are putting us all in. Once they dump her, we can go back to supporting them.
I did more thinking about the bill and there's this with some interesting numbers,
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/12/why-progressives-are-batshit-crazy-to.html
the thing some progressives aren't talking about is that the current senate bill WOULD provide some cost subsidies from the government for poor people who need health care. This is seriously worth considering before liberals go all-out on "kill the bill."
On the other hand, I personally still feel highly uncomfortable with "mandating" what the health insurance industry is still calling a "product." If health care is a "product," we shouldn't mandate that people buy it. This is a matter of consumer's rights. However, if health care is instead a "right:....ahhhhhhh....I want the discussions in washington to go there. THAT would be progress.
ug.
A while back, I posted a series on healthcare reform, outlining current problems, obstacles, a plan for single-payer universal reform that covers every American, and how to fully fund it without increasing taxes or the cost to American citizens. PLease feel free to read and comment. You never know; maybe if average citizens band together and garner enough support for such a proposal, the politicians will have no choice but to adopt it, or something similar.
I wrote to New York Senator Chuck Schumer about this topic. I was amazed that he took the time to write back, and was surprised at his answer. The Senator believes that single-payer universal healthcare IS the answer to our healthcare woes, but does not believe that there is anywhere near enough support for it to pass at this time in Congress.
So, it is left to us to advise our elected officials of our discontent, to educate ourselves on the topic and on the proposals being offered, to formulate a solution that WILL help us, and garner support, and send it to Congress. It's been done with other bills, other topics; why not this one?