Dana Dangerous

Dana Dangerous
Location
California, USA
Birthday
April 04
Bio
Dana is a six-foot, blonde, busty, liberal, lesbian lawyer, just like everyone else in L.A. *** One morning in 1973, she awoke on a park bench in a strange city, with no shoes. Finding herself in Southern California, she wandered the beaches of Santa Monica surviving on fish entrails and eeking out a meager living selling caricatures of Republican political figures, which she carved from tar balls that washed ashore from the many nearby offshore oil rigs. *** Ms. Dana got her start in politics when she landed a job as personal dominatrix to G. Gordon Liddy. That served as a springboard to her career in show business, and for the following six years, Ms. Dana could be seen performing eight shows a week in the back room of the Hwy 69 Truck Stop in Petaluma, California. It was there, during one of her midnight binge-and-purge sessions, that she developed her famous theories in socio-political philosophy. *** Currently, Ms. Dana spends her days jetting around the globe in wild shopping sprees and trying to avoid the many paparazzi who constantly pursue her. A major motion picture about her life is currently in production and scheduled for a Christmas release, starring Angelina Jolie as Dana and Danny DeVito as her longtime illicit lover, Squeaky. *** Commanding annual blog earnings well into eight figures, Ms. Dana has the commercial clout to write her own biographies which appear, unedited, in prestigious publications around the world.

MY RECENT POSTS

Dana Dangerous's Links

Salon.com
DECEMBER 15, 2009 3:51PM

Health Care Reform is Too Sick to Live

Rate: 15 Flag

Health care reform is sick

The Lieberman senate health care bill is not reform.  It does not provide competition to profit-driven insurance companies.  And the American people lose.  So progressives and liberals should put this dog down, and now.

Sure, it prohibits exclusion for pre-existing conditions and keeps insurers from dropping people when they get sick.  But frankly, that's not reform.  It is what should have been the case all along.  And, in fact, Congress has already addressed this issue with regard to group plans (e.g., plans that your employer buys to cover all employees), but failed to completely solve the problem.

In 1996, Congress passed a law known as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act or HIPAA (also known as the Kassebaum-Kennedy Act), which went into effect on July 1, 1997. HIPAA was designed to allow employees to move freely from one job to another without the risk of becoming uninsured for their most serious health problems. HIPAA also has protections for individuals who move from group plans to an individual health plan.

Under HIPPA, when you are otherwise eligible for health care services under an employee benefit plan, you cannot be completely excluded from the plan (except in the case you enrolled after the enrollment deadline) on the basis of any of the following:

  • health status
  • medical condition including both physical and mental illnesses
  • claims experience
  • medical history
  • genetic information
  • disability or evidence of insurability, including conditions arising out of acts of domestic violence 
  • If you are under a federally-regulated health plan, twelve months is the longest period of time that your plan can exclude coverage for your preexisting condition.  Some states -- such as California -- have even stricter limits.

    So the Lieberman senate bill merely extends what has already been implemented.  It does not do anything truly new, except for one thing:

    PEOPLE WILL BE MANDATED TO BUY INSURANCE PRODUCTS OR FACE A DAUNTING FINE.

    There is no competition for the profit-driven health insurance corporations.

    There is no limit on the ability to deny coverage for "organizational purposes."  An example of that is defining a particular type of policy into which a company funnels certain groups of applicants.  Even though coverage will supposedly be mandated, the company will not be prohibited from simply deciding that it will limit coverage in certain poliy lines, or even cancel those lines, completely!

    And that's just the beginning of the shennanigans that will go on under the Lieberman bill that mandates we all pay insurance companies and provides no caps on premiums, no competition for the profit corporations, no mandated coverage, and no enforcement mechanism to ensure that sick people are actually treated fairly and equally.

    The Lieberman bill has a pernicious and invasive cancer.  And so, since the Senate seems unable to cure the sickness, it is time for liberals and progressives to do the humane thing and euthanize this bill.  Kill it, for all our sakes.  Better no bill than a bill mandating purchase of insurance with no true reforms in place.

    Congress can mandate coverage for pre-existing conditions and can keep insurers from dropping sick people by amending HIPPA.  We don't need a phony "reform" bill that makes only insurance companies healthy.

    Your tags:

    TIP:

    Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
    Recipient's email address:
    Personal message (optional):

    Your email address:

    Comments

    Type your comment below:
    What do you think the odds are that progressives would kill this bill and have no reform rather than phony reform? I think they don't have the balls for it. But as big a political embarrassment as it would be for Obama, I think progressives would gain power by doing it. And that would be a Good Thing.
    Sadly, I agree Dana. Just kill it. Atomize it. Straight to the moon with it.
    Earlier today on a news channel they reported about Obama meeting with Congressional Dems, the goal of which meeting was just to agree on SOMETHING, ANYTHING. But if it passes now in this perverted and bastardized form there very well could be riots in the streets; a class war with blood and violence. I for one will be amongst the rioters since I will refuse to pay a for profit legal organized crime syndicate i.e. Aetna, Blue Cross, etc...
    dana, from what I know about the bill (which may not be enough) I'm with you. phony reform is not enough. I'm sickened by the concessions to every major player except the public. rated.
    Dana, it's good to see you blogging again.

