Dana Dangerous

Dana Dangerous
Location
California, USA
Birthday
April 04
Bio
Dana is a six-foot, blonde, busty, liberal, lesbian lawyer, just like everyone else in L.A. *** One morning in 1973, she awoke on a park bench in a strange city, with no shoes. Finding herself in Southern California, she wandered the beaches of Santa Monica surviving on fish entrails and eeking out a meager living selling caricatures of Republican political figures, which she carved from tar balls that washed ashore from the many nearby offshore oil rigs. *** Ms. Dana got her start in politics when she landed a job as personal dominatrix to G. Gordon Liddy. That served as a springboard to her career in show business, and for the following six years, Ms. Dana could be seen performing eight shows a week in the back room of the Hwy 69 Truck Stop in Petaluma, California. It was there, during one of her midnight binge-and-purge sessions, that she developed her famous theories in socio-political philosophy. *** Currently, Ms. Dana spends her days jetting around the globe in wild shopping sprees and trying to avoid the many paparazzi who constantly pursue her. A major motion picture about her life is currently in production and scheduled for a Christmas release, starring Angelina Jolie as Dana and Danny DeVito as her longtime illicit lover, Squeaky. *** Commanding annual blog earnings well into eight figures, Ms. Dana has the commercial clout to write her own biographies which appear, unedited, in prestigious publications around the world.

MY RECENT POSTS

Dana Dangerous's Links

Salon.com
SEPTEMBER 16, 2011 10:29AM

It's Time for Hillary Clinton to Run for President

Rate: 2 Flag
Hillary Clinton 
 

By election day in November 2012, there isn't likely to be significant improvement in the economy or appreciably reduced unemployment. Even President Obama predicts that unemployment will still be at 9%. And his weak, Republicanesque "American Jobs Act," even if passed -- which is increasingly unlikely -- will do little to create new jobs or improve the economy.

 

It's time to face facts. President Obama will likely lose to the Republican candidate. And it might be a Tea Party Republican like Rick Perry, who will set America back decades in economic and social policies. America as we know it will be gone, and the advancements of Social Security, Medicare, workers' rights, science, environmental protection and civil rights will be reversed. Far-right Christian zealotry will rule the agenda.

 

We Democrats, liberals and progressives simply cannot afford to lose next year's election. But the hard truth is that Obama is likely to lose. And because the economy moves in cycles, it is almost certain that 2016 will see a growing and robust economy, with whoever is in the White House reaping the electoral benefits of a second term to 2020. We must find a way to keep the White House out of Tea Party hands.  Waiting until 2016 to find a new candidate will be too late.

 

We've seen Obama's poll numbers and know the state of the economy. Zero job growth in August. And Obama's supporters are deeply disappointed, dispirited and disillusioned. Obama doesn't know who he is, doesn't know what he stands for, doesn't know how to fight. And so he constantly caves to the right in a misguided effort of elusive bipartisanship, with a party that will do anything, even sacrificing the American economy, to get him out of office.

We need and want a president who knows how to fight. A president who knows what she stands for, has a vision to achieve her goals, and has the passion and gravitas to battle the ruthless GOP machine to push through her agenda. A president who would rather wage war with Republicans than succumb to them.

 

That president is Hillary Clinton.

 

There are tens of millions of voters ready to dump Obama and support her. I count myself among them. Obama can't win; Hillary can. And when we hearken back to the questions about who is ready to govern on "Day 1," and who we can count on when that phone rings at 3:00 a.m., we now know that it isn't Obama. And I think we all know that Hillary Clinton would be such a president.

 

There is an army out here in America waiting for leadership. For almost three years we have been begging Obama to be our leader. He has proven that he does not know how to be that president. Hillary Clinton was born a leader. Unlike Obama, Hillary can save us from eight years of a Tea Party president. Unlike Obama, she knows how to withstand the withering onslaught from the right, and continue to lead, to know what she stands for, and to hold firm in the face of fierce opposition. People will follow Hillary. They will donate, man phone banks, knock on doors, blog, and get out and go to the polls for her.

 

It is time to begin a call to Hillary Clinton. Run, Hillary, run. Your country needs you. You were so close in 2008, you can make it in 2012.

 

Democrats will jump to support her, like passengers on the Titanic grasping for something to hold onto in the cold, dark water we are now drowning in. If Hillary runs in the Democratic primaries, this time Obama never even makes it to the convention.

 

These are extraordinarily desperate times, and the same need that lifted an unknown black man to the presidency, can lift a primary challenger to the nomination. We can make Hillary Clinton the Democratic nominee for president of the United States, if only she will run. We can create an unstoppable tide of desperate enthusiasm the likes of which have never been seen in America. And we can make her the strong and capable president that this country so desperately needs right now.

 

Yes we can.