    This post has been rated.
    Excellent post. This is such a complicated issue and hard for many to comprehend (myself included) so it becomes easy not to pay attention because of all the endless discussion and bantering back and forth.
    Thanks for explaining this in a manner I can understand.
    BTW-where have you been?
    Kill it. HR 676 is the solution. More insurance is not. It is not just a daunting fine in the offing, but jail time for those who say no.
    Yeah but it ain't gonna happen. What I'm still trying to figure out is what we'll actually be left with?
    Trig: The sad thing is I doubt there will be rioting or even a loud outcry. And Obama/Reid et al., know this. The fact is, most voters on Open Salon, most people are low-information voters. That means they don't know enough to know they are getting a raw deal. And to them it's not political anyway. It's just about whether or not they can take little Johnny to the doctor when he has a temperature or a boo-boo. They won't even know we don't have "reform." And that's what Barack and Rahm are counting on.

    dolores: you hit it on the head. Salon has a great piece today cast as a letter from a congresscritter to constituents, which brings home the fact that the public is not the real constituency of politicians, the moneyed interests are. So they never care about us.

    Jeanette: Thanks! And good to be back...sorta. I mean, sorta back. We'll see how it goes. :-)

    Ladyfarmerjed: What do you mean where have I been? I've been right here! ;-) Actually, I left here because I had a bit of a stalker problem. It seems to be gone. I'm hoping it stays that way.

    BehindBlueEyes: I do not think jail time will make it into law, although the insurance industry would LOVE that. So, maybe it will, after all. After all, the insurance chiefs are creaming their skid-marked tighty-whities right about now.

    Nikki Stern: You're probably right. And what we'll be left with is basically an amendment to HIPPA, touted as breakthrough health care reform. Obama is starting to look very Jimmy Carterish to me.
    Ugh. When I said, "The fact is, most voters on Open Salon, most people are low-information voters."

    What I meant was, "The fact is, unlike most voters on Open Salon..."

    I can be such a ditz...
    I understood Dana. Yes, we are assumedly at least a few IQ points above the sad average intelligence of our apathetic population. If "they" do try to jail people over this (you predict against that) then I predict my prediction of class wars and blood int he streets will come true..
    I've been encouraging people to cripple the Susan G. Komen institute. www.komen.org. Hadassah Lieberman, wife of Weasel Joe, has become a spokesperson. It's the height of hypocrisy to support an organization that will help diagnose cancer while supplying no insurance to treat it. Go to the Komen website, click Contact and tell them that unless they dump Hadassah, you will no longer give them a penny.

    This is to call attention to the situation that the slimy Liebermans are putting us all in. Once they dump her, we can go back to supporting them.
    Kill it!!! And may it never raise it's ugly head again.
    Thanks for the information and your well stated viewpoint. The only way to come up with true reform is to take away senate health care until they give Americans the same great coverage they are getting. That will light a fire under them. Rated!
    dana,

    I did more thinking about the bill and there's this with some interesting numbers,

    http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/12/why-progressives-are-batshit-crazy-to.html

    the thing some progressives aren't talking about is that the current senate bill WOULD provide some cost subsidies from the government for poor people who need health care. This is seriously worth considering before liberals go all-out on "kill the bill."

    On the other hand, I personally still feel highly uncomfortable with "mandating" what the health insurance industry is still calling a "product." If health care is a "product," we shouldn't mandate that people buy it. This is a matter of consumer's rights. However, if health care is instead a "right:....ahhhhhhh....I want the discussions in washington to go there. THAT would be progress.

    ug.
    Yeah I'm getting sick of the politics of this. It doesnt matter when it passes, wht it means for politicians. What matters is whether or not it is any good. And I'm getting sick of the media saying, "If this doesnt pass its going to be a real sot in the foot for Obama and the..." I don't care. They're insured. This is about Americans living or dying based on money. Write a good bill. This is just an HMO stimulus package.
    Agreed, and thank you for writing this in a way that laypeople will understand. These healthcare "reform" bills are just a great big gift to the health insurance industry. They get millions of new, virtually guaranteed customers, and in return, they simply have to actually cover them. There's no guarantee that anything these patients actually need in terms of treatment will be paid for, nor any guarantee that the insurance company won't severaly decrease the amount they pay for treatments. There's really no reason these proposed bills should cost the amount they do, considering how little they are going to help.

    A while back, I posted a series on healthcare reform, outlining current problems, obstacles, a plan for single-payer universal reform that covers every American, and how to fully fund it without increasing taxes or the cost to American citizens. PLease feel free to read and comment. You never know; maybe if average citizens band together and garner enough support for such a proposal, the politicians will have no choice but to adopt it, or something similar.

    I wrote to New York Senator Chuck Schumer about this topic. I was amazed that he took the time to write back, and was surprised at his answer. The Senator believes that single-payer universal healthcare IS the answer to our healthcare woes, but does not believe that there is anywhere near enough support for it to pass at this time in Congress.

    So, it is left to us to advise our elected officials of our discontent, to educate ourselves on the topic and on the proposals being offered, to formulate a solution that WILL help us, and garner support, and send it to Congress. It's been done with other bills, other topics; why not this one?
    Incidentally, I have to say that it's true that most voters don't have the info they need to understand that they are getting screwed. Therefore, it's up to those of us who DO know to get the word out. Blog here, blog everywhere. Include links to the actual proposals; most won't visit, but some will. Email, write, call and visit your elected officials. Do it every day; just send the same email again while you're checking it. Let them know we are serious. Perhaps most important, write letters to your local and national newspapers, magazines and other publications. If you don't make the Opinion page, try, try again. Every movement that ever got anything substantial accomplished started with a few determined people and grew. There's no reason that we can't follow their example.