 

It's time to start the call.  Let her know what you want.  Blog about it.  Let America know that what we need. Let them all know that we want her to run, Hillary, run.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
And I should add that it's time for Obama to announce that he will not seek a second term. Do it in time to clear the way, and allow a real Democrat to mount a campaign machine, raise money and create a tide of momentum. For the good of the country.
Appreciate your insight and forcefulness about the travesty of Obama's leadership. But as far as I am concerned Hillary Clinton, whom I once long, long, long ago had respect for and interest in, is now an international war criminal. She signed on and colluded with the amoral governmental system big time, especially of the military industrial security complex and its killing and human-rights destroying machine. She has succumbed to the lobbyists especially AIPAC in letting our national interests and international interests be sacrificed for our tragic and destructive and self-destructive codependency with that border-line personality war criminal nation, Israel. You get down with dogs you get up with fleas. So she has. To stay in the game Hillary gave up her soul imho. Hillary replace Obama, would be another historic first again, now of having a woman president, but behind the historic-ness to be so media-hyped, is another puppet person for oligarchs which is not worth the historic notch. I say it would be refreshing to have a person of principle at the helm of America and Hillary is not going to bring heart and hope back to the vast numbers of those disrespected and disenfranchised people of conscience on the left. We need a person who cares about human beings and human rights and is not cronied up with a systemically corrupt Dem Party and the corporate predator class. A person with a moral compass. You compromise to get to the top or near it sometimes, often, maybe always, and you lose your humanity on the way. This is how I see your Hillary. Gamesperson-ship over statesperson-ship is her modus operandi, as it was the callow Obama's. One more time. I don't want a "player" and careerist, I want a person with principle and courage. Again, Hillary is not going to capture the hope and imagination of people with conscience in this country. libby
I'm surprised to hear myself saying this, but I agree with you. She might be just what we need. We don't need more Obama and we don't need any of the Republican offerings either. R.
Dana...come back to the real world.

Take Obama off the ticket and the Democrats will never, ever win a national election again.

You are dreaming...and dreaming like this can really hurt.

Obama IS going to lose. He is going to lose because the Democratic Party base has gone apeshit...expecting way, way more than he or Hillary or anyone else could ever deliver.

He was deserted by the left fringe almost immediately because he did not get every damn thing they wanted in the healthcare bill...even though he got more than any president before him.

He has gotten as much out of this obstructionist garbage heap as anyone could possibly get.

Any reasonable guess is that if Hillary had been elected president instead of Obama...the state of affairs right now would be just about the same. And people like you would be yelling for her to step down and let Obama take the reins.

He is a real Democrat, Dana! (God that line about wanting a “real Democrat” sounds like Sarah Palin talking about real Americans.)

If you truly do not want to see a huge Republican victory in 2012 you should be backing an giving support to Obama…not asking for Hillary (who I think is smart enough to know not to run anyway.)
Great bio... love the Danny Devito line.
Libby, where you see gamesmanship I see political savvy. Where you see collusion I see moderation. She is no doubt a moderate, corporate Democrat, but then again that's where the American electorate is, too.
Rat, agreeing with me is a sure sign you've gone 'round the bend. Sorry to hear about the passing of your brain cells. I'll send flowers.
Dana, careful of the slippery slope of faux-pragmatism a/k/a throwing out the moral compass! It's a mean fall and takes all of us with it! libby
I'm with desert_rat on this one. Obama is not to blame for the economy-ALL politicians are. It is ludicrous to hear Tea Partiers talking about deficit reduction when what they are really saying is "we'll keep borrowing, just a few billion less each year." the problem is, though, that whoever is in office takes the blame.

Hilary won't take any crap. She is as strong as Obama is weak. Yes, Obama should propose drastic spending cuts that will have every tax-cutting Republican screaming bloody murder, state that he will veto any attempt to restore the cuts and say "oh, by the way, I'm not going to run again".

BUT-if Romney isn't the Republican candidate, he might just win.
if you think politicians can be fairy godmothers, hillary has an obvious advantage. but short term thinking is what has led america to this point.

a lot of poor people don't vote. the mechanics of vote farming have created a right wing party and a farther right wing party, and neither does anything for the poor. both court the middle class vote and dare not spend much money on the 20% at the bottom of american society.

so 40% of america doesn't vote, or more. america is ruled by half + one of 60% or less. currently more than 30% of america is comfortable, but worried about the direction their future is taking, as indeed they should be.

this means republicans are likely to be elected often for another generation, as the shrinking middle class cling to what they have, and vote 'no!' to socially progressive policies, out of fear money spent on 'losers' will never be recovered, and cause them to join the losers..

hillary won't win the next election, and possibly obama won't either, but it's not about personalities. the problem is much deeper, in the structure of american society.
I supported Hillary Clinton in 2007 and 2008 because she was the most qualified of the two Democratic Party candidates left standing for the nomination contest. First, she was mentored to be the best president possible by Bill Clinton. Second, she had spent eight years as a U.S. senator. She was seasoned and ready to be an effective president on day one.

In contrast to Hillary, Barack Obama possessed a featherweight political resume on the national level and no history of leadership or executive experience. It was clear to disinterested observers that most of his support came from people infatuated with the latest fad to come down the political pike. He had a golden orator's voice and was simply more chic than Hillary . . . and that's all most of them wanted to know. Essentially they treated the most important office in the world as a cheap crackerjacks toy.

But for all of that, Hillary has repeatedly stated that she will never run for higher office again and I tend to believe her in that one respect. Regardless of whether or not she could win her party's nomination process in 2012, she is not going to challenge Barack Obama for the presidency.